MLL111$NOTES$$ MICHAEL KRIEWALDT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Similar documents
An Introduction to the Law of CONTRACT STEPHEN GRAW

CONTRACT LAW IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF CONTRACT

Is there a contract?

CONTRACT LAW SUMMARY

Applied Business Law. Syllabus

MLL111- Exam Notes Contract Law (All Topics + Cases)

OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT LAW

CONTRACT LAW. Elements of a Contract

CONTRACTS. Miscellaneous applications of ACL for Contracts:! 6 PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL! Assumption! Detrimental Reliance!...

MBE WORKSHOP: CONTRACTS PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

CONTRACTS COMPLETE EXAM NOTES

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract

BAREXAMDOCTOR.COM UNLIMITED ESSAYS AND PTS ONLINE! ESSAY APPROACH. Bar Exam Doctor. CONTRACTS ESSAY

ANSON S LAW OF CONTRACT. 29th Edition SIR JACK BEATSON

Activity to Develop and Demonstrate Competence. Describe the different categories of law

Creation of the K a. Statute of Frauds land part performance one year debt 500 b. Offer master of the offer revoke mailbox rule absence of terms

LAW5005: PRINCIPLES OF CONTRACT LAW B EXAM NOTES

Contracts. Introduction. Introductions Seth C. Oranburg 1. Professor Seth C. Oranburg

Contents. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases. The Agreement to Contract

Chapter 11 Consideration and Promissory Estoppel 25-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preface... iii Preface to the First Edition... v Table of Cases... TC-1 Table of Statutes... TS-1

a) The body of law as made by judges through the determination of cases. d) The system of law that emerged following the Norman Conquest in 1066.

Question If CapCo files a lawsuit against the Bears seeking damages for breach of contract, who is likely to prevail? Discuss.

Class B.Com. I Sem. (Hons.)

BLAW BUSINESS LAW, SECTION B3

Contents. Table of cases. Introduction

Chapter 9: Contract Formation. Copyright 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning.

How to use this book Acknowledgements

CONTRACT LAW. Promisor - Person making the proposal Promisee - Person accepting the proposal Promise - Proposal when accepted becomes a promise

Table of Contents. The Authors 3. List of Abbreviations 13. Preface 15. General Introduction 17. Introduction to the Law of Contracts 27

In summary, there wasn t any contract because there was no acceptance because the offeree accepted on terms not specified by the offeror.

Privity: Third party to K can t enforce its obligations b/c they haven t contributed consideration for its promises ( Tweddle ); Principal not named

Simple. CONTRACTS & UCC Outline. NINETY PERCENT of the LAW in NINETY PAGES. Tim Tyler, Ph.D., Attorney at Law

INDEX. [References are to paragraph numbers] ABSURDITY, AVOIDANCE OF, 334 ABUSE OF RIGHTS. See GOOD FAITH ACCELERATION CLAUSE, 457 ACCEPTANCE


Genuineness of Assent

Session 34. Contract Law 1 Contracts in general

MARKING GUIDE. Subject Name: Commercial Law 1. Exam Date: June Number of pages: 7

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS TRANSLATION. Portatore, Possessore. Effetti e Titoli di Credito Negoziabili

7/23/2010. The. Contract. Sources of contractual obligations

CONTRACTS TOPIC OUTLINE1

LAW OF CONTRACT (PART II) Shanila H. Gunawardena LL.B. (Hons.) (Colombo) Attorney-at-Law, CTA (CASL)

CONTRACTS MID-TERM EXAMINATION December 2006 Santa Barbara/Ventura Colleges of Law Instructor: Craig Smith QUESTION 1

510 Introduction to Commercial Law

#: DEADLINE.com EXHIBIT B -1-

Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Formation

A REVIEW OF PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL LAW IN MICHIGAN. Lee Hornberger. This article reviews Michigan promissory estoppel law, including the development of

Question 1: I read that a mentally impaired adult s contracts may be void or voidable. Which is it?

THE CONTRACT FORMATION PROCESS THE PRESENTER INTRODUCTION TOPICS CONTRACT LAW: ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR NON-LAWYERS HYATT HOTEL CANBERRA 18 JUNE 2014

Business Law. Business Law

The Objective Principle of a Promise... 2 Intention to Create Legal Relations... 4 Offer and Acceptance... 5

Copyrighted material

Index. Volume 21 (2005) 21 BCL

COMM 393: COMMERCIAL LAW MIDTERM REVIEW SOLUTIONS BY: GABRIEL CHEUNG

CONTRACT LAW Part II * Spring 2018 Course Number Location: F. J. JACKSON Office Hours Course Books / Material Course Description Course Objectives

Table of Contents. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION by Eugenia G. Carter. I. Scope [ 1.1]

University of Miami School of Law. CONTRACTS PROFESSOR ROBERT ROSEN Fall Syllabus 1

Contract law LAWS1015

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

Sample. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Types of consideration

CONTENTS. PART ONE Introduction 1. Preface Abbreviations Table of cases Table of legislation. vii xxi xxix liii

Contract and Commercial Law Bill

THE LAW RELATING TO GUARANTEES

Opening Assignment. The Bargain. Contracts. Elements of Contract. Ending an Offer. What is an Offer 10/31/2017

Options Tickets Termination of the Offer Revocation Rejection Counter-Offer Lapse Acceptance...

Chapter 14 Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions 25-1

COURSE OUTLINE. Business Administration 120 (C-ID Number: BUS 125) Business Law I (C-ID Title: Business Law)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/08/2018

Marson & Ferris: Business Law, 5 th edition

THE CYPRUS INSTITUTE OF MARKETING DMM COMMERCIAL LAW

Interpreting Statutes

Define genuine agreement and rescission. Identify when duress occurs. Describe how someone may exercise undue influence.

--- N.E.2d ---- FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page N.E.2d ----, 2007 WL (Ill.App. 1 Dist.) (Cite as: --- N.E.2d ----) Nov. 13, 2007.

A) Preliminaries B) Formation

64 Contractual Remedies 1979, No. 11

Date Revised: 8/12 COURSE SYLLABUS. Syllabus for: BUS 2610 LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS. Former Quarter Course(s):

UNIT 2 : CONSIDERATION

osborneclarke.com Geschäftschancen in Indien - Indian law

Sample. Aims of this Chapter. 2.1 Introduction

CHAPTER 2 CONTRACT LAWS INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, A contract is an agreement made between two or more parties which the law will enforce.

REVIEW QUESTIONS TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER)

CHAPTER SEVEN. Conclusion

Law of Contracts. Determining Contractual Intent. Offer. 6 Elements of Legally Enforceable Contracts

MISTAKE. (1) the other party to the contract knew or should have known of the mistake; or

THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 68, PENSION FUNDS LAWYERS ASSOCIATION 07 March 2011

A. SOURCES OF THE LAW

Some Basic Principles Of Contract Law

Contract Law Final Exam Version C

Indexed as: Holdings Ltd. v. Alma Mater Society of the University of British Columbia (B.C.C.A.)

Exam Approach: I. CONTRACT FORMATION

Principles of European Contract Law

Equity and Trusts in Malaysia

Spring 2018 Business Law Fundamentals O'Hara 2018 D

TITLE 7 CONTRACTS TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTRACTS Ponoroff 2016

Index. References are to sections.

CONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT

A

MGT611 Business & Labor Law Solved Objective For Final Term Exam Preparation

Transcription:

MLL111NOTES MICHAEL KRIEWALDT 1

Index Formation Agreement...3 Certainty and conditional contracts...6 Consideration...9 Intention to create legal relations...17 Capacity...20 Formalities...23 Scope and content Privity of contract...27 Terms of a contract...32 Exclusion Clauses...39 Avoidance Misleading or deceptive conduct...42 Mistake...50 Duress...57 Undue Influence...60 Unconscionable conduct...63 Illegality and public policy...66 Performance and termination Performance...76 Discharge by agreement...81 Discharge for breach...83 Discharge for frustration...93 Remedies Damages and liquidated claims...97 Equitable remedies...108 2

OVERVIEW: Agreement6 Meetingofminds/consensusreachedb/w2ormorepartiesonaparticularsubject.SmithVHughes[1871] LR6QB597exampleofnomeetingoftheminds Determinedobjectively(reasonableperson) Needavalidofferandacceptance. Offer: Whatisit:It s a communication amounting to a promise to do (or not to do) something if the person to whomitisaddressedrespondsinacertainway;egbymakingapromiseinreturn,orperformingaspecified task. ToWhomcanitbemade?CanbemadetotheworldandcanbecomeaCTwithanyoneperforming conditionsstipulated:carlill&v&carbolic&smoke&ball&co&(facts:csboffered1000topersonwhocaughtfluifit usedoneoftheirsmokeballs.mrscboughtandusedasmokeballandcaughtfluandclaimedreward.held: Offertoworldmadeherethatcouldbecomeacontractwithanyoneperfomingconditionsstipulated) OffervsIntentiontoDeal/TreatPForoffer:Mustintendthatanaffirmativeresponsewillgiverisetoafinal agreement.invitationtodealpwhereresponsegivesrisetoafurthernegotiation(andaffirmativeresponse willamounttoofferwhichcanbeacceptedorrejected)partidgevcrittenden.egitemsonshopshelf, advertisements.testinpharmaceutical&society&of&great&britain&v&boots&cash&chemists&(southern)&ltd (Pharmcueticalgoodsonshelfofselfservicestore.Held:Inshop,CTnotcompletedtilshopkeeperaccepts customer soffer)):"lefkowitz&v&great&minneapolis&surplus&store&(facts:3coatsadvertisedtobesoldfor1 eachtofirstserved.held:courtsaidwhere theofferisclear,definiteandexplicit,andleavesnothingopen tonegotiation,itconstitutesanoffer,acceptanceofwhichwillcompletethecontract. Eachcasewilldepend onthe legalintentionofthepartiesandthesurroundingcircumstance ). Auctions:Auctioneermakesinvitationtodeal/treat(invitesoffers).Maybeissueifauctionis without reserve "AGC&(Advances)&Ltd&v&McWhirter& Tenders6StandingofferPTenderinvitedforgoodsandservicesPCTformedonlywhenordermade.Fixed Tender:amountstoanoffer. RequestsforInformation:eg:lowestpriceyouwillsellhouseisnotanofferbutrequestforinformation (Harvey&v&Facey).Toclassifyacommunicationlookat:Thelikelihoodofthecommunicationbeinganoffer; Thetermsofthecommunicationinvolved; Whetherpartiescontemplatedinvolvementoflawyers; Subsequentevent TerminationofOffer:Onceterminated,offercan tbeaccepted.terminationoccursvia:revocation; rejection; failuretoacceptontime; deathofofferor/offeree; failureofacondition. Revocation:WithdrawalofOfferbyofferorPcanoccuranytimebeforeacceptance,canusewords/conduct andmustbecommunicated.canhaverevocationvia3rdparty(ifitisauthorisedorresultsfromofferor). Promisenottorevokemustbesupportedbyconsideration:Dickinson&v&Dodds&(Facts:D(Dodds)offeredto sellp(dickinson)house,offeropentil12june.pdecidedtoacceptofferon11junebutdidnottelldand3rd partytoldpon11thhousesoldtoanother.ptriedtoacceptbutdsaidtoolate.held:revocationofoffer neednotbeexpresspcanbeeffectiveifofferorletsoffereeknowhehaschangedhismind(via3rdparty); ByrnevVanTienhoven.NorevocationtilcommunicatedandPostalRuledoesnotapplytorevocation: ByrnevVanTienhoven(Facts:Letterusedtorevokeofferofgoods) Rejection6CounterOfferPAmountstorejection:terminatesoffer.Mustbecommunicatedandpostalrule doesnotapply.counterofferpnewoffermadeinresponsetooffer(ieacceptingondifferentterms).rejects originaloffersocan tbesubsequentlyagreedtobyofferee:hyde&v&wrench(dofferstoselllandtopfor 1200.Drejects.Poffersat1000andPofferstobuy950.DrefusestosellandPsayswillbuyfor1.000.D refusestosell.contract?held:noctasp sofferfor950wasarejectionofd soffertosellat1,000).note differenceb/wcounterofferandrequestforfurtherinformation(latterdoesnotrejectoriginaloffer: Stevenson,&Jaques&and&Co&v&McLean&(Facts:SaskediftimeofdeliverywasnegotiableandMtreated 3

communicationasrejectionandsolditemsto3rdparty.held:merelyrequestforfurtherinfosos s subsequentacceptanceofm soffercreatedact) LapseofTime:Ifdurationoftimenotstipulated,offercomestoanendafterareasonabletime(thisdepends oncircumstances). InternationalPerspective:UNConventiononCTsforSaleofGoods(Art20/21);periodoftimefor acceptancefixedbyofferorintelegram/letterrunsfromtimetelegramhandedintobesentorfromdateon letter.timeforacceptancerunsfrommomentofferreachesofferee. India:IndianCTAct1872(ss3P5);China:CTLawofPeople srepublicofchina1999arts15p20) Acceptance: Isanunequivocalstatement(oral,writtenorbyconduct)bytheoffereeagreeingtotheoffer. Mustoccurinresponsetooffer(can toccurinignoranceofoffer)crown&v&clarke.& Canbeacceptedbypersontowhomitisdirectedorifit smadetoworldatlarge,byanyoneintheworld. MayacceptbywordsorconductPTestis whetherareasonablebystanderwouldregardtheconductofthe offeree,includinghissilence,assignallingtotheofferorthathisofferhasbeenaccepted. Empirinall& Holdings& Wordsorconductmustbeconsistentwithoffer:Maxitherm&Boilers&Pty&Ltd&v&Pacific&Dunlop&Ltd& MUSTBECOMMUNICATED When?AgreementconcludedattimeacceptanceisreceivedbyofferorPnotwhensent(ifinstantaneousP whenmessageisgiventoofferor). Where?Deemedtooccurwhereitisreceivedratherthanwhereitissent. Imposingsilence:willnotconstituteconsent.EgifIdon thearfromyou,youaredeemedtoaccept: Felthouse&V&Bindley& Exceptions:Waiver(Carlill);SilencePifcombinedwithothercircumstances(otherconduct),maybeavalid acceptance:empirnall&holdings&pty&ltd&v&machon&paull&& Partners&Pty&Ltd:&Estoppel;&Postal&Rule" PostalRule:"exception"to"the"general"rule"that"acceptance"occurs"when"and"where"it"REACHES&the"offeror. Whenthepostalruleapplies,acceptanceoccurswhen&and&where&letter&was&sent.& POSTALRULE Whentheruleapplies:BressanVSquires[1974]2NSWLR460 appliestoletters/telegramsandthelike theofferormusthavecontemplatedacceptancecouldbecommunicatedinthisway (whetherexpresslyorbyimplicationfromconductorcircumstances). Whentheruledoesnotapply Toinstantaneousformsofcommunicationsuchasfaxorphoneoremail.SeeBrinkibonLtdvStahagStahl undstahl6warendhandelsgesellschaftmbh(telex);schibpackagingsrlvemrichindustriesp/l IfpostisnotcontemplatedPseewordingofcommunications:Bressan&V&Squires&(Wordsusedwere bynotice inwriting =courtsaidthismeanswhenactuallycommunicatedtoofferor).alsonuninholdingsptyltdvv TullamarineEstatesPtyLtd6postalrulewillnotapplyifacontrarystipulationappearsinoffer. Ifpostiscontemplatedbytheofferormakesclearthatacceptancewillnotbeeffectiveuntilaletteris received"(seenunin&holdings&pty&ltd&vv&tullamarine&estates&pty&ltd) Ifaletterislostordelayedbecauseitwaswronglyaddressedorstamped Ifitisunreasonabletousepostinthecircumstances(eg,duringapostalstrike) FormofacceptancePifstipulatedandisobligatory,methodmustbeadoptedforvalidacceptance: Manchester&Diocesan&Council&for&Education&v&Commercial&&&General&Investments&Ltd& Electronic&Transactions&(Victoria)&Act&2000W&eg&emailsW&dispatchofanelectroniccommunicationoccurswhen youhitsendonyouremailanditdisappearsintothevoid. Theresultofthislegislationisthatwhereemailiscontemplatedasameansofacceptancethatacceptance occurswhen&theemailissent(ifemailnotcontemplated,thenwhenitcomestotherecipient sattention).it willbedeemedtohavebeenreceivedattheaddressee splaceofbusiness.thus,iftheaddressee splaceof 4

businessismelbourne,butshehappenstocheckheremailwhileonabusinesstriptohongkong,theemail willbetakentohavebeenreceivedinmelbourne. ElectronicTransactionsAct1999(Cth),ss5,14,14A,14B Keypointstonote!Section14 thetimeofdispatchofanelectroniccommunication( EC )(definedins5) isthetimeitleavestheinformationsystemundercontroloftheoriginatorunlessit doesn tleavetheoriginator sinformationsystem. Thenthetimeofdispatchiswhenitisreceivedbytheaddressee!Section14A thetimeofreceiptofanecis ss(a) thetimeoftheecbecomescapableofbeingretrievedbytheaddresseeat thedesignatedaddressor ss(b) atanotherelectronicaddressoftheaddress,itisthetimewhenboththe EChasbecomecapableofbeingretrievedandtheaddresseehasbecome awarethattheechasbeensent.!section14b theecisdispatchedattheoriginator splaceofbusiness(definedins5) andreceivedattheadressee splaceofbusiness. UnilateralAgreement:onlyonepartymakesapromise(cfbilateralagreementwherebothpartiesmakea promise).&test&for&deciding&if&a&contract&is&bilateral&or&unilateral:looktointentionoftheparties rather thanthewordsortheformused.ask:didthetermsoftheofferseekapromisefromtheoffereepwhatwas theofferoraskingfor? Example:Iwillpayyou1000ifyoupaintmyhouse.Unilateral(noreciprocalpromisesought). Thesetypesofcontractsaremostlikelytobeusedincaseswheretheofferorwantstheofferee(s)todo something,butknowsthattheyareunlikelytopromisetodoit.forexample,peoplearenotlikelytopromise" tofindyourlostdog,butyouwouldlikethemtotryto,soyoumightofferareward. RevocationofUnilateralContractPInDaulia&v&Four&Millbank&itwassuggestedthatinthecaseofoffersof unilateralcontracts,theofferisacceptedandacontractismadewhenanunequivocalcommencementof theacthasoccurred.butinmobil&oil&v&wellcomew&thereisnogeneralpropositionthatoffersforunilateral contractscouldnotberevokedafteroffereecommencedperformance. InternationalPerspective:India:S4IndianCTAct1872Postalruleisentrenchedasnormforcommunications usingpostorsimilarservices.revocation.offereecanrevokepostedacceptancesolongasrevocationarrives beforeacceptancedoes.chinactlawofpeople srepublicofchina1999:acceptancerequires communicationandcanbewithdrawnpriortocommunication.noequivalenttopostalrule. CertaintyandConditionalContracts: Certainty6 AgreementmustbecertaininallmaterialrespectsbeforeitisbindingPAgreementthatisuncertainin materialrespectcan tconstituteabindingct.counciloftheupperhuntercountydistrictvaustralian ChillingandFreezingcoLtd 3waysagreementmaybeconsidereduncertain: 1. Vaguenessorambiguity 2. Incompleteness 5

3. Agreementstoagree Vagueness/ambiguity: Ifagreementsovague/uncertainthatcourtcan tworkoutwhatisintendedptoouncertaintobeenforceable:& Scammell&v&Ousten&(hire"purchase"terms8"obscure);"Raffles&v&Wichelhaus"(mixupre2shipsnamedPeerless);" Council&of&the&Upper&Hunter&County&District&v&Australian&Chilling&&&Freezing&Co&Ltd&( supplier scost sfor electricityptermnotuncertain)" Courtswilltrytoresolveuncertainty/ambiguitybylookingat: 1. Extrinsicevidenceexplainingwords/phrases 2. Customortradeusage 3. Determiningwhatisa reasonable construction IllusoryAgreements: Makingperformanceofacontractualpromiseamatterforparty sdiscretion:eg Ipromisetosupplyyouwith applesifyoupromisetopaymeatapricetobedeterminedbyyou.promiseisillusoryasnopromisetopay anythingasoffereecanpay0sonotpromisingtodoanything. NoteKirbyPinBiotechnology&Australia&Pty&Ltd&v&Pace&(PenteredCTofemploymentwithBwhichsaidhe s haveoptiontoparticipateinco sstaffequitysharingschemepnosuchschemeexistedattimeofctorwhen Presigned.PsuedforbreachofCT,succeededandBappealed.Held:VaguetermofCTanduncertainsonot enforceable.wasjustaprovisionforfuturearrangements): Thecourtwillnotcreateanagreementwherepartieshavefailedtoarticulatetheiragreement. Norwillthe courtclarifythatwhichisirremediablyobscure or acceptforitselfadiscretionwhichthepartieshave reservedtooneorotherofthem.doingsowouldchangethecontract.relevantmattersincl: a. Atermwillbeenforceablewhereitclearlyidentifiesathirdpersonwhoisgivenpower(by theparties)to(anddoes) settleambiguitiesanduncertainties. b. But, ifthetermissovitalthatleavingittooneonlyofthepartiesunacceptablyremoves certaintyinthearrangement,thecourtmayormaynotrefusetoenforceitasillusoryor unacceptablyuncertain. c. Wherethereisareadilyascertainableexternalstandard thecourtwillconsideritwhen determiningwhethertheycangiveeffecttoaprovisionwhichotherwiseappearsvagueand uncertainorillusory. d. Whereatermcontainsa rangeofpossibilities thecourtwillholdthepartytoprovidingat leasttheminimumprovisionwithintherangeratherthanavoidingthecontractentirely(eg, providingforpaymentbetween100p500,thecourtwouldrequirepaymentofatleast theminimum,100,ratherthanholdingittobeuncertain) AlsoPlacerdevelopmentsLtdVCth1969 Incompleteness: General&ruleW&it snecessaryforthepartiestodealwiththeessentialtermsoftheagreementinorderforitto beenforceable. Whatisessentialwilldependonthenatureofthesubjectmatter. Forexample,pricesarerequiredforcontractsforthesaleoflandbeforetheywillbeenforceable(Hall&v& Busst&(1960)CLR);however,thereisnosuchrequirementinthecaseofagreementsforthesaleofgoods becausethegoods&act"ineachjurisdiction(invictoriaitiss13(2))providesthat,ifthepriceisnotfixedinthe agreement,thebuyermustpayareasonableprice. Noneedforagreementtobeworkedoutingreatdetail6partiescanpostponesomematterstothefuture (egrenttobefixedbyarbitrator)ortobedeterminedbyoneoftheparties(godecke&v&kirwanw&saleofland CTprovidingthatifKrequiredit,Gwouldexecutefurtheragreementcontainingthosetermsreas determinedbyk ssolicitors.&krefusedtoproceedwithsale."wasthereanagreement?trialpagreementnot bindingsogappealed.&held:inmostcasesbindingagreementcanleaveanimportanttermtobesettledbya thirdparty;ortobesettledbyoneoftheparties.herenofurtheragreementwasneededbetween"the" parties."walshjimpliedtermthatsolicitorscouldonlyincludeadditionaltermsthatwerenotinconsistent withoriginallyagreedtermsandthattheyhadtobereasonable.ctvalid.appealallowed) Partiescanleaveessentialmatterstobedeterminedinfuturesolongasthisdoesnotrequirethemtoreach afurtheragreementb/wthemselves. 6

Thiscanbedonebyincludinginagreementaformulaormechanismprovisionstofinalisematter.Godeckev Kirwan AgreementstoAgreeandAgreementtoNegotiate: Courtshavegenerallyheldthatagreementstoenterintoanagreementinthefuturearenotbinding.Thus, anagreement,whichprovidesthatadditionaltermsaretobeagreeduponbythepartiesinthefuture(like rentinfiveyearstime),willnotbeenforced. However,ifsuchanagreementhasbeenpartlycompletedanditisclearthattheprovisioninvolvedwas intendedtobeeffective,acourtmayfindawayofgivingeffecttoit. SimilarlytheHouseofLordsdecidedthatanagreementtonegotiateisnotenforceable. ThepositioninAustraliaislessclear:CoalCliffCollieriesPtyLtdvSijehamaPtyLtd(Headsofagreementfor miningrightspagreementtonegotiateingoodfaithcanbeenforceablepkirbyppneedtolookateach particularct(espif3rdpartyhaspowertosettleuncertaintiespherepromisetoovaguetobeenforcedand noexternalarbitratorappointed) Distinctiondrawnb/wagreementtonegotiateingoodfaithsoastofinaliseanagreement(Coal&CliffW&may& not&be&biding)andagreementinconcludedcttonegotiateingoodfaithshouldadisputeariseb/wparties aboutitsperformance.inlattercase:pnotvagueillusoryoruncertainpcourtwillgiveeffecttothese contractualprovisions(united&group&rail&services&ltd&v&rail&corporation&nsw) LockoutAgreements:PartiescanagreenottonegotiatewithathirdpersonPthiscouldbeabindingCT (Walford&v&MilesPphotographicbusiness) InternationalPerspective: India:IndianCTAct1872s.2IllusoryAgreementsPvoidable.S29Uncertainagreementsarevoid. China:Art61Ppartiescanenterintosupplementaryagreementstodealwithmaterialtermsnotincludedinhtheir agreement.ifmaterialtermsmissingplookatmarketstandards(art62). Severance:TheresultofUncertainty Ifuncertainpartisnotimportantandcanbe severed fromtheremainingtermsofthecontract,those remainingpartswillbeenforceable.ifnot,thewholeagreementwillbeunenforceable." Determiningwhethertermsmaybeseveredrequiresanassessmentoftheintentionoftheparties(Life& Insurance&Co&of&Australia&Ltd&v&Phillips).& ConditionalCTs PartiestoaCTcanavoidbeingimmediatelyboundbyagreementbymakingthecontractconditionalinsome waywhichwillsuspendorqualifytheirobligationsuntiltheconditionissatisfied. Conditionsprecedentorsubsequent (1) Conditionprecedent:aconditionwhichmustbefulfilledbeforeobligationsofpartiesbecomebinding(eg subjecttosolicitorapproval) (2) Conditionsubsequent:conditionwhichwillendthecontractualrightsandobligationsofthepartiesifitisnot fulfilled.(subjecttofinance) Partiesarestillcontractuallyboundwhentheyincludesuchconditionsunlessanduntilconditionfails. SubjecttoContract Clauses Masters&v.&Cameron&(SaleoffarmingpropertyPResp(vendor)andappellantsigneddocumentwhichwassubjto preparationofformalctofsalewhichshallbeacceptabletorespondent ssolicitorsonabovetermsandconditions. Apppaiddepositbutrefusedtoproceedwithpurchase.Bothclaimeddeposit.IfCTexisted,respwouldbeentitledto deposit.)courtsaidthatthereare3differentinterpretationsthatcanbeplacedonthesubjecttocontractclauses: 1. Partiesmayintendtobeimmediatelyboundbutproposetorestatetermsinmorepreciselanguage but withsameeffect.bindingctregardlessifformalctconcluded 2. Partiesmayhaveagreedonalltermsanddonotintendtodepartfromthembutmayhavemade performanceconditionaluponexecutionoffinaldocument.bindingbutperformanceisconditional.parties dowhatisnectobringformalctintoexistence. 3. Partiesmaynothaveintendedtomakeaconcludedbargainunlessanduntiltheyexecuteformal document.notbinding.noenforceablecttilfinalctconcluded.eg subjecttoct/subjecttoformalct. 7

Held: Inthiscasetheformalcontract,whiletobeonthesameconditionsasthoseagreed,weretobe satisfactoryto thesolicitors (subjecttoctpwhichwasacondition).nobindingcontractwasmadepriortotheformalisingofthe agreement.depositcouldberecovered.)type2. SubjecttoFinance clauses MeehanvJones Aclauseprovidingthatacontractisdependentononepartyobtainingthefinancenecessarytoperform his/herobligationsunderthecontract Theseclausesarecommoninconsumerrealestatetransactionsforcontractorsale. DesignedtomakethecontractsubjecttothepurchaserobtainingsatisfactoryfinancePfinanceon satisfactorytermsandconditions.thesetermsneedtobespecified(eg.astoamount,natureoflender, interestrateandterms).asmanyofthesetermsaspossibleshouldbeincludedsothatthecontractis sufficiently certain. Issue:ispurchaserboundtolookforfinance?Needtoseeiftermissubjective/objective.Thesetermswon t necessarilyrenderagreementuncertainandthere slikelytobeageneralobligationonpurchasertoacthonestlyin determiningiffinanceissatisfactory(meehanvjonespdagreestoselllandtoponwhichoilrefineryisbuiltpsubjto financecl.jarguedctvoidforuncertaintyandmgavenoticetojthatithadobtainedfinance.effectofsubjto financecl?held:hereterminologyusedimportedasubjectivetestppurchasertoacthonestly.notejudgementsof GibbsCJandMasonJ)) Wasthereabindingcontract? GibbsCJPWasitjustanagreementtoagree? No financeonlyneededtobetotopurchaser ssatisfaction,notbothparties. Waslanguageso impreciseandindefinite itcouldnotbegivenmeaning? Dependsonthewordsusedineachcase. Objectiveorsubjectivetest(lookatintention)? SolongascourtcandeterminewhichtestappliesPthereisnouncertaintyNouncertaintyhere subjectivetest applied Thepromisewasnotillusory MasonJ Satisfactory=satisfactorytopurchaser.Thisiscapableofprecisemeaning. Primaryobjecttoprotectpurchaser. Conditionmetif,subjectively,financeissatisfactorytopurchaser Isasubjecttofinanceclauseaconditionprecedentorsubsequent? GibbsCJ conditionsubsequentinthiscase.certainobligationsattachedimmediatelyuponsigning MasonJ conditionsubsequent Dopartieshaveobligationtoacthonestlyindeterminingiffinanceissatisfactory?(obiterinthiscase) Yes(maybe)(GibbsCJ) Yes(MasonandWilsonJJ) Dopartieshaveanobligationtoacthonestlyandreasonablyinseekingfinance?(obiterinthiscase) No(GibbsCJ) Yes(MasonandWilsonJJ) Canapurchaserwaivetheneedforasubjecttofinanceclausetobemet?(obiterinthiscase) Yes(MurphyJ) InternationalPerspective:India6doesn tprovideforconditionalcts.china:art45partiesmaystipulatectissubject tocertainconditions. CHAPTER4CONSIDERATION 8

OVERVIEW: MeaningofConsidn: 2ndkeyelementforformationofCTPCLrequiredthatforagreementtobebinding,promiseemustprovide consideration ConsiderationisthepricestipulatedbythepromisorinexchangeforthepromiseDunlopTyreCoLtdV SelfridgeandcoLtd[1915]AC847made.Maytaketheformofmoneybutneednottakethatform. Considerationisoftenreferredtointermsofbenefitanddetriment;considerationisgenerallyofbenefitto thepromisor(eitherdirectlyorbybenefitingathirdpartyatthepromisor srequest)or"adetrimenttothe promiseepsufficientifadetrimentissufferedbythepromiseeeventhoughthepromisorreceivesnobenefit. CarlillWCourtsaidinthatcaseitwouldbesufficientthatMrsCarlillsufferedthedetrimentassociatedwith usingthesmokeballasdirectedevenifthecarbolicsmokeballcoreceivednobenefit Paymentofconsiderationcantakeformof:BeatonVMcdivitt 1.Performinganact; 2.Forebearingfromperforminganact; 3.Promisingtodosomethinginreturn(mostcommon). Whenisconsidnreqd?Promisesnotbindingunlesspromiseepaysforthembyvaluableconsidn. Gratuitouspromisesarenotbinding.EgIpromisetogiveyou100.Promiseenotprovidedanything, Unilateral CT P binding. Ex:P promises Q 100 if Q stops smoking for 1 weekp P is promisor, Q promisee (considnforp spromiseisactofqquittingsmokingfor1week.qisnotpromisorb/cnotmakingreciprocal promisetostopsmoking. BilateralCT6binding.ExXpromisestosellcartoYinreturnforYpromisingtopayhim10,000.Forpromise tosellcar,xispromisorandypromisee.inrelationtopromisetopay10,000yispromisorandxpromisee. HereXisreceivingareciprocalpromisefromYtopay10,000andYisreceivingpromisetosellcar. Exception to requirement to provide considn: 2 exceptns: 1. Promises under sealp deed; 2. Promissory estoppels. Executed&consideration"takestheformofperforminganactratherthanapromiseofperformance.ExPactof Qquittingsmokingwouldbeexecutedconsideration.InCarlill,theactofusingthesmokeballwouldbe executedconsideration. Executoryconsideration"consistsofapromisetodosomething.Thus,inthecarsaleexample,thepromise tosellthecarandthereciprocalpromisetopay10,000wouldbothbeformsofexecutoryconsideration.as itisthepromise"itself"thatconstitutestheconsiderationinthesecases,considerationwillhavebeen provided(andacontractformed)eveniftheactpromisedisnotperformed. 3essentialelementsofconsideration: 1.Mustbes thingofvalueineyesoflaw; 2.Mustbenominatedbypromisor; 3.Mustbegiveninexchange(quidproquo)forthepromise(ieconsidnmustbebargainedforPcan tbe thrustonpromisorandfurther,detrimentsufferedbypromiseeorbenefitconferredonpromisorwillonly amounttoconsiderationifexpressly/byimplication,itwasrequestedbypromisor:austwoolenmillsp/lv TheCommonwealth). QuidProQuoPSeeAust&Woolen&Mills&Pty&Ltd&v&The&CommonwealthWGovtofferedsubsidytowool manufacturersforlocalmanufacture.ppurchasedandusedwoolandgotsomepaymentsandgovtstopped subsidysoasuedgovtforsubsidiesitclaimedwasduearguingunilateralct.held:nocthere.govt statementnotconsidnforabuyingwool(iestatementherewasnotpinconsidnofyoubuyingwooliwillpay yousubsidy).courtsaidincasessuchasthis itisnecessary, thatitshouldbemadetoappearthatthe statementoralannouncementwhichisreliedonasapromise[herethesubsidystatement]wasreally offeredasconsiderationforthedoingoftheact,andthattheact[buyingandusingthewoolasdirected]was reallydoneinconsiderationofapotentialpromiseinherentinthestatementorannouncement. Theremustbearelationshipofquid"pro"quo"betweenthestatementandtheAct. 9

Heretherewasnopromiseofferedinconsiderationofdoinganact.Buyingwoolwasmerelyacondition precedenttoentitlementtosubsidypitwasintendedasconsiderationforpromisetopaysubsidy(nothing heretosaypaymentofsubsidyandpurchaseofwoolwererelatedinsuchawaythatonewasconsidnfor theother.buyingwoolnotregardedaspricetobepaidforcthspromisepsonorelationofquidproquo.just agovtschemehere. Beaton&v&McDivittPM)promisedtotransferaportionofhislandtotheappellant(Beaton)whenaproposed rezoningoccurredif,inthemeantime,bworkedthelandinaspecifiedway.bworkeditasrequired (includingbuildingahouse).sevenyearslater,followingadispute,bwasorderedofftheland.issuearoseas towhetherbeatonhadprovidedvaluableconsideration.held:"beatonhadprovidedconsiderationforthe respondent spromisetotransferthepropertybyworkingonthelandinthemannerstipulated.mchugh:re: quidproquo betweenthepartiespinthiscasetherewassuchconsideration considerationforthepromise totransferwastheactofbincomingandworkingontheblockasrequested.thisconstituteda detriment sufferedbybandthatissufficientforconsideration. ConsiderationvsCondition: Theactrequestedbythepromisorwillonlybeconsiderationifitwasregardedasthepricetobepaidforthe promise.thetestistheattitudeofthereasonableperson. Iftheactisregardedasaconditionthenitissomethingthatmustbeperformedbeforeentitlementtothe promisearises,butperformance(absentseparateconsideration)doesnotallowthepromiseetoenforcethe promise.egcarliilp(catchingcoldwascondnprecedent,notconsidn).austwoollenmillspnoct.buying wooliscondnprecedenttoentitlementtosubsidypnotintendedasconsidnforapromisetopaythesubsidy. Nothingtosuggestpaymentofsubsidyandpurchaseofwoolwereregardedasrelatedinsuchawaythat onewasconsidnfortheother. ConsidncanbeanythingstipulatedbyPromisorCanbeanythingstipulatedbypromisor(notpromisee)so longasnotillegal/illusory6realvaluetopromisor. CarlillPanyactofMrsCwherebyCSBderivedbenefit/advantageoranydetriment/inconveniencesuffered bymrscpprovidedperformedatrequestofcsbpcouldconstituteconsideration.usingsmokeballinway directedwasinconveniencesufferedbymrscatrequestofcsbtobesufficientforconsideration; Chappell&&&Co&Ltd&v&Nestle&Co&Ltd:TopromotechocsalesNadvertisedtosupplyarecordtoanyonewhosent itmoneyand3chocwrappers.werewrappersconsidnforprice?held6wrappersnotacondnprecedentp partofconsideration. Acontractingpartycanstipulateforwhatconsiderationhechooses.Apeppercorn doesnotceasetobegoodconsiderationifitisestablishedthatthepromiseedoesnotlikepepperandwill throwawaythecorn. Dunton&v&Dunton:partiesenterwrittenagreementwhereMrDagreestopayformerwifeallowancesolong asshebehaveswithsobrietyandinrespectable/orderly/virtuousmanner.ddidnotpaymaintenance. Considnforpromise?Pargpromisetobehaverespectablyisgoodconsidn.Dargpromisetobehave respectablywasmerelyapromisetodowhatshewasalreadyboundtodo(tobehaverespectably)sonot goodconsidn.held:validconsidn.thoughpromisingnottodosomethingwhichcannotlawfullybedoneis& not"goodconsideration,apromisenottodosomethingwhichcanbelawfullydoneis&goodconsideration. MrsDpromisedtogiveupalibertyshehad(tobehaveunrespectably)soherpromisetosurrenderher libertyandtoconductherselfinmannerdesiredbydconstitutedgoodconsidn. Givingupliberty(forebearance)todosomethinglawful6isgoodconsidn.(HamervSidwayPUnclepromised thatifnephewrefrainedfromdrinking,smokingswearingandplayingcardsorbilliardstilhewas21,he wouldpayhim5000.)nephewdidthisandclaimed5k.dargued"(1)therewasnoconsiderationgivenby theplaintiffand(2)refrainingfromdrinkingetcwerenotaharmsufferedbutabenefit.held:phad surrenderedalegalrighthehadtodrinketcandthiswasgoodconsideration eventhoughitwasbeneficial totheplaintiff.q:"couldtheunclehavesuedifnephewhad,afterawhile,resumeddrinkingetcbeforehe became21?probablyno;contractprobablyunilateral;courtsaidthattheconsiderationwasgivinguplegal rightsandnotapromisetodosoasindunton scase.iftherewasnopromise(bynephew)contractwas unilateralpunclemadepromisehereonlyandnotnephew.)duntonvdunton Questions: CouldbehavingrespectablyberegardedasaconditionratherthanasconsiderationlikeinAustralian& Woollen&Mills&v&Commonwealth?No.InAustralianWoollenMills,hadtherebeenacontractitwouldhave beenunilateral.hereitwouldhavebeenbilateralastherewerepromisesonbothsides. IfthePlaintiffhadnotbehavedrespectably,couldMrDuntonhavesuedherforbreachofcontract?Why not!?unilateralctpshemadenopromise. 10