IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
Courthouse News Service

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

Courthouse News Service

Case 3:11-cv JCH Document 1 Filed 05/18/11 Page 1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff. vs. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF BOSTON, A CORPORATION SOLE; JOSEPH FLYNN; J. KEVIN MCANDREWS, Defendants

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION.NO.

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

2:15-cv BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 06/10/15 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

Plaintiff, for his cause of action against Defendants, alleges that: PARTIES

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Courthouse News Service

2:18-cv TLL-PTM Doc # 1 Filed 03/12/18 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS - LAW DIVISION. v. No.: COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case: 5:18-cv JRA Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/27/18 1 of 21. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

~D la'ls DISTRIC;iO~e 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 29 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 5:18-cv EGS Document 1 Filed 08/28/18 Page 1 of 24

Case 7:14-cv SLB Document 1 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 13

Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Case 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:17-cv JG Doc #: 2 Filed: 09/13/17 1 of 13. PageID #: 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

following in the above-referenced cause of action : COMMON ALLEGATIONS times material herein was a resident of Polk County, Iowa.

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al.

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Sex Crimes: Definitions and Penalties Georgia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv SRU Document 1 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. ADRIAN LOVELL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Brooklyn in which he was serving out the last months of his prison sentence to a

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. Plaintiff CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, by and through his attorneys, hereby states

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT. necessary medical care for serious medical needs by the defendants during her commitment to the

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

Case: 3:13-cv MPM-SAA Dcc #: 1 Filed: 08/28/13 1 of 16 PagelD #: 1

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, for his causes of action against Defendant, allege that: PARTIES

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, DEANNA HALLIDAY, by and through her undersigned counsel, brings this

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, Number:

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT AT LAW

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:12-cv CWD Document 1 Filed 03/26/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Case 2:18-cv JWL-TJJ Document 1 Filed 12/05/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

Appendix D Title IX Offense Definitions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY OF MILWAUKEE CIVIL DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA S.G., individually, and D.O., as guardian of B.0., a minor NO. Plaintiff, v. WEST WILLOW FIRE COMP ANY and STANLEY K. TODD, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT AND NOW, come the Plaintiffs, S.G., individually, and D.O., as guardian of B.O., a minor, by counsel, Andreozzi & Associates, P.C., who hereby file the within Complaint against the Defendants, West Willow Fire Company and Stanley K. Todd, and state as follows: PARTIES 1. The Plaintiff, S.G., is 23-year-old female who resides in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. 2. S.G. is identified by her initials since at all times relevant she was a minor, this case involves her sexual abuse as a child, publicly revealing her identity would cause her further harm, and the Defendants are aware of S.G.'s identity. I

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 13 3. The Plaintiff, D.O., as guardian of B.O., a minor, is the mother and legal guardian of B.O., a minor female that resides in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. 4. D.O. and B.O. are identified by their initials since at all times relevant B.O. was, and remains, a minor, this case involves B.O.'s sexual abuse as a child, publicly revealing their identities would cause B.O. further harm, and the Defendants are aware ofd.o. and B.O.'s identities. 5. Defendant West Willow Fire Company (also "West Willow" or the "Fire Company") is a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation that serves as the officially recognized volunteer fire company for the Township of Pequea, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, pursuant to official Township Ordinance(s). 6. Defendant Stanley K. Todd ("Todd" or "Defendant Todd") is an adult individual who, upon information and belief, resides at SCI Camp Hill in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. 7. At all times relevant, Defendant Todd was an agent of the Fire Company, and was acting under color of state law. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, which gives U.S. district courts jurisdiction over all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 2

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 3 of 13 9. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 139l(b), since all defendants reside in this District and the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District. FACTS 10. In 2009, then fourteen-year-old S.G. began participating in the junior firefighter program at the West Willow Fire Company. 11. The Fire Company's junior firefighter program allowed local youth to learn about firefighting, spend time at the Fire Company, and participate in West Willow Fire Company events. 12. As a member of the junior firefighter program, S.G. was, at all times relevant, an invitee of the Fire Company whose safety was the responsibility of Fire Company officials. 13. When S.G. joined the junior firefighter program in 2009, Defendant Stanley K. Todd was an adult volunteer fire fighter at the Fire Company. 14. For years, Defendant Todd used the Fire Company's junior firefighter program to gain access to children he could sexually abuse. 15. In 2009, Defendant Todd repeatedly sexually violated S.G. by touching her buttocks and breasts, and also by digitally penetrating her vagina. 16. Unfortunately, S.G. was not the only junior firefighter to fall victim to Defendant Todd. 3

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 4 of 13 17. In the summer of 2014, then fifteen-year-old B.O. began participating in the junior firefighter program at West Willow Fire Company. 18. Like S.G., as a member of the junior firefighter program B.O. was, at all times relevant, an invitee of the Fire Company whose safety was the responsibility of Fire Company officials. 19. From June 2014 until May 2015, Defendant Todd sexually abused B.O. on dozens of occasions. 20. Defendant Todd's abuse of B.O. included sexual fondling, digital penetration, oral sex, and sexual intercourse. 21. Tragically, S.G. and B.O.'s sexual abuse by Todd during their time as West Willow Fire Company junior firefighters was completely preventable by the Fire Company. 22. Defendant Todd should have never been allowed to have unsupervised access to the Fire Company's junior firefighters, including B.O. and S.G., much less an opportunity to sexually abuse them. 23. In May 2000, Defendant Todd's younger sister told Anthony Todd, Defendant Todd's father and an official with the West Willow Fire Company, that Defendant Todd was sexually abusing her. 24. Anthony Todd took no action to curb Defendant Todd's heinous abuse of young girls. 4

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 5 of 13 25. To the contrary, Anthony Todd actively brought Defendant Todd into the Fire Company by encouraging Defendant Todd to become a West Willow firefighter and by recommending Defendant Todd to the Fire Company. 26. Anthony Todd took such affirmative acts although he knew Defendant Todd would have access to West Willow junior firefighters as a member of the Fire Company, which would put junior firefighters, like S.G. and B.O., at risk for sexual abuse by Defendant Todd. 27. In the summer of 2009, S.G. told both Anthony Todd and Michael Topper ("Topper"), who was then a high-ranking official at the Fire Company, that Defendant Todd had sexually assaulted her at the firehouse. 28. Topper and Anthony Todd took no meaningful action whatsoever in response to S.G.'s report. 29. No West Willow Fire Company officials reported Defendant Todd to the authorities or took any remedial measures to protect Fire Company junior firefighters from Defendant Todd, a known sexual abuser. 30. As such, Defendant Todd remained part of the West Willow Fire Company, where he was able to continue his sexual abuse of S.G., and was years later in a position to sexually abuse B.O. 31. Finally, in 2015 Defendant Todd was arrested and charged with multiple serious crimes related to his sexual abuse of multiple young girls. 5

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 6 of 13 32. In February 2016, Defendant Todd pled guilty to crimes related to his heinous sexual abuse of five young girls, including S.G. and B.O. 33. As a result, Defendant Todd was sentenced to up to twenty years in state prison, which finally put a stop to his reign of terror. 34. As a result of the above actions and omissions of the Defendants described herein, S.G. and B.O. suffered severe, permanent, and debilitating injuries common to sexual abuse survivors. COUNT I Plaintiffs v. Defendant West Willow Fire Company 42 u.s.c. 1983 35. The allegations throughout this Complaint are incorporated as if set forth at length. 36. Under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Plaintiffs had a right to bodily integrity, which was violated by Defendant Todd's inappropriate contact with the Plaintiffs, including his grooming, groping, and/or sexual molestation of the Plaintiffs. 37. West Willow Fire Company officials took affirmative acts, and/or maintained official policies, practices, procedures, and/or customs, that amounted to reckless indifference toward West Willow Fire Company agents' sexual abuse of the Plaintiffs, including, but not limited to: 6

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 7 of 13 a. recklessly failing to adequately investigate allegations of sexual abuse against Defendant Todd; b. recklessly ignoring known allegations of sexual abuse against Defendant Todd; c. recklessly failing to remedy a known sexually abusive relationship between Defendant Todd and Plaintiffs; d. recklessly failing to supervise Defendant Todd's relationships with young female junior firefighters; e. recklessly failing to address Defendant Todd's known sexual misconduct with regard to junior firefighters; f. recklessly covering up Defendant Todd's sexual misconduct; g. recklessly maintaining official policies, customs, or practices that were indifferent to the risk of sexual abuse posed to junior firefighters; h. recklessly failing to train and/or supervise employees regarding responding to, investigating, and/or reporting sexual abuse within the West Willow Fire Company; 1. recklessly failing to screen Defendant Todd pnor to his becoming a West Willow firefighter; 7

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 8 of 13 J. affirmatively creating a danger to the Plaintiffs by recommending and bringing Defendant Todd into the West Willow Fire Company; and, k. affirmatively creating a danger to the Plaintiffs by placing Defendant Todd in a supervisory role over junior firefighters. 38. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' actions and omissions, the Plaintiffs have suffered severe and permanent injuries. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate. COUNT II Plaintiffs v. Defendant West Willow Fire Company Negligence 39. The allegations throughout this Complaint are incorporated as if set forth at length. 40. At all times relevant, the West Willow Fire Company had an obligation to protect the Plaintiffs from harm, including, but not limited to, sexual abuse by Defendant Todd. 41. West Willow Fire Company violated its duties, and was negligent and careless in the following manner: 8

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 9 of 13 a. failing to adequately investigate allegations of sexual abuse against Defendant Todd; b. ignoring known allegations of sexual abuse against Defendant Todd; c. failing to remedy a known sexually abusive relationship between Defendant Todd and Plaintiffs; d. failing to supervise Defendant Todd's relationships with young female junior firefighters; e. failing to address Defendant Todd's known sexual misconduct with regard to junior firefighters; f. covering up Defendant Todd's sexual misconduct; g. maintaining official policies, customs, or practices that were indifferent to the risk of sexual abuse posed to junior firefighters; h. failing to train and/or supervise employees regarding responding to, investigating, and/or reporting sexual abuse within the West Willow Fire Company; 1. failing to screen Defendant Todd prior to his becoming a West Willow firefighter; 9

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 10 of 13 J. affirmatively creating a danger to the Plaintiffs by recommending and bringing Defendant Todd into the West Willow Fire Company; and, k. affirmatively creating a danger to the Plaintiffs by placing Defendant Todd in a supervisory role over junior firefighters. 42. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' actions and omissions, the Plaintiffs have suffered severe and permanent injuries. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate. COUNT III Plaintiffs v. Defendant Todd, in his Individual Capacity 42 u.s.c. 1983 43. The allegations throughout this Complaint are incorporated as if set forth at length. 44. Under the Fourteenth Amendment, Plaintiffs had a right to bodily integrity that was violated by Defendant Todd's inappropriate contact with the Plaintiffs, including his grooming, groping, molesting, and sexual intercourse with Plaintiffs. 10

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 11 of 13 45. Defendant Todd used his authority as a West Willow Fire Company firefighter, employed by the Fire Company, and cloaked with the Fire Company's authority, to sexually abuse the Plaintiffs in violation of their Fourteenth Amendment rights to bodily integrity. 46. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' actions and omissions, the Plaintiffs have suffered severe and permanent injuries. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate. COUNT IV Plaintiffs v. Defendant Todd, in his Individual Capacity Assault and Battery 47. The allegations throughout this Complaint are incorporated as if set forth at length. 48. Defendant Todd sexually abused the Plaintiffs as set forth above. 49. This sexual abuse was intended or expected to put Plaintiffs m reasonable and immediate apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact. 50. The sexual abuse did in fact put Plaintiffs in reasonable and immediate apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact. 11

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 12 of 13 51. This sexual abuse was intended to cause harmful and offensive contact with Plaintiffs' bodies. 52. The sexual abuse did in fact cause harmful and offensive contact with Plaintiffs' bodies. 53. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' actions and omissions, the Plaintiffs have suffered severe and permanent injuries. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate. COUNTY Plaintiffs v. Defendant Todd, in his Individual Capacity Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 54. The allegations throughout this Complaint are incorporated as if set forth at length. 55. Defendant Todd sexually abused the Plaintiffs as set forth above. 56. Defendant Todd's sexual abuse of the Plaintiffs was extreme and outrageous, and utterly intolerable in a civilized society. 57. The sexual abuse did in fact put Plaintiffs m reasonable and immediate apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact. 12

Case 5:16-cv-04201-JFL Document 1 Filed 08/01/16 Page 13 of 13 58. This sexual abuse was intended to cause harmful and offensive contact with Plaintiffs' bodies. 59. The sexual abuse did in fact cause harmful and offensive contact with Plaintiffs' bodies. 60. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' actions and omissions, the Plaintiffs have suffered severe and permanent injuries. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs request damages against the Defendants, jointly and severally, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs, and such other relief as this Honorable Court deems appropriate. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: July 28, 2016 ANDREOZZI & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ~-- --- allie1 L. i(){)t(c Esq. (PA #318998) nate@victimscivilattomeys.com 111 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 Ph: 717.525.9124 I Fax: 717.525.9143 Attorney for Plaintifft 13