FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

Similar documents
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS TAMPA DISTRICT OFFICE

However, he was unable to find an attorney who wished to undertake

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER

was represented by Kate Albin Esq.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Miami District FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

undersigned reserved jurisdiction to adjudicate a pending Petition for Benefits filed on

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT AMENDED FINAL MERITS ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

At the Final Hearing, the claimant sought the following benefits:

Courtesy 440Authority.com

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN /MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims on January 14, 2011 in Orlando, Orange County, Florida, pursuant to claims raised in a

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS PORT ST. LUCIE DISTRICT OFFICE

OJCC No: GDAL DIA: 06/26/2017 JUDGE: Daniel A. Lewis FINAL ORDER ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS (FEE AMOUNT HEARING)

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI-DADE COUNTY DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE. Judge: W.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

F:INAL COMPENSATION ORDER

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Laura Roesch, Judge.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS GAINESVILLE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE

A hearing was conducted, telephonically, on September 15, 2016 to consider the

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margaret E. Sojourner, Judge.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS Orlando District

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E BOST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICE OPINION FILED JUNE 1, 2007

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HARTFORD UNDERWRITES INS. CO. CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 24, 2008

ORDER ON AWARD OF CLAIMANT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. MYERS DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NOS. F & F TIMMY J. HENSLEY, EMPLOYEE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

AFTER PROPER NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES, a Final Merits Hearing was held on

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

Nitzband, Bruce James v. Arconic, Inc.

Saitim, Mauro v. Advent Electric, Inc.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Judge.

CASE NO. 1D Bradley Guy Smith, Lakeland, and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellant.

held on October 8, Present for the hearing were Martha Fornaris, Esq., counsel for the

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ORLANDO DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS DAYTONA BEACH DISTRICT

CASE NO. 1D Walter C. Wyatt of Bradham, Benson, Lindley, Blevins, Bayliss & Wyatt, P.L.L.C., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellees.

FNAL COMPENSATION ORDER

attorney fees and costs (Petition for Benefits (PFB) #4) (Docket Number (DN) 38) and

CASE NO. 1D (1) Whether the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC s) apportionment findings,

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-32 RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

Appellants, CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Shelley M. Punancy.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G CATHERINE WILLIAMSON, Employee. BUTTERFIELD TRAIL VILLAGE, INC.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED APRIL 5, 2005

CASE NO. 1D Joseph R. North of the North Law Firm, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.

After due notice, the above styled matter came before the undersigned Judge of

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Doris E. Jenkins, Judge.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Henry H. Harnage, Judge.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARVIN G. WOODBERRY, EMPLOYEE H & H CONCRETE CO., EMPLOYER

Going on Offense: Best Strategies to Crush Fraudulent Claims

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G JASON GRIFFIETH, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured Employer

Eaves, Fredia Darlene v. Ametek

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DALE W. CLARK, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JUNE 21, 2004

CASE NO. 1D Nicolette E. Tsambis of Smith, Feddeler, Smith, P.A., for Appellee.

NO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED JULY 9, 2003

CASE NO. 1D L. Barry Keyfetz of L. Barry Keyfetz, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E502382/E709020/F003389

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F HERBERT AYERS, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G LINDA STERLING, EMPLOYEE

Case 1:16-cr GPG Document 1 Filed 03/11/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2017 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON December 14, 2009 Session

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F CHARLES NUNN, Employee. EXPRESS FLEET MAINTENANCE, Employer

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Lee, Thomas v. Federal Express Corporation

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mary A. D'Ambrosio, Judge.

Yarbrough, James v. Protective Services Co., Inc.

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM FORFEITURE RULES OF PROCEDURE

Dunn, Jason v. United States Infrastructure

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Owens, Sheila vs. Sitters, Etc.

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FORT LAUDERDALE DISTRICT D/A: 6/29/2012 FINAL ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims on February 22, 2012, in Orlando, Orange County, Florida. This matter was the subject

Transcription:

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS FT. LAUDERDALE DISTRICT OFFICE Jason Jaggon, Employee /Claimant, VS. Affinity Resources, LLC. /AmTrust North America of Florida, and Wesco Insurance Company, Employer /Carrier /Servicing Agent. / OJCC Case No. 17-024971IF Accident date: 10/10/2017 Judge: Iliana Forte Catherine F. Agacinski, Esq., Attorney for the Claimant Andrew R. Borah, Esq., Attorney for the Employ /Carrier /Servicing Agent FINAL COMPENSATION ORDER This matter came before me, the undersigned Judge of Compensation Claims, for a Final Hearing held on March 5, 2019. The adjudicated petitions for benefits were filed May 15, 2018, May 16, 2018 and May 23, 2018. Claims: CLAIMS AND DEFENSES 1. Temporary Partial Benefits from 3/22/2018 until present and continuing until Claimant is no longer eligible for that class of benefits. 2. Authorization, payment, provision and scheduling of return visit and continued care and treatment with Dr. Meli, as carrier has denied further care and treatment. 3. Penalties, interest, costs and attorney's fees. Defenses: 1. All further benefits are denied based on the claimant violating the misrepresentation provisions. 2. CIamant is at MMI. 1

3. No further treatment is medically necessary. 4. Industrial accident is not the major contributing cause of continuing need for medical treatment - WITHDRAWN. 5. Penalties, interest, costs and attorney's fees - not due or owing. Claimant: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 1. Notice of Withdrawal of E /C's Major Contributing Cause Defense - Joined by the EIC. 2. Composite of medical records from Dr. Paul Meli and Centra Care Medical Clinic - Docket ID #58-60. 3. Medical Records from University Hospital and Medical Center - Joined by the E/C - Docket ID #69. 4. Petition for Benefits filed 5/15/2018 - Docket ID #34. 5. Petition for Benefits filed 5/16/2018 - Docket ID #36. 6. Response to Petition for Benefits filed 5/21/2018 - Docket ID #37. 7. Petition for Benefits filed 5/23/2018 - Docket ID #38. 8. Response to Petition for Benefits filed 5/29/2018 - Docket ID #40. Employer /Carrier /Servicing Agent: 1. Claimant's deposition taken 1227/2017 - Docket ID #63. 2. Claimant's deposition taken 12/20/2018 - Docket ID #64. 3. Deposition of Dr. Paul Meli - Joined by the Claimant - Docket ID #65. 4. Notice of Defense under 440.105(4) and 440.09(4) - Docket ID #33. Judges Exhibits and /or for Identification Only: 1. Uniform Pre -trial Stipulation filed August 22, 2018; Claimant's Amendment filed on February 1, 2019. 2. Claimant Trial Memorandum - ID only. 3. Employer /Carrier's Trial Memorandum - ID only. Live witness testimony: 1. Claimant 2. Antonette Jaggon

FINDINGS OF FACTS 1. The claimant is a 38 year old machine operator who was working at a company named CKS through Affinity Resources, LLC. At CKS, he worked on a machine that produces gallon and half gallon plastic containers. He had been employed for approximately two months when he sustained this industrial accident. The claimant was attempting to clean resin from the machine to get it to operate, when his right arm got caught in the machine. The claimant testified that he felt his arm was about to get "snatched off." 2. He received initial medical attention at Florida Memorial Hospital and he was later referred to Concentra Medical Center. He described being in extreme shoulder pain and was unable to do anything with his right arm. An MRI of the right shoulder was prescribed by the physicians at Concentrai after which he was referred to Dr. Pual Meli who recommended surgery of the right shoulder. 3. The claimant first saw Dr. Meli on 12/14/2017. Dr. Meli examined the claimant tools x -rays of the right shoulder and reviewed the MRI report. He diagnosed the claimant with chronic pre -existing mild AC arthrosis and with a full- thickness tear of the rotator cuff as a result of the industrial accident. Dr. Meli recommended the claimant undergo right shoulder arthroscopie rotator cuff repair. The claimant underwent the procedure on 1/26/2018. 4. On 12/27/2017 the claimant was deposed on this matter, at which time he was represented by former counsel, Jesus Eloy Ravelo. At said deposition the claimant was questioned about prior accidents, injuries, medical treatment and specifically about prior treatment or complaints related to the right shoulder. The claimant reported being involved in an 3

automobile accident with his wife in 2009 where he injured his lower back; he reported dislocating his right hip when he was a child while playing baseball that required surgery; he reported surgery to the left hand due to developing an infection from a cut that was performed at University Hospital; and, he reported having undergone a kidney biopsy at Florida Medical. However, the claimant specifically denied injuring his right shoulder, having pain in the right shoulder, seeing a doctor for the right shoulder or having had an x -ray, CT scan or an MRI of the right shoulder before his 10/10/2017 industrial accident. 5. After the claimant's deposition, the E/C subpoenaed the records from University Hospital (where the claimant reported having surgery for the left hand infection). Those records revealed that on 8/5/2016 the claimant reported to the emergency room of this facility complaining of right arm pain and right shoulder pain. He reported that the symptoms had been present for over two weeks caused by trying to hold on to something to avoid falling. An x -ray of the right shoulder was in fact taken. The x -ray revealed calcified bursitis tendonitis of the shoulder. The records report the intensity of his pain to be a 10. He was given oxycodone during his stay at the E /R; and, he was prescribed Percocet with instructed to follow up with an orthopedic surgeon upon discharge. Incidentally, during this ER visit to University Hospital the claimant's blood pressure was dangerously elevated, as the claimant admitted to not taking his blood pressure medications for over a year. In fact, the claimant left the hospital against the advice of the physicians as it related to the elevated blood pressure. 6. Consequently, after receiving the records from University Hospital the E/C stopped all temporary partial disability benefits being paid to the claimant and denied authorization of Dr. Meli. The claimant was last seen by Dr. Meli on 4/30/2018. On 5/14/2018 4

the E/C filed a Notice of Defense under 440.105(4) and 440.09(4) alleging the claimant had made false or misleading statements resulting in the forfeiture of his entitlement to all workers' compensation benefits. ANALYSIS 7. It is prohibited by 440.I05(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006), for any person to "make, or cause to be made," any false, fraudulent, or misleading statements for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits. An employee found to have knowingly or intentionally committed one of these prohibited acts is not entitled to compensation or benefits under the workers' compensation statute pursuant to 440.09(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006); otherwise known as the fraud /misrepresentation defense. To establish a misrepresentation defense, the burden is on the E/C to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the claimant knowingly or intentionally committed one of the prohibited acts. 8. Determining whether a claimant has violated 440.105 is a factual determination to be made by the JCC. In deciding this issue, the JCC has to answer two questions: (1) whether the claimant made or caused to be made, false, fraudulent misleading statements; and, (2) whether the statement was intended by claimant to be for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits. It is not necessary that the misrepresentation be material in actuality; rather, the relevant inquiry is whether the claimant's misrepresentation is a misrepresentation the claimant thought would have a material impact on his case. Arreola v. Administrative Concepts, 17 So.3d 792 (Fla. First DCA 2009). 9. As to the first question, I find that the claimant did make false statements during his deposition and to Dr. Meli regarding prior injury and treatment involving the right shoulder. 5

Dr. Meli testified that he specifically asked the claimant if he had any prior injuries to his right shoulder and the claimant did not identify any history of antecedent trauma or focal events. In his deposition testimony taken on 12/27/2017 the claimant specifically denied prior injury, treatment or having undergone an x -ray of the right shoulder. Unquestionably, 14 months before, the claimant presented to the emergency room at University Hospital complaining of severe pain to the right shoulder, was diagnosed with bursitis, was prescribed pain medication and was referred to an orthopedic surgeon. 10. As to the second question, 1 find that the claimant's failure to disclose his emergency room visit at University Hospital on 8/5/2016 and denial of any previous injury, treatment or examination of the right shoulder was intended for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits. 1 reject the claimant's explanation that he forgot about this ER visit, that he wasn't injured or that it was simply inconsequential wear and tear pain. At his deposition the claimant recalled injuries that took place during childhood and an automobile accident that occurred in 2009 where he injured his lower back. I simply do not find it credible that he can recall an injury as far back as 2009 but not an emergency room visit that occurred 14 months before. One does not readily forget a visit to an emergency room. In fact, I would venture to say, that one does not visit an emergency room unless one is in severe pain; which appears to be clearly documented in the ER records. Moreover, while the claimant's blood pressure was very high when he visited the ER on 8/5/2016, his main reason for going to the ER was due to right arm and right shoulder pain, not due to the hypertension - that was an incidental finding. Likewise, it seems highly improbable that the claimant would forget this eventful visit to the ER, as he admitted that he had to sign papers assuming responsibility for his medical 6

condition upon discharge, as the physicians would not release him due to his elevated blood pressure. The claimant was diagnosed with bursitis, was given a prescription for Percocet and was referred to an orthopedic surgeon. 11. I reject the claimant's premise that he was the one who offered the information that he treated at University Hospital as evidence of any lack of intent to deceive the E /C. The EIC correctly points out that the claimant mentioned University Hospital because he had treated there for a hand injury and it is unlikely that the claimant appreciated the E /C's ability to subpoena those records. 12. 1 certainly felt empathy for Mrs. Jaggon who testified before me that she felt responsible for her husband's predicament, taking blame for having forced him to go to the emergency room on 8/5/2016 at University Hospital. However, it was not the visit at University Hospital that lead to the denial by the E/C of the claimant's workers' compensation benefits, but the claimant's failure to report it. The claimant may have thought that admitting to having had some prior injury or treatment to the right shoulder 14 months before his accident may have called into question his legitimate injury; but in fact, the opposite is true. It was evident to me in observing the claimant during these proceedings that he was remorseful for his poor judgment. Unfortunately, the claimant's knowing decision to conceal the E/R visit at University Hospital (which evidently would have had no bearing to his injury) is detrimental to his case, as the parties have a right to expect that all statements, whether written or oral, are truthful, responsive and complete. 13. 1 find that the EIC has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the claimant provided false statements for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits 7

in violation of Fla. Stat. 440.09(4) and Fla. Stat. 440.105(4)(b). WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT: 1. All claims contained in the adjudicated PFBs filed on May 15, 2018, May 16, 2018 and May 23, 2018 are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. All future workers' compensation benefits are barred pursuant to 440.09(4) and 440.105(4)(b) Florida Statutes. DONE AND SERVED this 8th day of March, 2019, in Lauderdale Lakes, Broward County, Florida. COPIES FURNISHED: Jason Jaggon 9073 Plymouth Place Tamarac, FL 33321 Affinity Resources, LLC. 800 West Cypress Creek Rd, Suites 410 & 430 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 AmTrust North America of Florida PO Box 94574 Cleveland, OH 44101 FLWCLegal cr amtrustgroup.com, Diana Forte Judge of Compensation Claims Division of Administrative Hearings Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims Ft. Lauderdale District Office 4500 North State Road 7, Building I, Suite 200 Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33319 (954)714-3400 www.fljcc.org Wesco Insurance Company PO Box 94574 Cleveland, OH 44101 FLWCLegal @amtrustgroup.com, 8

Catherine F. Agacinski, Esquire Silver & Agacinski 1325 W. Cass Street Tampa, FL 33606 wcservice@ silveragacinski.com,cathy @silveragacinski.com Jesus Eloy Ravelo Rosenberg & Rosenberg, P.A. 2501 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 110 Hollywood, FL 33020 jravelo@rrpalaw.com,sazucey@rrpalaw.com Paul S. Rosenberg Rosenberg And Rosenberg, P.A. 2501 Hollywood Blvd., Ste. 110 Hollywood, FL 33020 doah@rrpal aw.com,mhe Im@rrpal aw.com Andrew R. Borah, Esquire Hurley, Rogner, Miller, Cox, & Waranch, P.A. 700 W. Hillsboro Blvd., Suite #2-107 Deerfield Beach, FL 33441 aborah @hrmcw.com,sfournier @hrmcw.com 9