More out of touch and more vulnerable: The Republican House Battleground. December 9, 2011

Similar documents
REPUBLICAN-OBAMA BATTLEGROUND CONTESTED

The Republican-Obama battleground very contested

Democrats Gaining in Battleground; Ryan Budget Could Finish the Job The Congressional Battleground

Obama Builds Real Lead in Presidential Contest

REPUBLICAN-OBAMA BATTLEGROUND CONTESTED

Obama and Democrats have clear advantage in 2012 election. July 30, 2012

The real mandate and looking forward after this election. November 15, 2012

Not so fast 2014 Congressional Battleground very competitive

How unmarried women, youth and people of color defined this election. November 8, 2012

The Urgent Policy Agenda for Unmarried Women Unmarried women focused on critical economic issues

Voters Push Back Against Big Money Politics. November 13, 2012

Revolt against Congress: Game on Survey of the Battleground House Districts. December 12, 2013

Breakthrough Economic Message Results of major web survey on the economy. July 18, 2011

Obama s Majority and Republican Marginalization

State of the Congressional Battleground

A Pivotal Political Moment on Health Care. July 31, 2012

The Budget Battle and AIG

Rising American Electorate & Working Class Women Strike Back. November 9, 2018

ANOTHER CONGRESSIONAL WAVE ELECTION?

Interested Parties From: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. To: November 9, 2011

Democracy Corps June Survey: Grim Stability Will Require Race-by-Race Fight

Public Opinion Strategies/Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research October 2010

New message platform for 2018 s key battlegrounds Findings from Wave 1 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey. May 2018

Revolt Against Washington and the Republican Congress Survey of Battleground House districts shows rising GOP vulnerability

Women s Economic Agenda Powerful impact on vote and turnout in Democracy Corps/WVWVAF & VPC National Survey April 8, 2014

Will Democrats be brave enough to get to bluest wave?

National Public Radio The Final Weeks of the Campaign

Battleground 2016: new game. June 30, 2016

The Budget Battle in the Republican-Obama Battleground

Rising American Electorate & White Working Class Strike Back. November 27, 2018

A Winning Middle Class Reform Government & Politics Message. December 16, 2015

Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Erica Seifert and Scott Tiell, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

Obama Emerging Ahead in Close Race

America s Voice/Latino Decisions Congressional Battleground Poll - July 2013 Released July 24, 2013

With country angrier, Republicans at edge of even bigger congressional losses

Key Factors That Shaped 2018 And A Brief Look Ahead

Kansas: Sam Brownback s Focus on Restricting Reproductive Health Care Access Can Cost Him in The Race for Governor

Presentation to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers' International Union. Paul Lemmon July 26, 2010

Friends of Democracy Corps and Campaign for America s Future. It s Jobs, Stupid

ELECTION UPDATE Tom Davis

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

Economic Agenda for Working Women and Men

2010 Congressional Battleground: Stable and Within Normal Historical Range

The 2014 Election and Looking Ahead National Survey of 2016 Likely Voters November 7, 2014

2018 MIDTERM ELECTION OUTLOOK

The National Landscape. Margie Omero March 2012

National Public Radio The Campaign on the Eve of the Conventions

American Dental Association

Politics: big yellow flag

The race against John McCain

The sustained negative mood of the country drove voter attitudes.

Taxes, Healthcare, Spending and Earmarks: What to Expect From the New Congress Presented by:

Democracy Corps Congressional Battleground Frequency Questionnaire

Obama, Democrats Well Positioned For Budget Debate

Trump, Populism and the Economy

2016 us election results

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

THE TARRANCE GROUP. BRIEFING MEMORANDUM To: Interested Parties. From: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber. Date: November 7, 2006

National Security and the 2008 Election

2018 MIDTERMS PRE- ELECTION OVER VIEW OCTOBER 2018

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

Presented by: Ted Bornstein, Dennis Cardoza and Scott Klug

UNIFORM NOTICE OF REGULATION A TIER 2 OFFERING Pursuant to Section 18(b)(3), (b)(4), and/or (c)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

If you have questions, please or call

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

YG Network Congressional District Poll: December Topline Results

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Trump & GOP strategy make blue wave more likely: the evidence Findings from Wave 2 of Battleground web-panel & phone survey.

Inside Trump s GOP: Not what you think July National Phone Survey & Factor Analysis from April Battleground Phone Survey.

Revolt against Congress: Game On Survey of the Battleground House Districts

Key Takeaways TRUMP SENATE

Creating a Mandate to Rewrite the Rules of the Economy July 2016

LATINO VOTERS IN COMPETITIVE GOP HOUSE DISTRICTS

It s the Democrats Turn National Voter Survey of Likely 2016 Voters. January 16, 2015

An Election Year Like No Other:

Healthcare and the 2012 Election. October 17 th, 2012

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

1. Immigration Reform is Broadly Popular in Available District- specific Polling

Some Change in Apportionment Allocations With New 2017 Census Estimates; But Greater Change Likely by 2020

The race against John McCain

2008 election: on eve of convention

SPECIAL EDITION 11/6/14

Making a Difference In Washington, D.C.

Washington, D.C. Update

October 18, 2016 National Press Club Washington, D.C. Arturo Vargas Executive Director, NALEO Educational Fund

New Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

Democracy Corps/ Women's Voices. Women Vote Action Fund Frequency Questionnaire

October 18, 2016 National Press Club Washington, D.C. Arturo Vargas Executive Director, NALEO Educational Fund

Post-mortem survey: the historic 2010 election

Mindy Romero, Ph.D. Director

The real election and mandate Report on national post-election surveys

RCMA Government Affairs & Advocacy Update

Democracy Corps/CAF Frequency Questionnaire

The Changing Presidential Race after the Conventions

Representational Bias in the 2012 Electorate

Geek s Guide, Election 2012 by Prof. Sam Wang, Princeton University Princeton Election Consortium

Transcription:

More out of touch and more vulnerable: The Republican House Battleground December 9, 2011

2 Methodology and Overview This presentation is based on a unique survey of 1000 likely 2012 voters in 60 Republican battleground districts conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research for Democracy Corps and Women s Voices. Women Vote Action Fund December 4-7, 2011. Unless otherwise noted, margin of error=+/- 3.1% at 95% confidence. Note: The time series data represents the common 50 districts originally selected in March. All other data represents the full 60 districts tested in September and December.

3 The Republican-Obama Districts The 2012 Democracy Corps Congressional battleground research focuses intensely on the Republican-Obama districts; 48 of our 60 districts were won by Barack Obama in 2008 but claimed by Republicans in the 2010 midterm. Our battleground also includes 12 of the most competitive districts falling outside the Republican-Obama definition. This hybrid model, which includes the 60 most crucial battleground districts, allows Democracy Corps to track public opinion in ways that will define, shape, and structure the public debate going into 2012. Redistricting will obviously affect some of these districts, but this study is meant as an instructive look at the current districts, and voters, who have swung between the parties over the past four years, in addition to gauging public opinion on these specific Republican incumbents themselves. The districts are divided into 2 tiers. Tier 1 includes the 30 most competitive districts; Tier 2 is composed of 30 secondary targets. 50 of the 60 districts in this survey were included in our March battleground survey, giving us the unique ability to track changes in public mood and opinion over time in these crucial swing districts.

Battleground Districts: Tier 1 30 most competitive District 2008 Presidential vote margin 2010 Congressional vote margin Representative AZ-1 McCain +10 Rep +7 Paul Gosar R +6 CA-3 Obama +0 Rep +8 Dan Lungren R +6 CA-24 Obama +3 Rep +20 Elton Gallegly R +4 CA-26 Obama +4 Rep +17 David Dreier R +3 CA-50 Obama +4 Rep +18 Brian Bilbray R +3 CO-3 McCain +2 Rep +4 Scott Tipton R +5 FL-8 Obama +5 Rep +18 Dan Webster R +2 FL-22 Obama +4 Rep +8 Allen West D +1 FL-25 McCain +1 Rep +10 David Rivera R +5 IL-6 Obama +13 Rep +28 Peter Roskam Even IL-8 Obama +13 Rep +1 Joe Walsh R +1 IL-10 Obama +23 Rep +2 Robert Dold D +6 IL-11 Obama +8 Rep +14 Adam Kinzinger R +1 IL-13 Obama +9 Rep +28 Judy Biggert R +1 IL-14 Obama +11 Rep +6 Randy Hultgren R +1 IL-16 Obama +7 Rep +34 Don Manzullo R +2 IL-17 Obama +15 Rep +10 Bobby Schilling D +3 MN-8 Obama +8 Rep +1 Chip Cravaack D +3 NV-3 Obama +12 Rep +1 Joe Heck D +2 NH-1 Obama +6 Rep +11 Frank Guinta Even NH-2 Obama +13 Rep +1 Charlie Bass D +3 NJ-3 Obama +5 Rep +3 Jon Runyan R +1 NJ-7 Obama +1 Rep +18 Leonard Lance R +3 NY-25 Obama +13 Rep +0 Ann Marie Buerkle D +3 OH-6 McCain +2 Rep +5 Bill Johnson R +2 PA-7 Obama +13 Rep +11 Pat Meehan D +3 PA-8 Obama +9 Rep + 8 Mike Fitzpatrick D +2 PA-11 Obama +15 Rep +10 Lou Barletta D +4 WA-8 Obama +15 Rep +6 Dave Reichert D +3 WI-7 Obama +13 Rep +8 Sean Duffy D +3 Cook PVI 4

Battleground Districts: Tier 2 30 less competitive District 2008 Presidential vote margin 2010 Congressional vote margin Representative AR-1 McCain +21 Rep +9 Rick Crawford R +8 AZ-5 McCain +5 Rep +9 David Schweikert R +5 CA-44 Obama +1 Rep +12 Ken Calvert R +6 CA-45 Obama +5 Rep +10 Mary Bono Mack R +3 CO-4 McCain +1 Rep +12 Cory Gardner R +6 FL-10 Obama +5 Rep +32 C.W. Bill Young R +1 FL-16 McCain +5 Rep +34 Tom Rooney R +5 IN-8 McCain +4 Rep +20 Larry Bucshon R +7 IN-9 McCain +1 Rep +10 Todd Young R +6 MI-1 Obama +2 Rep +11 Dan Benishek R +3 MI-7 Obama +5 Rep +5 Tim Walberg R +1 MI-11 Obama +9 Rep +20 Thad McCotter Even MN-3 Obama +6 Rep +22 Erik Paulsen Even NE-2 Obama +1 Rep +23 Lee Terry R +6 NY-19 Obama +3 Rep +6 Nan Hayworth R +3 NY-20 Obama +3 Rep +10 Chris Gibson R +2 NY-24 Obama +3 Rep +6 Richard Hanna R +2 NC-2 Obama +5 Rep +2 Renee Ellmers R +2 OH-1 Obama +11 Rep +7 Steve Chabot D +1 OH-12 Obama +7 Rep +16 Patrick Tiberi D +1 OH-15 Obama +9 Rep +14 Steve Stivers D +1 PA-3 McCain +0 Rep +11 Mike Kelly R +3 PA-6 Obama +17 Rep +14 Jim Gerlach D +4 PA-15 Obama +13 Rep +15 Charlie Dent D +2 TX-23 Obama +3 Rep +5 Francisco Canseco R +4 TX-27 Obama +7 Rep +1 Blake Farenthold R +2 VA-2 Obama +2 Rep +10 Scott Rigell R +5 WA-3 Obama +6 Rep +6 Jaime Herrera Even WI-8 Obama +9 Rep +10 Reid Ribble R +2 WV-1 McCain +15 Rep +0 David McKinley R +9 Cook PVI 5

Battleground Districts: by type of district Rural Upscale Rural New Hampshire-2 New York-20 Downscale Rural Arkansas-1 Michigan-1 Minnesota-8 Ohio-6 Wisconsin-7 Exurban Upscale Exurban Michigan-7 Downscale Exurban Arizona-1 Colorado-3 Indiana-8 Indiana-9 New York-24 North Carolina-2 Pennsylvania-3 Wisconsin-8 West Virginia-1 Suburban Upscale Suburban California-3 California-24 California-26 California-44 Florida-22 Florida-25 Illinois-6 Illinois-8 Illinois-10 Illinois-13 Michigan-11 Minnesota-3 Nevada-3 New Hampshire-1 New Jersey-3 New Jersey-7 New York-19 Ohio-12 Pennsylvania-6 Pennsylvania-7 Pennsylvania-8 Pennsylvania-15 Washington-8 West Virginia-1 Suburban Downscale Suburban California-45 Florida-10 Florida-16 Pennsylvania-11 Metro Upscale Metro Arizona-5 California-50 Colorado-4 Florida-8 Illinois-11 Illinois-14 Illinois-16 New York-25 Washington-3 Downscale Metro Illinois-17 Ohio-1 Texas-23 Texas-27 Urban Upscale Urban Nebraska-2 Ohio-15 Virginia-2

Republican incumbents deeply out of touch on big budget debates

Voters in these Republican districts blame Republicans for Super-Committee failure As you may know, a bipartisan Congressional supercommittee was established in August to come up with a plan to reduce the federal budget deficit by 1.5 trillion dollars over the next ten years, but they just announced they could not reach an agreement. In your opinion, who do you think is mainly at fault for not reaching an agreement, the Democrats in Congress or the Republicans in Congress? +12 39 27 25 Republicans in Congress Democrats in Congress Both

Out of touch: 60% want member to cooperate with Obama, not try to stop his agenda Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: I want (HOUSE INCUMBENT) to try and work with President Obama to address our country's problems. Work with strongly STATEMENT 2: I want (HOUSE INCUMBENT) to try to stop President Obama from advancing his agenda for the country. Stop strongly +26 +86 +26 +27 90 60 54 83 60 56 61 56 34 31 34 31 34 29 4 3 Work with Stop Work with Stop Work with Stop Work with Stop Total Democrats Independents Republicans

Out of touch on taxes: almost 60% want member to vote higher taxes on wealthiest Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: I want to vote for a Member of Congress who will ask the wealthiest to pay a greater share of taxes to address our problems and the deficit. STATEMENT 2: I agree with (HOUSE INCUMBENT) who says (HE/SHE) won't vote for any tax increase. STATEMENT 1: I want to vote for a Member of Congress who will ask the wealthiest to pay a greater share of taxes and cut special interest spending to address our problems and the deficit. STATEMENT 2: I agree with (HOUSE INCUMBENT) who says (HE/SHE) won't vote for any tax increase and wants to reform and cut corporate tax rates. +20 +21 57 58 50 50 37 37 31 30 Tax wealthy No tax increase Tax wealthy/cut special interests No tax increase/cut corporate rates

Out of touch on deficits and Bush tax cuts: raise taxes on wealthiest and protect entitlements Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: In dealing with the deficit, I agree more with the Democrats who want to raise taxes on the wealthiest and end corporate subsidies, and oppose cuts in Social Security and Medicare. STATEMENT 2: In dealing with the deficit, I agree more with the Republicans who oppose any increase in taxes and want to reduce spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid by making overdue reforms. STATEMENT 1: The Bush tax cuts for those earning over 250,000 dollars should be ended, while maintaining the tax cuts for the middle class. STATEMENT 2: The Bush tax cuts should be extended permanently so we raise nobody's taxes. +20 +16 54 55 42 34 46 39 32 24 Agree with Democrats Agree with Republicans End tax cuts Extend tax cuts

Obama and Democrats gain in battleground, while Republicans tarnished

Democrats image improved since September Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. You can use any number from zero to one hundred, the higher the number the more favorable your feelings are toward that person or organization. If you have no opinion or never heard of that person or organization, please say so. 52.0 Net: +10 51 46.5 47.2 42 45 Very warm (75-100) Very cool (0-25) 45.9 39 40.4 42.6 30 33 44.2 Net: -4 Net: +1 Net: -5 Net: -19 Net: -15 Net: -8 37 38.7 Net: -26 26 40.6 Net: -18 31 34 27 29 17 11 13 15 9 11 33 37 37 31 37 35 32 36 36 41 46 44 44 49 48 45 52 49 March September December March September December March September December Barack Obama Democratic Party Democrats in Congress

While GOP continue to fall well after debt limit battle Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. You can use any number from zero to one hundred, the higher the number the more favorable your feelings are toward that person or organization. If you have no opinion or never heard of that person or organization, please say so. 47.3 Net: +3 44.4 41.8 45.6 Very warm (75-100) Very cool (0-25) 41.5 39.6 50.4 46.4 48.3 46.0 Net: -7 Net: -14 Net: -6 Net: -16 Net: -22 Net: +7 Net: Even Net: +2 Net: -6 42.3 Net: -15 42.2 Net: -18 35 33 29 37 31 29 31 34 33 37 33 31 15 14 10 15 12 10 13 14 14 14 13 11 25 29 30 29 33 36 16 25 22 28 34 32 32 40 43 43 47 51 24 34 31 43 48 49 March Sept Dec March Sept Dec March Sept Dec March Sept Dec John Boehner Republican Congress GOP House Incumbent Republican Party

Obama much more favorable than Romney and Gingrich in these Republican districts Now, I'd like to rate your feelings toward some people and organizations, with one hundred meaning a VERY WARM, FAVORABLE feeling; zero meaning a VERY COLD, UNFAVORABLE feeling; and fifty meaning not particularly warm or cold. You can use any number from zero to one hundred, the higher the number the more favorable your feelings are toward that person or organization. If you have no opinion or never heard of that person or organization, please say so. 48.4 Net: +3 46 Very warm (75-100) Very cool (0-25) 44.6 Net: -11 41.6 Net: -16 30 29 30 9 13 36 25 32 43 41 45 Barack Obama Mitt Romney Newt Gingrich

Obama s approval up a little since September Do you approve or disapprove of the job being done by Barack Obama as president? Strongly approve Strongly disapprove 48 47 55 41 43 52 37 44 41 25 21 22 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove March September December

Among independents, Obama doing much better Do you approve or disapprove of the job being done by Barack Obama as president? Strongly approve Strongly disapprove Among Independents 54 59 52 39 35 42 43 48 41 16 15 20 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove March September December

Obama in statistical tie with Romney and Gingrich I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the presidential election in 2012, if the election for president were held today and the candidates were Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney/Newt Gingrich, for whom would you vote? +1 +2 47 48 46 48 Obama Romney Obama Gingrich

Gaining significant ground against Romney since September I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the presidential election in 2012, if the election for president were held today and the candidates were Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney, for whom would you vote? +6 +1 43 49 47 48 Obama Romney Obama Romney September December

The very weak Republican incumbents

Will vote to re-elect named incumbent at only 37% Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: Next year, I CAN'T vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because we need new people that will fix Washington and get things done. Will re-elect strongly STATEMENT 2: Next year, I WILL vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is doing a good job and addressing issues that are important to us. Can't re-elect strongly +5 +9 +10 45 40 40 49 47 37 36 32 34 28 28 26 Will re-elect March Can't reelect Will re-elect September Can't reelect Will re-elect December Can't reelect

Majority of independents say can t vote to re-elect Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: Next year, I CAN'T vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because we need new people that will fix Washington and get things done. Will re-elect strongly STATEMENT 2: Next year, I WILL vote to reelect (HOUSE INCUMBENT) because (HE/SHE) is doing a good job and addressing issues that are important to us. Can't re-elect strongly +13 +66 +18 +40 75 64 49 51 36 26 36 9 57 33 22 36 48 24 16 5 Will re-elect Can't re-elect Will re-elect Can't re-elect Will re-elect Can't re-elect Will re-elect Can't re-elect Total Democrats Independents Republicans

Incumbent no warming but a little less negative Now I'm going to read you some pairs of statements. After I read each pair, please tell me whether the FIRST statement or the SECOND statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right. STATEMENT 1: The more I hear from Republicans in Congress like (HOUSE INCUMBENT), the LESS I like. More I like strongly STATEMENT 2: The more I hear from Republicans in Congress like (HOUSE INCUMBENT), the MORE I like. Less I like strongly +2 +11 +7 42 44 51 40 40 47 38 37 32 28 28 29 More I like Less I like More I like Less I like More I like Less I like March September December

Approval up marginally but stuck in low 40s Do you approve or disapprove of the way (HOUSE INCUMBENT) is handling his/her job as a member of the U.S. Congress? Strongly approve Strongly disapprove 38 +13 +8 +19 42 40 32 25 23 21 15 15 15 16 15 Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove Approve Disapprove March September December

House incumbents continue to have weak positive image in these districts Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes (HOUSE INCUMBENT) very well, well, not too well or not well at all. Very well Well Change in describes well from September Fights for people here 18 47 0 Has the right approach to spending and deficits 14 39-1 On your side 13 40-4 Has the right approach to the economy and jobs 13 40 +1 Will work with members from both parties to get things done 11 39-3 Part of the problem in Washington 16 33-4

Republicans weakening in battleground and vulnerable to attack

Close in entire battleground member below 50 percent and independents competitive I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +5 +85 +6 +87 89 91 42 47 37 43 4 4 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Total Democrats Independents Republicans *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Big shift in the vote after hearing attacks from both sides dead even with incumbent at 44 percent Now let me ask you again, I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +5 +1 42 47 45 44 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Initial vote Re-vote after hearing information on both sides *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

House members weaker in election and now below 50 percent I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +2 +9 +6 44 46 50 48 41 42 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican March September December *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Republican member loses big among independents I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +85 +84 +86 +18 +19 +8 +84 +89 +88 91 89 90 89 93 91 30 48 52 33 36 44 4 5 4 3 6 5 Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep March September December March September December March September December Democrats Independents Republicans *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Republicans are exactly where Democrats stood in 2010 campaign when they lost 63 seats I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +3 +2 +9 +6 48 45 46 44 50 41 42 48 Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep October 2009 March 2011 September 2011 December 2011 *Note: In 2011, HOUSE INCUMBENT refers to a Republican; in 2009, HOUSE INCUMBENT refers to a Democrat.

Ahead in rural, close in metro and suburban areas I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +1 +5 +12 +4 47 48 47 42 37 49 45 41 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Metro Suburban Exurban Rural *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

The race for Congress is no different across levels of competitiveness whole battleground in play I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +5 +5 +5 +6 47 47 47 48 42 42 42 42 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Total Tier 1 Tier 2 50 Same Districts from March *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Democrats have potential to gain among the new progressive base I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +14 +14 +40 +4 66 52 50 38 36 48 44 26 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Democrat Republican New Obama voters Youth (under 30) Minority Unmarried women *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Democrats have more winnable, fewer vulnerable voters Democrat Not Democrat 37 18 19 14 3 3 3 3 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable Republican Not Republican 35 19 19 6 9 3 3 6 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable

Democrats have much greater potential to win over independent voters Democrat Not Democrat 19 26 31 11 3 4 2 5 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable Republican Not Republican 30 18 17 12 10 7 3 3 Loyalist Supporter Conditional Vulnerable Winnable In Reach Peripheral Unreachable

Attacks expose Republican weaknesses and shift the vote

Attack on cuts to Medicare to pay for more special interest tax breaks powerful, but Social Security attack is strongest driver in regressions Now let me read you some statements that some people have made about (HOUSE INCUMBENT). After I read each statement, please tell me whether this raises very serious doubts, serious doubts, minor doubts, or no real doubts in your own mind about (HOUSE INCUMBENT). Very serious doubts Serious doubts (MEDICARE CONTRAST) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) voted to end Medicare as we know it, forcing seniors to pay 6,400 dollars more out of pocket every year, and to use that money to continue tax breaks for those earning over 200,000 dollars and special interest subsidies for oil companies. 40 70 (SOCIAL SECURITY) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) voted to privatize Social Security, raise the retirement age and reduce guaranteed health care benefits for seniors. 34 63 (REFORM) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) promised to change Washington but (he/she) has taken thousands from lobbyists at Washington fundraisers, while voting three times to protect 50 billion dollars in taxpayer-funded subsidies for the oil companies and refusing to block bonuses to Wall Street CEOs. (UPSIDE DOWN) The economy is upside down. Gas prices, bills, and tuition go up but wages and benefits remain stagnant for the smashed middle class. Ninety-nine percent of us are suffering, but (HOUSE INCUMBENT) cares more about keeping tax breaks for the top one percent than helping out the struggling middle class. 31 31 59 65

Attacking Republicans budget plan to cut taxes for the wealthiest and corporations drives the vote against them Now let me read you some statements that some people have made about (HOUSE INCUMBENT). After I read each statement, please tell me whether this raises very serious doubts, serious doubts, minor doubts, or no real doubts in your own mind about (HOUSE INCUMBENT). Very serious doubts Serious doubts (DEBT) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) says (he/she) wants to reduce our country's debt, but (he/she) voted for a budget plan that cuts taxes for the wealthiest and corporations and adds 8 trillion dollars to the national debt over the next 10 years. 29 66 (PAYROLL TAX) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) opposed extending the payroll tax cut of almost fifteen hundred dollars for 160 million working families and businesses because (he/she) did not want to raise taxes on millionaires by 3 percent to pay for these middle class tax cuts. 27 57 (OBSTRUCTIONISM) (HOUSE INCUMBENT) promised to change Washington but instead threatened to have America default its debts, producing gridlock that led to a credit downgrade of America that hurt our economy. (He/she) supports leaders who say their number one goal is to make President Obama a one-term president. 26 56

Taxes, regulations attacks on Democrats fall flat Now let me read you some statements that some people have made about Democrats in Congress. After I read each statement, please tell me whether this raises very serious doubts, serious doubts, minor doubts, or no real doubts in your own mind about Democrats in Congress. Very serious doubts (SOLYNDRA) The Democrats in Congress gave half a billion taxpayer dollars to a solar power company that donated to the Obama campaign, even though the company was on a path to bankruptcy. After the company eventually defaulted on its loan, the Democrats changed the terms to let the company continue taking taxpayer money. Now the company is bankrupt and taxpayers are stuck with the bill, but the Democrats approved another billion dollars in loans to similar companies who also donated to Democrats. (OBAMA HEALTH CARE) The Democrats in Congress supported Barack Obama's trillion dollar government takeover of our health care system, which raised the cost of health insurance premiums, increased taxes, and forced small businesses to pay for expensive insurance they can't afford, all while making it harder for people to see their doctors and get access to quality care. Serious doubts 38 35 61 68 (SPENDING) The Democrats in Congress passed a stimulus bill that added hundreds of billions to the debt, yet failed to create any jobs. They continue to support tax-and-spend policies that will burden middle class families with more debt, and cost our children their economic future. 34 65 (ANTI-BUSINESS) In a weak economy, Democrats in Congress support an anti-business, job killing agenda. They support Obamacare, which is filled with new red tape and mandates on businesses, and a new energy tax and environmental regulations that would drive up costs for manufacturers. (TAXES) The Democrats' deficit reduction plan actually raises taxes on job creators. It increases the already high corporate tax rate, raises the top individual tax rate, and is sure to create a stranglehold on the economy. We can debate about how to fix the deficit, but raising taxes during a recession is not the right place to start. 30 26 58 58

Big shift in the vote after hearing attacks from both sides incumbent falls to only 44 percent Now let me ask you again, I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Democrat Republican +5 +1 42 47 45 44 Democrat Republican Democrat Republican Initial vote Re-vote after hearing information on both sides *Note: Incumbent names were inserted with party identification. Generic challengers were inserted as The Democratic Candidate.

Big shifters in congressional vote even Republicans shift away from their incumbents Now let me ask you again, I know it's a long way off, but thinking about the election for Congress in November 2012, if the election for U.S. Congress were held today, would you be voting for the Democratic candidate or Republican (HOUSE INCUMBENT)? Shift toward Dem 9 13 13 13 12 12 12 11 10 9 9

WORLD HEADQUARTERS 10 G Street, NE Suite 500 Washington, DC 20002 T: 202.478.8300 F: 202.478.8301 EUROPEAN HEADQUARTERS 405 Carrington House 6 Hertford Street London, UK W1J 7SU T: +44.(0).207.096.5070 F: +44.(0).207.096.5068 LATIN AMERICAN HEADQUARTERS Cabrera 6060, 7D C1414 BHN Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina T: +54.11.4772.0813 www.greenbergresearch.com www.gqrr.com