Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv CKK Document 1 Filed 08/22/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/23/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 7:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/14/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 21 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/27/18 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 4:18-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2018 Page 1 of 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Plaintiffs, by their undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint against defendants, allegs INTRODUCTION

Attorneys for Plaintiff Betty Gregory and the Putative Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv SJF-GRB Document 1 Filed 07/02/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/04/18 Page 1 of 27. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant.

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/27/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/11/18 Page 1 of 26. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 1 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1-1 Filed: 08/04/14 1 of 9. PageID #: 3

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 22 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 24

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/12/17 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 1:14-cv RB-SMV Document 1 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )

Case 1:15-cv JG-JO Document 1 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

~ Civil Action No. 5: 18 v 1~3- rr3 12-

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2018 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/02/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 24. Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:18-cv RRS-PJH Document Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 6266

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 34 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 221 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 3:14-cv MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 30

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 14. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/17 Page 1 of 27 : : : : : : : : : : : :

In the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff GUILLERMO ROBLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 26

Case4:02-cv PJH Document1-1 Filed12/17/02 Page1 of 13

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 27 : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 27. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant.

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant. : : :

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/17 Page 1 of 28. : : Plaintiffs, 1. Plaintiff STEVEN MATZURA, on behalf of himself and others

Case3:10-cv SI Document25 Filed02/25/10 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:17-cv CEH-JSS Document 1 Filed 08/09/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 26

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/17 Page 1 of 28 : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/09/17 Page 1 of 27. : : Plaintiffs, 1. Plaintiff STEVEN MATZURA, on behalf of himself and others similarly

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 1:16-cv NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 27 : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/15/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv KAM-RML Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 31 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:18-cv ES-MAH Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

[Other Attorneys of Record Listed on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendants for failing to make their retail locations accessible in violation of Title III of the

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 26

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 29 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Civil Case No. : 5:16-cv-872 NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant. : : :

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 26

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1. : : Plaintiffs, : : Defendant. : : :

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICHOLAS DUPREE AND DEBORAH LOGERFO, PLAINTIFFS vs. COMPLAINT CITY OF NEW YORK and Bill de Blasio in his official capacity as Mayor, City of New York; CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE Civil Action No. DEPARTMENT and James P. O Neill in his official capacity as Commissioner, City of New York Police Department; COUNTY OF NASSAU, NEW YORK and Edward P. Mangano in his official capacity as County Executive, County of Nassau, New York; NASSAU COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT and Craig J. Craft, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Nassau County Office of Emergency Management; COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK and Steven Bellone in his official capacity as County Executive, County of Suffolk, New York; SUFFOLK COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT and Joseph F. Williams in his official capacity as Commissioner, Suffolk County Office of Emergency Management; DEFENDANTS. 1

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 2 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. In the following counties and municipalities, a person who is deaf or hard of hearing, or has speech or communication disabilities, cannot contact 911 via text message and is therefore in many circumstances unable to access critical 911 services, which are available to individuals without disabilities: Bronx County, Kings County, Nassau County, New York County, Queens County, Richmond County, and Suffolk County. 2. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, or have disabilities that impair their speech and communication, cannot report crimes, fires, motor vehicle accidents, or medical emergencies via text, placing these individuals and others at risk by delaying their access to emergency services. 3. The failure to make 911 accessible to individuals with such disabilities violates both Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ( Section 504, 29 U.S.C. 794. 4. As relief, Plaintiffs seek an order from this Court enjoining Defendants to provide direct, immediate, and equal access to emergency 911 services through the activation of text-to- 911 technology. JURISDICTION 5. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief brought pursuant to Title II of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq. and Section 504, 29 U.S.C. 794 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1343. 6. This Court has jurisdiction to issue declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S. 2201 and 2202. 2

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 3 VENUE 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b, venue is proper in the Eastern District of New York because Defendants are located within this District and a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims alleged herein occurred in this District. PARTIES 8. Plaintiff Nicholas Dupree is a resident of the City of New York. 9. Plaintiff Dupree has a tracheotomy and is on a ventilator. 10. Plaintiff Dupree communicates primarily by eye tracking software and text messaging. 11. Plaintiff Dupree cannot communicate via telephone. 12. Plaintiff Deborah LoGerfo is a resident of the Village of Farmingdale, an incorporated village in Nassau County. 13. Plaintiff LoGerfo has partial deafness and communicates primarily with written notes, emails and text messages; closed captioning; and lipreading. 14. Plaintiff LoGerfo cannot communicate via telephone. 15. Plaintiff LoGerfo travels throughout New York City and Long Island. 16. Defendant City of New York is a municipal corporation. 17. Defendant City of New York is located at City Hall, New York, NY 10007. 18. Defendant City of New York Police Department is a department of the City of New York. 19. Defendant City of New York Police Department operates the 911 system in Kings, Queens, and Richmond Counties. 3

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 4 20. Defendant City of New York Police Department is located at 1 Police Plaza Path, New York, NY 10007. 21. Defendant County of Nassau is a county of the State of New York. 22. Defendant County of Nassau is located at County Government Office, 1550 Franklin Avenue, Mineola, NY 11501. 23. Defendant Nassau County Office of Emergency Management is a department of County of Nassau. 24. Defendant Nassau County Office of Emergency Management operates the 911 system in Nassau County. 25. Defendant Nassau County Office of Emergency Management is located at 510 Grumman Rd W, Bethpage, NY 11714. 26. Defendant County of Suffolk is a County of the State of New York. 27. Defendant County of Suffolk is located at H. Lee Dennison Bldg, 100 Veterans Memorial Hwy, P.O. Box 6100, Hauppage, New York 11788. 28. Defendant Suffolk County Office of Emergency Management is a department of the County of Suffolk, NY. 29. Defendant Suffolk County Office of Emergency Management operates the 911 system in Suffolk County. 30. Defendant Suffolk County Office of Emergency Management is located at 30 East Ave, Yaphank, NY 11980. STATEMENT OF FACTS 31. Plaintiff Dupree experienced several health emergencies in or around April 2016. 4

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 5 32. During each of these emergencies, Plaintiff Dupree was unable to call 911 for assistance because he could not communicate with the 911 operator. 33. Plaintiff Dupree had to rely on other individuals to assist him in contacting 911. 34. Plaintiff Dupree was denied and continues to be denied meaningful access to 911 services in New York City. 35. Several years ago, Plaintiff LoGerfo encountered a car on fire while traveling on Route 135 North in Plainview, New York. Plainview is located in Nassau County. 36. Plaintiff LoGerfo called 911 to report the car fire. 37. The 911 operator asked Plaintiff LoGerfo multiple questions. 38. Plaintiff LoGerfo told the operator that she was unable to understand their questions. 39. Plaintiff LoGerfo and the operator repeated this exchange several times. 40. Plaintiff LoGerfo could not communicate crucial information to the 911 operator because of her disability. 41. Plaintiff LoGerfo was denied and continues to be denied meaningful access to 911 services in Nassau County. 42. In the areas in which Defendants provide emergency services, individuals without disabilities can use telephones, mobile phones, and voice over internet protocol to dial 911 and receive immediate access to emergency police, fire, and medical services provided by Defendants. 43. Individuals with disabilities that impair their ability to speak or to hear conversations on a telephone cannot contact 911 by voice. 44. Individuals with disabilities that impair their hearing or communication cannot independently access 911 services. 5

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 6 45. Because Defendants do not accept 911 text messages, Plaintiffs Dupree and Logerfo cannot independently access 911 services. 46. Plaintiff Dupree uses his eye tracking software to text message using instant messaging applications, and wishes to contact 911 via text as needed. 47. Plaintiff LoGerfo possesses a cell phone which she wishes to use to contact 911 via text as needed. 48. People without disabilities can contact 911 by telephone or cell phone if they have a medical emergency while away from home. 49. Individuals who have hearing, speech, or communication disabilities cannot contact 911 because of the absence of a text-to-911 service. 50. People without disabilities can contact 911 by telephone or cell phone if they are the witness to or the victim of a crime. 51. Individuals who have hearing, speech, or communication disabilities cannot contact 911 because of the absence of a text-to-911 service. 52. People without disabilities can contact 911 by telephone or cell phone if there is a fire or gas leak. 53. Individuals who have hearing, speech, or communication disabilities cannot contact 911 because of the absence of a text-to-911 service. 54. As a result of Defendants failure to implement text-to-911 services, individuals with disabilities do not have the direct, meaningful, reliable, and immediate access to emergency 911 services including medical, fire, and police services which is enjoyed by persons without disabilities. 6

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 7 55. As a result, individuals with disabilities who cannot contact 911 may suffer property loss, severe injury, or death. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF TITLE II OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 56. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporates herein all previously alleged paragraphs of the Complaint. 57. Title II of the ADA provides that no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity. 42 U.S.C. 12132. 58. A public entity includes state and local governments, their agencies, and their instrumentalities. 42 U.S.C. 12131(1. 59. Defendants are public entities under the ADA. 60. Title II of the ADA and its implementing regulations require that public entities take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants, members of the public, and companions with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. 28 C.F.R. 35.160(a(1. 61. Defendants have discriminated and continue to discriminate against Plaintiff Dupree and Plaintiff LoGerfo by denying them access to Defendants 911 emergency services, in violation of Title II of the ADA. 62. Defendants have discriminated and continue to discriminate against Plaintiff Dupree and Plaintiff LoGerfo by failing to provide appropriate auxiliary aids and 7

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 8 services enabling them to access Defendants 911 emergency services, in violation of Title II of the ADA. 63. Defendant s conduct is a present and ongoing violation of Title II of the ADA. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 64. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein all previously alleged paragraphs of the Complaint. 65. Section 504 provides that no otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States... shall, solely by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. 29 U.S.C. 794(a. 66. Defendants have received federal financial assistance at all relevant times. 67. Defendants have discriminated and continue to discriminate against individuals with disabilities on the basis of their disabilities by denying them access to Defendants 911 emergency services, and appropriate auxiliary aids and services enabling them to access Defendants 911 emergency services, in violation of Section 504. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request relief as set forth below: 1. Issue a declaratory judgment that Defendants policies, procedures, and practices have subjected and continue to subject Plaintiff Dupree and Plaintiff LoGerfo to discrimination in violation of Title II of the ADA and Section 504; 8

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 9 2. Order Defendants to promptly implement text-to-911 services to communicate with Defendants emergency services; 3. Order Defendants to develop and comply with policies, procedures, and practices to ensure that individuals with disabilities may communicate with 911 services via text message; 4. Order Defendants to train all their representatives and employees on the rights of individuals with disabilities under the ADA and Section 504, as well as provide training on Defendants policies and procedures for accepting text messages to 911; 5. An award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs; and 9

Case 1:17-cv-00010 Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 10 6. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: December, 2016 Brooklyn, New York By: ELIZABETH GROSSMAN EG2478 SARA LISS SL4649 DISABILITY RIGHTS NEW YORK Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 Chapel Street, Suite 1005 Brooklyn, NY 11201 (518 432-7861 x 4959 (voice (518 512-3448 (TDD (518 427-6561 (Fax (not for service. 10