European Medicines Agency decision

Similar documents
European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 8 March 2010

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 23 December 2009

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 30 October 2009

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 27 January 2009

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 30 October 2009

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 15 July 2009

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 29 February 2008

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 15 June 2009

EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY DECISION. of 24 June 2008

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

European Medicines Agency decision

The European Medicines Agency Code of Good Administrative Behaviour

Memorandum of understanding on working arrangements

Mandate, objectives and rules of procedure for the Inter- Committee Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) for Oncology

Title: Handling of Paediatric Art. 45 work sharing procedures by the CMDh Secretariat

Mandate, objectives and rules of procedure

Mandate, objectives and rules of procedure

The PCWP will now collaborate with the Agency in the revision, implementation and monitoring of the framework of interaction.

Decision of the Executive Director

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Output of the European Medicines Agency policy on access to documents related to corporate documents

VOLUME 6A. Procedures for marketing authorisation CHAPTER 6 DECISION MAKING PROCEDURE FOR THE ADOPTION OF COMMISSION DECISIONS.

Standard operating procedure

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

European Medicines Agency Inspections

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

D2 a copy of a Commission Decision of 22 January 2009 for a new oral formulation of COZAAR suitable for paediatric use.

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 thereof;

Amended proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Procedure for the review and revision of European Union herbal monographs and European Union list entries

REGULATION (EC) No 1103/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 22 October 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Preamble

Official Journal of the European Union L 334/7

E U C O P E S y n o p s i s

Procedure for the review and revision of European Union herbal monographs and European Union list entries

CMDv/BPG/012. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Informed consent for MRP and DCP procedures. Edition number: 00. Edition date: 14 June 2013

Standard operating procedure

Standard Operating Procedure for Disagreement in procedures Referral Art. 33(1) to CMDv

Distribution EFTA/TR 9 December 2009 DECISION OF THE JOINT EFTA-TURKEY COMMITTEE. No. 3 of (Adopted on 3 December 2009)

PROTOCOL E MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT OF PRODUCTS

15466/15 RD/DOS/vm DGD 1

16395/11 JPP/DOS/kst DG C

Procedural advice to applicants/marketing authorisation holders on re-examination of CVMP opinions

PHARMACEUTICAL COMMITTEE

Better and faster development: the regulators perspective on B/R assessment in orphan medicinal products

CMDv/BPG/018. BEST PRACTICE GUIDE for Worksharing. Edition number: 03. Edition date: 16 May Implementation date: 01 January 2010

Amendments to Healthcare Research

12629/17 DD/JU/vm DGG 3B

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Issues concerning the Court of Justice

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 October 2017 (OR. en)

2. SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON TEXT

agreement on ThE EUroPEaN ECoNoMiC area1 ParT iv CoMPETiTioN and other CoMMoN rules ChaPTEr 1 rules applicable To UNdErTaKiNGs Article 53

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 18 December 2003 *

Transcription:

EMA/683356/2010 European Medicines Agency decision P/271/2010 of 3 December 2010 on the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan and on the granting of a deferral and on the granting of a waiver for allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa) (EMEA-000888- PIP01-10) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council Disclaimer This Decision does not constitute entitlement to the rewards and incentives referred to in Title V of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006. Only the English text is authentic. 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HB United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8670 E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union

European Medicines Agency decision P/271/2010 of 3 December 2010 on the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan and on the granting of a deferral and on the granting of a waiver for allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa) (EMEA-000888- PIP01-10) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council The European Medicines Agency, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 1, Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency 2, Having regard to the application submitted by Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG on 6 April 2010 under Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 also requesting a deferral under Article 20 of said Regulation and a waiver under Article 13 of said Regulation, Having regard to the opinion of the Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency, issued on 12 November 2010, in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, and Article 21 of said Regulation and Article 13 of said Regulation, Having regard to Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, Whereas: (1) The Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency has given an opinion on the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan and on the granting of a deferral and on the granting of a waiver. (2) It is therefore appropriate to adopt a decision agreeing a paediatric investigation plan. (3) It is therefore appropriate to adopt a decision granting a deferral. (4) It is therefore appropriate to adopt a decision granting a waiver. 1 OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.1. 2 OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1. European Medicines Agency decision EMA/683356/2010 Page 2/8

Has adopted this decision: Article 1 A paediatric investigation plan for allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa), oromucosal solution, sublingual use, the details of which are set out in the opinion of the Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency annexed hereto, together with its appendices, is hereby agreed. Article 2 A deferral for allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa), oromucosal solution, sublingual use, the details of which are set out in the opinion of the Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency annexed hereto, together with its appendices, is hereby granted. Article 3 A waiver for allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa), oromucosal solution, sublingual use, the details of which are set out in the opinion of the Paediatric Committee of the European Medicines Agency annexed hereto, together with its appendices, is hereby granted. Article 4 This decision is addressed to Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG, Hermann-Körner-Strasse 52, 21465, Reinbek, Germany. Done at London, 3 December 2010 For the European Medicines Agency Thomas Lönngren Executive Director (Signature on file) European Medicines Agency decision EMA/683356/2010 Page 3/8

EMA/PDCO/608506/2010 Opinion of the Paediatric Committee on the agreement of a Paediatric Investigation Plan and a deferral and a waiver EMEA-000888-PIP01-10 Scope of the application Active substance(s): Allergens of birch pollen (betula alba/pendula/verrucosa) Condition(s): Treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhino-conjunctivitis Pharmaceutical form(s): Oromucosal solution Route(s) of administration: Sublingual use Name/corporate name of the PIP applicant: Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG Basis for opinion Pursuant to Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 as amended, Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG submitted for agreement to the European Medicines Agency on 6 April 2010 an application for a paediatric investigation plan for the above mentioned medicinal product and a deferral under Article 20 of said Regulation and a waiver under Article 13 of said Regulation. The procedure started on 20 May 2010. Supplementary information was provided by the applicant on 27 August 2010. 7 Westferry Circus Canary Wharf London E14 4HB United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7523 7040 E-mail info@ema.europa.eu Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union

Opinion 1. The Paediatric Committee, having assessed the proposed paediatric investigation plan in accordance with Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 as amended, recommends as set out in the appended summary report: to agree the paediatric investigation plan in accordance with Article 18 of said Regulation, to grant a deferral in accordance with Article 21 of said Regulation, to grant a waiver for one or more subsets of the paediatric population in accordance with Article 13 of said Regulation and concluded in accordance with Article 11(1)(c) of said Regulation, on the grounds that the specific medicinal product does not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing treatments for paediatric patients. The Icelandic and the Norwegian Paediatric Committee members agree with the above-mentioned recommendation of the Paediatric Committee. 2. The measures and timelines of the agreed paediatric investigation plan and the subset(s) of the paediatric population and condition(s) covered by the waiver are set out in the Annex I. This opinion is forwarded to the applicant and the Executive Director of the European Medicines Agency, together with its annex(es) and appendix. London, 12 November 2010 On behalf of the Paediatric Committee Dr Daniel Brasseur, Chairman (Signature on file) Opinion of the Paediatric Committee on the agreement of a Paediatric Investigation Plan and a deferral and a waiver EMA/683356/2010 Page 5/8

Annex I The subset(s) of the paediatric population and condition(s) covered by the waiver and the measures and timelines of the agreed Paediatric Investigation Plan Opinion of the Paediatric Committee on the agreement of a Paediatric Investigation Plan and a deferral and a waiver EMA/683356/2010 Page 6/8

1. Waiver 1.1. Condition Treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhino-conjunctivitis The waiver applies to: Children from birth to less than 5 years of age, for oromucosal solution, sublingual use, on the grounds that the specific medicinal product does not represent a significant therapeutic benefit over existing treatments. 2. Paediatric Investigation Plan 2.1. Condition: Treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhino-conjunctivitis 2.1.1. Indication(s) targeted by the PIP Treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhino-conjunctivitis 2.1.2. Subset(s) of the paediatric population concerned by the paediatric development From 5 to less than 18 years of age 2.1.3. Pharmaceutical form(s) Oromucosal solution, sublingual use 2.1.4. Studies Area Number of studies Description Quality 0 Not applicable. Non-clinical 1 Repeat-dose toxicity study in mice Clinical 2 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the longterm efficacy and safety of AllerSlit forte Birch in children 4 to less than 12 years of age Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the longterm efficacy and safety of AllerSlit forte Birch in adults and adolescents 12 years to less than 18 years of age Opinion of the Paediatric Committee on the agreement of a Paediatric Investigation Plan and a deferral and a waiver EMA/683356/2010 Page 7/8

3. Follow-up, completion and deferral of PIP Measures to address long term follow-up of potential safety issues and efficacy No in relation to paediatric use: Date of completion of the paediatric investigation plan: By Feb 2026 Deferral for one or more studies contained in the paediatric investigation plan: Yes Opinion of the Paediatric Committee on the agreement of a Paediatric Investigation Plan and a deferral and a waiver EMA/683356/2010 Page 8/8