Sterling International Consulting Group v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION, LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case LMI Doc 433 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 7

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case MDL No Document 2-1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:08-cv PAC

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:10-cv CAB-BLM

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case 5:04-cv JW Document 20 Filed 06/23/2004 Page 1 of 6 WECHSLER HARWOOD, LLP SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 8:14-cv DOC-AN Document 85 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:2663

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:16-md VC Document 1461 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 8:10-ml DOC-RNB Document 626 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:29073

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case MDL No Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas (Dallas) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:11-cv O

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 1084 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Page 1 of 13. Case 1: 05-cv-003-LY Document 23 Filed 01/2006 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OS CV-923

Case3:13-cv SC Document99 Filed06/05/15 Page2 of 7 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Arville Winans and Wilma Fritz in this action entitled Arville 2 Winans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation v. Alexander McQueen Trading Limited et al Doc. 16

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:11-cv JHN-JC

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-cv PGG

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:17-cv WHA Document 193 Filed 03/28/18 Page 1 of 6

Case: , 11/17/2017, ID: , DktEntry: 36, Page 1 of 12 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

U.S. District Court Southern District of Texas (Houston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:99-cv-02182

Case5:10-cv JF Document72 Filed09/16/11 Page1 of 7

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:11-cv EJD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. SA 10-ML-2145 DOC (RNBx)

Case 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

mg Doc Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/01/18 15:54:35 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

[FORM OF FINAL DISMISSAL ORDER] UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

E-FILED on 12/11/03 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

shl Doc 36 Filed 05/15/12 Entered 05/15/12 17:26:47 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-md RS Document 72 Filed 06/15/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case CSS Doc 512 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Ft. Lauderdale) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:11-cv WPD

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:00-cv TJW

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:06-cv JLS-WMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:16-cv RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:06-cv JF

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 5

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:10-cv JF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No

Mann et al v. United States of America Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Illinois Northern District Court Case No. 1:14-cv Wright et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC. Document 18.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED

Case CAC/2:12-cv Document 12 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

Case KG Doc 200 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 7

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRISBURG DIVISION : MDL DOCKET NO : : : :

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:15-cv BRO-JEM

Transcription:

Sterling International Consulting Group Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al Doc. 0 0 JONATHAN K. LEVINE (SBN: 0) ELIZABETH C. PRITZKER (SBN: ) SHIHO YAMAMOTO (SBN: ) PRITZKER LEVINE LLP 0 Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Oakland, California Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -0 Email: jkl@pritzkerlevine.com; ecp@pritzkerlevine.com; sy@pritzkerlevine.com Counsel for Plaintiff Sterling International Consulting Group [Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STERLING INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING GROUP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, and SUPERFISH INC., CAPTION CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE Case No. :-cv-000-rmw STIPULATION AND [] ORDER STIPULATION AND ] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW Dockets.Justia.com

0 0 CHRISTOPHER HALL, MATTHEW KELSO, MICHAEL MORICI, JAYNE COSTANZO, RYAN BAUMGARTNER, LAURA BURNS, THOMAS CARNEY, BEATRIZ DAVIS, DENNIS HASTY, WENDY DURAN and GABE DURAN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., LENOVO GROUP LIMITED and RHONDA ESTRELLA, SONIA FEREZAN, JOHN WHITTLE, and ALAN WOYT on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC. and KEN MARTINI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), Inc. and CAPTION CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE Case No. :-cv-00-rmw Case No. :-cv-00-rmw Case No. :-cv-00-rmw STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 JGX, INC. d/b/a LEFTY O DOUL S individually and on behalf of a class of those similarly situated, LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., and STANLEY D. JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, and MICHAEL SIMONOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., and CAPTION CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE Case No. :-cv-0-rmw Case No. :-cv-0-rmw Case No. :-cv-0- RMW STIPULATION AND [ ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 RUSSELL WOOD and THOMAS WILSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC., LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, and MICHELLE BEHREN and MARY JANE BARBOSA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and SUPERFISH INC., ROBERT RAVENCAMP, on behalf of Himself and all others similarly situated, LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC. and CAPTION CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE Case No. :-cv-0-rmw Case No. :-cv-0-rmw Case No. :-cv-00-rmw STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 SUSAN WEBSTER SCHULTZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and SUPERFISH INC., Case No. :-cv-00-psg 0 WHEREAS the above-referenced Plaintiffs filed the above-captioned cases; WHEREAS the Schultz action was filed after the third motion to relate was filed and has not yet been related to the other actions referenced above; WHEREAS ten other putative class actions complaints have been filed to-date in federal district courts throughout the United States by Plaintiffs asserting claims on behalf of purchasers of computers manufactured by Lenovo containing software manufactured by Defendant Superfish, Inc. ( Superfish ) (collectively, including the above-captioned matters, the In re Lenovo Adware Litig. cases ); WHEREAS a motion is pending before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ( JPML ) to transfer and coordinate the In re Lenovo Adware Litig. cases for pretrial proceedings pursuant to U.S.C. Sec. 0 ( MDL Motion ), and has not yet been set for hearing before the JPML; WHEREAS the parties uniformly support transfer and consolidation and disagree only on the issue of where the cases should be consolidated; WHEREAS the MDL Motion is not on the docket for the JPML s upcoming hearing session, scheduled for March, 0, and the next hearing session is scheduled for May, 0; - - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that one or more consolidated complaints will be filed in the In re Lenovo Adware Litig. cases; WHEREAS the above-referenced Plaintiffs and Defendants Superfish and Lenovo (United States) Inc. ( Lenovo ) have agreed that an orderly schedule for any response to the pleadings in the In re Lenovo Litig. cases would be more efficient for the parties and for the Court; WHEREAS the above-referenced Plaintiffs agree, subject to court approval, that the deadline for Defendants Superfish and Lenovo to answer or otherwise respond to their respective complaints shall be extended until forty-five days after the JPML issues an order deciding the MDL Motion, or as otherwise ordered by the MDL transferee Court if the MDL Motion is granted; WHEREAS, the above-referenced Plaintiffs and Defendants Superfish and Lenovo agree that preservation of evidence in the case is vital, that Defendants have received litigation hold letters, that they are complying with and will continue to comply with all of their evidence preservation obligations under governing law; WHEREAS this Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the parties of any of their respective claims, defenses or any other rights or positions they may have with respect to the same, including, with respect to Defendants, the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process or service of process; Now, therefore, the above-referenced Plaintiffs and Defendants Superfish and Lenovo, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:. The Schultz action shall be related to the other above-referenced actions and transferred to this Court because it meets all of the criteria set forth in Civil L.R. - for a related case;. The deadline for Defendants Superfish and Lenovo to answer or otherwise respond to any of the complaints in the above-referenced cases shall be extended until fortyfive days after the JPML issues an order deciding the MDL Motion, or as otherwise ordered by the MDL transferee Court if the MDL Motion is granted; - - STIPULATION AND [ ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the parties of any of their respective claims, defenses or any other rights or positions they may have with respect to the same, including, with respect to Defendants, the defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, sufficiency of process, or service of process.. The parties agree that they are complying with and will continue to comply with all evidentiary preservation obligations under governing law. 0 0 Dated: March, 0 Respectfully submitted, PRITZKER LEVINE LLP By:_/s/ Jonathan K. Levine Jonathan K. Levine Elizabeth C. Pritzker Shiho Yamamoto 0 Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Oakland, California Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -0 Email: jkl@pritzkerlevine.com; ecp@pritzkerlevine.com sy@pritzkerlevine.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Sterling Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-RMW KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP Laurence D. King Linda Fong Mario Choi By: /s/ Laurence D. King 0 Sansome Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 lking@kaplanfox.com lfong@kaplanfox.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Hall, et al. Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv- -RMW - - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 GIRARD GIBBS LLP Daniel C. Girard Eric H. Gibbs Adam E. Polk By: /s/ Daniel C. Girard 0 California Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - dcg@girardgibbs.com ehg@girardgibbs.com aep@girardgibbs.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Estrella, et al. Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-rmw COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER Timothy D. Cohelan Isam C. Khoury J. Jason Hill By: /s/ Timothy D. Cohelan 0 C Street, Suite 00 San Diego, California 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -000 tcohelan@ckslaw.com ikhoury@ckslaw.com jhill@ckslaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Martini Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-RMW COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP Steven N. Williams Matthew K. Edling By: /s/ Matthew K. Edling San Francisco Airport Office Center 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 00 Burlingame, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -000 Facsimile: (0) -0 medling@cpmlegal.com Counsel for Plaintiff in JGX, Inc. Lenovo Group Limited, et al., Case No. :-cv-- RMW - - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD William Federman By: /s/ William Federman 00 N. Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 0 Telephone: (0) -0 Facsimile: (0(- wbf@federmanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Johnson Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv- -RMW SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP Todd M. Schneider Mark T. Johnson By: /s/ Todd M. Schneider 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 000 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 tschneider@schneiderwallace.com mjohnson@schneiderwallace.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Simonoff Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv- -RMW WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Robin L. Greenwald James J. Bilsborrow Christopher B. Dalbey By: - - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW /s/ Christopher B. Dalbey 00 Broadway New York, NY 000 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - 0 Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -0

0 0 Facsimile: (0) - cdalbey@weitzlux.com rgreenwald@weitzlux.com jbilsborrow@weitzlux.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Wood, et al. Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. --cv--rmw FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Seth M. Lehrman Steven R. Jaffe By: /s/ Steven R. Jaffe N. Andrews Ave., Suite Fort Lauderdale, Florida 0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - seth@pathtojustice.com steve@pathtojustice.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Behren, et al. Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv--rmw STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP Jason S. Hartley By: /s/ Jason S. Hartley 0 West C Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () 00- Facsimile: () 00- hartley@stuevesiegel.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Ravencamp Lenovo (United States) Inc., et al., Case No. :-cv-0-rmw SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. R. Alexander Saveri - - STIPULATION AND [ ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

0 0 Cadio Zirpoli Carl N. Hammarskjold By: /s/ Cadio Zirpoli 0 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - rick@saveri.com cadio@saveri.com carl@saveri.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Schultz Lenovo Group Limited, et al., Case No. :-cv- 0-PSG FENWICK & WEST LLP Tyler G. Newby (CSB No. 00) By: /s/ Tyler G. Newby California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 Counsel for Defendant Superfish, Inc. DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP Daniel J. Stephenson By: /s/ Daniel J. Stephenson South Grand Avenue, Suite 00 Los Angeles, CA 00 Phone: () -00 Fax: () -0 dstephenson@dykema.com Counsel for Defendant Lenovo (United States), Inc. - - STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW

ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, it is SO ORDERED. 0 0 DATED: HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE - - STIPULATION AND [ORDER CASE NO. :-CV-000-RMW