IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. No. 1:18-cv- COMPLAINT COLLECTIVE ACTION

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

4:18-cv RBH Date Filed 05/24/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 3:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/31/14 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action 1:16-cv-1080

& Associates, P.C., upon their knowledge and belief, and as against Senator Construction

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584

they are so related in this action within such original jurisdiction that they form part (212) (212) (fax)

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 22

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION v. PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b)

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 22

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 10

similarly situated, seeks the recovery of unpaid wages and related damages for unpaid minimum wage and overtime hours worked, while employed by Bab.

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/20/17 Page 1 of 25

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 43 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the putative class.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

CASE 0:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/15/19 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge COMPLAINT

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/09/11 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Defendant. / INTRODUCTION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/01/18 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 25

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 25

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 03/15/17 Page 1 of 7

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION AMENDED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

2:16-cv PMD Date Filed 06/23/16 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

Plaintiff, Defendant.

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 MUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/13/17 Page 1 of 24

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Case 8:10-cv RWT Document 77 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Texas Sherman Division

Case: 2:16-cv ALM-KAJ Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/22/16 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT-COLLECTIVE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv SJF -ETB Document 7 Filed 04/14/11 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15

2.1T FILED. 3; b ov 16go-J-.9s- CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiff proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs, and proposed Class

P H I L L I P S DAYES

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 0:12-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2012 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:14-cv JHR-KMW Document 1 Filed 05/01/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID: 1

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION VICTORIA HOLSEY, Plaintiff, v. AGAPE HOSPICE CARE, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES COMES NOW Plaintiff Victoria Holsey (hereinafter Plaintiff, and files this lawsuit against Defendant Agape Hospice Care, Inc. (hereinafter Defendant, and shows the following: I. Nature of Complaint 1. Plaintiff brings this action to obtain full and complete relief and to redress the unlawful employment practices described herein. 2. This action seeks declaratory relief, liquidated, and actual damages for Defendant s failure to pay federally mandated overtime wages to Plaintiff in

violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. (hereinafter FLSA during Plaintiff s employment with Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the relevant time period. II. Jurisdiction and Venue 3. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b, and 28 U.S.C. 1343(a(4. 4. Defendant Agape Hospice Care, Inc. is a Georgia corporation, and the unlawful employment practices described herein occurred at 5825 Glenridge Dr. Bldg. 4, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA, 30328. Accordingly, venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b; LR 3.1(B(3, Northern District of Georgia. III. Parties 5. Plaintiff is a resident of the State of Georgia. 6. Plaintiff worked for Defendant from approximately April 25, 2011, through April 22, 2013, as a Medical Records Manager. 2

7. Plaintiff was an employee (as defined under FLSA 3(e, 29 U.S.C. 203(e for Defendant. 8. Plaintiff performed non-exempt labor for Defendant within the last three years and was paid on an hourly basis. Throughout her employment with Defendant, Plaintiff was entitled to overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of forty (40 hours in a workweek. 9. Defendant employed the named Plaintiff during the relevant time period. 10. During the relevant time period, Plaintiff worked an amount of time that was more than forty (40 hours per workweek and was not paid the overtime wage differential for all hours worked over forty (40 in such weeks. 11. Defendant is a private employer engaged in interstate commerce, and its gross revenues exceed $500,000 per year. 3

12. Defendant has employees engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or has employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods or materials that have been moved in or produced for commerce. 13. Defendant is an employer within the definition of FLSA 3(d, 29 U.S.C. 203(d. 14. Defendant is an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the definition of 29 U.S.C. 203(r and (s. 15. Defendant is governed by and subject to FLSA 7, 29 U.S.C. 207. IV. Facts 16. Defendant is in the business of providing hospice care services to customers. 17. Plaintiff worked for Defendant within the past three years as a Medical Records Manager. During this period, Plaintiff s duties included, inter alia, filing medical records, communicating with doctors and hospitals regarding medical 4

paperwork related to hospice care, creating and closing charts, and coordinating customer admissions to hospice care. 18. During the last three years, Defendant maintained a policy of denying its employees pay for hours worked in excess of forty (40 hours in a workweek. Plaintiff s duties necessitated that she work before and after Defendant s usual office hours in order to, inter alia, timely secure paperwork and signatures from doctors and hospitals to coordinate the admission of customers into hospice care, prepare for bi-weekly internal meetings, and manage the filing of customer medical records. Defendant either directed Plaintiff to perform this off-the-clock work or possessed actual or constructive knowledge of such work and permitted the work to be performed. 19. Because of the before- and after-hours work described above, Plaintiff regularly worked substantially in excess of forty (40 hours per week. 20. During the last three years, while employed by Defendant as a non-exempt Medical Records Manager, Plaintiff regularly worked in excess of forty (40 hours in given workweeks and was not paid the overtime wage differential required by 5

FLSA 7, 29 U.S.C. 207 for all hours worked in excess of forty (40 hours in such weeks. 21. Defendant terminated Plaintiff s employment on or about April 22, 2013. Defendant denied Plaintiff her last paycheck due for work she performed prior to her termination date. V. Violation of the Overtime Wage Requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 22. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint with the same force and effect as if set forth herein. 23. Defendant has violated FLSA 7, 29 U.S.C. 207, by failing to pay overtime wages for time that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty (40 hours in a workweek. 24. Defendant suffered and permitted Plaintiff to routinely work more than forty (40 hours per week without overtime compensation. 6

25. Defendant s actions, policies and/or practices violate the FLSA s overtime requirement by regularly and repeatedly failing to compensate Plaintiff at the required overtime rate. 26. Defendant knew, or showed reckless disregard for the fact that it failed to pay Plaintiff overtime compensation in violation of the FLSA. 27. Defendant failed to accurately report, record and/or preserve records of hours worked by Plaintiff, and thus has failed to make, keep, and preserve records with respect to each of its employees sufficient to determine their wages, hours, and other conditions and practices of employment, in violation of the FLSA. 28. Defendant refused to compensate Plaintiff for any of the hours she worked during the last two weeks of her employment in violation of the FLSA. 29. Defendant s conduct was willful and in bad faith. 7

30. Pursuant to FLSA 16, 29 U.S.C. 216, Plaintiff brings this lawsuit to recover overtime wage differential, liquidated damages in an equal amount, attorneys fees, and the costs of this litigation. VII. Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: (A (B Grant Plaintiff a trial by jury as to all triable issues of fact; Enter judgment awarding Plaintiff unpaid wages pursuant to the FLSA 7, 29 U.S.C. 207, liquidated damages as provided by 29 U.S.C. 216, court costs, expert witness fees and reasonable attorneys fees as provided under 29 U.S.C. 216, pre-judgment interest and all other remedies allowed under the FLSA; (C Grant declaratory judgment declaring that Plaintiff s rights have been violated; and (D Award Plaintiff such further and additional relief as may be just and appropriate. [Signature on the following page.] 8

Respectfully submitted the 30th day of September, 2013. BARRETT & FARAHANY, LLP 1100 Peachtree Street Suite 500 Atlanta, GA 30309 (404 214-0120 (404 214-0125 facsimile s/ Benjamin A. Stark _ Amanda A. Farahany Georgia Bar No. 646135 Benjamin F. Barrett Georgia Bar No. 039586 Benjamin A. Stark Georgia Bar No. 601867 Attorneys for Victoria Holsey 9