Review of returns to Srebrenica June 2005

Similar documents
COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. 29 April Table of Contents. I. Background to internal displacement in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN FOR 2002 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Executive Committee Summary

Croatia. Facilitate sustainable repatriation. Main objectives. Working environment. Impact. The context

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina

(8-26 July 2013) Bosnia and Herzegovina. 24 June Table of Contents. I. Background on Internal Displacement in Bosnia and Herzegovina...

L A W ON DISPLACED PERSONS, RETURNEES AND REFUGEES IN THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA (RS Official Gazette, no. 42/05 of 26 April 2005)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Update on Conditions for Return to Bosnia and Herzegovina

UNITED NATIONS UNITED NATIONS WORKING GROUP ON ENFORCED OR INVOLUNTARY DISAPPEARANCES CONCLUDES ITS VISIT TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

LAW ON DISPLACED-EXPELLED PERSONS AND REFUGEES-REPATRIATES IN THE SARAJEVO CANTON (Canton Sarajevo Official Gazette, no. 27/05)

Project Fiche IPA Annual Action Plan 2007 for Bosnia and Herzegovina - Support to return to Kotor Varos Municipality 1.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Extremely Vulnerable Individuals: The Need for Continuing International Support. in Light of the Difficulties to Reintegration Upon Return UNHCR

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: WINTER HUMANITARIAN NEEDS

REPORT SUBMITTED BY BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES

Supplementary Appeal. Comprehensive Solutions for the Protracted Refugee Situation in Serbia

Economic and Social Council

Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report

POST-CONFLICT PROPERTY RESTITUTION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Bosnia and Herzegovina

The 2018 General Elections basic information. The elections are administered for the following levels of authority:

Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes (Regional / Horizontal programmes ; centralised National programmes)

International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination

Serbia. Working environment. The context. The needs. Serbia

Spirit of Bosnia / Duh Bosne

Fourteen years after the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH),

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES

International Committee for Human Rights

Eastern Europe. Operational highlights. Working environment. Armenia. Azerbaijan. Belarus. Georgia. Republic of Moldova. Russian Federation.

CHALLENGES TO RECONSTITUTING CONFLICT-SENSITIVE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTIONS AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE CASE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

ANNEX 6: Summary of recent Human Development Reports for Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prepared by Dr Steve Goss

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

Country programme in Ukraine

REBUILDING SARAJEVO JULY. Sarajevo: Urban issues today might have been avoided by viewing reconstruction in more than just physical terms.

Country Programme in Ukraine

2011 Access to free legal aid for displaced persons in the Western Balkans countries; Overview the situation

ELECTION LAW OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (Unofficial consolidated text 1 ) Article 1.1. Article 1.1a

Human Resource Development Country Analysis Bosnia and Herzegovina

ELECTION LAW OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. Last amended 4/3/2006. Chapter 1. General Provisions

United States General Accounting Office May 1997 GAO/NSIAD

TOO LITTLE TOO LATE: Implementation of the Sarajevo Declaration

Ministry for Human Rights and Refugees of Bosnia and Herzegovina Agency for Gender Equality of Bosnia and Herzegovina

HCT Framework on Durable Solutions for Displaced Persons and Returnees

The EU & the Western Balkans

Multi-apartment buildings in Croatia

Sri Lanka. Operational highlights. Working environment. Persons of concern

The Status of the Croatian Serb Population. in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Refugees or Citizens?

Afghanistan. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

AFGHANISTAN. Overview. Operational highlights

CCPR/C/BIH/CO/2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations

In Lampedusa s harbour, Italy, a patrol boat returns with asylum-seekers from a search and rescue mission in the Mediterranean Sea.

Project Information Document (PID)

annual report_united women banja luka

Reaching Vulnerable Children and Youth. June 16-17, 2004 The World Bank, Washington DC. Palestine (West Bank and Gaza)

OFFICIAL GAZETTE SARAJEVO CANTON NO. 15/2001 OF 19 JUNE 2001

Sri Lanka. Pakistan Myanmar Various Refugees

Returnees and Refugees Afghanistan and Neighbouring Countries

2 Bosnia and Herzegovina - Behind closed gates

Bosnia and Herzegovina

CEDAW/C/BIH/4-5. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination. against Women. United Nations

Ministry for Human Rights and Refugees of Bosnia and Herzegovina

REGIONAL MONTHLY UPDATE: 3RP ACHIEVEMENTS FEBRUARY 2017

Liberia. Main objectives. Planning figures. Total requirements: USD 44,120,090

Poverty Profile of Bosnia and Herzegovina. A. Introduction. 1. Poverty in BiH

Finding durable solutions

Sri Lanka. Persons of concern

Accepting Responsibility: Moving Beyond Political and Economic Dependence in Post Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina

Southern Sudan: Overcoming obstacles to durable solutions now building stability for the future

INTERIM REPORT No September 2006

SERBIA AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SUBMISSION TO THE UN UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW 15TH SESSION OF THE UPR WORKING GROUP, JANUARY - FEBRUARY 2013

UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW OF CROATIA NGO Stakeholder s submission. April 2010

Afghanistan. Main Objectives

REGIONAL MONTHLY UPDATE: 3RP ACHIEVEMENTS NOVEMBER 2017

workshop The status of constituent peoples and minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina Background to the workshop 1

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Myanmar. Operational highlights. Working environment. Achievements and impact. Persons of concern. Main objectives and targets

United Women Banja Luka Address: Kalemegdanska 18, Banja Luka. Contact Information: Bosnia and Herzegovina

Refugees and IDPs in Serbia

Operational highlights

Table of Contents GLOSSARY 2 HIGHLIGHTS 3 SITUATION UPDATE 5 UNDP RESPONSE UPDATE 7 DONORS 15

Of whom assisted by UNHCR

I. Background. TRIAL Case postale 5116 CH-1211 Genève 11 Tél./Fax: +41 (0) CCP:

Having regard to the instrument of ratification deposited by Bosnia and Herzegovina on 11 January 2008;

Standard Summary Project Fiche IPA centralised programmes

Tanzania. Results strategy for Sweden s international development cooperation in MFA

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Bosnia and Herzegovina MODERATE ADVANCEMENT

Human Security Rapid Assessment Report UNTFHS Canton 10 Project Bosnia and Herzegovina

83% of Syrian refugees in Jordan live in urban areas and 17% live in three refugee camps. 48% of refugees are children, and 4% are elderly people.

DECISION ON ADMISSIBILITY

Turkey. Main Objectives. Impact. rights of asylum-seekers and refugees and the mandate of UNHCR.

Joint UN rapid assessment mission to Vindza, Kimba, Kindamba districts

NEWS BULLETIN August 1, 2014

COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN - IRAN

CONSOLIDATED VERSION FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY!!! LAW ON CIVIL SERVICE OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Transcription:

Sub-Office for Northern Bosnia and Herzegovina Tuzla SREBRENICA 1995-2005 Any account of Srebrenica s past and future is inextricably linked to the 1995 war-time killing of some 7,800 Bosniak men and boys stranded in the UN designated safe haven. On April 19, 2004 in Prosecutor v. Krstic, the ICTY Appeals Chamber unanimously ruled that this constituted an act of genocide. Review of returns to Srebrenica June 2005 As pointed out in the Report of the United Nations Secretary-General on the Fall of Srebrenica 1 (1999), the tragedy of Srebrenica will haunt our history forever. More and more mass graves are discovered, 32 previously unknown were identified by the Report of the Srebrenica Commission published on 11June 2004. Of the 5,000 bodies found to date, 1,327 have been buried at the Potocari Memorial Centre which was officially opened by former U.S. President William Clinton on 20 September 2003. The establishment of the Potocari Memorial provided a critical incentive to the return and reconciliation process in Srebrenica. The fact, however, that the most prominent indicted war criminals are still at large and that many more suspected war criminals continue to lead a life in total impunity is important to consider when assessing the possibility to return in safety and dignity. As highlighted in 1 UN General Assembly, Report of the Secretary General pursuant the General Assembly Resolution 53/35, The Fall of Srebrenica, Doc No A/54/549 dated 15 November 1999 Srebrenica Municipality in Eastern Republika Srpska, BiH UNHCR s Update on Conditions for Return to Bosnia and Herzegovina (January 2005), certain categories of persons, including war crimes witnesses and severely traumatised individuals, have continued protection needs. Female headed households comprise a very significant percentage of those who returned to Srebrenica already or who have expressed an interest to return, which should be duly taken into account. Many of such families continue to live in displacement in Tuzla and Sarajevo Cantons and whether they wish to return or are unable to do so, they have specific vulnerabilities which require the continued attention of the domestic authorities, and the international community alike. For a detailed assessment of the needs of this group, see also UNHCR Survey on Displaced Persons in Tuzla Canton from the

2 Podrinje Area, Eastern Republika Srpska, June 2003. As illustrated by the sporadic appearance of hate graffiti, posters and signs which discourage returns and intimidate returnees, continuing monitoring, law enforcement and confidence-building measures are required. The active NATO/SFOR military presence at Forward Operating Base Connor in Bratunac until last year had contributed significantly to the returnees sense of security. The fact that today a multi-ethnic police force is operational in Srebrenica, including 16 minority policemen (one of whom is a supervisor), gives hope that the situation will further stabilise. employment in the municipality. Srebrenica has thus raised the highest rate of employment of minority returnees in the Eastern RS. Over the last two years, the Eastern RS has seen the largest returns of any area in BiH. Most returns occur from Tuzla, Sarajevo and Zenica-Doboj Cantons in the Federation of BiH. Minority returns (Bosniak) have taken place primarily to isolated hilly rural areas away from the town centre. The infrastructure in these areas remains is in ruins, and some areas face additional problems with unexploded ordinance and land mines. Bosniak Returns to Srebrenica YEAR RETURNS 2000 60 2001 127 2002 462 2003 1,455 2004 780 2005 180 View of Srebrenica from surrounding hills GENERAL RETURN SITUATION Returns to Srebrenica have been slow to begin with, and many families remain in displacement, primarily in collective centres and settlements in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH). Minority returns to Srebrenica and most areas in Eastern Republika Srpska (RS) started in earliest only in 2000, approximately three years after most other areas in BiH had experienced significant return movements. Today, the Mayor of Srebrenica, Abdurahman Malkic, is proactive in supporting return. There are 57 Bosniak minority returnees who have found During the last official national Census in 1991, the Srebrenica pre-war population stood at 36,666, with the following ethnic breakdown: 27,572 Bosniaks; 8,315 Serbs; 38 Croats; 380 Yugoslavs; and 361 others. Population estimates today assume that approximately 4,000 Bosniaks and 6,000 Serbs reside in the municipality. At the same time, preliminary results of the 2004-2005 displaced persons (DP) registration show that 1,308 DPs (391 families) remain in Srebrenica today. The municipal return commission In December 2002, the Srebrenica Municipal Assembly established the Srebrenica Return Commission. It has five voting members who are municipal councillors and it is ethnically balanced and politically mixed. The Commission

3 also has two professional staff and maintains an Office in the municipality, accessible to the public on a daily basis. The Commission has three tasks: first, to register and collect data on families interested in returning or leaving the municipality; second, to assist with project beneficiary selection (making field assessments) with NGOs and donors; and third, to draft and forward project proposals. mediator between the local authorities and the population. AWO, a German NGO, recently opened a "House of Trust" in Srebrenica, which will provide a public kitchen, psychosocial support, legal aid and medical assistance. THE PROPERTY LAW IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Property Law Implementation Plan (PLIP) allowed all property owners and occupancy rights holders to repossess their pre-war property. PLIP was completed in February 2004 after 1,688 families repossessed their former homes. However, approximately 500 families who vacated property remain in government funded alternative accommodation within the municipality. These families could benefit from reconstruction assistance under a new Council of Europe Development Bank loan project, the implementation of which will commence in the latter half of 2005. RECONSTRUCTION Memorial plaque at Potocari Memorial Centre, Srebrenica Legal Aid, information and psychosocial support The Legal Aid Network Vasa prava ( Your Rights ) a UNHCR-supported national NGO operating throughout BiH has an office in Srebrenica, staffed with two lawyers and one information officer. A Centre for Local Development, funded by the European Commission (EC), also operates in Srebrenica. It supports returnee re-integration and acts as a Houses Approximately 6,600 houses were destroyed during and just after the war. Some 1,530 will have been reconstructed by the end of 2005. The primary international donors in Srebrenica have been the governments of the Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and U.S.A.. There are also a number of private donors providing housing assistance. These donors have made substantial contributions, primarily assisting those returnees that are able to rebuild their homes under a self-help policy. There are more than 2,600 families currently registered who are still awaiting housing and income generating assistance.

4 UNHCR invested some $680,000 in Srebrenica since 1996, which focused on reconstruction of homes, income generation activities and the provision of legal aid to all who need it, implemented by several NGOs. UNDP has been working in Srebrenica since 2002 to revitalise the municipality and surrounding villages. Their core task is in five areas: Economic Development, Local Government, Civil Society, Gender Mainstreaming and Infrastructure. The overall goal of the Srebrenica regional recovery Programme (SRRP) is to promote the socio-economic recovery while strengthening local government structures. The lack of economic opportunities, the high rate of unemployment, lack of modern technology, the loss of traditional markets linkages from before the war, coupled with the fact that qualified and skilled labour has fled, are mjor obstacles to getting the economy restarted. UNDP included housing assistance as part of their Srebrenica Regional Recovery Programme (SRRP) for the first time in 2005, as there remains a substantial reconstruction funding gap. The SRRP has committed $12.3 million and expects to have spent $11 million by the end of 2005 in the wider Srebrenica region. In 2004 the RS authorities, contributed KM 1,565,000, and the FBiH Government contributed KM 750,000 to the SRRP. In 2005, KM 612,000 for reconstruction of 34 housing units will be provided by the Return Fund established under the aegis of the State Commission on Refugees and Displaced Persons (SCRDP). Reconstruction funds are still required throughout Srebrenica Infrastructure Some of Srebrenica s villages are as far as 45 kilometers from the town by dirt roads, often inaccessible during the winter months. Returnees emphasize that return cannot be sustainable unless the pre-war infrastructure is re-established (e.g. regular bus lines to connect them with Srebrenica), since public services for residents in rural areas is almost nonexistent. In the past, USAID funded renovations of the electrical grid throughout Srebrenica. Despite a considerable monthly cash inflow, the electricity company does not budget funds to add new locations to the grid, however. This affects many return locations. The municipal water system was repaired with funding from the United Kingdom. The repair and on-going maintenance of primary roads is assisted by a World Bank loan. UNDP is providing assistance to reconstruct and repair eight rural feeder roads. These projects are co-financed with the municipality. However, a great deal of additional infrastructural support will be required to facilitate returns.

5 ACCESS TO PUBLIC SERVICES Education Primary and Secondary education is available in Srebrenica town. Several primary schools were repaired in returnee areas, but they only provide education up to the fourth grade, forcing older children to travel to the town to finish compulsory primary education. In some returnee areas there are no schools, in which case children, as young as six years of age, attend boarding schools in Sarajevo and visit their parents only during school holidays. New identification Documents Many returnees do not register as Srebrenica residents, thereby retaining benefits they enjoy in their former places of displacement in the FBiH (payments for families of missing persons, access to health care, social/pension benefits, priority in the fields of education, employment and housing, etc.). Health care Health services provided by the Dom Zdravlja are available to all, with a doctor from Tuzla visiting every 15 days. Utilities In recent years, the Srebrenica Legal Aid Centre of Vasa prava has received a decreasing number of complaints regarding telephone and water connections. UNHCR has met on numerous occasions with officials from the electric company at the regional and municipal level to ensure that services are provided on a fair and equal basis. Massive electrical infrastructure development is needed. war, this is now largely defunct despite the presence of valuable natural resources. Minority returnees complain that no minorities have been hired in the businesses that do exist, with the exception of the newly created Government of Sweden/Sida-funded food processing plant near the Potocari Memorial. Regional Economic Development authorities believe business potential exists in the following three sectors: a) Agro-business; b) Wood processing; and c) Tourism. Each would require substantial infrastructural investment in the future. The most viable option to achieve economic sustainability for rural returnees is agro-business. Local farm associations and co-operatives are attempting to secure European Union issued organic certifications for export of organic products. Ukrainian investors began rehabilitation and development of the Sase mine in 2004. However, no returnees work in the underutilized mine. The Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA) has initiated a project in Skelani in 2005. (ends) ECONOMIC SITUATION The very poor economic situation in Srebrenica is a primary obstacle to further returns. While Srebrenica had significant industrial activity before the