Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 192 Filed 03/09/2006 Page 1 of 8

Similar documents
Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 08/26/2005 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:04-cv PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 1 of 15

Case3:10-cv JSW Document47-2 Filed07/06/12 Page2 of 58

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/19/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 9:97-cv HC Document Filed 03/02/2005 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case PJW Doc 716 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case ast Doc 263 Filed 10/14/14 Entered 10/14/14 15:36:10. (Jointly Administered)

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

Case3:13-cv JSW Document88 Filed03/10/14 Page1 of 4

Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:15-cv WHO Document 42 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case4:94-cv CW Document2535 Filed06/29/15 Page1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EAST ST. LOUIS DIVISION

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO

mg Doc 5954 Filed 11/26/13 Entered 11/26/13 14:41:13 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtors.

Case 4:16-cv CW Document 75-4 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case3:07-cv SI Document102 Filed08/04/09 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

US District Court for the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case Filed 11/29/12 Doc 626

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

Case5:10-cv RMW Document207 Filed03/11/14 Page1 of 7

CONSENT TO JOIN ACTION (FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, 29 U.S.C. 216(b))

Case BLS Doc 2398 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

[FORM OF FINAL DISMISSAL ORDER] UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case dml11 Doc 6977 Filed 03/13/12 Entered 03/13/12 15:13:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Case KG Doc 776 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case abl Doc 164 Entered 05/02/14 12:43:53 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

2:08-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 08/29/2008 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 8

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv SI Document 39 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 5

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 1:10-CV ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

mg Doc 5847 Filed 11/18/13 Entered 11/18/13 19:33:43 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. SENIOR CARE CENTERS, LLC, et al. Case No.

I will continue to provide updates to creditors as relevant matters arise.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

Case5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Cause No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case Document 1075 Filed in TXSB on 12/20/16 Page 1 of 3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

Case5:10-cv JW Document72 Filed03/11/11 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 4:10-cv YGR Document Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 2:14-bk Doc 129 Filed 02/14/14 Entered 02/14/14 15:44:27 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

Case 2:13-bk NB Doc 26 Filed 02/15/13 Entered 02/15/13 10:13:59 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

Case 3:08-cv CRB Document 1 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:10-cv JF Document107 Filed01/12/12 Page1 of 7

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 NANCY L. ABELL (SB# ) nancyabell@paulhastings.com ELENA R. BACA (SB# 0) elenabaca@paulhastings.com HEATHER A. MORGAN (SB# ) heathermorgan@paulhastings.com JOSEPH W. DENG (SB# 0) josephdeng@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 00- Telephone: () -000 Facsimile: () -00 Attorneys for Defendant CINTAS CORPORATION Plaintiffs Counsel Listed on Next Page UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 ROBERT RAMIREZ, ROBERT HARRIS, LUIS POCASANGRE CARDOZA, JOSE SALCEDO, A. SHAPPELLE THOMPSON, CORETTA SILVERS (formerly VICK), SANDRA EVANS, BLANCA NELLY AVALOS, JAMES MORGAN and ANTHONY JONES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Case No. C0-0-JSW Plaintiffs, CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff/Intervenor. CASE NO. C0-0-JSW [RELATED TO CASE NO. C0-0-JSW] CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 MORRIS J. BALLER (SB# 0) ROBERTA L. STEELE (SB# ) NINA RABIN (SB# 0) GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER, BORGEN & DARDARIAN 00 Lakeside Dr., Suite 000 Oakland, CA Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - PAUL STRAUSS (SB# ) ROBERT S. LIBMAN (SB# ) NANCY MALDONADO MINER, BARNHILL & GALLAND W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 00 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ROBERT RAMIREZ, et al. 0 Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 RECITALS WHEREAS, on August, 00, Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza ( Cardoza ) filed his Fourth Amended Complaint ( FAC ) asserting claims on behalf of himself and as a putative class representative for certain present and former employees of Defendant Cintas Corporation ( Cintas ); WHEREAS, in the FAC, Cardoza individually asserted claims under the Civil Rights Act of, U.S.C., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of ( Section ), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of, U.S.C. 000e, et seq., as amended ( Title VII ), California Fair Employment and Housing Act, California Government Code 0, et seq. ( FEHA ), and Business and Professions Code 00, et seq. ( Section 00 ), specifically contending that Cintas refused to hire and then promote him to a driver ( Sales Service Representative or SSR ) position because of his race (Hispanic) and national origin (El Salvador) (FAC ), and that he resigned on or about August, 00 as a result of that discrimination; WHEREAS, in the FAC, Cardoza sought to assert claims as a class representative for Hispanics who allegedly were discriminated against by Cintas s decisions not to hire or promote them to the SSR position in Cintas Rental Division in violation of Section, Title VII, FEHA and Section 00 (FAC -0, (c), (b)); WHEREAS, Cardoza does not have standing to assert any of the claims he has alleged in his FAC because: Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Case No. C0-0-JSW () Cardoza filed a Voluntary Petition for relief under Chapter of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 0-, on May, 00; () In his Voluntary Petition Cardoza represented to the Court that he had no suits and administrative proceedings, executions, garnishments and attachments ; and () The Bankruptcy Court issued a Discharge of Debtor and Final Decree on August, 00, based on Cardoza s representations. WHEREAS, Cardoza intends to dismiss both his individual and class claims and therefore cannot serve as a class representative for any form of relief sought on behalf of the putative class described in paragraphs (c) and (b) of the FAC; and WHEREAS, Cardoza has agreed to dismiss with prejudice his individual and class claims against Cintas in exchange for Cintas waiver of its right to recover costs against Cardoza pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (d). STIPULATION THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:. Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza ( Cardoza ) withdraws as a named, representative plaintiff and dismisses with prejudice his class claims for the putative class of Hispanic applicants and Hispanic employees in Cintas Rental Division who contend they were denied hiring or promotion to driver ( SSR ) positions in violation of Section, Title VII, FEHA and Section 00;

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. Cardoza dismisses with prejudice his individual claims for discriminatory failure to hire and failure to promote in violation of Section, Title VII, FEHA and Section 00, and for a resignation resulting from discrimination;. Plaintiffs counsel will not include any attorneys fees or costs incurred as part of maintaining Cardoza s individual claims (or the class claims Cardoza has asserted if there is no adequate class representative to represent the putative class described in paragraphs (c) and (b) of the FAC), should they later apply for an award of attorneys fees or costs in this litigation. However, if Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs counsel apply for an award of attorneys fees and costs, this stipulation will not preclude them from arguing that some portion of the time and costs spent on the class claims asserted by Cardoza should be allocated to a claim on which Plaintiffs prevailed (including a claim of discrimination in hiring for the SSR job, if Plaintiffs prevail on that claim); nothing in this stipulation will preclude Defendant from asserting any legal arguments in opposition to such an allocation; and nothing in this stipulation will preclude the Court from ruling that such an allocation should or should not be made; and. Cintas waives its right to recover costs against Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza after the dismissal of his individual and putative class claims as permitted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (d). Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 DATED: MARCH, 00 DATED: MARCH, 00 Case No. C0-0-JSW Respectfully submitted, By: /S/ MORRIS J. BALLER MORRIS J. BALLER Morris J. Baller Roberta L. Steele Nina Rabin GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER, BORGEN & DARDARIAN 00 Lakeside Drive, Suite 000 Oakland, CA Phone: (0) -00 Fax: (0) - Paul Strauss Robert S. Libman Nancy Maldonado MINER, BARNHILL & GALLAND W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 00 Phone: () -0 Fax: () -0 Counsel for Plaintiffs Robert Ramirez, et al. By:/S/ NANCY L. ABELL NANCY L. ABELL Nancy L. Abell Elena R. Baca Heather A. Morgan Joseph W. Deng PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP South Flower Street, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00- Phone: () -000 Fax: () -00 Counsel for Defendant Cintas Corporation

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Case No. C0-0-JSW ORDER BASED ON THE PARTIES STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, this Court finds that Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza may not represent the alleged class of Hispanic applicants who contend that they were discriminated against when they were not hired, and the alleged class of Hispanic employees who contend that they were discriminated against when they were not promoted, to driver ( SSR ) positions in Cintas Rental Division in violation of Section, Title VII, FEHA and Section 00 as set forth in the Fourth Amended Complaint at paragraphs -0, (c), and (b); on this basis the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza s claims on behalf of this alleged class. This Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre Cardoza s individual claims that Cintas has violated Section, Title VII, FEHA and Section 00 by allegedly refusing to hire him as an SSR and refusing promote him to an SSR position because of his race (Hispanic) and national origin (El Salvador), and by causing him to resign as a result of discrimination. The Court also finds that Plaintiffs counsel is not entitled to recover any amount in attorneys fees and costs attributable to pursuing Cardoza s individual claims herein (or the class claims Cardoza has asserted if there is no adequate class representative to represent the putative class described in paragraphs (c) and (b) of the FAC). The parties have agreed that Plaintiffs counsel will not include any attorneys fees or costs incurred as part of maintaining Cardoza s individual claims (or the class claims Cardoza has asserted if there is no adequate class representative to represent the putative class described in paragraphs (c) and (b) of the FAC), should they later apply for an award of attorneys fees or costs in this litigation. However, if Plaintiffs or

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of Plaintiffs counsel apply for an award of attorneys fees and costs, this Order will not preclude them from arguing that some portion of the time and costs spent on the class claims asserted by Cardoza should be allocated to a claim on which Plaintiffs prevailed (including a claim of discrimination in hiring for the SSR job, if Plaintiffs prevail on that claim); and nothing in this Order will preclude Defendant from asserting any legal arguments in opposition to such an allocation. 0 Cardoza. Finally, Cintas may not recover costs against Plaintiff Luis Pocasangre IT IS SO ORDERED. 0 DATED:, March 00 LEGAL_US_W #. Case No. C0-0-JSW HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge