violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cr MGC Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2018 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cr BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2017 Page 1 of 7

Section 1B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines.

The Office of the United States A torney for the Southern District of Florida (hereinafter

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 112 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

States Department of Justice, Cdminal Division, Fraud Section (colectively, <ethis Office'l and

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

Case 0:17-cr BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:12-cr DMM Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2012 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:12-cr JES-UAM Document 41 Filed 07/01/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID 110

GUILTY PLEA and PLEA AGREEMENT8Y:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Judges PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr MHC Document 5 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cr HEH Document 11 Filed 07/19/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

involved in the transaction, full restitution, a special

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

United States v. Biocompatibles, Inc. Criminal Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

5 CRWIINAL NO. H

FILED DEC Q--IL. DecemberJ, 2008

Case 2:13-cr CLS-HGD Document 6 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 18 AMENDED PLEA AGREEMENT. The Government and defendant, RUTH GAYLE CUNNINGHAM hereby

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ) v. ) No CR-W-FJG. Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. ) No. 3:17-cr TMB ) ) ) ) ) PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 2:12-cr AWA-TEM Document 51 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THI

Case 3:16-cr BR Document 588 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

3.1 ARTICLE AMENDMENT

Case 2:14-cr JLL Document 10 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 62

Case 2:15-cr JLL Document 5 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 27. U.S. Department of Justice. United Slates Attorney District ofpieu Jersey

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. No. CR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT ON FILM CO- PRODUCTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLI C OF SOUTH AFRI CA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE I TALI AN REPUBLI C

Case 1:18-cr LM Document 2 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTWCT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PLEA AGREEMENT

Re: United States v. Alfonso Portillo, 09 Cr (RPP)

NON- PRECEDENTI AL DECI SI ON - SEE SUPERI OR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 676 WDA 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SOUTHEIWDISTQIGT 17 - F 0 FLORIDA or 2R-sc0u

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

8:15-cr JFB-FG3 Doc # 7 Filed: 04/10/15 Page 1 of 7 - Page ID # 19

Case 2:15-cr KM Document 154 Filed 11/20/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 996

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

United States Attorney District of Connecticut. February 20, 2015

United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case &:11 cr JMM Document 257 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 12. INTHEUNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT FILED s EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 3:06-cr AWT Document 4 Filed 11/22/06 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT.,Esq.

Case 1:16-cr FAM Document 98 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:18-cr RGK Document 24 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:80

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

WEsfMN ~~~f ~~C,.i'/D.~sAs

Two of the Information charges the defendant with conspiring to travel in foreign

Case 3:15-cr RNC Document 6 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 9. U.S. Department of Judtite. United States Attorn 5 i,ì,iíì I I

Case 1:15-cr RJD Document 8 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 39. WHEREAS, on or about November 21, 2015, SERGIO JADUE (the "defendant"),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

CR-MAR MATTHEW MAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Case: 5:16-cr KKC-REW Doc #: 65 Filed: 10/20/17 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 342

Case 1:15-cr KAM Document Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 15856

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

3:09-cr MJP Date Filed 04/15/09 Entry Number 5 Page 1 of 5

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AMUSEMENT RIDE SAFETY OFFICIALS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 - NAME

CR-COHN/SELTZER

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

AT SEA TILE. The United States of America, by and through John McKay, United States Attorney 16

NON- PRECEDENTI AL DECI SI ON - SEE SUPERI OR COURT I.O.P Appellees No. 545 WDA 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Eastern Division

Case 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.

does not accept this plea agreement, then either the defendant or the government will have the right

FlLED RECEIVED. Case 2:09-cr ROS Document 152 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 8 ~LODGED COPY NOV Ct.ERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTR CT OF A.

Case 6:10-cr WEB Document 52 Filed 01/27/11 Page 1 of 12

United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

LIMITED OFFICIAL USE

Case 8:09-cr CJC Document 54 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:143

UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT EASTERN DI STRI CT OF MI SSOURI EASTERN DI VI SI ON

L iechtenstein L aw G azette (L iechtensteinisches L andesgesetzblatt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

Case 1:17-cr PKC Document 5 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: CR 313 (PKC)

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLOD A Case No. 1GCR-20549-SCOLA/OTAZO-REYES (s)(s)(s) UNITED STATES OF AG RICA VS. ODETTE BARCHA, Defendant. / PLEA AGREEG NT The Urlited States of Am erica, by and through the Fraud Section of the Crim inal Division of the D epartm ent of Justice, and the United States A ttom ey's Office for the Southem D istrict of Florida (hereinaher referred to as the çurtited States'), and Odette Barcha (hereinafter referred to as the trefendanf'), enter into the folowing agreement: The defendant agrees to plead guilty to Count 6 of the Third Superseding Indictment (the tçlndictmenf'). The Indictment charges the Defendant with conspiring to: (a) violate the Anti-kickback Statute, Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320a-7b(b), w lich makes it a Federal ofrense for anyone to knowingly and w illfully, solicit, receive, offer, and pay remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate) directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind in retum for refening an individual to a person for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing of any item or service for which paym ent m ay be m ade in whole or in part by M edicare or M edicaid, Federal health care prov am s as defm ed in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2409; and ('b) defraud the United States by impairing, impeding, obstmcting, and defeating

through deceitful and dishonest m eans, the law ful govem m ent functions of the Urlited States Departm ent of Health and H um an Services in its adm inistration and oversight of the M edicare prop am. n e U nited States agrees to dism iss Counts 1, 14 through 16, 22, 23, and 36, of the lndice ent as to this Defendant after sentencing. The Defendant is aware that the sentence wil be imposed by the Court. The Defendant understands and av ees that federal sentencing law requires the Court to im pose a sentence that is reasonable and that the Court m ust consider the U nited States Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (hereinafter the tçsentencing Guidelines') in determining that reasonable sentence. The Defendant acknowledges and understands that the Court w il com pute an advisory sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines and that the applicable guidelines wil be determ ined by the Court relying in part on the results of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Oftice (çtprobation'), which investigation will commence after the guilty plea has been entered. n e Defendant is also aw are that, tm der certain circum stances, the Court m ay depart from the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range that it has com puted, and m ay raise or low er that advisory sentence tmder the Sentencing Guidelines. The Defendant is further aw are and understands that while the Court is required to consider the advisory guideline range determ ined under the Sentencing Guidelines, it is not bound to im pose that sentence. Defendant understands that the facts that determ ine the ofrense level w ill be fotm d by the Court at the tim e of sentencing and that in m nking those determ inations the Court m ay consider any reliable evidence, including hearsay, as w ell as the provisions or stipulations in tm s Plea Agreem ent. The United States and the Defendant agree to recom m end that the Sentencing G uidelines should apply pursuant to United States v. Booker, that the Sentencing Guidelines provide a fair and just resolution based on the 2

facts of this case, and that, except as otherwise expressly contem plated in tllis Plea Av eem ent, no upward or downw ard departures are appropriate. The Court is perm itted to tailor the ultim ate sentence in light of other statutory concem s, and such sentence m ay be either m ore severe or less severe than the Sentencing Guidelines' advisory sentence. Know ing these facts, the D efendant undersunds and acknow ledges that the Court has the authority to im pose any sentence w ithin and up to the statutory m axim um authorized by law for the offenses identified in parav aph 1 and that the Defendant m ay not w ithdraw the plea solely as a result of the sentence im posed. n e D efendant also tm derstands and acknow ledges that as to the offense charged in Count 6 of the Indictm ent, the Court m ay im pose a statutory m axim um term of im prisonm ent of up to five (5) years.in addition to any period of imprisonment, the Court may also impose a period of supervised release of up to three (3) years to commence at the conclusion of the period of im prisonm ent. In addition to a term of im prisonm ent and supervised release, the Court m ay impose a fine of up to the Feater of $250,000, ptlrsuant to 18 U.S.C. j 3571(a)(3), or twice the peclmiary gain from the ofrense, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. j 3571(d). 4. The D efendant further understands and acknow ledges that, in addition to any sentence im posed under parap aph 3 of tltis Av eem ent, a special assessm ent in the total am otm t of $100.00 wil be imposed on the Defendant. The Defendant av ees that any special assessment im posed shall be paid at the tim e of sentencing. The Defendant tmderstands and acknow ledges that as a result of this plea, the D efendant will be excluded as a provider from M edicare, M edicaid, and a1l federal health care progrmns. Defendant agrees to com plete and execute al1 necessary docvlm ents provided by any departm ent or agency of the federal governm ent, including but not lim ited to the U nited States

Departm ent of Health and Hum an Services, to e fecm ate tlis exclusion within 60 days of receiving the docnm ents. Tltis exclusion will not affect D efendant's right to apply for and receive benefits as a beneficiary under any federal health care program, including M edicare and M edicaid. The Defendant recognizes that pleading guilty m ay have consequences with respect to the Defendant's im m iv ation status if the Defendant is not a natural-born citizen of the United States. Under federal law, a broad range of crim es are rem ovable offenses, including the crim e to which the Defendant is pleading guilty.ln addition, under certain circum stances, denaturalization m ay also be a consequence of pleading guilty to a crim e. Rem oval, denaturalization, and other immipation consequences are the subject of a separate proceeding, however, and Defendant understands that no one, including the Defendant's attorney or the Court, can predict to a certainty the effect of the Defendant's conviction on the Defendant's im m iv ation status. The D efendant nevertheless affirm s that the D efendant chooses to plead guilty regardless of any im m igration consequences that the D efendant's plea m ay entail, even if the consequence is the D efendant's denaturalization and autom atic rem oval from the U nited States. The D efendant shall provide the Probation O ffice and counsel for the United States with a 1 1, com plete and acclzrate personal financial statem ent. lf the D efendant provides incom plete or untruthful statem ents in her personal financial statem ent, this action shall be deem ed a m aterial breach of tm s Agreem ent and the United States shall be 9ee to pursue all appropriate charges against her notwithstanding any agreem ents to forbear from bringing additional charges otherwise set forth in this A greem ent. 8. Provided that the Defendant com m its no new crim inal offenses and provided that she continues to dem onstrate an affirm ative recor ition and affirm ative acceptance of personal 4

responsibility for her criminal conduct, the United States agrees that it wil recommend at sentencing that the Defendant receive a three-level rezuction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to Section 3E1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines, based upon the Defendant's recognition and affirm ative and tim ely acceptance of personal responsibility. The U nited States, however, w il not be required to make this sentencing recommendation if the Defendant: (1) fails or refuses to make a 111, accurate and complete disclosme to the United States and Probation of the circumstances surrotmding the relevant ofrense conduct and her present financial condition; (2) is found to have m isrepresented facts to the United States prior to entering this Plea A p eem ent; or (3) commits any misconduct after entering tnto tlis Plea Aveement, including but not limited to com m itting a state or federal offense, violating any term of release, or m aking false statem ents or m isrepresentations to any governm ental entity or official. 9. The United States reserves the right to inform the Court and Probation of a1l facts pertinent to the sentencing process, including all relevant inform ation concenling the offenses com m itted, whether charged or not, as w ell as concerning the Defendant and the D efendant's background. Subject only to the express terms of any apeed-upon sentencing recommendations contained in tllis Plea Agreement, the United States further reserves the right to make any recom m endation as to the quality and quantity of p lnishm ent. The Urlited States reserves the right to m ake the Defendant's cooperation, or lack thereof, known to the Court at the tim e of sentencing. The Defendant adm its and acknow ledges that the following facts are true and that the United States could prove them at tlial beyond a reasonable doubt: (a) That the Defendant participated in the conspiracy to defraud the United States and 5

pay and receive health care kickbacks, as charged in Cotmt 6 of the Indictm ent; (b) That the Defendant's participation in the conspiracy to defraud the United States and pay and receive health care kickbacks as charged in Count 6 of the Indice ent resulted in an actual or intended loss to the M edicare and M edicaid Propxm s of $2,982,980; and (c) That the Defendant wilfuly obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration ofjustice respect to the investigation or prosecution of her participation in the conspiracy to defraud the United States and pay and receive kickbacks as charged in Count 6, and the Defendant's conduct related to the Defendant's offense of conviction and any related conduct and/or closely related offenses. 12. Based on the foregoing, the United States and the Defendant agree that, although not binding on Probation or the Court, they wil jointly recommend the advisory sentencing guideline range produced by application of the Sentencing Guidelines, but that the D efendant m ay argue for a three m onth variance from the low end of the agreed upon guideline range based on the D efendant's physical condition. Although not binding on Probation or the Courq the United States and the Defendant further agree that, except as otherwise expressly contem plated in this Plea Aveement, they wil jointly recommend that the Court neither depart upward nor depart downw ard under the Sentencing Guidelines when determ ii ng the advisory Sentencing Guideline range in this case. Further, the U nited States and the Defendant agree, although not binding on Probation or the Court, that there are no factors or circum stances wllich w ould support or otherwise suggest the propriety of the Court's finding of any variance tm der Title 18, United States Code, 6

Section 3553(a), aside from the Defendant's physical condition. The parties agree that, at the time of sentencing, the U nited States w ill recom m end a sentence at the low end of the Sentencing Guidelines. The United States and the Defendant agree that, although not binding on Probation or the Courq they wil jointly recommend that the Court make the following findings and conclusions as to the sentence to be im posed: (a) Base Oflknse Level: n at the base ofrense level is eight (8), pursuant to Section 2B4.1(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines; (b) Loss: That the defendant's offense level shal be increased by sixteen (16) levels pursuant to Sections 2B4.1(b)(1)(B) and 2B1.1(b)(1)(l) because the value of the improper benefit to be conferred (and/or actual or intended loss) related to the scheme was $2,982,980. This figure reflects the fraudulent billings for health care item s and services, known as of the date of tm s A p eem ent, that were subm itted to the M edicare and M edicaid prov am s as a result of the Defendant's conduct; and (c) Obstmction of Justice: That the Defendant's offense level shal be increased by two (2) levels pursuant to Section 3C1.1 because the Defendant wilfuly obstructed or impeded, or atempted to obstruct or impede the administration of justice with respect to the hw estigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant ofrense of conviction, and the Defendant's conduct related to the D efendant's offense of conviction and any related conduct and/or closely related offenses. TOTAL OFFENSE LEVEL - UNADJUSTED M (9 Acceptance of Responsibilitv: That the Defendant's offense level shal be 7

decreased by three (3) levels ptlrsuant to U.S.S.G. jj 3E1.1(a) and 3El.11) because the D efendant has dem onstrated acceptance of responsibility for her offense and assisted autholities in the investigation of and prosecution of her own m isconduct by tim ely notifying authorities of her intention to enter a plea of guilty. TOTAL OFFENSE LEVEL - ADJUSTED D 14. The Defendant acknowledges and understands that additional or different enhancem ents or provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines m ight be applicable, and that neither the Court nor Probation are bound by the parties' joint recommendations. 15. The D efendant av ees to forfeit to the United States, voluntarily and im m ediately, a l right, title and interest in al1 property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, 9om gross proceeds laceable to the offense of conviction. To the extent that such property is no longer available or has been otherwise dissipated, the D efendant agrees that the prerequisites of Title 21, United States Code, Section 8531) have been fuly satisfied, and the U nited States m ay seek the forfeiture of substimte property. The Defendant specifically av ees to the entry of a forfeiture order for a forfeiture money judo ent equal in value to the total gross proceeds traceable to the offense of conviction. 16. The D efendant know ingly and voluntarily agrees to w aive her right to a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2, to determine the nmotmt of the forfeiture moneyjudm ent. The Defendant agrees that she shall not, in any m nnner, act in opposition to the United States in seeking entry and ful satisfaction of the forfeiture money judpnent and the forfeiture of the specifk property identified above. 8

'I'he Defendant knowingly and voluntarily av ees to w aive the following rights with respect to the entry of forfeiture orders against her: (a) A1l constimtional, legal, and equitable defenses to such forfeiture; (b) Any constitutional or statutory double jeopardy defense or claim regarding such forfeiture; (c) Any statute of limitations claim or defense to such forfeimre; (d) Any claim or defense to such forfeiture brought or raised under the Eight Am endm ent to the United States Constitution, including, but not lim ited to, any claim or defense of excessive fm e; and (e) Any right he may have to an appeal of any resulting order of forfeiture. 18. The D efendant also agrees to assist the United States in all proceedings, adminiskative or judicial, involving forfeiture to the United States of any property, including substitute property, regardless of its nature or form, real or personal, which the D efendant or others known to the D efendant, have accumulated as a result of illegal activities. n e assistance shall include: identification of any property subject to forfeiture, aveement to the entry of an order enjoining the transfer or encumbrance of such property, and the transfer of such property to the U nited States by delivery to this office upon this om ce's request of any necessary and appropriate domlm entation, including consents to forfeiture and quit claim deeds, to deliver good and marketable title to such property. In furtherance of the colection of the forfeiture moneyjud> ent and/or a restitution judm ent, the Defendant agrees to the folowing: (a) The Defendant avees to make ful and accurate disclosure of her financial affairs to the United States A ttorney's Office and U.S. Probation O ffice. Specitk ally, the 9

D efendant agrees that 10 calendar days before the hearing on tlis Plea Agreem ent, the Defendant shall submit a completed Financial Disclosure Statement (form provided by the United States), and shal fuly disclose and identify al1 assets in w hich she has any interest and/or over which the D efendant exercises control, directly or indirectly, including those held by a spouse, nom inee, or other third party. The Defendant agrees to provide, in a tim ely m anner, all financial inform ation requested by the Urlited States Attom ey's O ffice and U.S. Probation O flice, and upon request, to m eet in person to identify assets/m orlies which can be used to satisfy the forfeiture money judgment and/or the restitution jud> ent. ln addition, the Defendant expressly authorizes the United States Attorney's O m ce to obtain a credit report. (b) The Defendant avees that she wil not sell, Mde, waste, encumber, destroy, or otherwise devalue any asset until the forfeiture moneyjudgment and her restitution judpnent are paid in ful without prior approval of the Govemment. 'I'he Defendant shal also identify any transfer of assets valued in excess of $5,000 since the date of the Indictm ent filed or w hen she becam e aware of the crim inal hw estigation, including the identity of the asset, the value of the asset, the identity of the third party to whom the asset w as transferred, and the current location of the asset. (c) The Defendant avees to cooperate fuly in the investigation and the identification of assets to be applied toward forfeiture and/or restitution. The Defendant agrees that providing false or incom plete inform ation about her financial assets, or hiding, selling, transferring or devaluing assets and/or failing to cooperate fully in the 10

investigation and identitkation of assets may be used as a basis for: (i) separate prosecution, including, under 18 U.S.C. j 1001,. or (i) recommendation of a denial of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines j 3E 1. 1. (d) The Defendant further avees to liquidate assets, or complete any other tasks w lich wil result in immediate payment of the forfeiture money judpnent and/or the restitution judgment in 1 1, or ful payment in the shortest amount of time, as requested by the Govem m ent. (e) The Defendant shall notify, within 30 days, the Clerk of the Court and the United States Attomey's Om ce of: (i) any change of name, residence, or mailing address, and (i) any material change in economic circumstances that affects the ability to pay the forfeiture. 19. The Defendant is aw are that the sentence has not yet been determ ined by the Court. The Defendant is also aware that any estim ate of the probable sentencing range or sentence that the Defendant m ay receive, whether that estim ate com es 9om the Defendant's a tom ey, the United States, or Probation, is a prediction, not a prom ise, and is not binding on the U nited States, Probation or the Court. The D efendant understands further that any recom m endation that the U nited States m akes to the Court as to sentencing, whether plzrsuant to this ytgreenxent or otherwise, is not binding on the Court and the Court m ay disregard the recomm endation in its entirety. The Defendant understands and acknow ledges, as previously acknow ledged in paragraph 2 above, that the Defendant m ay not withdraw her plea based upon the Court's decision not to accept a sentencing recommendation made by the Defendant, the United States, or a 11

recommendation madejointly by both the Defendant and the Urlited States. 20. The Defendant is aw are that Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 affords her the light to appeal the sentence im posed in this case. A cknow ledging this, in exchange for the undertakings m ade by the United States in this Plea A greem ent, the D efendant hereby waives al1 rights conferred by Section 3742 to appeal any sentence im posed, including any forfeiture or restitution ordered, or to appeal the m nnner in which the sentence was im posed, lnless the sentence exceeds the m axim um perm itted by stam te or is the result of an upward departure and/or a variance from the Sentencing Guidelines range that the Court establishes at sentencing. In addition to the foregoing provisions, the Defendant hereby w aives al1 rights to argue on appeal that the statute to which the D efendant is pleading guilty is unconstitutional and that the adm itted conduct does not fall w itllin the scope of the statute. The Defendant further understands that nothing in this Agreem ent shall affect the right of the U nited States and/or its duty to appeal as set forth in Title 18, Urlited States Code, Section 3742(19.However, if the United States appeals the Defendant's sentence pursuant to Section 3742(19, the Defendant shal be released from the above waiver of appellate rights. By signing tltis A greem ent, the Defendant acknow ledges that he has discussed the appeal waiver set forth in this A p eem ent with her attorney. The Defendant further agrees, together w ith the Urlited States, to request that the Court enter a specific finding that the Defendant's waiver of her light to appeal the sentence to be im posed in this case was know ing and voluntary. For pum oses of crim inal prosecution, tllis Plea A greem ent shall be binding and enforceable upon the Fraud Section of the Crim inal Division of the United States Departm ent of Justice and the U nited States A ttorney's O ffice for the Southem D istrict of Florida. The United 12

States does not release D efendant from any claim s under Title 26, U nited States Code. Further, tllis Agreem ent in no way lim its, binds, or otherwise affects the rights, powers or duties of any state or local law enforcem ent agency or any adm inistrative or regulatory authority. 22. Defendant ap ees that if she fails to com ply with any of the provisions of this A greem ent, including the failure to tender such Agreem ent to the Court, m akes false or m isleading statem ents before the Court or to any agents of the U nited States, com m its any further crim es, or attempts to withdraw the plea (prior to or after pleading guilty to the charges identified in paravaph one (1) above), the Government wil have the right to characterize such conduct as a breach of this Agreement. ln the event of such a breach: (a) the Government will be free from its obligations tm der the Agreem ent and further m ay take whatever position it believes appropriate as to the sentence and the conditions of the Defendant's release (for exnmple, should the Defendant commit any conduct after the date of this Aveement that would form the basis for an increase in the Defendant's ofense level orjustify an upward departure - examples of which include but are not limited to, obstruction of justice, failure to appear for a court proceeding, criminal conduct w lile pending sentencing, and false statem ents to law enforcem ent agents, the Probation O m cer, or Court - the G overnm ent is free under this A greem ent to seek an increase in the offense level based on that post-agreement conduct); (b) the Defendant wil not have the right to withdraw the guilty plea; (c) the Defendant shall be fuly subject to criminal prosecution for any other crimes which he has commited or might commit, if any, including perjury and obstmction ofjustice; and (d) the Defendant waives anyprotections afforded by Section 1B1.8(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Crim inal Procedure and Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and the Governm ent w ill be 9ee to use against the Defendant, directly and indirectly, in any crim inal 13

or civil proceeding any of the inform ation, statem ents, and m aterials provided by him pm suant to tlis Agreem ent, including offering into evidence or otherwise using the attached A v eed Facm al Basis for Guilty Plea. This is the entire Agreem ent and understanding between the United States and the D efendant. 'rhere are no other agreem ents, prom ises, representations or tm derstandings. ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN UNITED STATES AU ORNEY ROBERT ZINK ACTING CHWF U.S. DEPARTW NT OF JUSTICE CR INAL DIVISION, FRAUD SECTION Ilate: ;L By: ALLAN. A JAX S HAYES ELIZABETH YOUNG U.S. DEPARTW NT OF JUSTICE CRN INA L DIVISION, FRAUD SECTION Date: t %> tq B y:ode E BARC A DEFEND /. oate, 1 t.z-z l l q- :. - S J. ln, ES. SEL FOR ODETTE BARCHA A.'Y. >.<' g ' 14