Madam Chairperson, Distinguished participants,

Similar documents
Statement on Russia s on-going aggression against Ukraine and illegal occupation of Crimea

PC.DEL/385/19 5 April ENGLISH only

Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 759-th FSC Plenary Meeting (2 July 2014 at 10.00, Hofburg)

TEXTS ADOPTED. European Parliament resolution of 12 May 2016 on the Crimean Tatars (2016/2692(RSP))

BRIEFING NOTE TO MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: TWO YEARS OF RUSSIA S WAR AGAINST UKRAINE

TEXTS ADOPTED. Human rights situation in Crimea, in particular of the Crimean Tatars

Statement by H.E. Mr. Petro Poroshenko, President of Ukraine, during the General Debate. of the 72nd session of the United Nations General Assembly

epp european people s party

It is my utmost pleasure to welcome you all to the first session of Model United Nations Conference of Besiktas Anatolian High School.

Statement by. President of the Republic of Latvia

It is a great privilege for me to speak here before you today for several reasons.

Address by the President of the Republic of Estonia Toomas Hendrik Ilves at the General Debate of the 69th United Nations General Assembly

INTERNATIONAL INTERIM ADMINISTRATION AS A MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN DONBAS

EU-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE Seventh Meeting April 2018 Strasbourg

EU-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE Sixth Meeting

Is This the Right Time for NATO to Resume Dialogue with Russia?

From the demarcation line to a «demilitarized neutral territory» in Donbas

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT TEXTS ADOPTED. European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2015 on the situation in Ukraine (2014/2965(RSP))

OSCE Permanent Council No Vienna, 30 August 2018

well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine owne were;

General Assembly Security Council

1173rd PLENARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL

Draft Position Paper. On the situation in Ukraine tabled by the EGP Committee. 1. The Current Situation. 2. The Immediate Consequences

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2158(INI) on the state of EU-Russia political relations (2018/2158(INI))

Position Paper. On the situation in Ukraine. 1. The Current Situation

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

2017 ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW CONFERENCE

Conclusions on children and armed conflict in Somalia

Letter dated 8 March 2012 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council

Humanitarian consequences of the war in Ukraine

JOINT DECLARATION. 1. With regard to the implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, the CSP members:

WHY THE CONFLICT IN UKRAINE IS A REAL WAR, AND HOW IT RELATES TO INTERNATIONAL LAW.

The 'Hybrid War in Ukraine': Sampling of a 'Frontline State's Future? Discussant. Derek Fraser

Ukraine. In April, a paramedic with the OSCE s SMM was killed when the car he was riding in blew up on a landmine in eastern Ukraine.

Western Responses to the Ukraine Crisis: Policy Options

Conflict in Ukraine. the basis of joining Russia or staying as a separate state. The two opposing sides have been in a

PERSONAL INTRODUCTION

Humanitarian consequences of the war in Ukraine

France, Germany, Portugal, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

PC.DEL/754/17 8 June 2017

United States Policy on Iraqi Aggression Resolution. October 1, House Joint Resolution 658

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/63/L.48 and Add.1)]

Dear members of the Parliamentary Assembly! Mr. Chairman!

EUROPEAN UNION. 7 December EU Closing Statement

Materials of the Seminar. «The role of the OSCE and the German Chairmanship in the development. of the Ukrainian Society»

1012th PLENARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL

General Assembly, First Committee: Disarmament and International Security

Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the 758-th FSC Plenary Meeting (18 June 2014 at 10.00, Hofburg)

Democracy, Sovereignty and Security in Europe

Topic A: Improving Security for Peacekeeping Personnel

Peace Building Commission

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/61/L.45 and Add.1)]

Crimea referendum our experts react

Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Q&A: breaches of international law and human rights issues

European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the situation in Syria (2012/2543(RSP)) The European Parliament,

Nataliya Nechayeva-Yuriychuk. Department of Political Science & Public Administration. Yuriy Fed kovych Chernivtsi National University

I. Summary Human Rights Watch August 2007

THEMATIC REPORT CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE CRISIS IN UKRAINE

Speech by President Barroso on the June European Council

May In Search of New Lives: Situation of Internally Displaced Persons from Crimea

Prohlášení Statement Déclaration

786th PLENARY MEETING OF THE FORUM

UK DELEGATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS IN RED (paragraphs 31, 32 and 42)

Fifth Meeting of the Ministerial Council. Chairman's Summary

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. Association Agreements / Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine

[without reference to a Main Committee (A/62/L.38 and Add.1)]

International Convention On the Elimination Of all Forms of Racial Discrimination

Sea of Flames. The Russia-Ukraine possible escalation in the Black and Azov Seas. A work by Fabio Seferi

JAPAN-RUSSIA-US TRILATERAL CONFERENCE ON THE SECURITY CHALLENGES IN NORTHEAST ASIA

81st INTER-PARLIAMENTARY MEETING TRANSATLANTIC LEGISLATORS DIALOGUE. Washington D.C., 5 December Joint Statement

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/67/L.63 and Add.1)]

CISS Analysis on. Obama s Foreign Policy: An Analysis. CISS Team

National Model United Nations New York

The Fourth Ministerial Meeting of The Group of Friends of the Syrian People Marrakech, 12 December 2012 Chairman s conclusions

UKRAINE - COMPLEX EMERGENCY

THE SITUATION IN UKRAINE AND CANADA S RESPONSE. Briefing Note to Canada s Members of Parliament

THE SITUATION IN UKRAINE AND CANADA S RESPONSE

Madam President, Repatriation

Meeting of ambassadors and permanent representatives of Ru...

Respondent's age years years 56 years and over

UKRAINE. PERSONNEL Mobile staff 62 Resident staff (daily workers not included) 175

Political Implications of Unassisted Internally Displaced Persons in Ukraine. In 1991, Ukraine declared its independence from the USSR and became an

RUSSIA, UKRAINE AND THE WEST: A NEW 9/11 FOR THE UNITED STATES

PSC/PR/COMM. (DCXCI) PEACE AND SECURITY COUNCIL 691 ST MEETING ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA 12 JUNE 2017 PSC/PR/COMM. (DCXCI) COMMUNIQUÉ

Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation by the Russian Fe

Future of Donbas Conflict Areas after Minsk Agreements-II: Range of Options

SECURITY COUNCIL Topic C: Deciding upon Measures to Stabilize the Ukrainian Territory

RUSSIA & UKRAINE: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SELF DETERMINATION. Patrick McGuiness

the General Debate of the 73'''^ Session of the United Nations General Assembly

STATEMENT BY H.E. Mr. ANDREI STRATAN MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

One year after Minsk II: consequences and progress

Colloquy Project May 13, 2016 UKRAINE CONFLICT. Made by William Ding & Daisy Zhu. Colloquy Project 1

Analysis of Joint Resolution on Iraq, by Dennis J. Kucinich Page 2 of 5

The Eastern Question: Recommendations for Western Policy

Update. Ukrainian Conflict

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 14 December Situation of human rights in South Sudan

CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY. Madam Chairperson, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Strategic Intelligence Analysis Spring Russia: Reasserting Power in Regions of the Former Soviet Union

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. [without reference to a Main Committee (A/56/L.64 and Add.1)]

Transcription:

PC.DEL/906/17 30 June 2017 ENGLISH only Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna Statement by the Delegation of Ukraine at the special session of the OSCE Annual Security Review Conference Ensuring security and stability in the OSCE region in lights of developments with respect to Ukraine (Vienna, 27 June 2017) Madam Chairperson, Distinguished participants, For the fourth consecutive year the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Annual Security Review Conference (ASRC) features a special session dedicated to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. It underlines both the critical nature of this issue for ensuring security in the entire OSCE region and the regrettable lack of progress in de-escalation and conflict resolution. A year since the last ASRC meeting and we are no closer to a settlement of the conflict, or to dealing with its root cause - Russia s aggression against Ukraine in Crimea and Donbas which has not been eliminated. Russia remains unwilling to opt for a peaceful path. Their aggressive stance has been translated into a dangerous military build-up and brutal repressions in the temporarily occupied Crimea as well as unabated and bloody hostilities in Donbas. It also results in the on-going sufferings of Ukrainian hostages in Donbas, the illegally occupied Crimea and in Russia itself. The situation in Donbas remains painful for the Ukrainian people. Everyday fighting and military aggression carried out by the Russian hybrid forces take their toll among my fellow Ukrainians, both service personnel and civilians. The latest UN figures register over 10 000 killed and over 23,000 wounded since 2014. Since the beginning of this year alone more than 120 Ukrainian servicemen (UA MoD as of 21.06.2017) and at least 47 civilians (OSCE SMM as of 17.06.2017) have been killed in Donbas. This is how far from a sustainable peace we are due to the unrelenting bloody and criminal aggression of Russia s hybrid forces.

2 These forces have been integrated into Russia s military control and command chains and are equipped and trained by Russian officers. The violence in Donbas is continuously fueled by reinforcements from the territory of Russia, including mercenaries, heavy weapons and equipment through the uncontrolled section of the Ukrainian-Russian border. It is important to note that contrary to Russian claims the situation in Donbas is something which the Kremlin can and does turn on and off like a tap. Reinforcements from Russia are immediately brought into action against the Ukrainian forces and the civilian population of Donbas. We have plenty of evidence of Russia deliberate targeting civilian infrastructure, residential areas and crossing points at the contact line. This winter the town of Avdiivka was put on the brink of a humanitarian disaster, when shelling left the town without electricity and heat at temperatures below minus 20C. All our efforts to bring about de-escalation in Donbas are immediately undermined by Russia and its proxies. They disrupted the recent ceasefire initiative, offered by Ukraine on 1 June for International Children s Day. Now we note with concern the disregard that the Russia-led armed groups demonstrated towards the agreement in the TCG framework on the harvest truce, which was due to last from 24 June until 31 August. Already on 25 June a subversive group attacked Ukrainian positions. As the attack was repelled and the members of the neutralized we established the Russian citizenship of the group leader and some other militants. Ukraine remains committed to a peaceful resolution of this conflict. We stand ready to implement the Minsk agreements in full, starting with a comprehensive and sustainable ceasefire then withdrawal of heavy weapons and then effective verification by the OSCE SMM. But not until these security provisions are implemented, will the progress on other tracks, including political, be possible. The Russian Federation has deliberately violated its commitments as a party to the Minsk agreements by a number of unilateral steps, which clearly run counter to the norms of international law and the fundamental OSCE principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of frontiers. Let me remind you that earlier this year Kremlins regime recognized the so-called documents issued by the illegal institutions in Donbas, introduced the Russian ruble as currency in occupied areas and resorted to seizure of Ukrainian companies, which operated within a Ukrainian legislative framework. The Ukrainian government had little option but to respond with temporary suspension of trade with those companies. Ukraine strongly supports the OSCE SMM in accomplishing its mandate and tasks relating to monitoring the implementation of relevant provisions of the Minsk agreements. We applaud the dedicated work of the OSCE monitors, performing their duties in the hostile environment in the uncontrolled areas of Donbas.

3 Regular provocations by the Russia-led militants, obstacles and intimidation of the monitors finally resulted in the tragic death of an OSCE monitor and the wounding or two others near the non-government controlled village of Pryshyb on 23 April. Unfortunately, this tragedy has changed nothing of Russia s strategy of blinding the SMM to conceal its illegal activities in Donbas and facilitate creeping integration of non-governmental areas into the Russian political and economic space. We deem it dangerous for the OSCE credibility that the SMM is attacked in an attempt to make it serve the purposes of Russian propaganda and to underpin its deceptions and fake news. These attempts must receive a proper response from the OSCE community. Colleagues, We must also not forget that bringing peace back to Donbas will be only a one part of resolving the Russia-made crisis. The other, just as serious, relates to the illegal occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Over the past year the situation there has further deteriorated in terms of both security and human rights. The peninsula has been turned by Russia into a military base, thus increasing the threats to the Black Sea littoral and neighboring states. And the occupying regime does not tolerate dissent it imposes its illegal rule by persecution, detention and abduction. A particular plight continues to affect Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar communities on the peninsula. This was clearly assessed in the UN GA Resolution of 19 December 2016 and the decision by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers of 3 May 2017. Both spoke about the dire human rights situation in the occupied Crimea and Sevastopol. On 19 April 2017, the International Court of Justice recognized the validity of Ukraine s claims in the submitted case Ukraine against Russia and ordered, inter alia, that the Russian Federation must, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Eradication of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, to refrain from maintaining or imposing limitations on the ability of the Crimean Tatar community to conserve its representative institutions, including the Mejlis, and to ensure the availability of education in the Ukrainian language. The Court order has not yet been implemented by Russia. The unwillingness of the Russian Federation to fulfill the resolutions, decisions and orders undermines international law. There must be continued and concerted pressure on Russia to make it stop violating international rules and norms, in particular those enshrined by the Helsinki Final Act. The ongoing campaign of the Kremlin s regime based in revanchist ambitions and aiming, in particular, at undermining the Ukrainian state and probably wishing to

4 resurrect the Soviet Union in some form at the same time, represents a dangerous policy threatening the very foundation of the European security architecture. This is a policy aimed at building new dividing lines in Europe at the eastern borders of Ukraine. On one side a part of Europe, Ukraine, that is committed to values and rules-based order and on the other side a state, sad to have to say, that shows utter contempt for the same rules and norms. No sustainable long-term security is possible in Europe without restored territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. Stability and trust will be illusive notions until Russia pulls its troops back to within its own borders. We believe that the concerted pressure of the international community on the aggressor state combined with further progress of Ukraine as a democratic European state, will best serve the interests of peace and security. The sanctions regime, introduced in response to Russia s aggression against Ukraine and flagrant violation of international law, remains an important instrument to urge Russia to respect to the rules-based order. The international community must be consistently firm and clear in its message that in today s world aggression brings penalties not rewards. At the same time, it is important to continue to seek ways to develop the necessary tools for peaceful reintegration of Donbas. Without prejudice to the Minsk agreements a basis for the peaceful resolution, the toolbox to address the conflict, both on the national and international levels, should be adjusted to the security realities on the ground. The concept of an armed police mission led by the OSCE or the UN needs to be finalized to enable deployment as soon as the security provisions of the Minsk agreements are met. And the mission needs to be ready to provide security before, during and after local elections are held in Donbas. The uncontrolled part of the state border between Ukraine and Russia remains a critical factor in why peaceful efforts have had limited effect. Without being addressed, the problem of an uncontrolled border will continue to generate more insecurity and escalation in violence. We believe it is necessary to set up a working subgroup on border issues within the Trilateral Contact Group to address the border case. In particular there is a need to halt the illegal movements of military personnel and weapons. Russia s stance towards restoring border control to the Ukrainian government and ensuring, as a first step, full transparency and OSCE verification at the border will signal whether they are serious about a peacefully resolution the conflict. Release of hostages and illegally detained persons is an urgent humanitarian priority. We want to speedy finalization of the verification process without any artificial

5 obstacles from the Russian side as a part of the Minsk agreements provision on the release on the basis of all for all principle. These are the steps, which we see as our joint priorities. We once again urge the Russian Federation to follow this path. It is, ultimately, the only way to resolve this horrific and brutal conflict and restore security and stability to this part of Europe. Thank you, Madam Chairperson.