Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 1:13-cv LJM-DML Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kirker Enterprises, Inc. Document Filed Electronically UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:16-cv BMC Document 8 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 93 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Civil Action No JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 5:09-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv LJM-DML Document 186 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 2242

Case 1:14-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv MMD-CWH Document 1 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 10/13/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PDS ELECTRONICS, INC. d/b/a DX Engineering CASE NO.: 5:09 cv 1274 1212 Southeast Avenue Tallmadge, Ohio 44278 JUDGE Plaintiff. vs. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND MFJ ENTERPRISES, INC. 300 Industrial Park Road Starkville, Mississippi 39759 Defendant. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND NOW COMES Plaintiff, PDS Electronics, Inc. d/b/a DX Engineering ( PDS, by and through undersigned counsel, and for its Complaint at law against MFJ Enterprises, Inc. ( MFJ makes the following allegations: THE PLAINTIFF 1. PDS is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business located in Tallmadge, Ohio. 2. Paul D. Sergi ( Sergi is an individual and a resident of the State of Ohio. Sergi is also Chief Executive Officer of PDS. 3. PDS is authorized to transact business in the State of Ohio, and is transacting business in this judicial district. 4. PDS is in the business of designing, manufacturing, selling, and supplying

Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 2 of 5. PageID #: 2 radio communication equipment, and parts therefor. 5. After the investment of substantial time, expense, and expertise, Sergi developed a novel radial plate for an antenna. 6. Sergi s novel radial plate for an antenna (the Radial Plate is protected under United States Patent Number 6,927,740 (the 740 Patent, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The 740 Patent was issued prior to the events giving rise to this action. 7. On or about November 8, 2005, Sergi assigned all right, title and interest in the 740 Patent to PDS. THE DEFENDANT 8. MFJ is a Mississippi corporation with its principal place of business located in Starkville, Mississippi. 9. MFJ is a manufacturer and a supplier of radio communication equipment, and is transacting business in this judicial district. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a for the claims of patent infringement arising out of MFJ s violation of the U.S. Patent Code, 35 U.S.C. 271, 281-85. 11. MFJ regularly conducts business in Ohio including, but not limited to, sales and/or shipping of products to PDS, and, upon information and belief has committed acts of patent infringement in this judicial District, with events or omissions giving rise to the claims asserted in this Complaint occurring in this judicial District. Venue is proper in the Northern District of Ohio ( District under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b and 1400(b. 2

Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 3 of 5. PageID #: 3 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 12. Since the Radial Plate was commercially introduced, PDS and Sergi have labeled all of their Radial Plates with the required statutory patent notice. 13. Neither PDS nor Sergi has authorized MFJ to make, use, sell, offer for sale, or import into the United States products covered by the 740 Patent. COUNT ONE-PATENT INFRINGEMENT- THE 740 PATENT 14. Each and every allegation set forth in the above-numbered paragraphs is hereby incorporated by reference just as if it was explicitly set forth hereunder. 15. MFJ has been and still is infringing one or more claims of the 740 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell radial plates, including, without limitation, Part No. MFJ-2814, embodying the patented invention, and will continue to do so unless enjoined by this Court. A true and accurate copy of a printout of Part No. MFJ-2814, as advertised by MFJ for sale on its website is attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by reference. 16. Upon information and belief, MFJ has had actual knowledge of the 740 Patent since on or about August 9, 2005, the date the 740 Patent issued. 17. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, PDS is entitled to injunctive relief in accordance with the principles of equity to prevent the infringement of rights secured by its patent. 18. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, PDS is entitled to damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, although in no event less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs to be taxed to the infringer. Further, damages should be 3

Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 4 of 5. PageID #: 4 trebled pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 in light of MFJ s knowing, willful, conscious, and deliberate infringement of the patent rights at issue. 19. The infringing activity of MFJ brings this cause within the ambit of the exceptional case contemplated by 35 U.S.C. 285, thus PDS requests the award of reasonable attorneys fees and costs. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demand judgment as follows: A. Preliminarily and permanently enjoining and restraining Defendant MFJ, their officers, directors, employees, agents, servants, successors and assigns, and any and all persons acting in privity, under its control, or in concert with MFJ, from further infringement of the 740 Patent; B. Awarding Plaintiff its damages, including lost profits, together with prejudgment interest and costs, and increasing said damages to three times the amount found or assessed as provided by 35 U.S.C. 284 and by 15 U.S.C. 1117; C. Awarding Plaintiff punitive damages for Defendant MFJ s tortious conduct; D. Declaring this an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285 and of 15 U.S.C. 1117, and awarding Plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and costs and disbursements in this action; and E. Granting to Plaintiff such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. 4

Case: 5:09-cv-01274-DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 5 of 5. PageID #: 5 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a trial by jury of any and all issues triable of right by a jury in the above-captioned action. DATED: June 4, 2009 Respectfully submitted: /s/ Mark J. Skakun Mark J. Skakun, III (No. 0023475 David J. Hrina (No. 0072260 BUCKINGHAM, DOOLITTLE & BURROUGHS, LLP 3800 Embassy Parkway Suite 300 Akron, OH 44333 Telephone: (330 376-5300 Facsimile: (330 258-6559 «AK3:990715_v2» Counsel for Plaintiff PDS Electronics, Inc. d/b/a DX Engineering 5