Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:06-cv WMN Document 270 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

#0 I. ! l>a TE FILE ~ V 1 Q r USDC ~DNY, DOCU'.\'IENT I FLF.CTRO:\ICALLY FILED I I DOC#:

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 117 Filed: 08/12/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:706

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 4:14-md CW Document 615 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:04-cv SCB-EAJ Document 166 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 31

Case: 4:16-cv ERW Doc. #: 95 Filed: 12/15/17 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 734

Case 3:07-cv H-CAB Document 213 Filed 08/04/2009 Page 1 of 41

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 109 Filed: 10/26/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1837

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 866 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAUSE NO

Case 7:13-cv NSR-LMS Document 132 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

Case 1:15-cv MAK Document 191 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 36 PageID #: 7331

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv VEC Document 259 Filed 01/24/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 3:09-cv GAG-BJM Document Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 3:14-cv TJC-JBT Document 173 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID 6189

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 536 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : :

Case 1:09-cv PAC Document 159 Filed 07/13/15 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) )

Robbins Geller Rudman&Dowd UP

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

Transcription:

Case: 1: 1 0-cv-01 937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569 STEVE CROTTEAU, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 10 C 1937 (VMK)(JC) ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION, MARK S. HEANEY, FRANCIS J. The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall LEONARD, MARK L. FIRST, SIMON A. BACHLEDA, W. ANDREW WRIGHT, III, STEVEN I. GERINGER, ROBERT W. BAIRD & CO. INCORPORATED, OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC., and STEPHENS INC., Defendants. EXHIBIT A ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:570 WHEREAS, a class action is pending before the Court entitled Crotteau v. Addus HomeCare Corporation et al, Civil Action No. 10 C 1937 (VMK)(JC), United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the "Litigation"); WHEREAS, the Court has received the Stipulation of Settlement dated as of March 21, 2011 (the "Stipulation")', which has been entered into by Plaintiffs and Defendants, and the Court has reviewed the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; WHEREAS, the Parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), for an order preliminarily approving the Settlement of this Litigation, in accordance with the Stipulation which sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed Settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein; and the Court having read and considered the Stipulation; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below. 2. The Court finds that: (a) the Stipulation resulted from arm's-length negotiations; and (b) the Stipulation is sufficiently fair, reasonable and adequate as to the Settlement Class Members to warrant providing notice of the Settlement to Class Members and holding a Settlement Hearing. 3. The Settlement Hearing shall be held before this Court on r,4vzt, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., to determine whether the proposed Settlement of the Lit gation on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement For purposes of this Order, the Court adopts all defined terms as set forth in the Stipulation, and the terms used herein shall have the same meaning as in the Stipulation. 2

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:571 Class and should be approved by the Court; whether to certify a Settlement Class; whether a Judgment as provided in the Stipulation should be entered herein; whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved; and to determine the amount of fees and expenses that should be awarded to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to Members of the Settlement Class. 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court preliminarily certifies, solely for the purposes of effectuating this Settlement, a Settlement Class consisting of all Persons other than Defendants who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Addus HomeCare Corporation ("Addus") between October 27, 2009 and March 18, 2010, inclusive (the "Settlement Class"), and were purportedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants herein, the officers and directors of Defendants, members of their immediate families, and the heirs, successors or assigns of any of the foregoing, There has been no prior notice to Members of the Settlement Class of the certification of the Settlement Class in this Litigation or prior opportunity for any Person or entity to request to be excluded from the Settlement CIass. S. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Settlement Hearing (the "Notice"), the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of Claim"), and Summary Notice ("Summary Notice") annexed respectively as Exhibits A-1, A-2 and A-3 to the Stipulation, and finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and Due Process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto. 3

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:572 6. Pending final determination by the Court as to whether the Settlement, as set forth in the Stipulation, is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be finally approved and whether the Judgment dismissing the Litigation with prejudice should be approved, no Class Member, either directly, representatively or in any other capacity, shall assert, commence or prosecute against any of the Released Persons any of the Released Claims in this Litigation, or in any other proceeding or forum. This injunction is necessary to protect and effectuate the Settlement, this Order, and the Court's flexibility and authority to effectuate the Settlement and to enter judgment when appropriate, and is ordered in aid of the Court's jurisdiction and to protect its judgments. 7. The Court appoints the Garden City Group, Inc. ("Claims Administrator") to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims as more fully set forth below: (a) Not later than twenty (20) business days after the date of this Order (the "Notice Date"), the Claims Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed as Exhibits A-1 and A-2 to the Stipulation, to be mailed by first class mail to all Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; (b) Not later than thirty (30) business days after the date of this Order, the Claims Administrator shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investors Business Dailv, and on a different day shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Globe Newswire; 4

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:573 (c) Not later than twenty (20) business days after the date of this Order, the Claims Administrator shall cause the Stipulation and its Exhibits and a copy of the Notice to be posted on the following website: www.gcginc.com ; and (d) Not Iater than seventy (70) days after the date of this Order, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall cause to be served on Defendants' Counsel and filed with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing, publishing and posting. S. Nominees who purchased or acquired Addus common stock between October 27, 2009 and March 18, 2010, inclusive, shall send the Notice and the Proof of Claim to all beneficial owners of such Addus common stock within twenty (20) days after receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator within twenty (20) days of receipt thereof, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and the Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners. Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall, if requested, reimburse banks, brokerage houses or other nominees solely for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing the Notice to beneficial owners who are Settlement Class Members out of the Settlement Fund, which expenses would not have been incurred except for the sending of such Notice, subject to further order of this Court with respect to any dispute concerning such compensation. 9. Any Person falling within the definition of the Settlement Class may, upon request, be excluded from the Settlement Class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator a request for exclusion ("Request for Exclusion"), postmarked no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. A Request for Exclusion must state: (a) the name, address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b) each of the Person's purchases and sales of Addus common stock made during the Settlement Class Period, 5

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:574 including the dates of purchase or sale, the number of shares purchased and/or sold, and the price paid or received per share for each such purchase or sale; and (c) that the Person wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class. All Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this Paragraph shall have no rights under the Settlement, shall not share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Settlement or the Judgment entered in this Litigation. 10. All Members of the Settlement Class (other than those Persons or entities who submit a timely and valid Request for Exclusion) shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Litigation concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Settlement Class. 11. Settlement Class Members (other than those Persons or entities who shall timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class) who wish to collect in the Settlement shall complete and submit Proof of Claim forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms must be postmarked no later than one hundred twenty (120) days from the Notice Date, Any Settlement Class Member who does not timely submit a Proof of Claim form within the time provided for shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 12, Any Member of the Settlement Class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, at his, her or its own expense, individually or through counsel of his, her or its own choice. If they do not enter an appearance, Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel will represent them. 13. Any Member of the Settlement Class (other than those Persons or entities who submit a timely and valid Request for Exclusion) may appear and show cause, if he, she or it 6

Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:575 has any reason, why the proposed Settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, why a Judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan of Allocation should or should not be approved, or why attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses should or should not be awarded to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel; provided, however, that no Settlement Class Member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon approving the same, or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the attorneys' fees and expenses to be awarded to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, unless that Person has filed said objections, papers and briefs with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the Settlement Hearing and delivered copies of any such papers to counsel identified in the Notice, such that they are received on or before such date. Any Member of the Settlement Class who does not make his, her or its objection in the manner provided shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any such objection, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 14. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodies legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation or further order($) of the Court. 15. All papers in support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and the Fee and Expense Application, shall be filed and served not later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. Any papers in further support of the Settlement, the PIan of Allocation and

i I Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:576 the application for attorneys' fees or expenses, shall be filed and served no later than ten (10) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 16. Neither Defendants nor any of the Released Persons shall have any responsibility for or liability with respect to the Plan of Allocation or any application for attorneys' fees or expenses submitted by Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel, and such matters will be considered separately from the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement. 17. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether the Plan of Allocation proposed by Lead Counsel and any application for attorneys' fees or expenses shall be approved. 18. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Settlement Class Members, as well as administering the Settlement Fund, and paying taxes and tax expenses, shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulation. In the event the Settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Plaintiffs nor Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel shall have any obligation to repay any amounts actually and properly disbursed from the Settlement Fund pursuant to this Paragraph. 19. Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by the Defendants of the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind and shall not be construed as, or deemed to be evidence of or an admission or concession that Plaintiffs or any Settlement Class Members have suffered any damages, harm, or loss. 20. In the event that the Settlement does not become effective in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event that the Settlement 8

I Case: 1:10-cv-01937 Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:577 Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to the Addus Defendants, then this Order shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. 21. Pending the Settlement Hearing, the Court stays all proceedings in the Litigation, other than proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. 22. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the date of the Settlement Hearing without further notice to the Members of the Settlement Class, and retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the Settlement. The Court may approve the Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Settlement Clas DATED: f'd--e-, N ''^ orablwirginia M. -,-.all + States District Judge 9