The preliminary reference procedure in EU law and the role of the national judges in ensuring respect for the rights of persons with disabilities

Similar documents
LITIGATION BEFORE THE GENERAL COURT SIMILARITIES / DIFFERENCES AND THE BOARD OF APPEAL

(Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES COURT OF JUSTICE

To refer or not to refer? Dr. Wiebke Dettmers, LL.M. (Univ. Helsinki)

Luca Prete. Référendaire, Court of Justice of the European Union. The views expressed in this presentation are strictly personal

European Judicial Training Network. Seminar on EU Institutional Law. Ljubljana, Slovenia June Alastair Sutton, Brick Court Chambers, UK

How to Read, Interpret and Implement a CJEU Judgment

COMMISSION OPINION. of

The Preliminary Ruling Procedure: Revisiting the Basics. Rajko Knez

Official Journal C 257. of the European Union. Information and Notices. Resolutions, recommendations and opinions. Volume 61.

SJ DIR 4 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 November 2015 (OR. en) 2011/0901 B (COD) PE-CONS 62/15 JUR 692 COUR 47 INST 378 CODEC 1434

Infringement Proceedings & References to the Court of Justice of the EU. Adam Weiss The AIRE Centre

PRELIMINARY RULINGS - ARTICLE 234 TEC NICE (ARTICLE 267 TFEU LISBON)

Intra-EU Investment Treaties and EU Law Inaugural Conference of EFILA

Consolidated version of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 25 September Table of Contents

The role of national courts in the application of EU law and hearings for a preliminary ruling before the CJEU

NOTE GeneralSecretariat Delegations CreatingaUnifiedPatentLitigationSystem -ReflectionsontheBeneluxCourtofJustice

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 June /10 FREMP 24 JAI 509 COHOM 143 COSCE 14

712 Challenges of the Knowledge Society. Legal sciences CRISTIAN JURA

The admissibility of the preliminary ruling proceedings and the rephrasing by the CJEU

RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE GENERAL COURT

InfoCuria - Giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia

How widespread is its use in competition cases and in what type of disputes is it used? Euro-defence and/or claim for damages?

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

CONTENTS. J>repace Table of Cases Table of Legislation. v x1x lix. 1. References for Preliminary Rulings 1

1. Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 14 January 2009 (OJ L 24 of , p.

Statewatch Report. Consolidated agreed text of the EU Constitution. Judicial Provisions

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 12 October 2017 *

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

Before : MR JUSTICE LEWIS Between :

THE HIGH COURT RECORD NUMBER 2017/781 P. JOLYON MAUGHAM, STEVEN AGNEW JONATHAN BARTLEY and KEITH TAYLOR -AND- IRELAND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Implementing ECHR Protocol 16 on Advisory Opinions

The National Judge as EU Judge: Some Constitutional Observations

Case 432/05 Unibet read facts of the case (best reproduced in the conclusions of the Advocate General)

STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION)

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION

What are the objectives of preliminary references? The Belov case: litigating discrimination cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union

How to complain about the conduct of a barrister

The role of national courts and. the preliminary ruling procedure - Draft

Guidance from Luxembourg: First ECJ Judgment Clarifying the Relationship between the 1980 Hague Convention and Brussels II Revised

Patent Protection: Europe

THE IMPORTANCE AND UTILITY OF THE PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

An introduction to Community Legislation on Equal Treatment and the Novelties of the Recast Directive

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 November 2017 *

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber) 16 May 2018 *

The Court of Justice. Composition, jurisdiction and procedures

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 September 2018 *

1. The EU in violation of the access to justice provisions of the Aarhus Convention

Discussion paper. Seminar co-funded by the Justice programme of the European Union

APLIKACE DOKTRÍNY ACTE CLAIR NÁRODNÍMI SOUDY A JEJÍ ZHODNOCENÍ VE SVĚTLE PŘÍPADU CILFIT (NA PŘÍKLADECH BRITSKÉ JUDIKATURY)

THE PRELIMINARY RULING PROCEDURE AND THE ROLE OF THE NATIONAL JUDGE

The Impact of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights University of Kent 7 December 2017

9375/15 PB/NC/hc SJ DIR 4

Influence of EU Law on National Procedural Rules

The preliminary ruling procedure on the role of national courts in the application of EU law

1.2 Distinguish between common law and equity. 1.3 Distinguish between civil law and criminal law

The preliminary ruling procedure pursuant to Article 267 TFEU 1

(Non) Ne bis in idem. European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings

- USING ECONOMICS IN COURTS - * * * THE JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE FROM THE EU

Quantifying Harm for Breaches of Antitrust Rules A European Union Perspective

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 June 2002 *

FIFTH SECTION. CASE OF ROONEY v. IRELAND. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 31 October 2013

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Economic and Social Council

Arbitration Rules of the Court of International Commercial Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania

Article 50 Litigation: UK, Northern Ireland & EU Perspectives. Queen s University Belfast. 29 November 2016

European Academy of Law, Seminar on Anti-discrimination EU Law, Hungarian Academy of Justice, Budapest, 5 September 2018

TRENDS AND PATTERNS IN PRELIMINARY REFERENCES IN COURTS OF ROMANIA

Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 July 2016 (OR. en)

Worksheets on European Competition Law

PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 22 June 2010 *

The following aspects have been taken into consideration:

Table of Contents. Chapter one. General Issues

Joint Select Committee on Human Rights Inquiry into the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. The Law Society of Scotland s Response

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 9 November 1995 *

PREFERENCE FOR A REFERENCE? Owain Thomas

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES

ANSWER TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION [NOTE: OR ANSWER TO THE REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION AND COUNTERCLAIMS, IF

The Functions of the EFTA Court Skúli Magnússon, Registrar EFTA Court

Field: BVerwGE: No. Professional press: Yes

Judgments Of the Supreme Court

published (also published (URL:

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 April 1993 *

Brexit Essentials: Dispute resolution clauses

The role of the national court in applying EU anti discrimination directives and the preliminary ruling procedure

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 February 2015 (OR. en)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2015 *

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Delegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.

Introduction. amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 341 of 24 December 2015, p.

Procedure for cooperation by the Agency and its staff with Member States judicial authorities in the context of judicial proceedings

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 30 January 2014 *

Reports of Cases. ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber) 24 April 2016 *

A Guide to Applying to the European Court of Human Rights when fair trial rights have been violated October 2012

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 20 June 2014 (OR. en) 14011/2/13 REV 2 LIMITE COEST 284 NIS 56 PESC 1137 JAI 815 WTO 212 ENER 432

George GRYLLOS, Legal Secretary, General Court Chambers of Judge D. Gratsias

Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 October 2016 (OR. en)

Transcription:

The preliminary reference procedure in EU law and the role of the national judges in ensuring respect for the rights of persons with disabilities Carsten Zatschler Barrister (England & Wales). 1

WHY is there a preliminary reference procedure? 2

Elaina s Government for Dummies 3

4

Legal Source Texts All available on www.curia.europa.eu Article 267 TFEU Statute (Protocol No 3 to TFEU): Arts 23 and 23a Rules of Procedure (OJ 2012 L265, p.1), Articles 93 to 118 Recommendations to national courts and tribunals (OJ 2012 C338, p.1) 5

Article 267 TFEU The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning: a) the interpretation of the Treaties; b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the Union; Where such a question is raised before any court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal may, if it considers that a decision on the question is necessary to enable it to give judgment, request the Court to give a ruling thereon. Where any such question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State against whose decisions there is no judicial remedy under national law, that court or tribunal shall bring the matter before the Court. If such a question is raised in a case pending before a court or tribunal of a Member State with regard to a person in custody, the Court of Justice of the European Union shall act with the minimum of delay. 6

Can you make a reference? Notion of court or tribunal Question about interpretation or validity of Union law Decision on the question is necessary 7

Do you have to make a reference? Courts of last instance; except: Acte clair Acte éclairé Cases 283/81 Cilfit and C-495/03 Intermodal Transports Questions about the validity of Union law or acts or Union institutions Case 314/85 Foto Frost 8

Should you make a reference? How much relevant case law is there? How confident are you deciding without a reference? Will the questions have to be resolved by the ECJ at some point in any event? Is the case a good test case? Are the parties well represented? Is a reference in the parties (as opposed to their lawyers ) interests? Are other cases raising the same questions already pending? 9

Examples of References 10

Aim of the Order for Reference Permit Member States and Union Institutions to exercise their rights under Article 23 of the Statute Permit the ECJ to give a useful answer to the national court C-42/07 Liga Portuguesa, paras 40 and 41 11

Essential Elements Factual framework (including assumptions and hyoptheses) Applicable national legal framework Rules of Union law considered relevant, including how they are linked to the facts and national law Question(s) RP Art 94 12

Optional Elements Arguments of the parties Suggested answer to the questions asked 13

Drafting Suggestions Ask parties to prepare an agreed draft Cite important national legal provisions verbatim; explain any surprising interpretations of particular terms Concentrate on the individual dispute, and what you need to know to solve it Be aware of limits of ECJ s jurisdiction Be aware of 20-page translation limit 14

After the Reference Appeal Against Order for Reference? Requests for additional information? (RP Arts 61, 62 and 101) Inadmissibility? (RP Art 53(2)) Answer clear? (RP Art 99) Possible joinder with, or suspension pending, other case (RP Arts 54 to 56) 15

16

Internal Procedure at the ECJ Allocation to a reporting judge by the President Allocation to an AG by the First AG Preliminary Report discussed by all members of the Court (28 Judges + 9 AGs) - Allocation to a Chamber (3, 5 or 15 judges) Hearing AG s Opinion Draft judgment by reporting judge Deliberations of judges leading to judgment Translation and handing down of the judgment 17

18

Response to the Questions Limited to the factual and legal scenario as outlined by the referring court Will never opine on facts Will usually not opine on validity of national law Will be expressed in general, generic terms 19

Any Questions? Carsten Zatschler Barrister (England & Wales) cz@zatschler.com 20