ST.A T:: o r:- MArN. Cumber, 6 -~.., E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office. JUL 1,.a RE Cc. /VEO

Similar documents
Before the court is plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure

Plaintiff ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The plaintiff moves for summary judgment in an action for foreclosure

TITLE TO REAL ESTATE IS INVOLVED 170 Limestone Street, Caribou, Maine Mortgage recorded at SOARD Bk. 4569, pg.229

Defendants Black Bear Industrial Inc., Jeffrey P. Richard, and Northern Mountain I. BACKGROUND

Party-In-Interest. Before the Court is the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in its action seeking

,) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

'...;f\ -- C. I,A!(\ -77!1;.1 J_O: <'>,

C1 1 mmrland ss Clerk'i Off1ee

vs. STATE OF MAINE AROOSTOOK, SS. MAINE SUPERIOR COURT LOCATION: CAIUBOU CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO: CARSC-RE

INTRODUCTION. was held on January 10, On February 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Trial Memorandum

MN, On or about September 30, 2015 Nationstar Mortgage LLC filed a civil complaint against Megan

Quicken Loans Inc. v Diaz-Montez 2015 NY Slip Op 31285(U) March 13, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Robert J.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION DOCKET NO. RE ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER AND DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) ) ) )

Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R v Tsimmer 2017 NY Slip Op 30570(U) March 23, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Barbara

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BACKGROUND

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

KEVIN WILK et al. [ 1] Kevin Wilk appeals from a judgment of foreclosure entered in the

) ) ) BACKGROUND. The following facts, viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the non-moving

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

BAC Home Loans Serv., LP v Rodriguez 2013 NY Slip Op 32185(U) August 14, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Peter H.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

Before the court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. In count I, plaintiff alleges. In count II, plaintiff alleges breach of

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. (Filed: April 18, 2012)

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v McLean-Chance 2013 NY Slip Op 32606(U) October 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 11828/2012 Judge:

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

HSBC Bank USA v Murphy 2016 NY Slip Op 30850(U) May 3, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: David Elliot Cases posted

I. Mortgaging of Trust or Restricted Land

Case 1:11-cv LG -RHW Document 32 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

HSBC Bank USA v Jones 2016 NY Slip Op 30296(U) February 9, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /14 Judge: Darrell L.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION vs. ELVITRIA M. MARROQUIN & others. 1. Essex. January 9, May 11, 2017.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/03/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/03/2017

Citimortgage, Inc. v Sirota 2013 NY Slip Op 31659(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 12243/2011 Judge: Allan B.

FORECLOSURE FAQ WHERE IS A FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CIV JUDGMENT OF RONALD YOUNG J


IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 11 CV 233. v. : Judge Berens

Case 3:11-cv ST Document 9 Filed 02/23/11 Page 1 of 22 Page ID#: 145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Rodney 2016 NY Slip Op 30761(U) April 12, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Robert J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida


Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Wass 2015 NY Slip Op 30727(U) May 1, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Arthur G.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

2:12-cv DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Woodward, **Zarnoch, Friedman,

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Wachovia Bank of Delaware, NA v Henderson 2015 NY Slip Op 31324(U) June 19, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 16701/2010 Judge: Robert

Onewest Bank, FSB v Burrell 2013 NY Slip Op 31274(U) June 12, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Emily Pines Republished

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

310 W. 115 St. LLC v Greenpoint Mtge. Funding, Inc NY Slip Op 31644(U) August 27, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Mortgage who is the mortgagee? Is the mortgagee the Plaintiff? Is the mortgagee a corporation or a trust?

Case 3:12-cv RCJ-WGC Document 49 Filed 03/25/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

HSBC Bank USA v Bhatti 2016 NY Slip Op 30167(U) January 29, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21162/2013 Judge: Robert J.

John Cottle and Jay Roberts of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Walton Beach, for Appellant.

Case 8:13-cv RWT Document 37 Filed 03/13/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Neiman 2014 NY Slip Op 30644(U) March 4, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman Cases

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re: Chapter 11

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION on FED. HOME LOAN MTGE. CORP. v. SCHWARTZWALD

Foreclosure Litigation Overview

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IN A NUTSHELL

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Citimortgage, Inc. v Levy 2014 NY Slip Op 33488(U) December 22, 2014 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 10822/11 Judge: Jeffrey Arlen

U.S. Bank, N.A. v Campbell 2015 NY Slip Op 30390(U) March 16, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 11601/2012 Judge: Robert J.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

U.S. National Association, as Trustee for CSMC Mortgage- Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series (CSMC )., Plaintiff, against

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv MJP Document 35 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States District Court District of Massachusetts

Transcription:

STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, SS FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff EDWARD HITCHCOCK, LINDA HITCHCOCK, and CITIZENS LENDING GROUP, INC., and Defendants TOWN AND COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, ST.A T:: o r:- MArN Cumber, 6 -~.., E: -, " ~"' C'erk's Office JUL 1,.a 2016 RE Cc. /VEO SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION Docket No. RE-14-70 JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE Title to Real Estate Is Involved 88 Alba Street, Portland, Maine Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, Book 24480, Page 114 Party in Interest Before the court is plaintiff's post-trial brief in support of its proposed judgment of foreclosure. For the following reasons, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff. I. FACTS On September 29, 2006, Edward and Linda Hitchcock executed and delivered a note in the amount of $166,000.00 to Citizens Lending Group, Inc. (Citizens). The note was secured by a mortgage on real property located at 88 Alba Street in Portland. On October 23, 2013, Quicken Loans, Inc., plaintiff's servicer, sent the Hitchcocks a notice stating that the Hitchcocks were in default as of September 1, 2013. On January 2, 2014, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), acting as nominee for Citizens, assigned the mortgage to Quicken Loans. Quicken Loans so_ught a judgment of foreclosure by complaint filed February 27, 2014. The Hitchcocks were served in Auburndale, Florida on March 4, 2014, but have not answered 1

the complaint or otherwise appeared in this action. Trial was scheduled for September 3, 2014, however Quicken Loans moved to continue following the Law Court's decision in Bank ofam. v. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, 96 A. 3d 700. On February 17, 2015, Quicken Loans amended its complaint, with leave of court. The amended complaint added one count of declaratory judgment against Citizens, which sought a judgment that Quicken Loans owned the mortgage and had standing to foreclose. The Hitchcocks were served with the amended complaint on April 9, 201 5. Quicken Loans filed a return of service for Cit.izens on May 4, 2015, which indicated that National Registered Agents, Inc. was served on behalf of Citizens on April 23, 2015. On May 28, 2015, Quicken Loans assigned the mortgage to plaintiff. On June 12, 2015, plaintiff was substituted as plaintiff in place of Quicken Loans. Plaintiff moved for a default judgment on the declaratory judgment count on November 12, 2015. Trial was held on December 3, 2015. Plaintiff filed a post-trial brief in support of its requests for declaratory judgment and a judgment of foreclosure on March 3, 2016. Also on March 3, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for enlargement of time to file a return of service for Citizens. Plaintiff asserted that, in September 2015, National Registered Agents had sent a letter stating that it was unable to receive documents on behalf of Citizens due to lack of a forwarding address. Because the letter was sent to the wrong address, plaintiffs attorney was unaware of the issue until February 2016. The court granted the motion on March 10, 2016. On May 23, 2016, plaintiff filed a return of service for Citizens, which showed that Citizens was served in hand on March 1, 2016. On June 14, 2016, plaintiff moved to dismiss the declaratory judgment count on the ground that Citizens had executed a quitclaim assignment, dated June 8, 2016, purporting to assign to plaintiff any interest it held in the mortgage. 2

I~ II. DISCUSSION To obtain a judgment of foreclosure, the mortgagee must establish: the existence of a mortgage, including the property description and book and page number of its recording; proof of ownership of the note and mortgage, including all assignments and endorsements; a breach of condition in the mortgage; the amount due, including any reasonable attorney' s fees and court costs; the order of priority and any amounts that may be due to other parties in interest; evidence of a properly served notice of default and the mortgagor's right to cure; proof of completed mediation; and, if the mortgagor has not appeared, a statement as to whether the mortgagor is in military service. Chase Home Fin. LLC v. Higgins, 2009 ME 136, 111, 985 A.2d 508. 1. Existence of Mortgage Plaintiff has provided the mortgage, which contains a property description, street address, and book and page number of recording. (Pl.'s Ex. B.) 2. Ownership of Note The mortgagee may certify proof of ownership of the note by establishing that it is in possession of the note, and the note is endorsed in blank. Bank ofam. v. Cloutier, 2013 ME 17, 1 18, 61 A.3d 1242. Plaintiff has provided the note and an allonge, which contains an endorsement from Citizens to Flagstar Bank, and an endorsement in blank from Flagstar. 1 (Pl. ' s Ex. A.) 3. Ownership of Mortgage When MERS acts solely as nominee, an assignment from MERS transfers only the right to record the mortgage as nominee. Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, 1116-17, 96 A.3d 700. The assignments in this case show that MERS, acting as nominee for Citizens, assigned the mortgage I The note itself contains a separate endorsement to Flagstar, which is stamped with "NOTE ENDORSEMENT VOID." To the extent that the voided endorsement raises questions about the validity of the endorsements on the allonge, the quitclaim assignment, discussed below, resolves those questions in favor of plaintiffs ownership. 3

from Citizens to Quicken Loans. (Pl. 's Ex. C.) To remedy this issue, plaintiff has provided a quitclaim assignment from Citizens. (Ex. A to Mot. Dismiss.) The Law Court has indicated that a quitclaim assignment from the original lender to the plaintiff is sufficient to establish the plaintiffs ownership of the mortgage. See Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Halfacre, 2016 ME 97, ~ 6, _ A.3d _ ("We recognize that the trial court apparently was not presented with the Fannie Mae quitclaim assignment, and therefore that the trial court had no reason to question the quitclaim assignment to Nationstar and the representations of counsel that Nationstar's assignment was effective."). Plaintiff therefore has standing and is entitled to a judgment of foreclosure if it can establish the remaining elements. See Greenleaf, 2014 ME 89, ~ 9, 96 A.3d 700. 4. Breach At trial, plaintiff moved to admit records of the Hitchcock's payment history with Quicken Loans. (Pl. 's Ex. E.) To establish the records' admissibility, plaintiff offered the testimony of Kristin Wykowski, an employee of Quicken Loans. Ms. Wykowski's testimony established that: ( 1) the records were made at or near the time by someone with knowledge; (2) the records were kept in the course of Quicken Loans 's regularly conducted activities; (3) making the records was a regular practice of those activities; ( 4) Ms. Wykowski was the custodian of the records; and (5) neither the source of information nor the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. M.R. Evid. 803(6); see HSBC Mortg. Servs. v. Murphy, 2011 ME 59, ~ 10, 19 A.3d 815. The payment history records are therefore admitted. The records and testimony at trial establish that the Hitchcocks failed to make the September 1, 2013 payment and have not made any payments since that time. 4

5. Amount Due The payment history records and testimony at trial also establish that, as of December 3, 2015, the total amount due under the note and mortgage was $185,498.85. (Pl.'s Ex. E.) Plaintiffs attorney's affidavit of attorney's fees and costs shows that, as of December 1, 2015, plaintiff has incurred $6,990.00 in attorney's fees and $1,375.76 in costs. (Pl. 's Ex. G.) These amounts are supported by itemized lists. See HSBC Bank USA, NA. v. Gabay, 2011 ME 101, ~ 27, 28 A.3d 1158. 6. Priority of Parties in Interest On August 20, 2014, the court granted Town and Country Federal Credit Union's motion to file an affidavit in lieu of appearing at trial. Town and Country submitted the affidavit of Jessica Schneckloth, a Collections Manager at Town and Country. Ms. Schneckloth's affidavit and the accompanying note establish that, on September 10, 2007, the Hitchcocks executed and delivered to Town and Country an Open-End Home Equity Credit Agreement and Truth in Lending Disclosure in a maximum credit limit amount of $32,300.00. The note was secured by a mortgage on 88 Alba Street, the same property at issue in this action. 7. Notice of Default At trial, plaintiff also moved to admit the notice of default sent by Quicken Loans to the Hitchcocks. (Pl.' s Ex. D.) Ms. Wykowski' s testimony at trial satisfied the elements of M.R. Evid. 803(6) with respect to the notice, and the notice is therefore admitted. The notice complies with 14 M.R.S. 6111 because it contains the information required under section 1-A, was sent via certified mail, and was received by the Hitchcocks on October 29, 2013, more than 35 days before Quicken Loans commenced this action. 14 M.R.S. 6111(1), (1-A), (3) (2015). 5

8. Mediation Proof of mediation is not required because the Hitchcocks have not appeared in this action. See M.R. Civ. P. 93(c)(3) ("The court will schedule a mediation session for each foreclosure action filed against a defendant who is an owner-occupant and who appears, answers, or otherwise requests mediation in the action within 20 days after service of the summons and complaint and attends an informational session."); see also 14 M.R.S. 6321-A(6) (2015). 9. Military Service When the defendant has not appeared, the mortgagee must provide a statement, with a supporting affidavit, of whether or not the defendant is in military service in accordance with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. See 50 U.S.C. 3931 (20 12). Plaintiff has provided a statement and affidavit for both Edward Hitchcock and Linda Hitchcock, which show that neither is in military service. (Pl. 's Ex. F.) III. CONCLUSION The court hereby finds the following : 1. The names and addresses of all parties and their counsel of record are: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. c/o Bendett & McHugh, P.C. 30 Danforth Street, Suite 104 Portland, ME 04101 Edward Hitchcock Linda Hitchcock 45 Leisure Drive Auburndale, FL 33823 Citizens Lending Group, Inc. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 102 Townson, MD 21204 Town and Country Federal Credit Union c/o Daniel L. Cummings, Esq. 6

Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC Two Canal Plaza P.O. Box 4600 Portland, ME 04112 2. All parties received notice of the proceedings in this action, and the notice was given in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. 3. Plaintiff is the owner of a certain note and mortgage dated September 29, 2006 and recorded in the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds in Book 24480 at Page 114. Reference is made to the mortgage for a more particular description of the real estate located at 88 Alba Street. 4. The Hitchcocks are in breach of the terms of the note and mortgage, the breach constitutes a default, and the Hitchcocks received proper notice of the default. 5. Plaintiff is owed the following: a. Principal balance: $150,559.95 b. Accrued interest through December 3, 2015: $22,888.46 c. Escrow advances: $9,302.23 d. Pre-acceleration late charges: $52.46 e. Property inspections: $397.00 f. Property preservation: $2,298.75 g. Attorney's fees through December 1, 2015: $6,990.00 h. Costs through December 1, 2015: $1,375.76 SUBTOTAL: $193,864.61 6. The order of priority and the amount of the claim of each party is: a. Plaintiff in the amount of $193,864.61 plus accrued interest from and including December 4, 2015 at the rate of 6.5% per annum $26.81 per day to the date ofjudgment plus interest after judgment, pursuant to 14 M.R.S. 1602-C, at a rate of 6.5% per annum, plus the attorney' s fees and costs set forth in paragraph 5 above. Plaintiff is entitled to add reasonable post-judgment attorney's fees and costs in connection with the foreclosure. b. Town and Country Federal Credit Union by virtue of a mortgage dated September 10, 2007 and recorded in the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds in Book 25531 at Page 116 in the amount of $28,385.5 6, plus interest in the amount of $404.65 through August 7

, 8, 2014, with additional interest accruing at a rate of$3.11 per day, and late fees in the amount of $30.00. c. Clerk of Court in the amount of any excess proceeds from the sale, pursuant to 14 M.R.S. 6324. The court hereby orders the following: 1. COUNT I of plaintiffs amended complaint is DISMISSED, and Citizens Lending Group, Inc. is DISMISSED as a defendant. Judgment is entered in favor of PLAINTIFF and against defendants Edward Hitchcock and Linda Hitchcock on COUNT II of plaintiffs amended complaint. 2. Ifthe Hitchcocks or their successors, heirs, and assigns do not pay the sum of $193,864.61 with interest to plaintiff within 90 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall proceed with a sale of the property described in the mortgage, pursuant to 14 M.R.S. 6321-6324. If the Hitchcocks or their successors, heirs, and assigns pay the sum of $193,864.61 with interest to plaintiff within 90 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall discharge the mortgage and file a dismissal of this action with the clerk of court. in the docket. Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 79(a), the clerk is directed to incorporate this Order by reference n \',, Dated: "2v I /,. -e/'""\ --0-.P d -; '--fj I "::) / '-= CERTIFICATION OF CLERK Pursuant to 14 M.R.S. 2401 (3)(F), it is hereby certified that no notice of appeal of the Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale in this matter was filed with the Clerk of Court within the appeal period following the entry ofjudgment. Dated: - ---- Clerk of Court 8