Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
Case M:06-cv VRW Document 152 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 597 Filed 04/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 374 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 543 Filed 01/15/2009 Page 1 of 7

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 104 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 7

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 151 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 8

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 557 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 7

CaseM:06-cv VRW Document716 Filed03/19/10 Page1 of 8

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 345 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 145 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Case 3:13-cv HSG Document 133 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 5

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs - Appellants, Defendants - Appellees.

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:06-cv VRW Document 346 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 9

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case MDL No Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Plaintiffs' Response to Individual Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 34 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 2:18-cv JAM-DB Document 15 Filed 10/26/18 Page 1 of 8

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case 2:09-cv MCE-EFB Document Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc Doc. 332 Att. 1

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/06/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/06/2017

PREEMPTION OF LOCAL REGULATION BASED ON HEALTH EFFECTS OF RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS UNDER THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

RANDELL ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, OFFICER OUKA, OFFICER ENNIS, OFFICER JOE and DOES ONE through FIFTY,

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case 4:17-cv YGR Document 19 Filed 04/26/17 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:06-cv VRW Document 16 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 1 of 6

APPLICATION FOR JUVENILE DEPENDENCY LAW PANEL. Name: State Bar number: Telephone: Fax: Full time SF office address: Mailing address (if different):

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 153 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv WB Document 97 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:08-cv EJD Document Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 47 Filed: 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:299

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No

Case3:12-cv SI Document33 Filed10/21/14 Page1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv GBL -TRJ Document 4 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 349

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 1:05-cv SLR Document 19 Filed 06/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Case3:07-cv SI Document102 Filed08/04/09 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Judge:

Case 4:13-cv AWA-LRL Document Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 4323 EXHIBIT 8

Transcription:

Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 BRENDAN V. SULLIVAN, JR. JOHN G. KESTER GILBERT O. GREENMAN WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 000 Tel.: (0-000 Fax: (0-0 jkester@wc.com ggreenman@wc.com Attorneys for Sprint Nextel Corp., Sprint Communications Co. L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Nextel West Corp. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- San Francisco Division -- In re: MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS TO STAY CASES AGAINST SPRINT LITIGATION This document relates to: [Civil L.R. -, -(a(, -] Nos. C-0--VRW; Courtroom:, th Floor C-0--VRW; Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker C-0--VRW; C-0--VRW; C-0-0-VRW MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW

Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 STIPULATION In furtherance of judicial economy and to avoid potentially unnecessary expense, the undersigned counsel for and on behalf of the entities named below wish to stay all proceedings against the Sprint entities pending determination of appellate review in Hepting v. AT&T Corp., No. C-0--VRW, currently pending on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Interim class counsel for the Sprint Subscriber Class plaintiffs and counsel for the Sprint defendants */ follows: hereby stipulate as. All proceedings against the Sprint defendants shall be stayed until the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issues its ruling on review of the July 0, 00, order of this Court in Hepting v. AT&T Corp., No. C-0--VRW.. This stay shall encompass any proceedings pending herein against the Sprint defendants, or transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to this Court and consolidated with this MDL, No. 0--VRW, subsequent to the entry of this Stipulation. The following cases filed against the Sprint defendants have been transferred to this Court: */ C-0--VRW; C-0--VRW; C-0--VRW; C-0--VRW; C-0-0-VRW. The Sprint defendants are Sprint Nextel Corp., Sprint Communications Co. L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Nextel West Corp. and as used herein include any entities related to them. - - MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW

Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. This stay shall not apply to any MDL proceedings against entities other than the Sprint defendants.. This stay shall not otherwise alter the substantive and other procedural rights of the Sprint defendants or of the subscribers who have filed complaints against the Sprint defendants.. The Sprint defendants are not required to file any response to any complaint against them until sixty (0 days after the expiration of this stay. GARY E. MASON NICHOLAS A. MIGLIACCIO THE MASON LAW FIRM, PC th Street, N.W., Ste. 00 Washington, D.C. 00 Tel.: (0-0 Fax: (0 - By /s/ Gary E. Mason per G.O. JOHN C. WHITFIELD WHITFIELD & COX, PSC East Center Street Madisonville, KY Tel.: (0-0 Fax: (0 - By /s/ John C. Whitfield per G.O. Interim Class Counsel for Sprint Subscriber Class BRENDAN V. SULLIVAN, JR. JOHN G. KESTER GILBERT O. GREENMAN By WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 000 Tel.: (0-000 Fax: (0-0 /s/ John G. Kester Attorneys for Sprint Nextel Corp., Sprint Communications Co. L.P, Sprint Spectrum L.P. and Nextel West Corp. - - MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW

Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of February, 00 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER I declare that I have received authorization to file this document from each of the signatories listed above. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing declaration is true and correct. Executed February, 00, at Washington, D.C. /s/ John G. Kester 0 0 - - MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW

Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Chief Judge 0 0 - - MDL Dkt. No. 0--VRW