Lupin Pharmaceutkals,Inc.

Similar documents
RECEIVED. FirstEnemv. AUG 20 mi. Via Federal Express. August 20, 2012

FLORIO PERRUCCI STEINHARDT& FADER. Amirncys ;ii l.;iw. September 21, 2012

Please do not hesitate to contact me at or riacobs(q?viridian.com if you have any further questions.

Guidance for Industry

PHARMACEUTICAL LAW GROUP PC

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott Tomsky Vice President, U.S. Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

HOGAN & HARTSON APR -9 P4 :18 BY HAND DELIVERY

Amendments to Regulations on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of

o 1205 Culbreth Dr., Suite 200, Wilmington, NC Phone : Facsimile :

Case 1:07-cv RMU Document 81 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Some Declaratory Judgment Guidance For ANDA Litigants

Iff/]) FEB Gregory 1. Glover Pharmaceutical Law Group PC 900 Seventh Street, NW Suite 650 Washington, DC

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Litigation Webinar Series. Hatch-Waxman 101. Chad Shear Principal, San Diego

Suitability Petition (SP)

Internal Agency Review of Decisions; Requests for Supervisory Review of Certain. Decisions Made by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Proposal to Refuse to Approve a New Drug Application for Oxycodone Hydrochloride

A. ANDAs and Eligibility for 180-day Exclusivity

(4- I. Background. Douald O. Beers Arnold & Porter LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.c

Maximal Usage Trials for Topical Active Ingredients Being Considered for Inclusion in an Overthe-Counter

A. Bayer's New Drug Application for Precose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

S To prohibit brand name drug companies from compensating generic drug companies to delay the entry of a generic drug into the market.

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; XIENCE

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 9 Filed 12/03/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:09-cv DMC-MF Document 17 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 28 : :

Case 1:14-cv IMK Document 125 Filed 06/16/14 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1959

Case 1:07-cv RMU Document 71-2 Filed 05/08/2007 Page 1 of 6. ANDA , Amlodipine Besylate Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg.

Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of

Case 2:12-cv WHW-MCA Document 10 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 141

Laser Products--Conformance with IEC Ed. 3 and IEC Ed. 3.1 (Laser

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is reinstating the provision

Patent and Exclusivity Update

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

I'D [3, 2 7 ~ ~ a Anthony Figg Lisa N. Phillips

Refurbishing, Reconditioning, Rebuilding, Remarketing, Remanufacturing, and Servicing of

From PLI s Program New Strategies Arising from the Hatch-Waxman Amendments #4888

Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level Guidance for Industry and Review Staff

Case 1:10-cv JCJ Document 20 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Sunscreen Feedback Letters; Notice of Availability Under the Sunscreen Innovation Act

The Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA) submits these. comments on the proposal published by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 64

Case 3:11-cv JAP -TJB Document 32 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 530 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Indirect Food Additives: Adhesives and Components of Coatings. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is amending the food additive

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing the

Clarification of When Products Made or Derived from Tobacco Are Regulated as Drugs,

We have carefully considered the Petition.! For the reasons described below, the Petition is granted.

Case 1:16-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

This responds to your citizen petition dated July 24, 2009, submitted on behalf of Osmotica

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:12-cv PGS-LHG Document 1 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Regulatory Requirements for Hearing Aid Devices and Personal Sound Amplification Products;

Case 1:11-cv RGA Document 10 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 47

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/06/16 Page 1 of 9

No IN THE EISAI CO. LTD AND EISAI MEDICAL RESEARCH, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., through its GATE PHARMACEUTICALS Division,

Case 2:11-cv WHW -MCA Document 7 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 57

Attachment C M AY Daniel J. Tomasch, Esq. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 666 Fifth Ave. New York, NY Dear Mr.

RECEIVED JUL PA PUBUC UTIUTY COMMISSION SECRETARY'S BUREAU

United States. Country QUESTIONNAIRE

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/13/2009 Page 1 of 17

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 87 PageID #: 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

PENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS

NOV PROPOSAL TO DEBAR NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING Docket No. OON-1530

EXTENDING THE LIFE OF A PATENT IN THE UNITED STATES

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

An ANDA Update. June 2004 Bulletin 04-50

Center for Devices and Radiological Health Appeals Processes: Questions and Answers About 517A

Case 2:15-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 81 PageID: 1

Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web

The Declaration of Added Sugars on Honey, Maple Syrup, and Certain Cranberry Products;

Coronary, Peripheral, and Neurovascular Guidewires--Performance Tests and

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Case 1:10-cv MGC Document 11-1 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 55 EXHIBIT A

Case 8:14-cv GJH Document 1 Filed 08/19/14 Page 1 of 22

=======================================================================

The Korean Drug Approval-Patent Linkage System: A Comparison with the US Hatch-Waxman Act

Teva v. EISAI: What's the Real Controversy

) ) Court to enter a preliminary injunction ordering the Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) to

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

BNA s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal

Recent developments in US law: Remedies and damages for improper patent listings in the FDA s Orange Book

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv LPS Document 118 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2856 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Guidance for the public, FDA Advisory Committee Members, and FDA Staff: The Open Public Hearing at FDA Advisory Committee Meetings

Case 5:13-cv SMH-MLH Document 1 Filed 06/20/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Caraco V. Novo Nordisk: Antitrust Implications

A federal court authorized this notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

Case 1:14-cv IMK Document 103 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1860

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/04/17 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv LPS Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.

Case 2:10-cv WHW-CLW Document 804 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 47723

Review of Existing General Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements of the

A New History and Discussion of 180-Day Exclusivity

Case 1:18-cv IMK Document 250 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2905 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

Lupin Pharmaceutkals,Inc. 1011 1 9 A 8 : 43 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Division of Documents Management Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services 5630 Fishers Lane Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 CITIZEN PETITION On behalf of Lupin Limited ("Lupin"), the undersigned submits this petition under Section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDC Act), as well as 21 U.S.C. 10.20, 10.25 and 10.30, requesting that the Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration formally determine that Teva Pharmaceuticals ("Teva") has forfeited its 180-day marketing exclusivity period for generic versions of Avapro brand irbesartan tablets, 75 mg, 150 mg and 300 mg. Lupin is a subsequent ANDA filer for these drug products that is directly affected by this issue and thus seeks expedited consideration of the petition to avoid delaying generic competition. P. D027? HARBORPLACE TOWER, 111 SOUTH CALVERT STREET, 21ST FLOOR, BALTIMORE, MD 21202. TEL: 410-576-2000 FAX: 410-576-2221 www.lupinpharmaceuticals.com

Page 2 Lupin has expected to obtain final FDA approval to market its generic versions of Avaproe-brand tablets, with such approval to be effective on March 30, 2012. Lupin now understands that such approval will be delayed until Teva has enjoyed a 180-day patentchallenge exclusivity, an exclusivity to which Teva should not be entitled. I. Action Requested This petition requests that FDA issue a formal determination that Teva has forfeited its 180-day exclusivity related to ANDA No. 077159, under 21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(IV). As discussed below, Teva failed to obtain tentative approval of its ANDA within 30 months from the date on which its application was filed, and none of the exceptions to that forfeiture provision applies. This petition also requests that the Commissioner expedite consideration of this petition to ensure that Lupin is granted final approval to market its generic irbesartan tablets on March 30, 2012. II. STATE OF GROUNDS A. Factual Background We set forth the following relevant background facts based on public filings and other publicly available information. 1. The Reference listed Drug: Avapro Brand Irbesartan Tablets Sanofi Aventis US ("Sanofi") is the current owner of NDA No. 020757 for Avapro0- brand irbesartan tablets. According to the electronic version of the Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the "Orange Book"), U.S. Patent Nos. 5,270,317 ("the '317 patent") and 6,342,247 ("the '247 patent") are listed in reference to this drug. The

Page 3 Orange Book indicates that the '317 expired on September 30, 2011 and the associated pediatric exclusivity is scheduled to expire on March 30, 2012. The '247 patent is scheduled to expire on June 7, 2015 with pediatric exclusivity expiring on December 7, 2015. 2. Teva's Paragraph IV "First Applicant" ANDA Based on publicly accessible documents, it appears that Teva was the "first applicant" to file a substantially complete ANDA, No. 077159, that contains a paragraph IV certification that seeks approval of a generic version of Avaproe-brand tablets. Teva's ANDA apparently was filed on May 25, 2004, the date on which the first ANDA for a generic version of the Avapro -brand product containing a Paragraph IV Certification was filed according to the FDA's Paragraph IV website. Because the first Paragraph IV ANDA for a generic version of Avaprot-brand tablets was submitted after December 8, 2003, 180-day exclusivity for generic versions of Avaproe-brand tablets is governed by the current requirements set forth in the FDA Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(B)(iv) and (j)(5)(d), including its forfeiture provisions. See Pub. L. No. 108-173, 1102(b)(1). B. Teva Forfeited Its Exclusivity By Failing to Obtain Timely Tentative Approval Teva has forfeited its 180-day exclusivity rights for a generic version of Avapro0-brand tablets because it failed to obtain tentative approval of its ANDA within 30 months after the date on which the application was filed. The statutory provision governing Teva's forfeiture for failure to obtain timely tentative approval states: (IV) Failure to obtain tentative approval. The first applicant fails to obtain tentative approval of the application within 30 months after the date on which the application is filed, unless the

Page 4 21 U.S.C. 355(J)(5)(D)(i)(1V) failure is caused by a change in or a review of the requirements for approval of the application imposed after the date on which the application is filed. Section 505(q) of the statue also provides that, in some instances, a "first applicant" does not forfeit exclusivity for failing to obtain tentative approval within 30 months if a petition related to that ANDA delayed its approval: If the filing of an application resulted in first-applicant status under subsection 00(5)(D)(1)(IV) and approval of the application was delayed because of a petition, the 30-month period under such subsection is deemed to be extended by a period of time equal to the period beginning on the date on which the Secretary received the petition and ending on the date of final agency action on the petition (inclusive of such beginning and ending dates), without regard to whether the Secretary grants, in whole or in part, or denies, in whole or in part, the petition. 21 U.S.C. 355(q)(1)(G) (emphasis added). This forfeiture exception, however, applies only to petitions that raise an issue of public health with respect to the "first applicant" ANDA: The Secretary shall not delay approval of a pending application submitted under subsection (b)(2) or (j) because of any request to take any form of action relating to the application, either before or during consideration of the request, unless (i) the request is in writing and is a petition submitted to the Secretary pursuant to section 10.30 or 10.35 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations); and (ii) the Secretary determines, upon reviewing th petition, that a delay is necessary to protect the public health. 21 U.S.C. 355(q)(1)(A) (emphasis added) Based on the plain language of these statutory provisions, a first applicant forfeits its 180- day exclusivity if it fails to obtain tentative approval of its ANDA application within 30 months from the ANDA filing date, unless (1) there was a change in or review of the requirements for

Page 5 approval of that ANDA that occurred after the ANDA had been filed, or (2) a petition delayed approval of the first applicant's ANDA because such a delay was necessary to protect the public health. Teva forfeited its 180-day exclusivity under these provisions. Teva's ANDA was filed on May 25, 2004. The ANDA filing date plus 30 months was November 25, 2006. Teva received tentative approval on March 28, 2007. Its failure to obtain tentative approval by the November 25, 2006 deadline constitutes a statutory forfeiture. Neither statutory forfeiture exception applies here. First, Teva's failure to obtain tentative approval within the 30-month period may not be excused due to a "change in or a review of the requirements for approval of the application imposed after the date on which the application is filed." 21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(IV). Based on publicly accessible documents, there is nothing to indicate any change in or review of the approval requirements since May 25, 2004, the date Teva's ANDA was filed, that could have been delayed approval of that ANDA. Teva thus has no basis to rely on the forfeiture exception. Second, Teva caimot argue that "approval of [its] application was delayed because of a petition" and that such delay was "necessary to protect the public health." 21 U.S.C. 355 (q)(1)(a)(ii), (G). The statue defines "petition" as one "submitted to the Secretary pursuant to section 10.30 or 10.35 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations." Id. 355(q)(1)(A)(i). Such petitions include a citizen petition (21 C.F.R. 10.30) and a petition to stay administrative action (21 C.F.R. 10.35). But no such petition has been filed, relevant to Teva's ANDA.

Page 6 C. The FDA Should Expedite Consideration Of This Petition To Avoid Delaying Generic Competition Lupin seeks expedited c onsideration of this petition to ensure a timely launch of its generic products upon final approval. The FDA has previously indicated that it will make a forfeiture determination if a subsequent applicant becomes eligible for approval within 180-days after the first applicant begins commercial marketing. That is the situation here. Lupin as well as at least seven other ANDA filers (besides Teva) hold tentative approvals of ANDAs that are related to generic versions of Avaproe-brand irbesartan. Upon i nformation and belief, at least some of the ANDA filers, including Lupin, submitted Paragraph IV Certifications with respect to the '247 patent and were not sued. Accordingly, the '247 patent calmot be a basis for precluding the grant of final FDA approval for such ANDA filers. Upon information and belief, those commonly-situated ANDAs relating to generic irbesartan tablets should be entitled to obtain final approval upon the expiration of the pediatric exclusivity period that is associated with the '317 patent. That pediatric exclusivity expires on March 30, 2012. We thus seek a formal determination of Teva's forfeiture to ensure that generic competition for Avaproe-brand products is not delayed. Lupin, like all generic drug manufacturers, needs time to ramp-up immediately for commercial marketing. To be sure, such activities can begin only upon a formal Agency determination that Teva's ANDA will not stand in the way of Lupin's launch. Resolving this straightforward petition as soon as possible will substantially enhance Lupin's ability (as well as the ability of all other ANDA filers that are similarly situated) to

Page 7 launch its generic products immediate upon final approval. Such a ruling would not only benefit Lupin, it would prevent undue delay in public access to lower-priced generic al ternatives to Av aprot-brand products. Lupin thus seeks a prompt and formal de termination as to Teva's eligibility for 180-day generic drug exclusivity. Upon information and belief, the FDA already reached an internal de termination with respect to whether Teva has forfeited its 180-day patent-challenge exclusivity, but the Agency i ntentionally is delaying publication of that determination. In view of the wide-reaching implications of such a d etermination and the imminent March 30, 2012 date, Lupin again r espectfully requests an immediate response to this petition. III. ENVIR ONMENTAL IMPACT Under 21 C.F.R. 25.3(a), the relief requested by this petition is categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of an enviromnental assessment or an environmental impact statement, IV. ECONOMIC IMPACT According to 21 C.F.R. 10.30(b), information on economic impact is to be submitted only when requested by the Commissioner following review of the petition. Such information will be promptly submitted upon request. V. CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 10.30(b), the undersigned certifies that, to the best knowledge and belief of the undersigned, this petition includes all information and views on which the

Page 8 petition relies, and that it includes representative data and information known to the petitioner which are unfavorable to the petition. Sincerely, LESLIE SANDS Director Regulatory Affairs (USA) LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Harborplace Tower, 111 South Calvert Street, 21 st Floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 TEL: 410 576 2000 FAX: 410 576 2221

Page 1 of 2 Front (410)576-2000 Origin ID: ODMA Feasz Office Manager LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC law; HARBORPLACE TOWER 111 S. CALVERT STREET BALTIMORE, MD 21202 JI2101112190225 SHIP TO: (311) 327.6860 BILL SENDER Div of Dockets Management, DHHS FDA 5630 FISHERS LN RM 1061 Ship Date: 16MAR12 ActiNgt 1.0 LB CAD: 7527369ANET3250 Deltiery Address Bar Code 1111111111111 Ref # Ctiee Petition Invoice 0 PO Dept# 1111111111111111111111111111111 ROCKVILLE, MD 20857 TRX# 7981 7751 6472 [02111 19 OBTA MON - 19 MAR A2 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 20857 MD-US IAD II 12G15105/A278 II After printing this label: 1. Use the 'Print' button on this page to print your label to your laser or inkjet printer. 2. Fold the printed page along the horizontal line. 3. Place label in shipping pouch and affix it to your shipment so that the barcode portion of the label can be read and scanned. Warning: Use oniy the printed original label for shipping, Using a photocopy of this label for shipping purposes is fraudulent and could result in additional billing charges, along with the cancellation of your FedEx account number. Use otkisaystern constitutes your agreement to the service conditions in the curent FedEx Service Guide, available on fedex.com.fedex will not be responsible for any claim in excess of $100 per package, whether the rest-tit-cif loss, damage, delay, non-letivery,rnisdewery,or rag -05-f- r-5-- na on, unless yordedare a nigher vevetpay an seasonal cnarge, tro3%---rnerrysuramatiuss-artrffle-a timely claim.limitations found in the current FedEx Service Guide apply. Your right to recover from FedEx for any loss, including intrinsic value of the package, loss of sales, income interest, profit, attorney's fees, costs, and other forms of damage whether direct, incidentalconsequential, or special is limited to the greater of $100 or the authorized declared value. Recovery cannot exceed actual documented loss.maximum for items of extraordinary value is $500, e.g. jewelry, precious metals, negotiable instruments and other items listed in our ServiceGuide. Written claims must be filed within strict time limits, see current FedEx Service Guide. https://www.fedex.com/shipping/html/en//printlframe.html 3/16/2012