Anti Land-Grabbing Action Committee

Similar documents
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016

W.P.No.32054/2014 (GM-RES) ORDER. In Prakash Singh Vs. Union of India, (2006) 8 SCC 1, Apex Court issued several directions in the matter of police

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 [Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

Yes, it is possible. Rule nos.5(4), 14(8)(a) and 14(8)(c) pave way for processing of such applications.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER

THE KARNATAKA SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PROHIBITION OF TRANSFER OF CERTAIN LANDS) ACT, 1978

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 18 OF 2003 THE HAMPI WORLD HERITAGE AREA MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ACT, Arrangement of Sections

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS. CRIMINAL PETITION No. 979/2012

THE HAMPI WORLD HERITAGE AREA MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ACT, Arrangement of Sections

THE KARNATAKA PARKS, PLAY-FIELDS AND OPEN SPACES (PRESERVATION AND REGULATION) ACT, 1985

The Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991

SV Ramachandra Rao Managing Director Resource Inputs Limited At Nellore branch of SIRC of ICAI

Vide our judgement dated 07 th May, 2016 the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No.5740 OF 2007 (LA-BDA)

THE KARNATAKA OWNERSHIP FLATS (REGULATION OF THE PROMOTION OF CONSTRUCTION, SALE, MANAGEMENT AND TRANSFER) ACT, 1972

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO

KARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2012 THE KARNATAKA POLICE (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2012 Arrangement of Sections

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE LANDS (VESTING OF OWNERSHIP TO THE OCCUPANTS) ACT, 2001

Breaking Free: Rehabilitating Former Manual Scavengers

PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA Sub: Special scheme of State awards Sarvottam Seva Prashashthi for outstanding civil servants.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA. CP.KLRA No.3/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO

FORUM FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. DATED THIS THE 21 st DAY OF MAY 2013 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303/2013

BETWEEN: 1. SMT MAHADEVAMMA W/O MAHADEVAIAH R/AT KEREPALYA HAMLET OF ANCHIKUPPE MADABAL HOBLI MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DSTIRICT.

THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS OF 2014 (LA-RES)

THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE

Note on abolition of capitation fee in private institutions And taking action against such institutions

Karnataka High Court Sri John Adil Kamath Pinto vs Shri Umesh Chandra on 26 July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.

1. The Commissioner of Police No.1, Infantry Road Bangalore.

THE BANGALORE METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT, 1985 CHAPTER I CHAPTER II

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. CA No.969/2015 IN COP NO.84/2012 BETWEEN:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU. Before THE HON BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No.31892/2009 (LA-BDA)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (C) NO. 150 OF versus WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. W.P.Nos.50029/2013 & 51586/2013 (CS-RES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision :

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI. Application No. 06 of Manoj Mishra Vs. Union of India & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MINES LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 259 TO BE ANSWERED ON 30 TH MARCH, 2012 R&R POLICY FOR MINING PROJECTS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ELECTION MACHINERY

The Director of Horticulture welcomed the Chairman and members to the first meeting of the Executive Committee.

KARNATAKA INFORMATION COMMISSION NOTIFICATION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

Draft Ward Committee & Area Sabha Rules

Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. User s guide to Karnataka Right to Information Act*

SCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF OFFENCES (BY ACIDS) ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN

Kittur Rani Chennamma Memorial Committee, Kittur, (represented by its Member Secretary), Kittur Petitioner

BENAMI PROPERTY LAW :- ADV. CA ASHWANI TANEJA (FCA, ACS, AICWA, NCFM, DISA, LL.B, LL.M)

BENAMI PROPERTY LAW :- ASHWANI TANEJA (FCA, ACS, AICWA, NCFM, DISA, LL.B, LL.M)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS. Crl.P.No.4731/2013 C/W Crl.P.No.

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2012

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2016 (KLR CON)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

A Presentation by. Years of Expert Professional Services

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 30 OF 2005 THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, Arrangement Sections CHAPTER-1

NIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT

The Kerala Land Conservancy Act, Keyword(s): Property of Government, Unauthorised Occupation, Government Lands

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)

PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

THE KARNATAKA PRESERVATION OF TREES ACT, 1976 CHAPTER III CHAPTER V

The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR

THE MAHARASHTRA EMPLOYEES OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) REGULATION ACT, [3 of 1978] 1. (Amended upto Mah.

DEPOSITORIES ACT, 1996 [As amended by the Securities Laws(Amendment) Act, 2014]

1 of 7 03-Oct-15 6:31 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6472/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

Legislative Brief The Information Technology (Amendment) Bill, 2006

PROCEEDINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 CHAPTER I

THE PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971 ACT NO. 40 OF 1971

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA. W.P. No OF 2014 (KLR-RR-SUR)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.

Indira Sagar Dam. Rs crore but expected to be nearly Rs. 5,000 crore Loss

CHAPTER FOUR MEDIA & JOURNALISTS. The Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1955.

THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL ACT, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION ACT, 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Transcription:

Anti Land-Grabbing Action Committee No. 759, 5th Main, 8th Cross, R.T.Nagar, II Block, Bangalore 560032 Ph: 094481 20305 Website : http://savekarnataka.in email: karnatakasave@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE GIVEN ON 8/5/2015 TO HON BLE CHIEF MINISTER ABOUT ABOUT LAND GRABBING IN KARNATAKA (Note excludes issues raised in the Memorandum given to the Hon ble Lokayukta on 2 nd May 2015, as the Hon ble Lokayukta has already taken suo-moto cognizance of the three specific cases and has already issued notices to the government) Very large extents of government lands have been encroached/ grabbed all over Karnataka. Encroachers of government lands are only unauthorised occupants without title of the land. Encroachments are done either for living purpose or for commercial purpose. Clearing of encroachments have to be done differently keeing in view the purpose of encroachment.the identification of such encroachers is easy and the encroachments can be cleared anytime as they cannot sell the land and cheat innocent people. But the more serious and dangerous offence is grabbing of government land by creating false documents in connivance with government officials. The government officials who are the custodians of government lands and documents have themselves indulged in the most henious crime of supporting the land mafia to grab vast extents of government land. Very senior officers have deliberately ignored reports given by Legislative Committees and Expert Groups to help land grabbers. Even specific directions given by the Courts have been ignored to allow huge land grabbing. Our Committee has been making persistent efforts to not only force the government to get back the grabbed land, but also to punish the land grabbers and officials who helped the land grabbers. The recent demolition drive by the government ignoring the specific directions given by the Courts has affected large number of innocent citizens who have not only lost all their life earnings, but also have been mercilessly thrown on streets. In this connection, our Committee would like to bring to the notice of the Hon ble Chief Minister the following points for immediate necessary action: 1. CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS SHOULD BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY AGAINST THE CHIEF SECRETARIES AND OTHER CONCERNED OFFICERS WHO FAILED TO ACT TILL TODAY AS PER SPECIFIC DIRECTIVES GIVEN IN HIGH COURT JUDGMENT DATED 11/4/2012: The High Court while hearing WP No.817/2008 & others, constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of Hon ble Justice Sri N.K. Patil to examine the ground realities and prepare an action plan for preservation of lakes in the City of Bangalore. The Committee submitted the report to the Hon ble Court on 3/3/2011. The Court accepted the Report. WP Nos 13690/2009, 31343/1995, 18030/2005 and 6036/2006 were C/W WP No. 817/2008 and in the judgment dated 11/4/2012, in the final Order, it was clearly stated that all the recommendations of the Report must be implemented by the First Respondent,i.e., the Chief Secretary. What was the Administration doing since the pronouncement of the judgment. It had ample time to prepare a suitable Action-plan for the eviction process. Since no action has been taken as per the Court Order, FIRs should be filed on all the officers who were responsible for 1

proper maintenance and preservation of lakes. No steps have been taken to create awareness among the innocent public to avoid being cheated by land grabbers.if action had been taken, at least those people who constructed houses after the date of judgment would not have lost their hard-earned life savings and thrown onto streets. 2. LAND GRABBING ALLOWED EVEN AFTER JOINT LEGISLATURE COMMITTEE REPORT WAS MADE PUBLIC IN 2007 Since the submission of the Joint Committee Report, massive land grabbing has taken place with the connivance of officers/officials. Since even in well establised cases of forgery, land grabbers were not punished and officers were not prosecuted, it continued unabated without any fear of punishment. 3. SANGLIANA S CASE Though 8 acres of land grabbed by forgery by Sangliana s family members was taken back by the District Administration, no criminal case has been filed against Sangliana and his family members. No action has been initiated against officers/officials who assisted in creating the false docuements. The DPAR instead of initiating action against Sangliana has even denied the information sought under the RTI Act. This is just an example. The Revenue department itself has informaion about thousands of other similar cases. Why no action is being taken? Action must be immediately initiated against officers in DPAR who failed to act even after our Committee gave information about Sangliana s case to the government. The case was also widely reported in all major newspapers. 4. MIS-USE OF QUASI-JUDICIAL POWERS - The quasi judicial powers has been extensively misused by the Special Deputy Commissioners to help land grabbers. In Union of India Vs K.K.Dhawan (1993(2) SCC 56), Hon ble Supreme Court has held that the desciplinary action can be taken agaisnt an officer who acts negligently or recklessly or in order to confer undue favour on a person while excercising judicial or quasi-judicial powers. There are thousands of cases where this power has been misused to help land grabbers and cheat innocent public of their hard earned money. Why no criminal action has been initiated on them? Action should also be initiated against Appellate authorities who have suo-moto powers to review such decisions but have failed to do so till today. 5. 3.7 LAKH ACRES ENCROACHMENT/LAND GRABBING ALLOWED FROM 2011 TO 2014 : In 2014, the government submitted an affidavit to the High Court that the revenue land encroached/grabbed had increased to 13 lakh acres, besides the forest land encroachments/grabbing of 1.7 lakh acres. Serious action has to be initiated against all those who allowed such massive land grabbing even after exhaustive reports about land grabbing had been made public. 6. LAND GRABBING SURROUNDING BANGALORE URBAN AREA SINCE JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT WAS GIVEN HAS NOT BEEN MADE PUBLIC EXCEPT FILING AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE HIGH COURT: Government is paying some attention to only Bangalore Urban district encroachments/grabbing. Bangalore Urban district is only 2,200 sq. kms. The so-called Bangalore Rural District (Hosakote, Nelamangala, Devanahalli and Doddaballapur) is no longer rural and has become fully urbanized. Similarly, Ramanagaram district, is also almost urbanized. These three districts were till 1980 one Bangalore Composite district and these three are now together known as Bangalore Metropolitan Region Development Authority (about 8,000 sq. kms) of which the Chief Minister is the Chairman. It is this 2

B.M.Region which is fast getting urbanized and massive government lands are being grabbed and innocent people are cheated 7. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IS BEING DONE TO RECOVER THE LANDS JUST OUTSIDE BANGALORE URBAN AREA: In the BMRDA area there is still about 90,000 acres of government land under encroachment/grabbing which are mostly in Bangalore Rural and Ramanagaram districts, worth about Rs.1 lakh crores at a conservative estimate of Rs.1 crore per acre 8. TIME BOUND ACTION PLAN- Since the problem is unprecedented in nature and is all purvasive, the government should have come out with an accurate Time-Bound Action Plan applicable Statewide. Clearing/recoverning encraochments/grabbed lands as per individual Court Orders will not solve the problem. The problem needs to be addressed in a top-down approach and not a bottom-up approach. Identification of landgrabbers preparing a list of the officers/officials who connived with them - filing of FIRs on both the land grabbers and the listed officers/officials, - confiscating their assets - providing for rehabilitation/compensation of the displaced innocent public cheated by these land-grabbers and officers and finally evicting the illegal occupants. No liniency should be shown to enforcers of law like government servants, former and present Ministers and legislators, retired and sitting judges as even ordinary are not excused on the ground of ignorance of law and their houses have already been mercilessly demolished without making proper alternate arrangement though they had enough time to do so. 9. NOT A SINGLE OFFICIAL HAS BEEN PROSECUTED FOR PREPARING BOGUS RECORDS AND PUNISHED SO FAR EVEN THOUGH SECTION 192 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT WAS AMENDED AS EARLY AS IN 2007: Section 192A has been added to the Karnataka Land Revenue Act to punish not only encroachers but persons who grabbed lands by fabricating false documents with the sole intention of selling the land to cheat innocent people. It also provides for punishment with imprisonment of officers/officials who supported the land grabbers in creating false documents. 192 B provides for punishing the abettors of land grabbers. In spite of clear provisions, why no action has been initiated against land grabbers and officials under the provisions of Sec 192? 10. LAND GRABBERS ALLOWED TO RETAIN TITLE OF THEIR GRABBED LAND AND HELP THE LAND GRABBERS TO CHEAT THE INNOCENT PUBLIC OF THEIR HARD-EARNED LIFE SAVINGS: About 20,000 acres have been under occupation of landlords and builders in the name of UNAUTHORIZED CULTIVATORS APPLICATION (FORM 50 AND 51) in Bangalore Urban district, even though no such land within 18 km limit of BBMP can be regularized. A former Special DC of Bangalore Urban District, Mr.Ramanjaeya had regularized lands over 1,042 acres in 428 cases as has been documented in 6 volumes of enquiry report by Regional Commissioner, Bangalore in 2011. These reports are available with Revenue Department. No action has been initiated in any of the cases. 11. 3000 ACRES OF LAND ACQUIRED BY BDA IS UNDER THE POSSESSTION OF LAND GRABBERS/ENCRAOCHERS :The BDA has so far acquired since 1962 about 20,000 acres of land in its 1,300 sq.km area of which about 4,000 acres have been de-notified. Of the balance about 16,000 acres, 25% or about 4,000 acres should be Civic Amenities and open spaces available 3

with BDA. But BDA has only about 800 acres and over 3,000 acres are under encroachment. These are under occupation of landlords, builders and political leaders. The BDA should recoer these lands and should rehabilitate the innocent poor and middle class people who have been duped by land sharks by selling these sites without title. The BDA itself has made layouts in over 21 lake-beds illegally like Sarakki and Banswadi. Those innocent persons who are thrown out of their houses should be rehbilitated by BDA by recoering its own land under encroachment. 12. 60000 FILES AVAILABLE IN GOVERNMENT ITSELF WHICH THROWS LIGHT ON SPECIFIC LANDS GRABBED BY CREATING BOGUS RECORDS HAVE NOT BEEN EXAMINED FOR THE LAST DECADE AND LAND GRABBERS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO CHEAT INNOCENT PUBLIC OF THEIR HARD EARNED MONEY: There are about 60,000 files relating to government lands grant applications dumped in the record room of Viswesvaraya Towers Taluk Office. It contains mostly bogus records created by the Revenue Officials. Efforts made to get these files examined have been deliberately ignored by concerned officers. If these files are examined one by one, the magnitude of bogus records creation by revenue officials will be known. Officers who have been vested with responsibility of examining these files but failed to do so should be severly punished as many innocent people have been cheated because of their inaction. The provisions of The Inam Abolition Act have been violated and proper Orders of the Land Tribunals have not been acted upon to facilitate land grabbers and the government has not furnished any information to our Committee about the identification and action taken in such cases even when we wrote to the revenue department. Even information sought about cases examined under 136(3) of KLR Act have not been furnished. 13. Lakshman Rao Committee did not say that Lakes which have lost characteristics of lake should be distributed as sites. On the other hand it said that such lake bed lands should be converted into Tree Parks. 14. In the case relating to Race Course shifting to Chika Jala- Dodda Jala vilalge limits in Devanahalli, the Karnataka Hight Court judgment by Justice Gopala Gowda in 2010 specifically said that part of the lake which had lost its characteristics as a water body, should be restored to its original position. 15. IN THE RECENT DEMOLITION CARRIED OUT BY DC, BANGALORE URBAN, HE VIOLATED SUPREME COURT S SPECIFIC DIRECTIVE REGARDING DEMOLISHING RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES, ETC, IN LAKE BED AREA: The reason why lakes lose their water storage is because of the deliberate action of encroaching upon the 850 kilometers of Rajakaluwes in Bangalore Urban district and builders dumping debris into the lakes and encouraging construction of Didheer temples (instant temples) so that no government officials will dare to remove them. There is a Supreme Court Order in 2010 that all unauthorized religious structures by the road side and government lands must be removed within one year and a report must be sent by the Chief Secretary to the Supreme Court. This has been disregarded by government itself to help land grabbers. 16. By allowing a mis-classification of lakes having lost their characteristics should be allowed for building sites government walks into the trap of Land Mafia which will destroy the remaining few lakes also. 4

17. FAILURE TO USE 326 ACRES AND 18 GUNTAS OF LAND GIVEN BY GOVERNMENT AT CONCESSIONAL RATES GIVEN TO BDA FOR DISTRIBUTION AMONGST VERY POOR AND DISPLACED FAMILIES. BDA CRIMINALLY MISUSING PART OF THE ABOVE LAND BY ALLOTING IT TO PEOPLE WHO WERE NOT ELIGIBLE: Government in its GO dated 21/6/2007 had handed over 326 acres 18 guntas of land to BDA to construct houses and distribute to families displaced as a result of eviction process of government lands. BDA had to use this land and complete these projects within a time frame of 3 years. BDA had to form a committee to identify the beneficiaries, prepare a list and allot the houses. DC, Bangalore Urban District was also one of the members of this Committee. Most of land has not been used and is lying vacant today, in spite of clear action plan. The DC Bangalore being a member was aware that such land was available to be distributed among the displaced innocent public, but took no steps to rehabilitate them before demolishing their houses as per the Court orders recently. 18. NO ACTION TAKEN TILL TODAY AGAINST OFFICERS WHO ALLOWED MULTI- STOREYED BUILINGS TO COME UP IN LAKE BED AREA - The Government cannot claim ignorance of the unauthories layouts which have come up in the lake beds. What were the officers doing when multi-storied buildings were coming up in the lake bed area and the public were being cheated by land grabbers? 19. WATER BODIES DEPLETING - Most of the lakes today have become sewage tanks. Instead of preserving and ensuring that the ground water level improves, the opposite has been done by blocking the inlet channels and the lake have been deliberately made to dry up to facilitate land grabbers and big builders to grab the land by creating false documents, form layouts and cheat the innocent public. 20. UNREGULATED GROWTH OF CITIES The Country and Town Planning Act and other specific Acts applicable to Bangalore have been deliberately not enforced resulting in extremely haphazard growth of Bangalore affecting not only the air but also water and transport. Large number of layouts have been allowed to come up without reserving 50% of the mandatory area for public purposes resulting in congestion and lack of lung space. The situation today has been so created that in the event of any natural calamity, a large number of innocent people will be affected for failing to properly regulate the growth. Bengaluru Date: 8 th May 2015 (A.T.Ramaswamy) Convener Anti Land-Grabbing Action Committee 5