Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Similar documents
Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

AWARD FINRA Dispute Resolution. vs. Case Number: Hearing Site: Chicago, Illinois Names of Respondents NATURE OF THE DISPUTE

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Miami, Florida Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Michael R. Averett

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FiNRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award NASD Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: Houston, Texas Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc.

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

RECEiVED. WELLINGTON SHIELDS & Co. LLC MEMBER NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE FEB 2 21U8

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Santanu Bhattacharya and Gargi Dasgupta (Claimants) vs. Chicago Investment Group LLC and Mitesh Shere (Respondents)

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution. Claimant Case Number: Karl Austin Pettijohn REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting.

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

Case No HO ORDER (1) APPROVING SETTLEMENT WITH SETTLING BROKERS and (2) ENTERING FINAL CLAIMS BAR ORDER AND INJUNCTION

AWARD NASD Dispute Resolution REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES. CASEINFORl\1ATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc.

NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes

Investment Consulting Agreement

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

ICDR INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION ARBITRATION RULES

NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION. Arbitration Claim

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DECISION

No. U Ml An WILLODEAN P. PRECISE, COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION.

1. Please indicate the nature of the initial claim that was filed. Note: AP is the abbreviation for Associated Person. Member vs.

August 30, A. Introduction

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST DECLARES FEBRUARY CASH DISTRIBUTION. Current Month Distribution 1,205,000 39,000 $3.52 (b)

Updated October 1, 2018

Understanding Legal Terminology in NFA Arbitration Cases

Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES

Plaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:

Supplemental reply to FINRA s response to requests for data on motions to dismiss, dated April 19, 2011: SR-FINRA

PAMS ARBITRATION RULES

APG ASBESTOS TRUST. 1. A copy of these ADR Procedures; 2. Form Affidavit of Completeness; 3. Election Form and Agreement for Binding Arbitration; and

Award FINRA Dispute Resolution

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs.

Upon the application, dated January 25, 2010 (the Application ) 1 of South

EXHIBIT Q LIMITED GUARANTY OF COMPLETION

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

2007 PA Super 177. OPINION BY DANIELS, J.: Filed: June 11, These are Consolidated Appeals from the Order of the lower court

GTMAX PROFESSIONAL END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

Sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans

SELECTED INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Award FINRA Dteputo Resolution


National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *

Non-Discretionary IA Services Client Services Agreement

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

The court annexed arbitration program.

AON HEWITT DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NEXUS PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator Training. Motions to Dismiss Training Module Release Date August 2010 (Rule Effective Date February 23, 2009)

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND DISTRIBUTION PLAN

WELLNESS CENTER AGREEMENT. (Oldsmar), 100 State Street West, Oldsmar, Florida 34677, (collectively, the "the Cities"), the

ALI-ABA Course of Study Civil Practice and Litigation Techniques in Federal and State Courts

THIS INDEPENDENT ENGINEER'S AGREEMENT (this Independent Engineer's Agreement) is made on [ ]

Independent Arbitration Scheme for the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)

AUTONOMIE COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 36

THE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES

RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

GAC GLOBAL HUB SERVICES HUB AGENCY STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 1.1 In this Agreement, the following words shall have the following meanings:

NASSAU COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION PANELS ARBITRATION RULES

Rules Of Arbitration Of The Alternative Dispute Resolution Tribunal Of The Bar Association Of Nassau County, N.Y., Inc.

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

MCGRAW CONGLOMERATE CORPORATION SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Case 2:06-cv JS-WDW Document 18 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 13. Plaintiffs,

Illinois Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Arbitration and Mediation Rules

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Fifth Circuit Rejects Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraudulent Transfer Claims

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Under the terms of sale the following meaning shall apply:- You means the person seeking to purchase the goods from us

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :01 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

Transcription:

Award In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimants Bruce A. Wilkerson and Antoinette M. Wilkerson, Individually and as Trustees of the Wilkerson Family Education Trust, Laura A. Wilkerson Trustee UTA-DTD-10-19-92 Case Number: 14-00904 vs. Respondent Resource Horizons Group LLC Hearing Site: Nashville, Tennessee Nature of the Dispute: Customers vs. Member This case was decided by an all-public panel. REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES For Claimants Bruce A. Wilkerson and Antoinette M. Wilkerson, Individually and as Trustees of the Wilkerson Family Education Trust, Laura A. Wilkerson Trustee UTA- DTD-10-19-92: Adam J. Gana, Esq., Adam J. Weinstein, Esq. and Daniel Gwertzman, Esq., Gana LLP, New York, New York. For Respondent Resource Horizons Group LLC ( RHG ): From May 20, 2014, to December 4, 2014, Alan M. Wolper, Esq., Nathan Lamb, Esq. and Heidi E. VonderHeide, Esq., Ulmer & Berne, LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Thereafter, Kelly S. Miller, Resource Horizons Group, LLC, Marietta, Georgia. CASE INFORMATION Statement of Claim filed on or about: March 21, 2014. Antoinette M. Wilkerson signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. Bruce A. Wilkerson signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. The Wilkerson Family Education Trust, Laura A. Wilkerson Trustee UTA-DTD-10-19-92 signed the Submission Agreement: March 21, 2014. Statement of Answer filed by Respondent on or about: May 20, 2014 Resource Horizons Group LLC signed the Submission Agreement: May 22, 2014. Motion to Amend the Statement of Claim ( Motion to Amend ) filed by Claimants on or about: September 26, 2014. Motion to Initiate Default Proceedings Pursuant to FINRA Rule 12801 ( Motion for Default ) of the Code of Arbitration Procedure (the Code ) filed by Claimants on or about: December 3, 2014.

Arbitration No. 14-00904 Award Page 2 of 5 CASE SUMMARY In the Statement of Claim, Claimants asserted the following causes of action: failure to supervise; omission of facts; misrepresentation; negligence; respondeat superior; unsuitability; breach of fiduciary duty; fraud; and conversion. The causes of action relate to the alleged conversion of Claimants funds and purchase of unsuitable securities in Claimants account, as a result of an alleged Ponzi scheme put in place by Respondent s financial advisor. Unless specifically admitted in its Answer, Respondent denied the allegations made in the Statement of Claim and asserted various affirmative defenses. RELIEF REQUESTED In the Statement of Claim, Claimants requested: compensatory damages in the amount of $610,000.00, plus interest at the statutory rate; attorneys fees; expert fees; forum fees; punitive damages; and such other and further relief as this Panel deems just and proper. At the close of the hearing, Claimants requested $1,830,000.00, which includes compensatory damages in the amount of $610,000.00, plus treble damages allowed by the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act in the amount of $1,220,000.00. In the Statement of Answer, Respondent requested a denial and dismissal of Claimants claims. OTHER ISSUES CONSIDERED AND DECIDED The Arbitrators acknowledge that they have each read the pleadings and other materials filed by the parties. On or about September 26, 2014, Claimants filed a Motion to Amend to add two (2) Respondents to Claimants Statement of Claim. On or about October 21, 2014, the proposed Respondents subject to the Motion to Amend filed with FINRA Dispute Resolution a Notice of Bankruptcy. Subsequently, Claimants filed correspondence requesting that their Motion to Amend be held in abeyance and did not reassert the Motion to Amend. On or about December 3, 2014, Claimants filed a Motion for Default. In the Motion, Claimants asserted that Respondent advised FINRA that it would no longer participate in this arbitration proceeding and Claimants requested that the Panel enter a default ruling against Respondent. Respondent did not file a response. On January 23, 2015, the Panel held a telephonic hearing on Claimants Motion for Default, which Respondent attended, and issued an Order which held in abeyance Claimants Motion for Default. Subsequently, the Panel determined that the Motion for Default did not meet the requirements under Rule 12801 of the Code. On the January 23, 2015, telephonic hearing, Claimants also moved to have the evidentiary hearing held telephonically and Respondent did not oppose Claimants request. Further, Respondent participated in the recorded telephonic evidentiary hearing held on March 3, 2015.

Arbitration No. 14-00904 Award Page 3 of 5 The parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies or that a handwritten, signed Award may be entered. AWARD After considering the pleadings, the testimony and evidence presented at the recorded telephonic hearing, and post-hearing submissions, the Panel has decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows: 1. Respondent RHG is liable and shall pay to Claimants $1,830,000.00, which includes compensatory damages in the amount of $610,000.00, plus treble damages allowed by the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act in the amount of $1,220,000.00. 2. Respondent RHG is liable and shall pay to Claimants interest at the rate of 10% per annum on the amount of $1,830,000.00 from the date of this Award until paid in full, pursuant to Tennessee law. 3. Respondent RHG is liable and shall pay to Claimants punitive damages in the amount of $183,000.00, pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. 4. Respondent RHG is liable and shall pay to Claimants attorneys fees in the amount of $610,000.00, pursuant to the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. 5. Any and all relief not specifically addressed herein is denied. FEES Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed: Filing Fees assessed a filing fee* for each claim: Initial Claim Filing Fee =$ 1,575.00 *The filing fee is made up of a non-refundable and a refundable portion. Member Fees Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm(s) that employed the associated person(s) at the time of the event(s) giving rise to the dispute. Accordingly, as a party, Respondent RHG is assessed the following: Member Surcharge =$ 2,250.00 Pre-Hearing Processing Fee =$ 750.00 Hearing Processing Fee =$ 4,000.00 Hearing Session Fees and Assessments The Panel has assessed hearing session fees for each session conducted. A session is any meeting between the parties and the arbitrator(s), including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator(s), that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees associated with these proceedings are:

Arbitration No. 14-00904 Award Page 4 of 5 Two (2) Pre-hearing sessions with the Panel @ $1,200.00/session =$ 2,400.00 Pre-hearing conferences: July 30, 2014 1 session January 23, 2015 1 session One (1) Hearing session @ $1,200.00/session =$ 1,200.00 Hearing Date: March 3, 2015 1 session Total Hearing Session Fees =$ 3,600.00 The Panel has assessed the total hearing session fees of $3,600.00 to Respondent RHG. All balances are payable to and are due upon receipt.

MARCH 11, 2015

MARCH 11, 2015

MARCH 11, 2015