Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11

Similar documents
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Case: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7

: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481

Case 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL

Case 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

2:18-CV W. SHAWN MURNAHAN (Ga. Bar No ) murnahanw(a~sec.gov

ORTHOFIX INTERNATIONAL N V

Case 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:16-cv DPG Document Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT

Case 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38

USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is

) ) WHEREAS, in connection with the investigation, the Division has determined that

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 EXHIBIT 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.

Case 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 830-X-6 EXEMPT SECURITIES AND EXEMPT TRANSACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Electricity Supplier Cash Collateral Agreement. THIS ELECTRIC SUPPLIER CASH COLLATERAL AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

$201,450,000 CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS (LIMITED TAX REFUNDING BONDS) SERIES 2012A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10

15 USC 80b-3. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

muia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 179 Filed 03/05/19 Page 1 of 8

Case KRH Doc 3040 Filed 07/12/16 Entered 07/12/16 17:55:33 Desc Main Document Page 62 of 369

Case 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs

C V CLASS ACTION

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

) NJ Holdings, LLC (d/b/a Coast to Coast ) Business Funding), Nickolas Godfrey, )

Case CSS Doc 84 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11

DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,

Case 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

i Case No (KJC)

Case 1:18-cv CM Document 6 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1

mew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEV ADA. consented to the entry of this Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction (the "Decree"), without

Case 2:13-cv DBP Document 2 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Case 3:13-cv M Document 60 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1778

Case 0:17-cv RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2017 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Case 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:13-cv CW Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

Case 2:16-cv RFB-GWF Document 4 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4

Case 1:14-cv CM Document 166 Filed 12/19/14 Page 1 of 17

STORMWATER UTILITY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED UNDERWRITING AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

11? "76WiA, y01\v7-aikt ' DAVID DE

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY WASHINGTON, D.C ORDER RELATING TO GLS SOLUTIONS. INC.

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Capital Markets and Services (Amendment) 1 A BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007.

Sec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CV -MIDDLEBROOKS/BRANNON

A DEVELOPMENT IN INSIDER TRADING LAW IN THE UNITED STATES: A CASE NOTE ON CHIARELLA v. UNITED STATES DOUGLAS W. HAWES *

Case 4:12-cv Document 209 Filed in TXSD on 07/02/14 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

8:11-cv LSC -TDT Doc # 8 Filed: 08/16/11 Page 1 of 23 - Page ID # 16

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-01002 (CRC) v. LAWRENCE P. SCHMIDT, et al., Defendants. CONSENT OF RECEIVERSHIP DEFENDANTS 1. 1Vlar on Hecht ("Receiver"), as the Covert-appointed. Receiver for Defendants FutureGer~ Company djb/a FutureGen Capital; Commercial Equity Partners, Ltd.; FGC Distressed Assets Investment #l, LLC; FuiureGen Capital DDA CG Fund LLC; FGC Tax Lien Fund #2, LLC; FGC Trading Fund #1 LLC; FGC SPE No 1 LLC; FGC SPE NO 2 LLC and FGC CM Note Fund LLC (collectively, the "Receivership Defendants"), acknowledges that the Receivership Defendants have been served with the Complaint in this action, enters a general appearance, and admits the Court's jurisdiction over the Receivership Defendants and over the subject matter of this action. 2. The Receivership Defendants hereby consent to the entry of the. final Judgment in the form attached hereto (the "Final Judgment") anal incorporated by reference herein, which, among other things: 1

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 2 of 11 (a) permanently restrains and enjoins the Receivership Defendants from violation of Sections 5 and 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S,C. 77e and 77q] and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)] and Rule 1Ob-5 thereunder 17 C.F.R. 24O.1Ob-5]; (b) orders that the Receivership Defendants are jointly and. severally liable far disgorgement in the amount of $T2,025,21O;i and (c) orders.: that the. obligation of the Receivership Defendants, but not -any obligation of Defendant Lawrence Schmidt, sha11 be deemed satisfied by the Court-approved distribution of assets by the Receiver and shall not extend past the Court-approved closing of the. receivership estate. 3. The Receivership Defendants waive the entry of findings of act and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 4, The Receivership Defendants waive the right, if any,. to a jury trial and to appeal from the entry of the Final Judgment. 5. The. Receivership Defendants enter into this: Consent voluntarily and represent that no threats; offers, promises, ar inducements of a:ny kind have been made by the Commission or any member, officer, employee, agent, or representative of the Commission to induce the Receivership Defendants to enter into this Consent. 6. The Receivership Defendants agree that this Consent shall be incorporated into the Final Judgment with the same force and effect as if fully set forth therein. ' This disgorgement amount was calculated by the SEC in accordance with the relevant legal precedents and is the same amount of disgorgement the Court ordered in granting the SEC's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Lawrence Sclundt in this matter. See Docket Nos. 222, 205, 205-1, and 205-2. 2

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 3 of 11 7. The Receivership Defendants. will nat oppose the enforcement of the Final Judgment on the ground, if any exists, that it fails to comply with Rule 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and hereby waives any objection based thereon. 8, The Receivership Defendants waive service of the Final 3udgment and agree that entry of the Final Judgment by the Caurt and filing with the Clerk of the Court will constitute notice to the Receivership Defendants of its terms. and conditions. On behalf of the Receivership Defendants, the Receiver further agxees to provide counsel for the Commission, within thirty days after the Final Judgment is filed with the Clerk of the Court, with. an affidavit or declaration stating that the Receivership Defendants have received and read a copy of the Finai Judgment. 9. Consistent with 17 C.F.R.. 202.50, this Consent z~salves only the claims asserced against the Receivership Defendants in this civil proceeding. The Rece uership Defendants.acknowledge that no promise or representation has been made by the Commission or any member, :officer,. employee, agent, or representative of the Commission with regard to any criminal liability that may have arisen ar may arise froze the. facts underlying this. action or immunity from any such c~minal liability. The Receivership Defendants waive any claim of Double Jeopardy based upon the seftlement of this proceeding, including the imposition of any remedy or civil penalty herein. The Recervarship Defendants further acknowledge that the Court's entry of a permanent injunction may have collateral consequences under federal or state law and the rules and regulations. ofself-regulatory organizations, licensing boards, and otller regulatory organizations. Such collateral consequences include, but. are not limited to, a statutory disqualification wit11 respect to membership or participation in, or association with a member of, a self-regulatory organization. This statutory disqualification has consequences that are separate from any sanction imposed in an administrative paroceedng. In addition,, in any disciplinary

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 4 of 11 proceeding before the Cornrnission based on the entry of the injunction in this action, the Receivership Defendants understand that they shall not be permitted to contest the factual allegations of the Complaint in this action. 10. The Receivership Defendants understand and agree to cotnpl~ with the terms of 17 C.F.R. 202.5(e), which provides in part that it is the. Commission's policy "not to permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the Complaint or order for proceedings," and "a refusal tia admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits n.or denies the allegations." As part of the Receivership Defendants' agreement to comply witk~ the terms of Section 202.5(e), the Receivership Defendants: (i) will not take any action or make or permit to he made any public. statement denying, directly or indirectly, any allegation in the Complaint or creating the impression that the Complaint is without factual basis; (ii) will not make or pei~rnit to be made any public statement to the effect that Defendant does not admit the allegations of the Complaint, or ~h~.t this Consent. contains. no admission of the. alle~atians, without also stating. that the Receivership Defendants do not deny the allegations and {iii) u~an the ding of this Consent, the Receivership Defendants hereby withdraw any papers filed in this action to the extent that they deny any allega#ion in the Complaint. If the Receivership Defendants breach this agreement, the Comrx~iss on may pefit on the Court to vacate the Final Judgment a11d restore this action to its active docket. Nothing in this paragraph affects the Receivership Defendants: (i) testimonial obligations; or (ii) right to take legal or factual positions in litigation or other legal proceedings in which the Conlxnission is zlot a party.. 1 1. The Receivershzp Defendants hereby waive any rights under the Equal Access to Justice Act, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, or any other 4

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 5 of 11 provision of law to seek from the United States, or any agency, or any o~fieial of the Uxuted States acting in his or her official capacity, directly or indirectly, reimblusement of attorney's fees oz other fees, expenses, or costs expended by the Receivership Defendants to defend against this action. For these purposes, the Receivership Defendants agree that the Receivership Defendants are not the prevailing parties in this action since the parties have reached a good faith settlement. 12. The Receivership Defendants agree that the Cornrnission may present the Final Judgment to the Court for signature and entry without further notice. 13. The Receivership Defendants agree that this Couxt shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms. of the Final Judgment. Dated: /0 /S "2U/~ FutureGen Company d/b/a FutureGen Capital; Commercial Equity Partners, Ltd., FGC Distressed Assets Investment #1, LLG; FutureGen Capital DDA CG Fund LLC; FGC T~ Lien Fund #2, LLC; FGC Trading Fund #1 LLB; FGC SPE No 1 LLC; FGC SPE NO 2 LLC; and FGC CM Note Fund LLC gy; ~~ai~t,glii ~. Marion Hecht Receiver for the Receivership Defendants Cliftonl,arsonAllen LLP 901 North Glebe Road, Suite Z00 Arlington, VA 22203 5

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 6 of 11 On ~~-t I ~, 2018,, a person known to me, personally appeared before me and acknowledged executing the foregoing Consent with full authority to do so on behalf of the Receivership Defendants as the Court-appointed Receiver for those entities. c~.-,,-r ---_.. Notary Public Commission expires: APr, ~ 3~ + ~Q~ ~ Approved as to form: EIV{ANNE MUNOZ NOTARY PUBLIC R EGISTRATION # 7700948 C OMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MYC APRIL30, 020P ~ RES Pavia lianeman, r,sq. Whiteford Taylor Preston LLP 7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21202-1636 (410) 347-8729 Attorney fox Receivership Defendants D

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 7 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-01002 (CRC) v. LAWRENCE P. SCHMIDT, et al., Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO RECEIVERSHIP DEFENDANTS The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendants FutureGen Company d/b/a FutureGen Capital; Commercial Equity Partners, Ltd.; FGC Distressed Assets Investment #l, LLC; FutureGen Capital DDA CG Fund LLC; FGC Tax Lien Fund #2, LLC; FGC Trading Fund #1 LLC; FGC SPE No 1 LLC; FGC SPE NO 2 LLC; and FGC CM Note Fund LLC (collectively, the "Receivership Defendants"), by and through the Court-appointed Receiver, Marion Hecht, having appeared; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over the Receivership Defendants and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Receivership Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the"exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. 78j(b)]

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 8 of 11 and Rule lob-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. 240.1Ob-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) the Receivership Defendants' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with the Receivership Defendants or with anyone described in (a). II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Receivership Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 9 of 11 (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) the Receivership Defendants' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with the Receivership Defendants or with anyone described in (a). III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Receivership Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 10 of 11 instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77h]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) the Receivership Defendants' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with the Receivership Defendants or with anyone described in (a). IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Receivership Defendants' are jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of $12,025,210, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint. The obligation of the Receivership Defendants, but not any obligation of Defendant Lawrence Schmidt, shall be deemed satisfied by the Court-approved distribution of assets by the Receiver and shall not extend past the Court-approved closing of the receivership estate.

Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 11 of 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that the Receivership Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VII. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: Hon. Christopher R. Cooper, U.S.D.J.