IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 92 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

Murder of Eric Smith. Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 3593(a), the United States hereby gives notice that it believes that the

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Case 9:06-cr DTKH Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

v. Criminal No [ELECTRONICALLY FILED] JELANI SOLOMON

Case 2:05-cr JFW Document 2724 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAlVIA * * AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Newport News Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

- - x OF INTENT TO S~K THE DEATH PENALTY. The United States of America, pursuant to the requirements of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3593(a),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. 4:97CR1~1 ERW (rcm) ) ) ) ) )

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NABHVILLE DIVISION. COMES NOW the United states of America, pursuant to 18

Case 2:08-cr wks Document 106 Filed 08/25/2009 U.S. Page DISTRICT 1 of 7 coun: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

MIAMI DIVISION. Case No Cr-Gold (s)(s)lbandstra NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY AS TO DEFENDANT IAN ORVILLE AIKEN

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEKA SENTENCE OF DEATH

AND NOW come~_th~_:united States of America, pursuant to

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. the United States of America, by and through the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division ) ) ) ) ) )

ti:66 alrt I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT LUBBOCK DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

01 Dt:C I 3 PM 3: 3 I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

cr. No ,-01,-02(TFH) -03

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 41 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. (Muir, J.) UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T~H~E~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

Alexandria Division NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK A SENTENCE OF DEATH

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

Section 9 Causation 291

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

- ~'. - . ~., .. ' zp DATI ipal'ry. United St.te. Attorney. Form No. JSA-33s-274 (Ed ) NOTICE or INTENt TO IIIK. S8 02 Cr.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

Terry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog

UNITED STAT!S DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FONTANA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT. Julie Ann Epps (MS Bar No. 504 East Peace Street Canton, MS (601) facsimile (601)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Dept.1

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

Florida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.

SUBSTITUTE INFORMATION IN LIEU OF INDICTMENT

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF YOLO. Dept. Case No

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT

A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellee PETERSEN-BEARD. Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S S REPLY BRIEF APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

Supreme Court of Florida

Matter of Martin CHAIREZ-Castrejon, Respondent

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PETITION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON [Pursuant to Penal Code and ]

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 94-CF-163. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Organized Crime And Racketeering

No Kevin Lynch

H 5104 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. objection to the PSR based on Blakely v. Washington, 2004 WL (2004).

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

H 5447 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Federal Capital Offenses: An Abridged Overview of Substantive and Procedural Law

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Defendant SUMMARY

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CASE NO CR. DEUNDRA JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff-Appellee.

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2007

Case 3:18-mc HTW-LRA Document 1 Filed 05/21/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. HON. NANCY G. EDMUNDS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, (A)

NO CRK STATE OF TEXAS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS. ) 218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT RAUL SMITH ) KARNES COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Homicide. Motor Vehicle Offenses Resulting in Death. First Degree Murder. Second Degree Murder. For example. Involuntary Manslaughter

Matter of Martin CHAIREZ-Castrejon, Respondent

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

NO In The Supreme Court of the United States ARTEMUS RICK WALKER, STATE OF GEORGIA

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" U~,t::'.: ", ATLANT1\ DIVISION ... NQTICfl OF INTEN'l TO SEt;K THE DEATH PENALTY

Transcription:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, ANTONIO ROBERTO ARGUETA, alkla "Alex Antonio Cruz," alkla "Buda," Defendaut. Case No. DKC-OS-0393 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY AS TO DEFENDANT ANTONIO ROBERTO ARGUETA COMES NOW the United States of America, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3593(a, by and through its undersigned counsel, and notifies the Court and the defendant in the above-captioned case that the Government believes the circumstances of the offenses charged in Counts Fifteen and Eighteen of the Third Superseding Indictment are such that, in the event of the defendant's conviction of any of these offenses, a sentence of death isjustified underchapter228 (Sections 3591 through 3598 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and that the Government will seek the sentence of death for these offenses: Count Fifteen, murder of Nancy Diaz in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1959(a(1; and Count Eighteen, causing the death of Nancy Diaz with a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 9240. The Government proposes to prove the following factors beyond a reasonable doubt as justifying a sentence of death.

COUNT FIFTEEN MURDER IN AID OF RACKETEERING A. Statutory Proportionality Factors Enumerated under 18 U.S.C. 359ICa(2(AHDl. 1. Intentional Acts to Take Life or Use Lethal Force. The defendant intentionally participated in an act, contemplating that the life of a person would be taken and intending that lethal force would be used in connection with a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, and Nancy Diaz died as a direct result of the act. 18 U.S.C. 3591(a(2(C. 2. Intentional Acts of Violence Creating a Grave Risk of Death. The defendant intentionally and specifically engaged in an act of violence, knowing that the act created a grave risk of death to a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, such that participation in the act constituted a reckless disregard for human life and Nancy Diaz died as a direct result of the act. 18 U.S.c. 359J(a(2(D. B. Statutory Aggravating Factors. Enumerated under 18 U.S.C. 3592(c. 3. Substantial planning and premeditation - the defendant committed the offenses after substantial planning and premeditation to cause the death of a person (18 U.S.c. 3592(c(9; and 4. Mnltiple killings or attempted killings - the defendant killed or attempted to kill more than one person in a single criminal episode (18 U.S.C. 3592 (c(16. 2

participants in the offense, and Nancy Diaz died as a direct result oftheact. 18 U.S.C. 3591(a(2(C. 2. Intentional Acts of Violence Creating a Grave Risk of Death. The defendant intentionally and specifically engaged in an act of violence, knowing that the act created a grave risk of death to a person, other than one of the participants in the offense, such that participation in the act constituted a reckless disregard for human life and Nancy Diaz died as a direct result of the act. 18 U.S.C. 3591(a(2(D. B. Statutory Aggravating Factors Enumerated under 18 U.S.C. 3592(c. 3. Substantial planning and premeditation - the defendant committed the offenses after substantial planning and premeditation to cause the death of a person (18 U.S.c. 3592(c(9»; and 4. Multiple killings or attempted killings - the defendant killed or attempted to kill more than one person in a single criminal episode (18 U.S.c. 3592(c(16». C. Non-StatutoryAggravatingFactorsldentifiedunder 18 U.S.C. 3593 Will 1. Victim Impact Evidence. As demonstrated by the victim's personal characteristics as an individual human being and the impact of the death upon the victim and the victim's family and friends, the defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the victim and the victim's family and friends. 2. Callous Disregard for the Severity of the Offense. The defendant has demonstrated a callous disregard for the severity of the offense, as evidenced by a statement made by the defendant to law enforcement officers in which he callously disregarded the severity of his actions in the murder of Nancy Diaz. 4

3. Participation in additional serions acts of violence. Those serious acts of violence include, but are not limited to, the following: a The assault ofjhony Diaz on September 17, 2004 outside a nightclub in Langley Park, Maryland. The Government further gives notice that in support of imposition of the death penalty, it intends to rely upon all the evidence admitted by the Court at the guilt phase of the trial and the offenses of conviction as described in the Indictment as they relate to the background and character of the Defendant, in his moral culpability, and the nature and circumstances of the offenses charged in the Indictment. Respectfully submitted, Rod J. Rosenstein United States Attorney a es M. Trust istant Unite States Attorney District of Maryland 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this ]'i"" day of May, 2006, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Intention to Seek the Death Penalty As To Defendant ANTONIO ROBERTO ARGUETA to be mailed first class, postage prepaid to counsel for Argueta as follows: Teresa Whalen Law Offices of Teresa Whalen 801 Wayne Ave, Suite 400 Silver Spring, Maryland 2091 0 Arcangelo M. Tuminelli Law Offices of Arcangelo M. Tuminelli 1005 N. Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Jam. Trusty United States torney 6