Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

Similar documents
Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 92 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

(a) Except as provided in K.S.A Supp and , and amendments thereto, if a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. the United States of America, by and through the

Case 2:08-cr wks Document 106 Filed 08/25/2009 U.S. Page DISTRICT 1 of 7 coun: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Intended that deadly force would be used in the course of the felony.] (or)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. (Muir, J.) UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

Do Capital Jurors Understand Mitigation? Why mitigation? 4/13/2011. Aggravation vs. Mitigation

Terry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog

G.S. 15A Page 1

cr. No ,-01,-02(TFH) -03

Murder of Eric Smith. Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 3593(a), the United States hereby gives notice that it believes that the

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEKA SENTENCE OF DEATH

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 212th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 27, 2006

Deadly Justice. A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty. Appendix B. Mitigating Circumstances State-By-State.

Death Penalty. Terry Lenamon on the. Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 822

1 HB By Representative England. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 12/15/2016. Page 0

Federal Capital Offenses: An Abridged Overview of Substantive and Procedural Law

ti:66 alrt I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT LUBBOCK DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Case 9:06-cr DTKH Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. 4:97CR1~1 ERW (rcm) ) ) ) ) )

SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

Case 2:05-cr JFW Document 2724 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 5

v. Criminal No [ELECTRONICALLY FILED] JELANI SOLOMON

Law School for Journalists

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" U~,t::'.: ", ATLANT1\ DIVISION ... NQTICfl OF INTEN'l TO SEt;K THE DEATH PENALTY

Supreme Court of Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Carrico, S.J.

In the event you find (have found) the defendant guilty of (name offense), you must then consider and answer the following question:

Intimidatory Offences Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE

INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 81B 1

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY 8, 2017 AN ACT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Defendant Below, Appellant, Nos. 516 and 525, 2000

For An Act To Be Entitled

TAB 12: Aggravating & Mitigating Circumstances

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

CHAPTER House Bill No. 7101

Landmark Case MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR MURDER R. v. LATIMER

RICHARD STALDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF BLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS AND VENETIA MICHAEL WARDEN DAVID WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,493. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CHRISTOPHER J. ALLISON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT SENATE BILL Chapter 68, Laws of th Legislature 2005 Regular Session SENTENCING REFORM ACT

Missouri Revised Statutes

INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY

As Amended by Senate Committee. SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-6

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (N0. 2) ACT 2000 BERMUDA 2000 : 23 CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (N0. 2) ACT 2000

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Newport News Division

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PERSONS IN CUSTODY. Prison Number Case No.: (To be supplied by the Clerk of the District Court) INSTRUCTIONS--READ CAREFULLY

Alexandria Division NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK A SENTENCE OF DEATH

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

Appellant, Appellee. [February 16, Jack Dempsey Ferrell appeals his conviction and sentence of

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Annex C: Draft guidelines

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 41 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION

Written Materials for Supreme Court Review 8 th Amendment Instructor: Joel Oster

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

- - x OF INTENT TO S~K THE DEATH PENALTY. The United States of America, pursuant to the requirements of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3593(a),

REVISOR XX/BR

4. What is private law? 3. What are laws? 1. Review all terms in chapters: 1, 2, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, What is the purpose of Law?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,270. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BRENT L. ALFORD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

NC Death Penalty: History & Overview

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior.

United States District Court Western District of Kentucky PADUCAH DIVISION

FEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation

Case 3:16-cv ADC Document 6 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

ERRATA SHEET FOR ROBINSON, CRIMINAL LAW: CASE STUDIES & CONTROVERSIES, THIRD EDITION (as of March 25, 2013)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2003 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 693

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, AD 2014 (Criminal Jurisdiction) INDICTMENT NO C82/05

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

THE QUEEN. and AKEEM SEBASTIAN

A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS

Transcription:

FILED Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!'%nsas IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1 1 v. 1 CRIMINAL NO. 4:04CR00035-02 WRW 1 VERTIS CLAY 1 SPECIAL VERDICT FORM MURDER OF DARRYL JOHNSON BY DEFENDANT VERTIS CLAY - I. AGE OF DEFENDANT Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO." Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that: VERTIS CLAY was eighteen years of age or older at the time of the offense. YES )( Instructions: If you answered "YES" with respect to the determination in this Section I, proceed to Section I1 which follows. If you answered "NO" with respect to the determination in this section, then stop your deliberations, cross out Sections 11,111, IV, V and VI of this form, and proceed to Section VII. Each juror should then carefully read the statement in Section VII, and sign in the appropriate place if the statement accurately reflects the manner in which he or she reached his or her decision. You should then advise the court that you have reached a decision.

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 11 11. REQUISITE MENTAL STATE Instructions: For each of the following, answer "YES" or "NO." 1 (A). Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY intentionally killed Darryl Johnson.,,y Y E NO 1 (B). Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY intentionally inflicted serious bodily injury which resulted in the death of Darryl Johnson.,x YES Instructions: If you answered "YES" with respect to one or more of the determinations in this Section 11, proceed to Section I11 which follows. If you answered "NO" with respect to all of the determinations in this section, then stop your deliberations, cross out Sections 111, IV, V, and VI of this form, and proceed to Section VII. Each juror should carefully read the statement in Section VII, and sign in the appropriate place if the statement accurately reflects the manner in which he or she reached his or her decision. You should then advise the court that you have reached a decision.

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 3 of 11 111. STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS Instructions: For each of the following, answer "YES" or "NO." 1. Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY committed the offense described in Count 4 in an especially heinous, cruel, and depraved manner in that it involved torture or serious physical abuse to and severe mental pain and suffering of the victim, as set out in Instruction No. 5? YES NO 2. Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY committed the offense in Count 4 as consideration for the receipt, and in expectation of the receipt, of anything of pecuniary (monetary) value, as set out in Instruction No. 6? I

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 4 of 11 3. Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY committed the offense described in Count 4 after substantial planning and premeditation to cause the death of a person, as set out in Instruction No. 7? YES 2- Instructions: If you found the requisite age in Section I, the requisite mental state in Section I1 and answered "Yes" with respect to one or more of the aggravating factors in this Section 111, proceed to Section IV which follows. If you answered "NO" with respect to all of the Statutory Aggravating Factors in this Section 111, then stop your deliberations, cross out Sections IV, V, and VI of this form, and proceed to Section VII of this form. Each juror should then carefully read the statement in Section VII, and sign in the appropriate place if the statement accurately reflects the manner in which he or she reached his or her decision. You should then advise the court that you have reached a decision.

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 5 of 11 IV. NON-STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTOR Instructions: Answer "YES" or "NO." 1. Do you, the jury, unanimously find that the Prosecution has established beyond a reasonable doubt that VERTIS CLAY would be a danger in the future to the lives and safety of other persons, as evidenced by his lack of remorse, and that his dangerousness tends to support imposition of the death penalty, as set out in Instruction No. 8? X YES NO Instructions: Regardless of whether you answered "YES" or "NO" with respect to the Non-Statutory Aggravating Factor in this Section IV, proceed to Section V, which follows.

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 6 of 11 V. MITIGATING FACTORS Instructions: For each of the following mitigating factors indicate, in the space provided, the number of jurors who have found the existence of that mitigating factor to be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. A finding with respect to a mitigating factor may be made by one or more of the members of the jury, and any member of the jury who finds the existence of a mitigating factor may consider such a factor established in considering whether or not a sentence of death will be im- posed, regardless of the number of other jurors who agree that the factor has been established. Further, any juror may also weigh a mitigating factor found by another juror, even if he or she did not also find that factor to be mitigating: 1. Mr. Clay is punishable as a principal in the offense, which was committed by another, but his participation was relatively minor, regardless of whether the participation was so minor as to constitute a defense to the charge. one Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 2. Another defendant, equally culpable in the crime, will not be punished by death. Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 3. Mr. Clay does not have a significant prior history of criminal conduct. I Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 4. The victim consented to the criminal conduct that resulted in the victim's death. 3 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none").

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 7 of 11 5. Darryl Walker was intimately involved in the murder of Darryl Johnson, but Walker has made a deal with the Prosecution to not only avoid the death penalty, but a sentence of life 6. Mr. a Clay has not engaged in any violent behavior while in custody. 1 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 7. Mr. Clay has adjusted well to imprisonment. 1 8 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 8. Mr. Clay has been a model inmate while incarcerated. 1 1 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none7'). 9. A sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of release would be a significant punishment, particularly because Mr. Clay will be left for years to contemplate his wrongdoing and to feel the loss of his children, fnends, and family. 7 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 10. Mr. Clay's children, family, and fnends will be adversely affected if he is executed. Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 1 1. Mr. Clay is a father, and his children will suffer if he is executed. ] b Number ofjurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none7').

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 8 of 11 12. Mr. Clay has acted as a father figure to other children, who will also suffer if he is 1- Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 13. The favorable plea agreements offered to cooperating witnesses in this case are factors that weigh against imposition of a sentence of death for Mr. Clay- 5 Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 14. Mr. Clay has proven himself to be capable of acts of generosity and kindness. k)ylp, Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 15. Mr. Clay was raised in a decent and wholesome environment. _a, Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). 16. Other than the conduct charged in this indictment, Mr. Clay has led a decent life. Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none"). ~rotect others. 17. Other than the circumstances of this case, Mr. Clay has used his size and strength to 1- Number of jurors who find this to be a mitigating factor (if none, write "none").

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 9 of 11 The following extra spaces are provided to write in additional mitigating factors, if any, found by any one or more jurors. If none, write "NONE" and line out the extra spaces with a large "X." If more space is needed, write "CONTINUED" and use the reverse side of this page. Number of jurors who so find. Instructions: Regardless of whether you chose to make written findings for the Mitigating Factors in Section V above, proceed to Section VI and Section VII which follow.

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 10 of 11 VI. DETERMINATION Based upon consideration of whether the aggravating factors found to exist sufficiently outweigh any mitigating factor or factors found to exist, or in the absence of any mitigating factors, whether the aggravating factors are themselves sufficient to justify a sentence of death, and whether death is therefore the appropriate sentence in this case: A. Death Sentence We determine, by unanimous vote, that a sentence of death must be imposed. YES If you answer "YES," the Presiding Juror must sign here, and you must then proceed to Section VII. If you answer "NO," the Presiding Juror must sign, and you must then proceed to Section VI(B): Date: B. Sentence of Life in Prison Without Possibility of Release We determine, by unanimous vote, that a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of release must be imposed. YES.)( If you answer "YES," the Presiding Juror must sign here, and then you must proceed to Section VII. If you answer "NO," the Presiding Juror must sign here, and then you must proceed to Section VII. 3 Date: I" O C C,2007. ~ ~

Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 11 of 11 VII. CERTIFICATION By signing below, each juror certifies that consideration of the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, or sex of VERTIS CLAY or the victim was not involved in reaching his or her individual decision, and that the individual juror would have made the same recommendation regarding a sentence for the crime or crimes in question regardless of the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, or sex of the defendant, or the victim. Date: 3/"0&k,2007.