Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

Case 3:06-cv JAP-TJB Document 1 Filed 03/27/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HA WAIl. Case No.: NATURE OF THE ACTION AND JURISDICTION

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS eu,:".' IJ~:'LD~~?~:~~URT EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

Case 4:04-cv LLP Document 1 Filed 12/28/2004 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 47 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 9:06-cv RHC Document 1 Filed 02/28/2006 Page 1 of 7

5:06cv1684 JUDGE HICKS MAG. JUDGE HORNSBY

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 6:10-cv TC Document 1 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintitl, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

Case 8:04-cv SCB-TBM Document 32 Filed 10/07/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~A I FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINO~ STRA~ E EASTERN DIVISION 0~U ) ) tl0v 1 0 7_604 ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 4:05-cv CLS Document 1 Filed 05/26/2005 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:04-cv PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

Case 1:06-cv LTB-CBS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:13-cv LEK-KSC Document 1 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DIVISION OF OHIO EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:14-cv KAM-JO Document 8 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 36

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Courthouse News Service

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv WLS Document 1 Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Transcription:

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 ROBERT D. UNITAS (MA KENNETH J. KRYVORUKA (DC, OH ERICA D. WHITE-DUNSTON (DC, MD EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 0 L Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 00 Telephone: (0 - FAX: (0 - Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ROBERT RAMIREZ, et. al. Case No. C0-0-JSW Plaintiff, and EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, AMENDED Plaintiff-Intervenor, COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION v. CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide appropriate relief to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and other women who have been adversely affected by those practices. As alleged with more particularity below, Defendant Cintas Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Corporation (Defendant refused to recruit and hire and otherwise discriminated against women nationwide as Drivers/Service Sales Representatives because of their sex, in violation of Title VII. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission s (EEOC intervention is limited to the issue of Defendant s refusal to recruit and hire women as Drivers/Service Sales Representatives, and it covers Defendant s practices nationwide. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to U.S.C.,,,, and. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 0(g( and 0(f( and ( of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of, as amended, U.S.C. 000e- and -(f( and ( (Title VII.. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and nationwide. PARTIES. Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos is described in Plaintiff s Second Complaint, incorporated herein by this reference. The class she seeks to represent with respect to her Title VII claims is also described in Plaintiff s Third Complaint.. Plaintiff-Intervenor Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Sections 0(g( and 0(f( and ( of Title VII, U.S.C. 000e- and -(f( and (.. At all relevant times, Defendant Cintas Corporation has been a corporation that continuously has been doing business in the State of California and continuously has had at least employees. Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0. At all relevant times, Defendant continuously has been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 0(b, (g and (h of Title VII, U.S.C. 000e(b, (g and (h. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS. All conditions precedent to this intervention have been fulfilled. Attached as Appendix A is a certification that this case is of general public importance.. Since at least August,, Defendant has engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Section 0(a of Title VII, U.S.C. 000e-(a. Defendant has denied employment to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and a class of women applicants nationwide by refusing to recruit and hire them as Drivers/Service Sales Representatives because of their sex.. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint has been to deprive Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she seeks to represent of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect their status as applicants because of their sex. 0. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint are and were intentional.. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint are and were done with malice or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she seeks to represent. Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, EEOC respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in the unlawful conduct alleged above and any other employment practice that discriminates on the basis of sex. B. Order Defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs that provide equal employment opportunities for women and eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. C. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she represents by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to rightful-place hiring. D. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she represents by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint, in amounts to be determined at trial. E. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she represents by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint, including compensation for emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial. F. Order Defendant to pay Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she represents punitive damages for Defendant s malicious and reckless conduct as described above and in Plaintiffs' Second Complaint, in amounts to be determined at trial. Case No. C0-0-JSW

Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 G. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and the class of women she represents by providing the affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of their unlawful practices, including but not limited to rightful-place hiring or, alternatively, front pay. public interest. H. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the I. Award the Commission its costs of this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint. Respectfully submitted, JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel PHILIP B. SKLOVER Associate General Counsel Systemic Litigation Services BARBARA DOUGHERTY Assistant General Counsel SLS /S/ ROBERT D. UNITAS Senior Trial Attorney /S/ ERICA D. WHITE-DUNSTON Trial Attorney KENNETH J. KRYVORUKA Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 0 L Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 00 (0 - OFFICE (0 - FAX Case No. C0-0-JSW