Executive Summary Case No 140 of 2017

Similar documents
Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).

Case No. 224 of Coram. Shri. I.M. Bohari, Member Shri. Mukesh Khullar, Member. M/s. Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd (VIPL-G)

NOW IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOW:

Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013

Case No.3 of Shri P.Subrahmanyam, Chairman Shri Venkat Chary, Member, Shri Jayant Deo, Member.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

Case No. 02 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri S. B. Kulkarni, Member Shri V. L. Sonavane, Member

DRAFT RULES UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013 CHAPTER XV COMPROMISES, ARRANGEMENT AND AMALGAMATIONS

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI DISTRIBUTION LICENSE

Case No.83 of In the matter of Petition under Section 67 of the E.A, 2003 seeking directions upon MSETCL in regard to erection of Tower.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

Case No. 61 of In the matter of. Petition of Wardha Power Company Ltd. for Review of Order dated 17 January, 2014 in Case No.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

Winding up. Tribunal. Voluntary (Now governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 7097/2010

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE

CASE No. 337 of Coram. Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson I.M. Bohari, Member Mukesh Khullar, Member ORDER

CHAPTER XX WINDING UP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L)NO OF 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1 ST DAY OF MARCH 2014 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY

Case No. 295 of Coram. Anand B. Kulkarni, Chairperson Mukesh Khullar, Member. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited (APML)

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015

.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004

Case No.139 of Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Chairperson Shri Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri Deepak Lad, Member

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 854 OF 2004 CONNECTED WITH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1374 OF 2008

CHAPTER 26 THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NEW DELHI. Petition No. 211/MP/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva

BEFORE THE H.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AT SHIMLA

MORTGAGE DEED THIS DEED OF MORTGAGE IS MADE ON DAY OF THIS MONTH OF IN THE YEAR.

Case No. 2 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

Case No. 94 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 A COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN ISPAT and ENERGY LIMITED

Before the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Bhopal

Captive generation by CTU under the Electricity Act, contextually prohibited?

Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The LLP Bill, 2006 was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on 15 th December,

BILL NO. 19 OF THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY [PART II

THE COAL MINES (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) BILL, 2015

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI. Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 ORDER

GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (GERC)

Through Mr.Prabhjit Jauhar Adv. with Ms.Anupama Kaul, Adv.

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 521 of 2018

ORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH ORDER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2004

The Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill, 2011 A Bill

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO OF 2018] VERSUS

1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Acquisition of rights of three companies in relation to the power transmission systems.

11. To give effect to this guarantee, the IRBI may act as though the guarantors were the principal debtor to the IRBI. 6. The appellant sanctioned the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure for filing appeal before the Appellate Authority) Regulations, 2004

National Disability Insurance Scheme (NSW Enabling) Act 2013 No 104

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur Case No.

Downloaded From

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: versus

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

CASE No. 47 of In the matter of Appointment of foreign firm as Management Consultant by Maharashtra State Electricity Board.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Decision : December 3, 2012 CS(OS) 1785/2010

THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Case No. 135 of Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Member. (1) M/s B.S.Channabasappa & Sons...Petitioner 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH COMPANY PETITION NO.

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

Smt. Yallwwa & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 16 May, 2007

THE HINDUSTAN TRACTORS LIMITED (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS) ACT, 1978 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. CA No.969/2015 IN COP NO.84/2012 BETWEEN:

Agreement for H.V./ L.V. Consumer.

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

GUJARAT ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (GERC) LICENSING OF ELECTRICITY TRADING. Notification No. 3 of 2005

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI

Grievances No.K/DOS/015/874 of and No. K/DOS/016/875 of

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 24 th April, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 08 th October, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010

ORDER Dated: 11 th August, 2004

THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, 2015

CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM M.S.E.D.C.L., PUNE ZONE, PUNE. Case No.07/2016 Date of Grievance : Date of Order :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT. LPA No.658 of 2011 & CM No /2011 VERSUS

Trusts and Guarantee Company Limited and the Union Trust Company Limited, Respecting

Case No. 68 of Coram. Shri. I. M. Bohari, Member Shri. Mukesh Khullar, Member. M/s RattanIndia Nasik Power Ltd.

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

Case bjh11 Doc 957 Filed 04/16/19 Entered 04/16/19 14:24:44 Page 1 of 12

REGULATION MAKING POWER OF CERC

DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 20 OF Vs. DEVAS MULTIMEDIA P. LTD...

Court No Case :- WRIT - C No of 2017

BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PATNA FEES, FINES AND CHARGES REGULATIONS,

Number 4 of County Enterprise Boards (Dissolution) Act 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005

Case No. 167 of Coram. Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Chairperson Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri. Deepak Lad, Member

THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE RAILWAYS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2008

THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 W.P.(C) 1458/2008

Transcription:

Executive Summary Case No 140 of 2017

BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION CASE NO. 140 OF 2017 1. Reliance Infrastructure Limited 2. Reliance Electric Generation and Supply Limited.. Petitioners Vs Adani Transmission Limited.. Respondent 1. The 1 st Petitioner is engaged inter alia in the business of generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. The 1 st Petitioner undertakes setting up of power plant on EPC basis. The 1 st Petitioner is also involved in other businesses unrelated to electricity such as development, execution and implementation of infrastructure projects such as Metro Railway, Roads, etc. 2. The 1 st Petitioner is a licensee having been granted licence for distribution of electricity under the provisions of Section 14 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (EA03 for short). 3. The 2nd Petitioner being Reliance Electric Generation & Supply Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the 1st Petitioner, is incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is an existing company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. 4. The present petition is being filed under the provisions of Section 17(3) of the EA03 read with Regulation 8.3.10 of Maharashtra Electricity

Regulatory Commission (General Conditions of Distribution Licence) Regulations 2006 for, inter alia, seeking approval of this Hon ble Commission to assign the distribution licence granted to the 1 st Petitioner and transfer of distribution utility including transfer of the assets of the 1 st Petitioner to the 2 nd Petitioner. 5. Pursuant to a Scheme of Arrangement between the 1 st Petitioner, the 2 nd Petitioner and their respective Shareholders and Creditors ( the Scheme for short), the 1 st Petitioner proposes to hive off its electricity related businesses to the 2 nd Petitioner which as stated hereinabove is a wholly owned subsidiary of the 1 st Petitioner. 6. The Scheme is to take effect from the Appointed Date or such other date as may be decided by the Bombay High Court and would be operative from the Effective Date as defined therein. 7. With effect from the Appointed Date, the whole of the undertaking and properties of the power generation, transmission and distribution divisions of the 1 st Petitioner, shall pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 or the Companies Act, 2013 as may be applicable and without any further act, deed, matter or thing, stand transferred to and vested in and / or be deemed to be transferred to and vested in the 2 nd Petitioner so as to vest all rights, title and interest pertaining to the power generation, transmission and distribution divisions.

8. With effect from the Appointed Date, all reserves, debts, liabilities, contingent liabilities, duties and obligations of every kind, nature and description of 1 st Petitioner pertaining to power generation, transmission and distribution divisions shall also, under the provisions of Company Act, 1956 and all other applicable provisions, if any, of the Companies Act, 2013 and without any further act or deed, be transferred to or be deemed to be transferred to the 2 nd Petitioner, so as to become from the Appointed Date the reserves, debts, liabilities, contingent liabilities, duties and obligations of the 2 nd Petitioner and it shall not be necessary to obtain the consent of any third party or other person who is a party to any contract or arrangement by virtue of which such reserves, debts, liabilities, contingent liabilities, duties and obligations have arisen in order to give effect to the provisions of this sub-clause. 9. With effect from the Appointed Date and upon the Scheme becoming effective, any statutory licenses, permissions or approvals or consents held by the 1 st Petitioner required to carry on operations of power generation, transmission and distribution divisions shall stand vested in or transferred to the 2 nd Petitioner without any further act or deed, and shall be appropriately mutated by the statutory authorities concerned therewith in favour of the 2 nd Petitioner and the benefit of all statutory and regulatory permissions, environmental approvals and consents, registration or other licenses, and consents shall vest in and

become available to the 2 nd Petitioner as if they were originally obtained by it. In so far as the various incentives, subsidies, rehabilitation schemes, special status and other benefits or privileges enjoyed, granted by any Government body, local authority or by any other person, or availed of by the 1 st Petitioner relating to the power generation, transmission and distribution divisions are concerned, the same shall vest with and be available to the 2 nd Petitioner on the same terms and conditions as applicable to the 1 st Petitioner, as if the same had been allotted and/or granted and/or sanctioned and/or allowed to the 2 nd Petitioner. 10. The Hon ble Bombay High Court by its judgment and order dated 19.01.2017 in Company Scheme Petition Nos 440 and 441 of 2016 has given approval to the Scheme of Arrangement. 11. The Scheme specifically provides, inter alia, that the Scheme is and shall be conditional upon and is subject to the approval of this Hon ble Commission. 12. It is submitted that the said Scheme is in the interest of efficient and effective conduct and running of the electricity generation, transmission and distribution businesses. 13. During the pendency of the present Petition, addendum to the Petition was filed to bring on record subsequent developments after filing of Petition in respect of integrated Mumbai Power Division i.e Generation,

Mumbai Transmission and Mumbai Distribution business regulated by the Hon ble Commission. 13.1. 1 st and 2 nd Petitioner have entered into the Scheme of Arrangement pursuant to which the 2 nd Petitioner shall acquire the Mumbai Power Division from the 1 st Petitioner under the Scheme of Arrangement. It is submitted that consequent to such transfer of the Mumbai Power Division to the 2 nd Petitioner, the 1 st Petitioner has agreed to sell to the Respondent and the Respondent has agreed to purchase from the 1 st Petitioner, the Sale Shares,as per the terms and subject to the conditionsof the Share Purchase Agreement ( SPA ) dated 21.12.2017 signed between Petitioners and Respondent 13.2. As per paragraph 5.2 of the Distribution License No. 1 of 2011, Distribution Licensee has to intimate the Hon ble Commission on any change in the major shareholding of the Distribution Licensee. However, Petitioners are approaching this Hon ble Commission for its approval for and intimation of the said share transfer to Respondent 14. It is submitted that four land parcels ( plots ), details of which are mentioned herein below, at Santacruz, are currently part of asset base of distribution licensed business of the 1 st Petitioner. Sr.No Plot Details Plot Area SqMtr Boundary 1 CTS NO. 34, F.P. No. 61A, TPS- V, Santacruz (E) 15513.90 On or towards North F. P. No. 126 On or towards East Western Express Highway On or towards South

Sr.No Plot Details Plot Area SqMtr Boundary 2 3 4 CTS NO. 34, F. P. No. 61A/3, TPS- V, Santacruz (E) CTS NO. 52, F.P. No. 62, TPS -V, Santacruz (E) CTS NO. 33, F.P. No. 125, TPS-V, Santacruz (E) 2349.70 2790.00 1239.97 Road No. 3 On or towards West Road No. 2 On or towards North Road No. 3 On or towards East Road No. 11 On or towards South Road No. 12 On or towards West Road No. 2 On or towards North Road No. 6 On or towards East Road No. 2 On or towards South Road No. 3 On or towards West F. P. No. 63 & F.P. No. 64 On or towards North Road No. 5 On or towards East Road No. 2 On or towards South Road No. 6 On or towards West F. P. No. 123 & F.P. No. 124 15. It is submitted that the said plots of 1 st Petitioner were permitted to be used for distribution license activity. The 1 st Petitioner wishes to retain these plots of land, in view of its presence at the site, at the value of land. In view of the proposed transfer of shares to the Respondentas stated above, the 1 st Petitioner seeks approval of the Hon ble Commission to permit retention of these plots of land by the 1 st Petitioner as above, at a consideration of Rs. 250 Crores. The said

consideration amount has been arrived at based on the Ratable Value as per Ready Reckoner rates prescribed by Government of Maharashtra for the year FY2017-18, and is in line with the principle established by Hon ble Appellate Tribunal for Electricity in judgment dated 08.04.2015 in Appeal No 160 of 2012 and batch of appeals. 16. Under the Scheme of Arrangement approved by Hon ble High Court, the utility including assets and license of the 1 st Petitioner in respect of the Mumbai Power Division, as on the appointed date (as referred in High Court order) shall stand transferred to and be operated by the2nd Petitioner. As stated above, the shares of 2 nd Petitioner would thereafter be transferred to the Respondent. It is therefore, submitted that all matters (including claims and liabilities)relating to the aforesaid licensed business upto the appointed date, which are under process, initiated or to be initiated in relation to any legal proceedings or regulatory proceedings, or pending with any Government Entity, pertaining to various expenses and/or disallowances and/or liabilities and/or demands and/or receivables all of which are in relation to the period prior to assignment of license to 2 nd Petitioner, are deemed to have been retained by and belong and accrue to the 1 st Petitioner. All such amounts receivable from consumers or payable to consumers, if and when materialized in relation to the period prior to assignment of license to 2 nd Petitioner shall be to the account of 1 st Petitioner. All such amounts receivable and recovered by the 2 nd Petitioner from the

consumers and after adjusting the amount payable by the 2 nd Petitioner to the consumers shall be paid / transferred accordingly to 1 st Petitioner. 17. Prayer The Petitioners, therefore, pray that this Hon ble Commission may be pleased: a. approve transfer of distribution utilityincluding transfer of the assets from 1 st Petitioner to 2 nd Petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid Scheme of Arrangement as approved by the Hon ble Bombay High Court on 19.01.2017 in Company Scheme Petitions Nos 440 and 441 of 2016 and such further orders that may be passed by the appropriate forum; and b. to approve the assignment of the Distribution Licence No 1 of 2011 of the 1 st Petitioner in favour of the 2 nd Petitioner; c. approve transfer of 100% stake of 1 st Petitioner in 2 nd Petitioner to Respondent d. allow the 1 st Petitioner to retain four plots of land at Santacruz valued at Rs 250 Crore e. hold that 1 st Petitioner is entitled to receive from the 2nd Petitioner and is liable to pay to 2 nd Petitioner, all such amounts as may become so receivable or payable in respect of past claims in respect of the licensed business

f. for such further and other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require.