MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO Telephone: (303) Direct: (303) Fax: (303)

Similar documents
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:12-cv- ) ) ) COME NOW Plaintiff the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes ("Tribes") by and

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, CHARLES D.

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT CITIZEN CENTER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

GRAY PETERSON, Appellant. CHARLES F. GARCIA, et al., Appellees

CASE NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT MEDICAL SUPPLY CHAIN, INC,

Case 5:07-cv C Document 27 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No In The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT CADDO NATION OF OKLAHOMA. WICHITA AND AFFILIATED TRIBES, et al.

Case No ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOINT MOTION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) and 10th Cir. R. 27.5, the parties jointly

USCA No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, SANTANA DRAPEAU, Appellant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

In The United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE No & UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

cv IN THE. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ELIZABETH A. TREMBLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case No. CIV HE Judge Joe Heaton, United States District Judge, Presiding

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case: Document: Filed: 09/04/2012 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 04, 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Defendants Vance Norton, Anthoney Byron, Bevan Watkins, Troy Slaugh,

Case 3:16-cv LRH-WGC Document 92 Filed 11/16/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COLORADO REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE

UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No JIM BEICKER, et al.,

IN THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT MARK MARTIN, SECRETARY OF STATE INTERVENORS FIRST AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM

Case 2:17-cv RBS-DEM Document 21 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID# 175

Case 1:16-cv JEB Document 64 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 5:08-cv D Document 71 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Attorneys for Vernal City and Uintah County, Defendants

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case 5:09-cv F Document 11 Filed 02/18/2009 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC

No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. HO-CHUNK, INC. et al., Appellant,

Case ABA Doc 10 Filed 02/10/16 Entered 02/10/16 14:10:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

APPEAL DISMISSED. Division IV Opinion by JUDGE BERNARD Webb and Nieto*, JJ., concur

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

CASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

No In the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit RICHARD DOUGLAS HACKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION PRACTICE DIRECTIVE APPEALS UNDER SECTION 55 OF THE AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION ACT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Nos , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. KRIS W. KOBACH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

ORAL ARGUMENT PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED MARCH 31, No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT NO Plaintiff/ Appellee, Defendant/ Appellant.

Case 5:12-cv C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

CASE NOS , -1307, -1309, -1310, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

OFFICE OF THE CLERK B

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF GEORGIA

Appellate Case: Document: Date Filed: 08/29/2018 Page: 1. No OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No ANNETTE NAWLS and ADRIAN NAWLS, vs.

In The Supreme Court of the United States

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UTE INDIAN TRIBE, MYTON,

United States Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv GJQ ECF No. 58 filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID.1293 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO: 5:07-CV-231

GOVERNOR S MOTION TO STRIKE APPENDICES AND ASSOCIATED ARGUMENTS IN REPLY BRIEFS

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:18-cv HSG Document 73 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 11

PUBLISH TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No

Supreme Court of the United States

Kane County Local Rule

Case , Document 34-1, 03/18/2016, , Page1 of 1

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case 1:15-cv JAP-CG Document 110 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 11

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:12-cv JDL Document 34 Filed 08/06/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 330 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case: Document: 20 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Filed: September 11, 2014

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN, M.D.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 5:15-cv L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:15-cv RRE-ARS Document 91 Filed 10/13/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

Appellate Case: 13-6117 Document: 01019133581 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 Page: 1 MARTHA L. KING 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, CO 80027 Telephone: (303) 673-9600 Direct: (303) 815-1712 Fax: (303) 673-9155 E-Mail: mking@ndnlaw.com www.ndnlaw.com September 27, 2013 VIA ECF SYSTEM DELIVERY Circuit Clerk United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit The Byron White U.S. Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 Re: Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes v. First Bank and Trust Company Case No. 13-6117 Dear Circuit Clerk: In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. Rule 28(j), we notify you of pertinent and significant authority which has come to our attention. On September 24, 2013, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma issued an opinion in Sheffer v. Buffalo Run Casino, 2013 OK 77, overruling Bittle v. Bahe, 192 P.3d 810, a case heavily relied on by First Bank and Doug Haught 1. Bittle was a decision in which the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held that tribes implicitly waive their sovereign immunity when they contract in a state and the contract contains a provision whereby the parties agree to be bound by the state s laws. The Bittle court applied a balancing test and concluded that the state s interests in having its commercial transactions work properly outweighs any interests the tribe might have. Doug Haught felt so strongly about it he included in his state court order: I have reviewed Bittle v. Bahe, 192 P.3d 810. It was a part of the analysis in that case that the tribe agreed to be bound by state law when they applied for a liquor license. In the present case, the tribe agreed to be bound by state law when they opened this account. In Bittle, the tribe acknowledged 1 Ans. Br. 31-32; Aplt.App., vol. 6, 1794, 1796, 1797; Aplt.App., vol. 7, 1916-17, 2016, 2040, 2095-96. CALIFORNIA COLORADO MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NEBRASKA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WASHINGTON DC www.ndnlaw.com

Appellate Case: 13-6117 Document: 01019133581 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 Page: 2 that the casino s agreement to be bound by state law constituted a waiver of any immunity to the subject matter jurisdiction of the Oklahoma courts when the state initiated an action on a violation. Aplt.App., vol. 7, 2095. He continued, It is an element of the preemption analysis discussed in Bittle that all citizens must be assured that they have access to the court system. Id. at 2096. Sheffer overruled Bittle and held Congress has to expressly abrogate sovereign immunity or the tribe has to expressly and unequivocally waive its immunity for waiver to apply in a case. Where neither is present, there is no waiver and there is no state court jurisdiction. Sincerely, FREDERICKS PEEBLES & MORGAN LLP /S/ MARTHA L. KING Martha L. King, OK Bar No. 30786 Rebecca Rizzuti FREDERICKS PEEBLES & MORGAN LLP 1900 Plaza Drive Louisville, Colorado 80027-2314 Telephone: (303) 673-9600 Attorneys for the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes Executive Branch, Appellant-Plaintiff CHEYENNE AND ARAPAHO TRIBES /S/ Martha L. King for CHARLES B. MORRIS Charles B. Morris, OK Bar No. 16019 CHEYENNE AND ARAPAHO TRIBES P.O. Box 32 Concho, Oklahoma 73022 Telephone: (405) 422-7421 Attorney General of the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Appellant-Plaintiff 2

Appellate Case: 13-6117 Document: 01019133581 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 Page: 3 Section 1. Word count CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE As required by Fed. R. App. P. 32 (a)(7)(c), I certify that this Reply Brief is proportionally spaced and contains 337 words. Complete one of the following: 1. I relied on my word processor to obtain the count and it is Microsoft Word 2010. 2. I counted five characters per word, counting all characters including citations and numerals. I certify that the information on this form is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief formed after a reasonably inquiry. /s/ MARTHA L. KING /s/ Martha L. King for CHARLES B. MORRIS 3

Appellate Case: 13-6117 Document: 01019133581 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 Page: 4 CERTIFICATE OF DIGITAL SUBMISSION AND PRIVACY REDACTIONS I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing LETTER TO THE CIRCUIT CLERK as submitted in Digital Form via the court s ECF system, is an exact copy of the written document filed with the Clerk and has been scanned for viruses with the Symantec AntiVirus Corporate Edition version 10.0.0.359, Virus Definition File Dated: 3/1/2011 rev. 6 and, according to the program, is free of viruses. In addition, I certify all required privacy redactions have been made. /S/ KELLY H. BASINGER Litigation Legal Secretary 4

Appellate Case: 13-6117 Document: 01019133581 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 Page: 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing LETTER TO THE CIRCUIT CLERK was served on this 27th day of September, 2013, via the Court s CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all parties of record below. Scott Meacham, OBA #13216 Adam C. Hall, OBA #21202 Melanie Wilson Rughani, OBA #32041 CROWE & DUNLEVY, P.C. 20 North Broadway, Suite 1800 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102-8273 Telephone: (405) 235-7700 Facsimile: (405) 239-6651 Scott.meacham@crowedunlevy.com John.Thompson@crowedunlevy.com Melanie.Rughani@crowedunlevy.com Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee First Bank And Trust Company M. Daniel Weitman, OBA #17412 Assistant Attorney General Oklahoma Attorney General s Office Litigation Division 313 N. E. 21st Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 Telephone: (405) 521-3921 Facsimile: (405) 521-4518 Dan.Weitman@oag.ok.gov Attorney for Defendant-Appellee Doug Haught /S/ KELLY H. BASINGER Litigation Legal Secretary 5