FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Similar documents
Fr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:05-cr JFW Document 2724 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Case 9:06-cr DTKH Document 311 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Case 4:14-cr JPG Document 92 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNMENT S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C (a) and. that it believes that the circumstances of this case are such

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Murder of Eric Smith. Pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 3593(a), the United States hereby gives notice that it believes that the

v. Criminal No [ELECTRONICALLY FILED] JELANI SOLOMON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Newport News Division

- - x OF INTENT TO S~K THE DEATH PENALTY. The United States of America, pursuant to the requirements of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3593(a),

Case 2:08-cr wks Document 106 Filed 08/25/2009 U.S. Page DISTRICT 1 of 7 coun: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

AND NOW come~_th~_:united States of America, pursuant to

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NABHVILLE DIVISION. COMES NOW the United states of America, pursuant to 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. 4:97CR1~1 ERW (rcm) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION. the United States of America, by and through the

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEKA SENTENCE OF DEATH

MIAMI DIVISION. Case No Cr-Gold (s)(s)lbandstra NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY AS TO DEFENDANT IAN ORVILLE AIKEN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAlVIA * * AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

cr. No ,-01,-02(TFH) -03

Case 1:11-cr LO Document 41 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 126 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ti:66 alrt I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C URT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT LUBBOCK DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. (Muir, J.) UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY

Case 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

" findings in regard to the following offenses against Tanji Jackson:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T~H~E~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

01 Dt:C I 3 PM 3: 3 I

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Terry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog

I am proud to share with you one of the great wins of anybody s legal career.

Federal Capital Offenses: An Abridged Overview of Substantive and Procedural Law

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Florida Jury Instructions. 7.2 MURDER FIRST DEGREE (1)(a), Fla. Stat.

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Bulgaria International Extradition Treaty with the United States

Section 9 Causation 291

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Hitachi, Ltd. - Cooperation and Non-Prosecution Agreement

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DAVIS, STATE OF UTAH

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLANT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF

UNITED STAT!S DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

Case3:11-cr WHA Document40 Filed08/08/11 Page1 of 10

Alexandria Division NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK A SENTENCE OF DEATH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION

- ~'. - . ~., .. ' zp DATI ipal'ry. United St.te. Attorney. Form No. JSA-33s-274 (Ed ) NOTICE or INTENt TO IIIK. S8 02 Cr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

INFORMATION FOR FILING A CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1983 AND 1985

PLEA AGREEMENT RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT

Romania International Extradition Treaty with the United States

Case 3:14-cr WHA Document 954 Filed 12/28/18 Page 1 of 7

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

I. Limits of Criminal law a. Due process b. Principle of legality c. Void for vagueness II. Mental State a. Traditional law i.

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Law School for Journalists

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER House Bill No. 7101

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

Case 1:19-cv PAB Document 1 Filed 01/04/19 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

NOTICE OF LODGMENT OF ORDER APPROVING CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE S SETTLEMENT WITH ARMEN HAIG GUGASIAN AND LEVON GUGASIAN [Relates to Docket No.

Case 3:10-cr JAH Document 19 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 6

August 3, Re: Request for Publication of Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker B (July 25, 2017)

NOV STEVE COOLEY CONFORMED COPY. District Attorney of Los Angeles County David Waigren. Deborah Brazil. Deputy District Attorney

Case 2:14-cv GW-AS Document 6 Filed 07/07/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:389

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

SEALING YOUR JUVENILE RECORDS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, United States v. Donald Sterling, et al. (C.D. Cal.)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C

Transcription:

~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DEBRA W. YANG U~ited States Attorney S~EVEN D. CLYMER A~'sistant United States Attorney C ief, Criminal Division S SAN J. DEWITT (California State Bar No. 132462) RqBERT E. DUGDALE (California State Bar No. 167258) KAREN I. MEYER (California State Bar No. 0554) A~sistant United States Attorneys O~ganized Crime and Terrorism Section 1500 United States Courthouse 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-4685/4496 Facsimile: (213) 894-3713 A~torneys U~ITED for Plaintiff STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I I v. I J~RIJUS KADAMOVAS, Plaintiff, No. CR 02-0(B)-NM GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY AGAINST DEFENDANT JURIJUS KADAMOVAS 17!! Defendant. 18 NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY 19 The United States of America, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 20!3593(a), notifies the Court and defendant JURIJUS KADAMOVAS 21 (1defendant"), that the Government believes the circumstances of I tpe offenses charged in Counts One, Two, Three, and Four of the S4cond Superseding Indictment are such that, in the event of a 24! c~nviction, a sentence of death is justified under Chapter 8 25 (~ections 3591 through 3598) of Title 18 of the United States 26 C de, and that the Government will seek the sentence of death for tje following offenses: (1) conspiracy to commit hostage taking 28

~ resulting in the deaths of Meyer Muscatel, Rita Pekler, Alexander 2 Umansky, Nick Kharabadze, and George Safiev, in violation of 3 Title 18, United States Code, Section 1203 [Count One]; the 4 hostage taking resulting in the death of Alexander Umansky, in 5 violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1203 [Count 6 Two]; the hostage taking resulting in the death of Nick 7 Kharabadze, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 8 1203 [Count Three]; and the hostage taking resulting in the death 9 of George Safiev, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 10 Section 1203 [Count Four], each of which carries a possible 11 sentence of death. 12 The Government proposes to prove the following factors as 13 justifying a sentence of death. 14 A. Statutory Proportionality Factors Enumerated under 18 15 U.S.C. 3591(a) (2) (A)-W) 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 28 The following statutory proportionality factors apply to each of Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4. 1. Intentionally Killing the Victim The defendant intentionally killed Meyer Muscatel [Count 1], Rita Pekler [Count 1], Alexander Umansky [Counts 1 and 2], Nick Kharabadze [Counts 1 and 3], and George Safiev [Counts 1 and 4]. 18 U.S.C. 3591 (a) (2) (A). 2. Intentionally Inflicted Serious Bodily Injury that Resulted in the Death of the Victims The defendant intentionally inflicted serious bodily injury that resulted in the deaths of Meyer Muscatel [Count 1], Rita Pekler 2

1 [Count 1J, Alexander Umansky [Counts 1 and 2J, Nick Kharabadze 2 [Counts 1 and 3J, and George Safiev [Counts 1 and 4]. 18 U.S.C. 3 3591 (a) (2) (B). 4 3. Intentional Acts to Take Life or Use Lethal Force 5 The defendant intentionally participated in an act, contemplating 6 that the life of a person would be taken or intending that lethal 7 force would be used in connection with a person, other than one 8 of the participants in the offense, and Meyer Muscatel [Count 1J, 9 Rita Pekler [Count IJ, Alexander Umansky [Counts 1 and 2J, Nick 10 Kharabadze [Counts 1 and 3J, and George Safiev [Counts 1 11 and 4] died as a direct result of the act. 18 U.S.C. 12 3591 (a) (2) (C). 13 4. Intentionally and Specifically Engaged in an Act 14 of Violence Creating a Grave Risk of Death 15 The defendant intentionally and specifically engaged in an act of 16 violence knowing that the act created a grave risk of death to a 17 person, other than one of the participants in the offense, such 18 that participation in the act constituted a reckless disregard 19 for human life and Meyer Muscatel [Count 1J, Rita Pekler [Count 20 1], Alexander Umansky [Counts 1 and 2J, Nick Kharabadze [Counts 1 21 and 3], and George Safiev [Counts 1 and 4] died as a direct result of the act. 18 U.S.C. 3591 (a) (2) (D). B. statutory Aggravating Factors Enumerated under 18 24 U.S.C. 3592(c) 25 The following statutory aggravating factors apply to each of 26 Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4. 28 3

l 1. Death During the Commission of Another Crime 2 The deaths of Meyer Muscatel [Count 1], Rita Pekler [Count 1], 3 Alexander Umansky [Counts 1 and 2], Nick Kharabadze [Counts 1 and 4 3], and George Safiev [Counts 1 and 4] occurred during the 5 commission and attempted commission of an offense under 18 U.S.C. 6 1203 (conspiracy to commit hostage taking and hostage taking). 7 18 U.S.C. 3592 (c) (1). 8 2. Procurement of the Offense by Payment 9 The defendant procured the commission of the homicide offenses 10 charged in Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4 by payment, and promise of 11 payment, of anything of pecuniary value. 18 U.S.C. 3592 (c) (7). 12 3. Substantial Planning and Premeditation 13 The defendant committed the offenses charged in Counts 1, 2, 3, 14 and 4 after substantial planning and premeditation to cause the 15 death of a person. 18 U.S.C. 3592 (c) (9). 16 4. Multiple Killings 17 The defendant intentionally killed more than one person in a 18 single criminal episode. 18 U.S.C. 3592 (c) (16). 19 C. Other, Non-Statutory, Aggravating Factors Identified 20 under 18 U.S.C. 3593 (a) (2) 21 The following non-statutory, aggravating factors apply to each of Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4. 1. Future Dangerousness of the Defendant 24 The defendant is likely to commit criminal acts of violence In 25 the future that would constitute a continuing and serious threat 26 to the lives and safety of others, as evidenced by, at least, one or more of the following: 28 4

l a. continuing Pattern of Violence 2 The defendant has engaged in a continuing pattern of violence, 3 attempted violence, and threatened violence, includina. nt lq~~t, 4 the crimes alleged against defendant in the Second Superseding 5 Indictment. 6 b. Escape Risk and Institutional Misconduct 7 The defendant poses a future danger to the lives and safety of 8 other persons, as demonstrated by institutional misconduct, 9 including, at least, defendant's participation in a conspiracy to 10 escape from the Metropolitan Detention Center - Los Angeles, 11 California, which was detected by the government on or about 12 March 7, 2003. 13 c. Lack of Remorse 14 The defendant has demonstrated a lack of remorse for the capital l5 offenses committed in this case, as indicated by defendant's 16 statements and actions during the course of and following the 17 offenses alleged in the Second Superseding Indictment. 18 2. Uncharged Murders, Attempted Murders, and Other 19 Serious Acts of Violence 20 Apart from the offenses charged in the Second Superseding 21 Indictment, the defendant has been involved in other murders and serious acts of violence which are not reflected in his criminal record. Specifically: 24 i. Between on or about November 5, 2000 and on or about 25 November 17, 2000, in Istanbul, Turkey, defendant participated in 26 the hostage taking, resulting in death, of Anton Popsuy-Shapko; ii. Between on or about May 29, 2001 and on or about 28 5

1 June 16, 2001, in Pathos, Cyprus and elsewhere, defendant 2 participated in the hostage taking, resulting In death, of Valery 3 Papou; and 4 iii. Between on or about November 14, 2001 and on or about 5 November 17, 2001, in Los Angeles County, within the Central 6 District of California, defendant participated in the hostage 7 taking of Armen Gyurdzhiyants. 8 3. Contemporaneous Convictions 9 Defendant faces contemporaneous convictions for multiple murders 10 and other serious acts of violence. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 4 Witness Elimina~ion Defendant killed the victims of his crimes, including Meyer Muscatel, Rita Pekler, Alexander Umansky, Nick Kharabadze, and George Safiev, in order to eliminate these victims as possible witnesses to defendant's crimes. 5. Emotional Suffering of the Victims Defendant displayed an indifference to the emotional suffering of the victims of his crimes, including Meyer Muscatel, Rita Pekler, Alexander Umansky, Nick Kharabadze, and George Safiev, as demonstrated by the extended period of time between the time defendant initially seized his victims and the time he ultimately killed them. 6. Victim Impact Evidence i. The defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the 25 family, friends, and co-workers of Rita Pekler as evidenced by 26 her personal characteristics as a human being and the impact of her death on her family, her friends, and her co-workers. 28 6

1 ii. The defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the 2 family, friends, and co-workers of Meyer Muscatel as evidenced by 3 his personal ch~racteristics as a human bejng and the impact of 4 his death on his family, his friends, and his co-workers. 5 iii. The defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the 6 family, friends, and co-workers of Alexander Umansky as evidenced 7 by his personal characteristics as a human being and the impact 8 of his death on his family, his friends, and his co-workers. 9 iv. The defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the 10 family, friends, and co-workers of Nick Kharabadze as evidenced ~~ by his personal characteristics as a human being and the impact 12 of his death on his family, his friends, and his co-workers. 13 v. The defendant caused injury, harm, and loss to the 14 family, friends, and co-workers of George Safiev as evidenced by 15 his personal characteristics as a human being and the impact of 16 his death on his family, his friends, and his co-workers. 17 The Government further gives notice that in support of 18 imposition of the death penalty it intends to rely upon all the 19 evidence admitted by the Court at the guilt phase of the trial 20 and the offenses of conviction as described in the Second 21 Superseding Indictment as they relate to the background and 24 2S 26 28 7

~ character of the defendant, JURIJUS KADAMOVAS, his moral 2 culpability, and the nature and circumstances of the offenses 3 charged in the Second Superseding Indictment. 4 DnTE: August 3, 2004 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Respectfully submitted, DEBRA W. YANG United States Attorney STEVEN D. CLYMER Special Assistant United States nttorney Chi\f, ~2minal Division ----- (\/'t, {)~ R6BERT E. DUGDALE SUSAN J. DEWITT KAREN I. MEYER Assistant United Stales Attorneys Organized Crime and Terrorism Section Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of Americ~ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 28 8

l CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, SUSAN M. CRUZ, declare: 3 That I am a citizen of the Unit~d States and resident or 4 employed in Los Angeles County, Californiai that my business 5 address is the Office of United States Attorney, United States 6 Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 7 90012i that I am over the age of eighteen years, and am not a 8 party to the above-entitled action; 9 That I am employed by the United States Attorney for the 10 Central District of California who is a member of the Bar of the 11 United States District Court for the Central District of 12 California, at whose direction I served a copy of: GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY AGAINST DEFENDANT 13 JURIJUS KADAMOVAS 14 service was: 15 16 17 18 19 20 [] Placed in a closed envelope, for collection and interoffice delivery addressed as follows: [] By hand delivery addressed as follows: [] By messenger as follows: [XX] Placed in a sealed envelope for collection and mailing via United States Mail, addressed as follows: [XX] By facsimile as follows: [] By federal express as follows: 21 24 25 26 SEE ATTACHMENT This Certificate is executed on August 3, 2004, at Los Angeles, California. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ~Aro.(1~/ SU AN M. CRUZ V 28

SERVICE LIST Mikhel Richard Callahan, Esq. 0 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 1200 Pasadena, CA 91101 (626) 202-4060 fax: 626-794-4676 Dale Rubin, Esq. (capital counsel) 75 Huntington Drive, Suite 902 San Marino, CA 91108 (800) 695-3717 fax: 413-8-0521 Kadamovas Marcia Brewer, Esq. 300 Corporate Pointe, Suite 330 Culver City, CA 900 (310) 670-5325 fax: 310-670-3706 Richard Lasting, Esq. (capital counsel) White & Lasting 1717 Fourth Street Third Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 (310) 576-6242 fax: 310-576-6247 Krylov George Buehler, Esq. 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3900 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 625-3900, xl28 fax: 213-625-1600 213-626-5800

David Evans, Esq. (capital counsel) 202 South Lake Avenue Suite 0 Pasadena, CA 91101 (626) 432-5100 fax: 626-432-5110 Markovskis Terrence Bennett, Esq. (capital counsel) P.O. Box 709 Pasadena, CA 91102-0709 (626) 792-5868 fax: 626-798-6663 Solovyeva Terry Amdur 1939 Rose Villa Street Pasadena, CA 91107 (626) 449-9254 fax: 626-568-17 Michael M. Crain, Esq. (capital counsel) P.O. Box 3730 Santa Monica, CA 90408 (310) 571-3324 fax: 310-571-3354