Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights

Similar documents
Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

Copyright Act - Subsidiary Legislation CHAPTER 311 COPYRIGHT ACT. SUBSIDIARY LEGlSLA non. List o/subsidiary Legislation

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

GLOBAL PRESS FREEDOM RANKINGS

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 2008

REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN THE AMERICAS: THE IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

2017 Social Progress Index

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

2018 Social Progress Index

Proforma Cost for national UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

TD/B/Inf.222. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Membership of UNCTAD and membership of the Trade and Development Board

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Status of National Reports received for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III)

World Refugee Survey, 2001

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

STATUS OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

Proforma Cost for National UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies for National UN. months) Afghanistan 14,030 12,443 4,836

Voluntary Scale of Contributions

UNHCR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

Information note by the Secretariat [V O T E D] Additional co-sponsors of draft resolutions/decisions

Per Capita Income Guidelines for Operational Purposes

A Practical Guide To Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

INCOME AND EXIT TO ARGENTINA

The Henley & Partners - Kochenov GENERAL RANKING

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

58 Kuwait 83. Macao (SAR China) Maldives. 59 Nauru Jamaica Botswana Bolivia 77. Qatar. 63 Bahrain 75. Namibia.

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

CAC/COSP/IRG/2018/CRP.9

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2012.

Overview of the status of UNCITRAL Conventions and Model Laws x = ratification, accession or enactment s = signature only

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

Committee for Development Policy Seventh Session March 2005 PURCHASING POWER PARITY (PPP) Note by the Secretariat

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2014

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2013

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data, end 2001

A) List of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders. 1. States

Return of convicted offenders

Human Resources in R&D

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

Bahrain, Ecuador, Indonesia, Japan, Peru, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Serbia and Thailand.

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

GENTING DREAM IMMIGRATION & VISA REQUIREMENTS FOR THAILAND, MYANMAR & INDONESIA

A) List of third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders. 1. States

OFFICIAL NAMES OF THE UNITED NATIONS MEMBERSHIP

Millennium Profiles Demographic & Social Energy Environment Industry National Accounts Trade. Social indicators. Introduction Statistics

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Antipersonnel Mine Stockpile Destruction (Article 4)

corruption perceptions index

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

2018 Global Law and Order

Open Doors Foreign Scholars

The requirements for the different countries may be found on the Bahamas official web page at:

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

TAKING HAPPINESS SERIOUSLY

Japan s s Strategy for Regional Trade Agreements

The World s Most Generous Countries

INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT SIGNED AT CHICAGO ON 7 DECEMBER 1944

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

corruption perceptions index

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka: Korea (for vaccine product only):

ANNEX IV: RATES APPLICABLE FOR UNIT

Proforma Cost Overview for national UN Volunteers for UN Peace Operations (DPA/DPKO)

KYOTO PROTOCOL STATUS OF RATIFICATION

ALLEGATO IV-RATES APPLICABLE FOR UNIT CONTRIBUTIONS

corruption perceptions index 2016

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

Open Doors Foreign Scholars

Sex ratio at birth (converted to female-over-male ratio) Ratio: female healthy life expectancy over male value

1 THICK WHITE SENTRA; SIDES AND FACE PAINTED TO MATCH WALL PAINT: GRAPHICS DIRECT PRINTED TO SURFACE; CLEAT MOUNT TO WALL CRITICAL INSTALL POINT

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

TABLE OF COUNTRIES WHOSE CITIZENS, HOLDERS OF ORDINARY PASSPORTS, REQUIRE/DO NOT REQUIRE VISAS TO ENTER BULGARIA

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2012

Charting Cambodia s Economy, 1H 2017

( ) Page: 1/12 STATUS OF NOTIFICATIONS OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION ON CUSTOMS VALUATION AND RESPONSES TO THE CHECKLIST OF ISSUES

IMO MANDATORY REPORTS UNDER MARPOL. Analysis and evaluation of deficiency reports and mandatory reports under MARPOL for Note by the Secretariat

-Ms. Wilkins. AP Human Geography Summer Assignment

Montessori Model United Nations - NYC Conference February Middle School Level COMMITTEES

Illustration of Proposed Quota and Voting Shares--By Member 1/ (In percent)

Thirty-seventh Session. Rome, 25 June - 2 July Third Report of the Credentials Committee

Transcription:

World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights Highlights and data trends from the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Trinidad & Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam Zambia Zimbabwe Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovenia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & the Grenadines Suriname Sweden Tanzania Thailand Togo Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russia Rwanda Senegal Liberia Macedonia, FYR Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Moldova Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nepal Guatemala Guinea Guyana Honduras Hong Kong SAR, China Hungary India Indonesia Iran Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kyrgyzstan Lebanon Czech Republic Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada & Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Cambodia Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Congo, Dem. Rep. Costa Rica Cote d'ivoire Croatia Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Antigua & Barbuda Argentina Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bolivia Bosnia WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 1

World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights Copyright 2019 by the World Justice Project The WJP Rule of Law Index and the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index are trademarks of the World Justice Project. All Rights Reserved. Requests to reproduce this document should be sent to the World Justice Project: 1025 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20005 USA. E-mail: press@worldjusticeproject.org.

4

Table of Contents 07 Introduction 08 Overall Rule of Law Scores & Rankings 10 Rule of Law Around the World 12 Factors of the Rule of Law Over Time 13 Improving & Declining Rule of Law 14 Year-to-Year Rule of Law Score Changes 16 Rule of Law in Africa 17 Rule of Law Changes in Europe 18 A Sign of Rising Authoritarianism? 20 Conceptual Framework of the WJP Rule of Law Index 21 About the Rule of Law Index 21 About the Rule of Law 21 About the World Justice Project WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 5

6

Introduction The World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Index 2019 is the latest report in an annual series measuring the rule on law based on the experiences and perceptions of the general public and in-country experts worldwide. The scores and rankings for the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 are derived from more than 120,000 household surveys and 3,800 expert surveys in 126 countries and jurisdictions. The Index is the most comprehensive dataset of its kind and is the world s leading source for current, original data on the rule of law. Effective rule of law reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease, and protects people from injustices large and small. It is the foundation for communities of justice, opportunity, and peace underpinning development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights. Despite its profound importance, the rule of law is notoriously difficult to measure. The WJP Rule of Law Index provides a simple, coherent framework by examining a set of outcomes that the rule of law brings to societies, each of which reflects one aspect of the complex concept of the rule of law. The Index measures countries rule of law performance across eight factors: Constraints on Government Powers, Absence of Corruption, Open Government, Fundamental Rights, Order and Security, Regulatory Enforcement, Civil Justice, and Criminal Justice. Key findings from the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 include: More countries declined than improved in overall rule of law performance for a second year in a row, continuing a negative slide toward weaker rule of law around the world. In a sign suggesting rising authoritarianism, Constraints on Government Powers declined in more countries than any other factor worldwide over the last year (61 countries declined, 23 stayed the same, 29 improved). Over the past four years, Poland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia have lost the most ground in this dimension of the rule of law. he top three overall performers in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 were Denmark (1), Norway (2), and Finland (3); the bottom three were DR Congo (124), Cambodia (125), and Venezuela (126). The second largest decline over the last year was seen in the area of Criminal Justice, followed by Open Government and Fundamental Rights. On a positive note, for the second year in a row more countries improved in Absence of Corruption than declined. The Index is intended for a broad audience that includes policy makers, civil society organizations, academics, citizens, businesses, and legal professionals, among others. It is our hope that this diagnostic tool will help identify countries strengths and weaknesses and encourage policy choices that strengthen the rule of law within and across countries. WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 7

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Overall Rule of Law Scores & Rankings Figure 1: This table presents the scores and rankings of the 126 countries included in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019. Scores range from 0 to 1, where 1 signifies the highest score (strong adherence to rule of law) and 0 signifies the lowest possible score (weak adherence to rule of law). Country/Jurisdiction Score * Score Change * Global Rank Afghanistan 0.35 0.00 123 0 Albania 0.51 0.00 71 0 Algeria 0.51 72 Angola 0.41 111 Antigua & Barbuda 0.63 0.00 33 1 Argentina 0.58 0.00 46 3 Australia 0.80 0.00 11 1 Austria 0.82 0.01 7 1 Bahamas 0.61 0.01 39 3 Bangladesh 0.41 0.00 112 1 Barbados 0.65 0.00 29 1 Belarus 0.52 0.00 66 2 Belgium 0.79 0.02 14 1 Belize 0.48 0.00 86 0 Benin 0.50 79 Bolivia 0.38 0.00 119 2 Bosnia & Herzegovina 0.53 0.00 60 1 Botswana 0.59 0.01 44 4 Brazil 0.53-0.01 58 3 Bulgaria 0.54 0.01 54 4 Burkina Faso 0.50 0.00 73 1 Cambodia 0.32 0.00 125 0 Cameroon 0.37 0.01 120 0 Canada 0.81 0.00 9 0 Chile 0.68 0.01 25 2 China 0.49-0.01 82 2 Colombia 0.50-0.01 80 3 Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.33 124 Costa Rica 0.69 0.00 24 0 Cote d'ivoire 0.46-0.01 93 4 Croatia 0.61 0.00 42 4 Czech Republic 0.73-0.01 19 2 Rank Change Country/Jurisdiction Score * Score Change * Global Rank Rank Change Denmark 0.90 0.01 1 0 Dominica 0.59-0.01 45 1 Dominican Republic 0.46 0.00 95 0 Ecuador 0.48 0.01 87 3 Egypt 0.36 0.00 121 0 El Salvador 0.48 0.00 84 0 Estonia 0.81 0.01 10 2 Ethiopia 0.39 0.01 118 0 Finland 0.87 0.00 3 0 France 0.73 0.00 17 1 Georgia 0.61 0.00 41 0 Germany 0.84 0.00 6 0 Ghana 0.58-0.01 48 2 Greece 0.62 0.01 36 4 Grenada 0.60-0.01 43 4 Guatemala 0.46 0.02 96 5 Guinea 0.44 105 Guyana 0.50 0.00 75 2 Honduras 0.40 0.00 115 1 Hong Kong SAR, China 0.77 0.00 16 0 Hungary 0.53-0.01 57 4 India 0.51-0.01 68 3 Indonesia 0.52 0.00 62 4 Iran 0.45-0.03 102 16 Italy 0.65 0.01 28 3 Jamaica 0.56-0.01 50 0 Japan 0.78-0.01 15 1 Jordan 0.57-0.03 49 4 Kazakhstan 0.52 0.00 65 2 Kenya 0.45 0.00 101 0 Kyrgyzstan 0.48 0.00 85 2 Lebanon 0.47 0.00 89 3 * Scores and change in scores are rounded to two decimal places. The change in rankings was calculated by comparing the positions of the 113 countries measured in the 2017-2018 edition of the Index with the rankings of the same 113 countries in 2019, exclusive of the 13 new countries indexed in 2019. Overall Rule of Law Score Changes Figure 2: Percentage change in countries rule of law score since last year. Countries with a change in score of less than 1% or those which are new to the Index in 2019 are not shown. -6.9% -6.2% -4.8% -3.5% -3.0% -2.9% -2.7% -2.5% -2.4% -2.2% -2.2% -2.2% -2.1% -2.0% -1.9% -1.8% -1.6% -1.5% -1.4% -1.4% -1.4% -1.3% -1.2% -1.2% -1.2% -1.2% -1.2% -1.1% -1.0% -1.0% -1.0% Nicaragua Iran Jordan Venezuela Trinidad & Tobago Peru China Ghana Vietnam United States Hungary St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia Jamaica Romania Dominica South Africa Netherlands Colombia Czech Republic Madagascar Grenada Cote d Ivoire Zambia India Morocco Brazil Tunisia Nigeria Moldova Sweden In the last year, 31 countries rule of law performance declined by 1% or more, with Nicaragua, Iran, Jordan, and Venezuela seeing the largest drop. 8

Country/Jurisdiction Score * Score Change * Global Rank Liberia 0.46 0.01 97 2 Macedonia, FYR 0.54 0.01 56 4 Madagascar 0.43-0.01 107 0 Malawi 0.51 0.00 67 2 Malaysia 0.55 0.02 51 5 Mali 0.45 103 Mauritania 0.35 122 Mauritius 0.61 37 Mexico 0.45 0.00 99 2 Moldova 0.49 0.00 83 0 Mongolia 0.55 0.00 53 1 Morocco 0.50-0.01 74 3 Mozambique 0.43 108 Myanmar 0.42 0.00 110 0 Namibia 0.62 34 Nepal 0.53 0.00 59 2 Netherlands 0.84-0.01 5 0 New Zealand 0.82 0.00 8 1 Nicaragua 0.40-0.03 114 4 Niger 0.44 104 Nigeria 0.43 0.00 106 0 Norway 0.89 0.01 2 0 Pakistan 0.39 0.00 117 1 Panama 0.52 0.00 64 0 Peru 0.51-0.02 70 7 Philippines 0.47 0.00 90 3 Poland 0.66-0.01 27 2 Portugal 0.71-0.01 22 1 Republic of Korea 0.73 0.01 18 2 Romania 0.64-0.01 31 2 Russia 0.47 0.00 88 6 Rwanda 0.61 40 Rank Change Country/Jurisdiction Score * Score Change * Global Rank Rank Change Senegal 0.55 0.00 52 0 Serbia 0.50 0.00 78 2 Sierra Leone 0.45 0.00 98 0 Singapore 0.80 0.00 13 0 Slovenia 0.67 0.00 26 0 South Africa 0.58-0.01 47 0 Spain 0.71 0.01 21 2 Sri Lanka 0.52 0.00 63 1 St. Kitts & Nevis 0.65-0.01 30 2 St. Lucia 0.61-0.01 38 3 St. Vincent & the Grenadines 0.62 0.01 35 3 Suriname 0.51 0.00 69 3 Sweden 0.85-0.01 4 0 Tanzania 0.47 0.00 91 0 Thailand 0.50 0.00 76 1 Togo 0.45 100 Trinidad & Tobago 0.54-0.02 55 4 Tunisia 0.53-0.01 61 4 Turkey 0.42 0.01 109 2 Uganda 0.40 0.00 113 2 Ukraine 0.50 0.00 77 4 United Arab Emirates 0.64 0.00 32 0 United Kingdom 0.80-0.01 12 1 United States 0.71-0.02 20 1 Uruguay 0.71 0.00 23 1 Uzbekistan 0.46 0.00 94 2 Venezuela 0.28-0.01 126 0 Vietnam 0.49-0.01 81 2 Zambia 0.47-0.01 92 4 Zimbabwe 0.40 0.03 116 3 Twenty-three countries rule of law performance improved by 1% or more in the last year, with Zimbabwe, Guatemala, Ethiopia, and Malaysia seeing the greatest improvement. 7.1% 4.6% 3.3% 3.1% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.0% 1.8% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Zimbabwe Guatemala Ethiopia Malaysia Belgium Bulgaria Greece Cameroon Macedonia, FYR Republic of Korea Turkey Spain St. Vincent & the Grenadines Chile Bahamas Liberia Botswana Estonia Ecuador Austria Ukraine Uzbekistan Russia WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 9

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Rule of Law Around the World Figure 3: Scores and rankings of the 126 countries included in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019. Scores range from 0 to 1, where 1 signifies the highest score (strong adherence to rule of law) and 0 signifies the lowest possible score (weak adherence to rule of law)..40 & Below.41.50.51.60.61.70 weaker adherence to the rule of law Country/Jurisdiction.81 & Above Overall Score* Global Rank Denmark 0.90 1 Norway 0.89 2 Finland 0.87 3 Sweden 0.85 4 Netherlands 0.84 5 Germany 0.84 6 Austria 0.82 7 New Zealand 0.82 8 Canada 0.81 9 10 Estonia 0.81 Australia 0.80 11 United Kingdom 0.80 12 Singapore 0.80 13 Belgium 0.79 14 Japan 0.78 Hong Kong SAR, China 0.77 France 0.73 17 Dominica 0.59 45 Republic of Korea 0.73 18 Argentina 0.58 46 Czech Republic 0.73 19 South Africa 0.58 47 United States 0.71 20 Ghana 0.58 48 Spain 0.71 21 Jordan 0.57 49 50 Overall Score* Global Rank Croatia 0.61 42 15 Grenada 0.60 43 16 Botswana 0.59 44 Country/Jurisdiction Portugal 0.71 22 Jamaica 0.56 Uruguay 0.71 23 Malaysia 0.55 51 Costa Rica 0.69 24 Senegal 0.55 52 Chile 0.68 25 Mongolia 0.55 53 Slovenia 0.67 26 Bulgaria 0.54 54 Poland 0.66 27 Trinidad & Tobago 0.54 55 Italy 0.65 28 Macedonia, FYR 0.54 56 Barbados 0.65 29 Hungary 0.53 57 St. Kitts & Nevis 0.65 30 Brazil 0.53 58 Romania 0.64 31 Nepal 0.53 59 United Arab Emirates 0.64 32 Bosnia & Herzegovina 0.53 60 Antigua & Barbuda 0.63 33 Tunisia 0.53 61 Namibia 0.62 34 Indonesia 0.52 62 St. Vincent & the Grenadines 0.62 35 Sri Lanka 0.52 63 Greece 0.62 36 Panama 0.52 64 Mauritius 0.61 37 Kazakhstan 0.52 65 St. Lucia 0.61 38 Belarus 0.52 66 Bahamas 0.61 39 Malawi 0.51 67 Rwanda 0.61 40 India 0.51 68 Georgia 0.61 41 Suriname 0.51 69 * Scores are rounded to two decimal places. 10.71.80 stronger adherence to the rule of law

Overall Score* Global Rank Peru 0.51 70 Albania 0.51 71 Algeria 0.51 72 Burkina Faso 0.50 73 Country/Jurisdiction Morocco 0.50 74 Guyana 0.50 75 Thailand 0.50 76 Ukraine 0.50 77 Serbia 0.50 78 Benin 0.50 79 Colombia 0.50 80 Vietnam 0.49 81 China 0.49 82 Moldova 0.49 83 El Salvador 0.48 84 Kyrgyzstan 0.48 85 Belize 0.48 86 Ecuador 0.48 87 Russia 0.47 88 Lebanon 0.47 89 Philippines 0.47 90 Tanzania 0.47 91 Zambia 0.47 92 Cote d'ivoire 0.46 93 Uzbekistan 0.46 94 Dominican Republic 0.46 95 Guatemala 0.46 96 Liberia 0.46 97 Country/Jurisdiction Overall Score* Global Rank Sierra Leone 0.45 98 Mexico 0.45 99 Togo 0.45 100 Kenya 0.45 101 Iran 0.45 102 Mali 0.45 103 Niger 0.44 104 Guinea 0.44 105 Nigeria 0.43 106 Madagascar 0.43 107 Mozambique 0.43 108 Turkey 0.42 109 Myanmar 0.42 110 Angola 0.41 111 Bangladesh 0.41 112 Uganda 0.40 113 Nicaragua 0.40 114 Honduras 0.40 115 Zimbabwe 0.40 116 Pakistan 0.39 117 Ethiopia 0.39 118 Bolivia 0.38 119 Cameroon 0.37 120 Egypt 0.36 121 Mauritania 0.35 122 Afghanistan 0.35 123 Congo, Dem. Rep. 0.33 124 Cambodia 0.32 125 Venezuela 0.28 126 * Scores are rounded to two decimal places. WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 11

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Factors of the Rule of Law Over Time Figure 4: Percentage of countries whose score has improved or declined for each of the eight factors of the WJP Rule of Law Index. % of countries that have declined in the last year* % of countries that have declined in the last 4 years % of countries that have improved in the last year* % of countries that have improved in the last 4 years 36% 64% Biggest one-year decline 60% 40% 46% 54% 51% 49% 46% 54% 53% Biggest four-year decline 47% 51% 49% 70% 30% 53% 47% 53% 47% 30% 70% 33% 67% 42% 58% 50% 50% 39% 61% 55% Constraints on Government Powers * Out of 113 countries Out of 102 countries 12 Absence of Corruption 45% Open Government Fundamental Rights Order and Security Regulatory Enforcement Civil Justice Criminal Justice

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Improving & Declining Rule of Law Figure 5: Categorization of countries according to whether their overall Rule of Law Index score is above or below the median, and whether it has improved or declined in the last year. Stable countries those with a score change between -.005 and.005 are not shown. -0.03-0.025-0.02-0.015-0.01-0.005 0.00 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Declining Rule of Law; Above the Median Improving Rule of Law; Above the Median Above Median 0.90 0.85 0.80 Netherlands Sweden United Kingdom Japan Norway Denmark Austria Estonia Belgium Index Score 2019 Below Median 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 Jordan Iran Nicaragua United States St Kitts & Nevis Trinidad & Tobago St. Lucia Ghana Peru China Poland Romania Dominica Grenada South Africa Jamaica Brazil Hungary Tunisia Colombia India Vietnam Morocco Cote d Ivoire Zambia Madagascar Czech Republic Portugal Venezuela Chile Republic of Korea Spain Italy St. Vincent & the Grenadines Greece Botswana Bahamas Bulgaria Malaysia Macedonia, FYR Cameroon Ecuador Liberia Turkey Ethiopia Guatemala Zimbabwe Declining Rule of Law; Below the Median Improving Rule of Law; Below the Median -0.03-0.025-0.02-0.015-0.01-0.005 0.00 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 Change in Score 2017-18 to 2019 In the last year, 56 countries rule of law score changed by more than +/-.005. More than one third of these are countries whose Index score is above the median but declining. The smallest group consisting of seven countries are countries whose Index score is below the median but improving. WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 13

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Year-to-Year Rule of Law Score Changes Figure 6: Percentage change in score between each edition of the Rule of Law Index since 2015. Countries that are new to the Index in 2019 are not shown. % Score Change 2015 to 2016 % Score % Score Change Change 2016 to 2017-18 to 2017-18 2019 Overall Score 2019 % Score Change 2015 to 2016 % Score % Score Change Change 2016 to 2017-18 to 2017-18 2019 Overall Score 2019 Afghanistan -2.2% -0.3% 0.9% 0.35 Albania -3.2% 0.8% -0.3% 0.51 Antigua & Barbuda -5.8% 0.1% 0.63 Argentina 6.7% 5.0% 0.1% 0.58 Australia 0.5% 0.2% -0.4% 0.80 Austria 1.3% -2.4% 1.0% 0.82 Bahamas -0.9% 1.5% 0.61 Bangladesh -2.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.41 Barbados -2.8% 0.2% 0.65 Belarus 1.4% -4.6% 0.8% 0.52 Belgium 2.8% -2.0% 2.4% 0.79 Belize -2.8% -0.2% 0.8% 0.48 Bolivia -2.7% -5.2% 0.0% 0.38 Bosnia & Herzegovina -1.7% -4.9% -0.2% 0.53 Botswana -9.9% 1.3% 1.3% 0.59 Brazil 2.9% -3.1% -1.2% 0.53 Bulgaria -0.8% -2.4% 2.4% 0.54 Burkina Faso 3.1% 4.8% -0.5% 0.50 Cambodia -12.2% -1.1% 0.5% 0.32 Cameroon -8.0% -0.1% 2.0% 0.37 Canada 3.8% 0.3% -0.1% 0.81 Chile 0.8% -2.4% 1.5% 0.68 China 0.3% 3.8% -2.7% 0.49 Colombia 1.2% -0.4% -1.4% 0.50 Costa Rica 0.4% -0.1% 0.3% 0.69 Cote d'ivoire -1.4% 1.4% -1.3% 0.46 Croatia 1.0% 1.0% -0.6% 0.61 Czech Republic 4.1% -1.2% -1.4% 0.73 Denmark 1.9% 0.6% 0.8% 0.90 Dominica -0.8% -1.8% 0.59 Dominican Republic -3.4% -0.4% -0.4% 0.46 Ecuador -3.4% 3.7% 1.2% 0.48 Egypt -16.7% -1.0% 0.1% 0.36 El Salvador -3.2% -2.8% -0.4% 0.48 Estonia 1.8% 1.2% 1.3% 0.81 Ethiopia -9.4% -0.8% 3.3% 0.39 Finland 3.0% -0.3% 0.6% 0.87 France -2.9% 2.8% -0.4% 0.73 Georgia -0.2% -6.7% -0.2% 0.61 Germany 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.84 Ghana -3.7% 2.4% -2.5% 0.58 Greece -0.2% 0.5% 2.3% 0.62 Grenada -7.8% -1.4% 0.60 Guatemala -0.1% 0.1% 4.6% 0.46 Guyana 1.9% 0.0% 0.50 Honduras -0.5% -3.9% -0.3% 0.40 Hong Kong SAR, China 1.3% -0.4% -0.2% 0.77 Hungary -1.3% -3.9% -2.2% 0.53 India 1.4% 0.9% -1.2% 0.51 Indonesia -0.1% -0.9% 0.9% 0.52 Iran 7.5% 1.8% -6.2% 0.45 Italy 0.1% 0.6% 0.9% 0.65 Jamaica 1.5% 0.7% -2.0% 0.56 Japan -0.8% 1.1% -0.8% 0.78 Jordan 4.1% 1.5% -4.8% 0.57 Kazakhstan 1.3% 2.2% 0.9% 0.52 Kenya -3.5% 4.0% 0.0% 0.45 Kyrgyzstan -0.7% 0.7% 0.9% 0.48 Lebanon -5.4% 2.7% 0.2% 0.47 Liberia 0.1% 1.2% 1.4% 0.46 Macedonia, FYR -1.7% -2.3% 1.8% 0.54 Madagascar 0.6% -3.9% -1.4% 0.43 Malawi 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 0.51 Malaysia -5.2% -0.5% 3.1% 0.55 Mexico -1.7% -0.7% -0.2% 0.45 Moldova 2.4% -0.5% -1.0% 0.49 Mongolia 1.1% 0.8% 0.3% 0.55 Morocco 1.4% -3.4% -1.2% 0.50 Myanmar 4.0% -3.2% -0.5% 0.42 Nepal -2.2% 1.1% 0.8% 0.53 * Scores are rounded to two decimal places. 14

% Score Change 2015 to 2016 % Score % Score Change Change 2016 to 2017-18 to 2017-18 2019 Overall Score 2019 % Score Change 2015 to 2016 % Score Change 2016 to 2017-18 % Score Change 2017-18 to 2019 Overall Score 2019 Netherlands 3.4% -0.7% -1.5% 0.84 New Zealand 0.0% -0.3% -0.5% 0.82 Nicaragua -1.1% 3.2% -6.9% 0.40 Nigeria 9.0% -1.2% -1.0% 0.43 Norway 1.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.89 Pakistan 1.1% 1.9% -0.2% 0.39 Panama -1.9% -0.3% -0.2% 0.52 Peru 3.1% 1.7% -2.9% 0.51 United Kingdom 3.0% -0.1% -0.7% 0.80 United States 1.4% -1.1% -2.2% 0.71 Uruguay 1.9% -1.9% -0.6% 0.71 Uzbekistan -1.4% 1.9% 1.0% 0.46 Venezuela -13.7% 4.0% -3.5% 0.28 Vietnam 2.9% -2.1% -2.4% 0.49 Zambia 0.5% -0.8% -1.2% 0.47 Zimbabwe 0.8% 0.6% 7.1% 0.40 Philippines -3.6% -7.7% -0.2% 0.47 Poland -0.2% -5.8% -0.9% 0.66 Portugal 1.7% 0.9% -0.8% 0.71 Republic of Korea -7.7% -1.0% 1.7% 0.73 Romania 6.6% -0.7% -1.9% 0.64 Russia -4.1% 3.2% 1.0% 0.47 Senegal 0.8% -4.0% 0.3% 0.55 Negative % Change Positive % Change No Data Serbia -0.7% -0.3% 0.1% 0.50 Sierra Leone 1.8% 2.0% 0.1% 0.45 Singapore 1.0% -2.6% 0.0% 0.80 Slovenia 1.9% -0.3% 0.5% 0.67 South Africa 1.7% 0.3% -1.6% 0.58 Spain 2.0% 0.9% 1.6% 0.71 Sri Lanka 0.6% 2.8% -0.9% 0.52 Fourteen countries have seen consistent year-to-year improvements in their rule of law scores, while 18 have seen consistent year-to-year declines. St. Kitts & Nevis -0.5% -2.2% 0.65 St. Lucia -2.1% -2.1% 0.61 St. Vincent & the Grenadines -0.4% 1.6% 0.62 Suriname -3.9% 0.4% 0.51 Sweden 1.3% 0.2% -1.0% 0.85 Tanzania -1.4% 0.2% -0.3% 0.47 Thailand -0.3% -1.8% -0.4% 0.50 Trinidad & Tobago -2.1% -3.0% 0.54 Tunisia -4.6% 0.3% -1.1% 0.53 Turkey -7.2% -3.1% 1.7% 0.42 Uganda -4.1% 2.6% 0.6% 0.40 Ukraine 1.9% 1.6% 1.0% 0.50 United Arab Emirates -2.1% -1.5% -0.7% 0.64 WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 15

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Rule of Law in Africa Figure 7: Rule of law performance across Sub-Saharan Africa. Senegal Score:.55 Guinea Score:.44 Sierra Leone Score:.45 Mauritania Score:.35 Mali Score:.45 Cote d Ivoire Score:.46 Burkina Faso Score:.50 Ghana Score:.58 Niger Score:.44 Nigeria Score:.43 Benin Score:.50 Togo Score:.45 Cameroon Score:.37 Congo, Dem. Rep. Score:.33 Ethiopia Score:.39 Uganda Score:.40 Kenya Score:.45 Tanzania Score:.47 Rwanda Score:.61 For the 2019 edition of the WJP Rule of Law Index, the WJP expanded coverage of Sub-Saharan Africa to include 12 new countries. Two of these new countries Namibia and Mauritius now rank among the top performers in the region. Angola Score:.41 Namibia Score:.62 Zambia Score:.47 Botswana Score:.59 South Africa Score:.58 Zimbabwe Score:.40 Mozambique Score:.43 Madagascar Score:.43 Malawi Score:.51 Mauritius Score:.61.40 & Below.41.50.51.60.61.70.71.80.81 & Above weaker adherence to the rule of law stronger adherence to the rule of law Namibia Score Global Ranking Regional Ranking Income Ranking Mauritius Score Global Ranking Regional Ranking Income Ranking Constraints on Government Powers Absence of Corruption Open Government Fundamental Rights Order and Security Constraints on Government Powers.68 28/126 2/30 2/38.60 44/126 4/30 7/38 Absence of Corruption.53 51/126 5/30 14/38.58 41/126 3/30 7/38 Open Government.58 40/126 2/30 7/38.54 50/126 4/30 11/38 Fundamental Rights.66 37/126 1/30 5/38.64 40/126 2/30 6/38 Order and Security.73 59/126 6/30 17/38.77 45/126 3/30 12/38 Regulatory Enforcement Regulatory Enforcement.58 35/126 3/30 4/38.63 28/126 1/30 2/38 Civil Justice Civil Justice.66 24/126 1/30 1/38.63 33/126 2/30 5/38 Criminal Justice Criminal Justice.54 40/126 3/30 8/38.53 44/126 4/30 11/38 * Scores are rounded to two decimal places. 16

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Rule of Law Changes in Europe Figure 8: Percentage change in Western European countries rule of law score over the last four years. Norway 3.2% Score change.03 Sweden 0.5% Score change 0.00 Finland 3.2% Score change.03 Estonia 4.4% Score change.03 United Kingdom 2.2% Score change.02 Denmark 3.3% Score change.03 Belgium 3.2% Score change.02 France -0.5% Score change.00 Netherlands 1.1% Score change.01 Germany 2.8% Score change.02 Czech Republic 1.4% Score change.01 Austria -0.1% Score change.00 Croatia 1.4% Score change.01 Slovenia 2.1% Score change.01 Poland -6.9% Score change -.05 Bulgaria -0.8% Score change.00 Hungary -7.3% Score change -.04 Romania 3.8% Score change.02 Portugal 1.9% Score change.01 Spain 4.6% Score change.03 Italy 1.7% Score change.01 Greece 2.6% Score change.02 Hungary Constraints on Government Powers Absence of Corruption Open Government Fundamental Rights Order and Security Regulatory Enforcement % Change 2015 2019 Score Change* Poland Constraints on Government Powers -17% -0.08-25% -0.19 Absence of Corruption +2% 0.01 +11% 0.07 Open Government -11% -0.06-7% -0.05 Fundamental Rights -11% -0.07-14% -0.11 Order and Security +5% 0.05 +1% 0.01 Regulatory Enforcement % Change 2015 2019 Score Change* -14% -0.03 +4% 0.02 Civil Justice Criminal Justice Civil Justice -14% -0.08-3% -0.02 Criminal Justice -13% -0.07-18% -0.13 * Changes in scores are rounded to two decimal places. WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 17

WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 A Sign of Rising Authoritarianism? Figure 9: Changes in score for Factor 1, Constraints on Government Powers, since 2015. Countries that do not have four years of data are not shown..15.20.25.30.35.40.45.50.55.60.65.70.75.80.85.90.95 In a sign suggesting rising authoritarianism, the factor Constraints on Government Powers declined in more countries than any other factor worldwide in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2019. When taking a longer-term perspective, we see that 60% of countries show a decline over the last four years. More Constraints on Government Powers Less Constraints on Government Powers Mongolia Greece Indonesia Slovenia South Africa Jamaica Peru Spain Italy Ghana Germany New Zealand Australia Belgium United Kingdom Portugal Senegal Botswana Romania Tunisia Nepal Georgia India Philippines Brazil Croatia United Arab Emirates Bosnia & Herzegovina Malawi Morocco Lebanon Kenya Colombia Albania Liberia Tanzania Estonia Costa Rica Canada Chile Finland Norway Denmark Sweden Netherlands Austria Republic of Korea France Poland Japan Uruguay United States Singapore Czech Republic Hong Kong SAR, China 18

.15.20.25.30.35.40.45.50.55.60.65.70.75.80.85.90.95 Uzbekistan Zimbabwe Venezuela Panama Malaysia Nigeria Guatemala Pakistan Jordan Argentina Macedonia, FYR Sri Lanka Thailand Ukriane Myanmar Madagascar Vietnam Burkina Faso Kazakhstan Belarus Ecuador Uganda Iran Russia Egypt Bolivia Turkey Ethiopia Nicaragua Cambodia China Bulgaria Sierra Leone El Salvador Mexico Kyrgyzstan Serbia Hungary Zambia Dominican Republic Cote d Ivoire Belize Moldova Honduras Afghanistan Cameroon Bangladesh WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 19

Conceptual Framework of the WJP Rule of Law Index The conceptual framework of the WJP Rule of Law Index is comprised of eight factors further disaggregated into 44 sub-factors. These factors and sub-factors are presented below. Constraints on Government Powers Absence of Corruption Open Government Fundamental Rights Order & Security Regulatory Enforcement Civil Justice 1.1 Government powers are effectively limited by the legislature 1.2 Government powers are effectively limited by the judiciary 1.3 Government powers are effectively limited by independent auditing and review 1.4 Government officials are sanctioned for misconduct 1.5 Government powers are subject to non-governmental checks 1.6 Transition of power is subject to the law 2.1 Government officials in the executive branch do not use public office for private gain 2.2 Government officials in the judicial branch do not use public office for private gain 2.3 Government officials in the police & the military do not use public office for private gain 2.4 Government officials in the legislative branch do not use public office for private gain 3.1 Publicized laws & government data 3.2 Right to information 3.3 Civic participation 3.4 Complaint mechanisms 4.1 Equal treatment & absence of discrimination 4.2 The right to life & security of the person is effectively guaranteed 4.3 Due process of the law and rights of the accused 4.4 Freedom of opinion & expression is effectively guaranteed 4.5 Freedom of belief & religion is effectively guaranteed 4.6 Freedom from arbitrary interference with privacy is effectively guaranteed 4.7 Freedom of assembly & association is effectively guaranteed 4.8 Fundamental labor rights are effectively guaranteed 5.1 Crime is effectively controlled 5.2 Civil conflict is effectively limited 5.3 People do not resort to violence to redress personal grievances 6.1 Government regulations are effectively enforced 6.2 Government regulations are applied & enforced without improper influence 6.3 Administrative proceedings are conducted without unreasonable delay 6.4 Due process is respected in administrative proceedings 6.5 The government does not expropriate without lawful process & adequate compensation 7.1 People can access & afford civil justice 7.2 Civil justice is free of discrimination 7.3 Civil justice is free of corruption 7.4 Civil justice is free of improper government influence 7.5 Civil justice is not subject to unreasonable delay 7.6 Civil justice is effectively enforced 7.7 Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are accessible, impartial, and effective Criminal Justice 8.1 Criminal investigation system is effective 8.2 Criminal adjudication system is timely and effective 8.3 Correctional system is effective in reducing criminal behavior 8.4 Criminal justice system is impartial 8.5 Criminal justice system is free of corruption 8.6 Criminal justice system is free of improper government influence 8.7 Due process of the law & rights of the accused 20

About the Rule of Law Index The WJP Rule of Law Index is a quantitative assessment tool designed to measure how the rule of law is experienced and perceived in practical, everyday situations by the general public worldwide. Performance is measured across the eight primary rule of law factors and 44 sub-factors outlined on the previous page. To present an accurate portrait of the rule of law as experienced by ordinary people, each score of the Index is calculated using a large number of questions drawn from two original data sources collected by the WJP in each country: Qualified Respondents Questionnaires (QRQs) consisting of closed-ended questions completed by in-country practitioners and academics with expertise in civil and commercial law, criminal justice, labor law, and public health. For the full methodology of the Index and more detailed country-level information, please refer to the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2019 report, available for download at worldjusticeproject.org. A General Population Poll (GPP) conducted by leading local polling companies, using a representative sample of 1,000 respondents in each country; About the Rule of Law The WJP Rule of Law Index captures adherence to the rule of law as defined by the WJP s universal principles. Four Universal Principles of the Rule of Law The rule of law is a framework of laws and institutions that embodies four universal principles: 1. Accountability 2. Just Laws 3. Open Government 4. Accessible & Impartial Dispute Resolution The government as well as private actors are accountable under the law. The laws are clear, publicized, stable, and just; are applied evenly; and protect fundamental rights, including the security of persons, contract and property rights, and certain core human rights. The processes by which the laws are enacted, administered, and enforced are accessible, fair, and efficient. Justice is delivered timely by competent, ethical, and independent representatives and neutrals who are accessible, have adequate resources, and reflect the makeup of the communities they serve. About the World Justice Project The World Justice Project (WJP) is an independent, multidisciplinary organization working to advance the rule of law worldwide. Effective rule of law reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease, and protects people from injustices large and small. It is the foundation for communities of justice, opportunity, and peace underpinning development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights. Learn more at: www.worldjusticeproject.org WJP Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights I 21

worldjusticeproject.org data.worldjusticeproject.org /thewjp @thewjp