FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON

Similar documents
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

Case 3:16-cv KI Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 8

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

9/29/2017 1:57:26 PM 17CV42542 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Filing # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT LEE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

3/11/ :19 AM 19CV11254 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

8/31/2018 2:12 PM 18CV38516 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

3/24/ :21:10 AM 17CV12356 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. ) ) Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

2/25/2019 4:13 PM 19CV08567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF. (Negligence)

11/29/2018 2:22 PM 18CV54567 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT PARTIES

(Negligence, Negligence Per Se)

1/9/2019 1:52 PM 19CV01569 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

11/9/2017 9:48 AM 17CV48960 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES. Case No.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF HAMPTON ) CASE NO.: 2019-CP-25-

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

12/4/ :33 PM 17CV52549 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No.

Filing # E-Filed 08/31/ :25:22 PM

The Honorable Chainnan and Members ofthe Board ofcounty Commissioners. William M. Davis, Interim Director, Risk Management

10/11/2018 8:39 AM 18CV45669 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) COMPLAINT ) ) ) Case No.:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence

E-FILED 2017 MAY 11 3:00 PM DELAWARE - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT

D-1-GN Cause No. v. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

Case 1:16-cv MEH Document 1 Filed 09/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1/1/2019 4:52 PM 19CV00011 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GILES COUNTY, TENNESSEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

CAUSE NO. v. FALLS COUNTY, TEXAS I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN LEVEL

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHANNON COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to Answer the Complaint, a copy of

10/10/2018 9:50 AM 18CV45543 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

CV CMCO 01/06/ :18:35 PM OLDFIELD, JOY M Page 1 of 8 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.:

: No. 01 CV 1162 Plaintiff, : : Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein v. : UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a corporation : COMPLAINT. Defendant.

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORPHANS' COURT DIVISION

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CAUSE NO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION NOW COMES SHERRY REYNOLDS, BRANDON REYNOLDS, KATY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR DAMAGES

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH CQUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION C 0 M P L A I N T

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Civil File:

CIRCUIT COURT OF OREGON COUNTY OF DESCHUTES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Case 2:10-cv GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 2:17-cv DBH Document 1 Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

Legal Update BELL ROPER LAW FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PROHIBITS FEE REDUCTION IN CLAIM BILLS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR LANE COUNTY

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

7/19/2018 6:06 PM 18CV30704 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Plaintiff WOF SW GGP 1 LLC alleges as follows:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Petitioner, Respondent.

G.S. 1a-1. Rule 84 Page 1

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI

Plaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ea iq5 corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and doing business in Orange County Florida. CASE NO.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FL0RIDA

/ Court: 055

DC PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW, PLAINTIFFS DEE VOIGT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

4/2/2018 2:16 PM 18CV12858 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC

5:17-cv JMC Date Filed 04/19/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ORANGEBURG DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF W ASIITNGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendants. COME NOW, the Plaintiffs herein and allege on information and belief as follows:

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

2/13/ :36 PM 19CV07131 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY. Case No. COMPLAINT. Negligence FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv RJJ Doc #1 Filed 12/27/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/03/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/03/2016. Plaintiff(s), Yours etc.

Transcription:

2/13/20 :01 AM CV072 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 20 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON FRANCISCO JAVIER PEREZ-SANCHEZ, the Personal Representative of the Estate of ELENA VELASQUEZ-PELICO, deceased; and FRANCISCO JAVIER PEREZ-SANCHEZ, the Personal Representative of the Estate of BABY VELASQUEZ-PELICO, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. SUHA M. AL NAISANI; SALSA MARKET, INC., an Oregon corporation; TIENDA TIERRA CALIENTE, INC., dba Salsa Market, an Oregon corporation; ALICIA and URIEL ESTRADA, wife and husband, Defendants. Plaintiffs allege: Case No. COMPLAINT FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Against Defendant Suha M. Al Naisani (Negligence and Negligence Per Se Wrongful Death - Negligence - Negligence Per Se -Premises Liability Demand for Jury Trial (Not Subject to Mandatory Arbitration Fee Authority: ORS.160(1(d Amount in Controversy: $3,320,988.13 22 At all times material hereto: 1. 24 25 a Plaintiff Francisco Javier Perez-Sanchez was the duly appointed and acting Personal Representative of the Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico, his common-law spouse, pursuant to a Limited Judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, county of Multnomah, Department of Probate, Case No. PB00026, on January 4, 20; Page 1 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1 b 2 3 4 c 5 6 d 7 8 e 9 11 t 13 g 16 h 20 i 22 j 24 Ill Plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez-Pelico, was a resident of the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon, and is survived by Francisco Javier Perez-Sanchez, common-law spouse; Kevin Brayan Sequec-Velasquez, son; Jessica Joanna Juarez-Velasquez, daughter; Alexander Javier Perez Velasquez, son; and Juana Pelico-Perez, mother; Plaintiffs decedent Elena Velasquez-Pelico was pregnant with plaintiffs decedent, Baby Velasquez-Pelico; Plaintiffs decedent, Baby Velasquez-Pelico, was a viable fetus, who is survived by her father, Francisco Perez-Sanchez; Plaintiff Francisco Javier Perez-Sanchez was the duly appointed and acting Personal Representative of the Estate of Baby Velasquez-Pelico, his daughter, pursuant to a Limited Judgment entered in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon, county of Multnomah, Department of Probate, Case No. PB024, on March 29, 20; Defendant Suha M. Al Naisani ("AL NAISANI", was a resident of the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon; Defendant Salsa Market, Inc. was a duly organized Oregon corporation, with a principal place of business in the state of Oregon, engaged in the business of operating a specialty grocery market known as Salsa Market, located at 4265 S.W. Cedar Hills Boulevard, in the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon, and was not in good standing with the Oregon Secretary of State; Defendant Tienda Tierra Caliente, Inc. dba Salsa Market ("TIENDA" was a duly organized Oregon corporation, with a principal place of business in the state of Oregon, engaged in the business of operating a specialty grocery market known as Salsa Market, located at 4265 S.W. Cedar Hills Boulevard in the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon, and had been administratively dissolved by the Oregon Secretary of State; Defendants Alicia Estrada and Uriel Estrada, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "ESTRADA" defendants were residents of the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon; Defendants Alicia Estrada and Uriel Estrada, were the owners of real property that consisted of a commercial shopping mall located at 4265 S.W. Cedar Hills Boulevard in the city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon; 25 Ill Page 2 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 2. On or about November 8, 2016, in the afternoon, Plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez Pelico was a business invitee who was shopping during general business hours in the Salsa Market store, owned and operated by defendants Salsa Market, Inc. and Tienda, and each of them, located at 4265 S.W. Cedar Hills Boulevard, city of Beaverton, county of Washington, state of Oregon, in the commercial shopping mall owned by the Estrada defendants. At that time, defendant Al Naisani, who was operating a 2002 Hyundai Santa Fe SUV, began reversing out of a parking space in front of the entrance to the Salsa Market. After reversing out of the parking spot, defendant Naisani believed she had put her vehicle in drive and pressed on the accelerator pedal, but was actually still in reverse. Defendant Al Naisani accelerated in reverse towards the Salsa Market and drove directly into the business establishment, shattering the glass window and thus striking and running over plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez-Pelico, causing her death and the death of her unborn daughter, plaintiffs decedent Baby Velasquez-Pelico, as hereinafter alleged. 3. The negligence of defendant Al Naisani was a substantial factor in causing the collision in one or more of the following particulars: a In failing to keep a proper lookout; b In failing to keep and maintain proper control over her vehicle; and 20 c In driving carelessly. 4. 22 Defendant Naisani was negligent per se in operating her motor vehicle in violation of one or more of the following Oregon statutes: 24 25 26 Ill Ill a ORS 811.135, which prohibits a person from driving a motor vehicle in a manner that endangers or would likely endanger any person or property; Page 3 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 16 20 22 24 25 26 b ORS 811.060, which penalizes a person who recklessly operates a vehicle upon a highway in a manner that results in contact between the person's vehicle and a pedestrian and the contact causes physical injury to the pedestrian. 5. The negligence per se of defendant Al Naisani, in one or more of the particulars set forth above, was a substantial factor in causing the collision. Plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez Pelico, was a member for the class of persons that ORS 811.135 and ORS 811.060 were enacted to protect. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Against Defendants Salsa Market, Tienda Tierra Caliente, Inc., dba Salsa Market; and Alicia And Uriel Estrada (Negligence -- Premises Liability 6. Plaintiffs incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1 and 2 of the First Claim for Relief, as if set forth in full herein. The condition of the Salsa Market, which was owned, leased, licensed, operated, maintained, inspected, repaired, and/or controlled, by defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant 7. Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, was unreasonably dangerous and posed an unreasonable risk of harm to persons seated at the "cafe table," walking in front, entering, and/or shopping in the store, or in close proximity to the store. 8. As the owners and operators of a parking lot open to the general public, defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, had a duty to exercise due care in the ownership, operation, repair, inspection, and maintenance of the area in front of the Salsa Market, to ensure that persons seated at the "cafe table", walking in front of, entering, and/or shopping in the store, were not subject to unreasonable and foreseeable risks of harm. Page 4 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1 9. 2 Defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, knew, or in 3 the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, that the condition of the area in front of the 4 Salsa Market was unreasonably dangerous, and posed a foreseeable risk of harm to persons using 5 the store, because there were no warnings, caution sings, and/or other indications posted, marked 6 or made known to users of, and bystanders to the Store Front Parking Area, regarding the lack of 7 any adequate and necessary protective devices and barriers, including, but not limited to, 8 bollards, posts, curbs, parking lot wheel stops, fencing, rails guard walls, and/or other protective 9 barriers.. 11 As the owners and operators of the Salsa Market and the area directly in front of it, defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, owed a duty of care 13 to persons seated at the "cafe table", walking in front, entering, and shopping in the store, to take reasonable steps to eliminated the unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm posed to those persons and to plaintiffs in particular. 16 11. As the owners and operators of the Salsa Market and the area directly in front of it, defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, owed a duty of care to persons using the Salsa Market and the adjacent surrounding area to take reasonable steps to 20 warn or guard against the unreasonable risk of harm posed to persons walking in front, entering, and shopping in the store. 22. Defendant Salsa Market 0 Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, negligently 24 failed to take reasonable steps to eliminate the unreasonable and foreseeable risk of harm posed 25 to persons seated at the "cafe table", entering, and/or shopping in the store, as set forth above. Page 5 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street Portland, OR 97204

1 13. 2 Defendant Salsa Market, Inc., defendant Tienda, and the Estrada defendants, negligently 3 failed to take reasonable steps to warn or guard against the unreasonable and foreseeable risk of 4 harm posed to persons seated at the "cafe table", walking in front of, entering, and shopping in 5 the store, at a time when they knew or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known, of 6 the unreasonably dangerous condition of the premises. 7. 8 The negligence and/or fault of the defendants, and each of them, as described herein, was 9 a substantial factor in causing the traumatic injuries to, and death of, plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez-Pelico. 11. The negligence and/or fault of the defendants, and each of them, was a substantial factor 13 in causing the beneficiaries of the Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico to suffer the loss of society and companionship of the decedent, entitling the estate to an award of noneconomic damages in the sum of $2,500,000.00. 16 16. The negligence of the defendants, and each of them, was a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs decedent, Elena Velasquez-Pelico, to experience pain and suffering between the time of her injury and the time of her death, thereby entitling the estate to an award of noneconomic 20 damages in the sum of $0,000.00.. 22 The negligence and/or fault of the defendants, and each of them, was a substantial factor in causing the Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico, to incur reasonable and necessary medical 24 expenses on her behalf, between the times of her injury and death, in the sum of $33,453.13. 25 Ill Page 6 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1. 2 The negligence and/or fault of the defendants, and each of them, was a substantial factor 3 in causing the Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico to incur a pecuniary loss on behalf of plaintiff's 4 decedent, Elena Velasquez-Pelico, in the approximate sum of $30,000.00 for her loss of earnings 5 and/or loss of earning capacity to date, and the approximate sum of $0,000.00 as the present 6 value for loss of earnings and/or loss of earning capacity in the future. 7. 8 The negligence and/or fault of defendants, and each of them, was a substantial factor in 9 causing the Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico to incur the sum of $7,530.00 for reasonable burial and funeral expenses. 11 20. The negligence and/or fault of the TIENDA and ESTRADA defendants, and each of 13 them, caused the beneficiaries of the Estate of Baby V elasquez-pelico to suffer the loss of society and companionship of the decedent, entitling the estate to an award of noneconomic damages in the sum of$500,000.00. 16. The Estates of Elena Velasquez-Pelico and Baby Velasquez-Pelico are entitled to interest at 9% per annum for economically verifiable losses from the date of loss to the date of entry of judgment. 20 22. Plaintiffs reserve the right to amend this Complaint at the time of trial to more completely 22 allege the estates' economic losses and/or to conform to proof offered at trial. 24 Plaintiffs hereby demand a jury trial. 25 Ill Ill Page 7 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street

1 WHEREFORE Plaintiff Francisco Javier Perez-Sanchez, Personal Representative of the 2 Estate of Elena Velasquez-Pelico, deceased, prays for judgment against defendants, and each of 3 them, in the sum of $2,820,988.13; Plaintiff Francisco Javier Perez-Sanchez, Personal 4 Representative of the Estate of Baby Velasquez-Pelico, prays for a judgment against the 5 TIENDA and ESTRADA defendants, in the sum of $500,000.00; and both estates pray for their 6 costs and disbursements incurred herein, and such other relief as the court deems just and 7 equitable. 8 9 DATED this 13 th day of February, 20. 11 13 R. Brendan D SB #932588 PICKETT D~i ~-U~~AN MCCALL LLP of Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 20 22 24 25 26 Page 8 - COMPLAINT 2 S.W. Morrison Street Portland, OR 97204