CONTENTS PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3. Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13

Similar documents
.Wolters Kluwer Law & Business

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAW PROFESSOR VIKRANT KISHIN ADVANI SPRING 2015 COURSE NUMBER: 37:575:316, SECTION NUMBER: 02

The Evolution of Discrimination Laws & How To Remain Compliant. Chad E. Wallace Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C.

In the Supreme Court of The United States

Individual Disparate Treatment

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

B. The 1991 Civil Rights Act and the Conflict between the Circuits

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv VMC-TBM.

I. Failure to State a Claim

Legal Update: Discrimination, Harassment & Retaliation Law

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Case 1:13-cv LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12

BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AARP, AND EQUAL JUSTICE SOCIETY

Supreme Court Narrows the Meaning of Supervisor and Clarifies Retaliation Standard. Michael A. Caldwell, J.D.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE

Investigating EEO complaints. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

Laura A. Pfeiffer RETALIATION CLAIMS ON THE RISE WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO ABOUT IT? with special guest Justice Ericson Lindell

DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit

Lawyers for employees breathed a

GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF NATIONAL ORIGIN, PART 1606

2007 EMPLOYMENT LAW SYMPOSIUM July 20, 2007 Dallas, Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-LENARD/GOODMAN

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Maryland Commission on Civil Rights State Gov. Art., Title 20 MCCR 101

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 06/07/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:107

JUDICIARY OF GUAM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICY AND PROCEDURE

EMPLOYMENT LAW IN THE SUPREME COURT: 2001 TERM

Claiming Employment Discrimination in New Mexico under State and Federal Law

Formalism and Employer Liability Under Title VII

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No CHRYSOULA J. KOMIS, Appellant SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Smith v. City of Jackson: Does It Really Open New Opportunities for ADEA Plaintiffs to Recover Under a Disparate Impact Theory?

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

by DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Avoiding and Handling Retaliation Claims

Question and Instruction on Retaliation under Texas Whistleblower Act

The Tort Label. Florida Law Review. Sandra F. Sperino. Volume 66 Issue 3 Article 3. February 2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Labor, Employment, and HR Law Update ( ) Aaron L. Zandy, SPHR, Esquire FordHarrison LLP (407)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA I. INTRODUCTION

KRUPIN O'BRIEN LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1156 FIFTEENTH STREET, N.W. SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Drew M. Capuder CAPUDER FANTASIA PLLC

Case 8:05-cv GLS-DRH Document 31 Filed 01/17/2006 Page 1 of 21

Employment Law Update and Trends

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No MICHELLE PRECIA JONES,

United States Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

A (800) (800)

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. VICKY S. CRAWFORD, Petitioner,

DEFENSE ANALYSIS UNDER FARAGHER/ELLERTH OF MS. STRONG S SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS:

CHAPTER 3 WORKFORCE DIVERSITY, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CHAPTER DESCRIPTION

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cv MSS-GJK.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

COUNSEL JUDGES OPINION by the State of New Mexico. All rights reserved.

A Comprehensive Review of Revised Article 9

Phoenix District EEOC Office Legal Update. Mary Jo O Neill, Regional Attorney, November

The Supreme Court's Anti-Retaliation Principle

NO In the Supreme Court of the United States. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER, PETITIONER, v. NAIEL NASSAR, M.D., RESPONDENT.

In The Supreme Court of the United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VICKY S. CRAWFORD, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE,

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

REED V. UAW: AN ADVERSE RULING ON ADVERSE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SMU Law Review. Lindsey Watkins. Volume 58. Follow this and additional works at: Recommended Citation

Federal Laws Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Application To Immigrant Workers

CLASS-BASED ADJUDICATION OF TITLE VII CLAIMS IN THE AGE OF THE ROBERTS COURT

Legal Update. Fire Districts Association of California (FDAC) 2017 Annual Conference April 5, 2017


Employer Liability and Title VII: Recent U.S. Supreme Court Guidance on Supervisor Conduct and Retaliation

CHAPTER 5 MEASURING AND PROVING INTENTIONAL JOB DISCRIMINATION...40

Intersection Between the New York State Division of Human Rights and Title the Goes New York Here Courts

Jody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division

Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments The Clean Up. Amendments Civil Rights. Amendments Civil Rights

Case 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States CITY OF CHICAGO,

Plaintiff, 1:14-CV-0771 (LEK/RFT) Defendant. MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

Civil Rights. New Employee Orientation March 2018

FACULTY MASTER AGREEMENT

DEPENDS. year! unlawful procedures in the workplace. in the workplace.

NAACP v. Town of Harrison: Applying Title VII Disparate Impact Analysis to Municipal Residency Requirements

Dancing with the Supremes: L&E Issues in the Supreme Court this Year

WHAT IS MY CASE WORTH

Individual Liability of Supervisors for Sexual Harrassment Under Title VII: Courts' Reliance on the Rules of Statutory Construction

FOR CODERS 102. Other Notes (if you have a note for ABF staff, write it below or on the back of this page) Very weak/flimsy case

MARALYN S. JAMES, Petitioner, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY, Respondent. BRIEF IN OPPOSITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

S. ll IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES A BILL

Public Sector Employment Law Update League of California Cities 2014 City Attorneys Spring Conference

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is proposing revisions to its

Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure

Procedures For Complaints of Unlawful Discrimination, Including Sexual Harassment

Margaret Tourtellotte v. Eli Lilly & Co

Price Waterhouse, Wright Line, and Proving a "Mixed Motive" Case under Title VII

Transcription:

CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgements Practice and Procedural Tips A Note About the Cases Included and Case Editing xix xxiii xxi xxxiii PART ONE INTRODUCTION AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS Chapter 1: Employment Discrimination 3 A. Introduction 3 B. Current Debate Theory v. Procedure 5 C. Employment Statutes 7 D. Constitutional Claims 10 E. State and Local Claims 11 F. This Book and Employment Discrimination Law 12 Chapter 2: Administrative Process 13 A. Introduction 14 B. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Justice 14 C. The Administrative Process 15 National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan 20 D. Standing and Coverage Requirements 27 Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates v. Wells 28 Mariotti v. Mariotti Bldg. Products, Inc. 35 E. Filing the Complaint 40 Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A. 40 Ashcroft v. Iqbal 45 F. Discovery, E-Discovery, and Summary Judgment 54 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Houston Funding II, Ltd. 56 xi

xii Contents G. Jury Trial 61 May v. Chrysler Group 62 H. Arbitration 68 Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips 69 I. Chapter-in-Review 75 PART TWO ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORKS Chapter 3: Disparate Treatment 79 A. Introduction 80 B. Circumstantial Evidence of Discrimination 80 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 81 Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine 88 St. Mary s Honor Center v. Hicks 92 Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 97 C. Direct Evidence of Discrimination 105 Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 106 D. Mixed-Motives Analysis/Civil Rights Act of 1991 114 Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa 114 Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc. 119 E. After-Acquired Evidence 120 McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. 120 F. Intentional Discrimination Framework: Summary Review 123 G. Systemic Litigation 125 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes 126 In re Bemis Co. 134 H. Further Defining Discrimination 137 Ricci v. DeStefano 138 I. Retaliation 146 1. Coverage 148 Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP 148 2. Protected Activity 151 a. Participation Clause 151 b. Opposition Clause 152 3. Adverse Action 153 Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White 154

Contents xiii 4. Causation 158 University of Texas Sw. Medical Center v. Nassar 159 5. Completing the McDonnell Douglas Framework 166 6. Retaliation Review 167 J. Chapter-in-Review 168 Chapter 4: Disparate Impact 169 A. Introduction 169 Griggs v. Duke Power 170 Dothard v. Rawlinson 176 Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio 182 B. Statutory Framework 190 C. Subjective Criteria 193 Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust 193 D. Defenses 198 1. The Bottom-Line Defense 199 Connecticut v. Teal 199 2. Validation Studies as a Safe Harbor to Disparate Impact Claims 203 E. Chapter-in-Review 204 Chapter 5: Harassment 207 A. Introduction 208 B. Protected Categories of Harassment 209 Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. 209 C. The Harassment Cause of Action 211 1. Because of Sex 211 Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 211 Ocheltree v. Scollon Productions, Inc. 217 2. Unwelcome, and Severe or Pervasive 223 Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson 224 Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. 232 D. Imputing Liability 236 Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth 236 Faragher v. City of Boca Raton 245 1. Supervisor Harassment 252 Vance v. Ball State University 252

xiv Contents 2. Co-Worker Harassment 260 3. Constructive Discharge 262 Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders 263 E. First Amendment Defense 268 Lyle v. Warner Bros. Television Productions 269 F. Chapter-in-Review 274 PART THREE ENFORCEMENT BY PROTECTED CLASS Chapter 6: Race and Color Discrimination 279 A. Introduction 280 B. EEOC Guidance 281 C. Discrimination An Ongoing Problem 283 EEOC v. Pipefitters Ass n Local Union 597 284 Henderson v. Irving Materials, Inc. 290 D. Reverse Discrimination Claims 296 McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. 296 E. Affirmative Action Plans 301 Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County 301 F. Chapter-in-Review 311 Chapter 7: Sex Discrimination 313 A. Introduction 314 B. Pregnancy as a Form of Sex Discrimination 315 Ames v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. 316 Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. 321 C. The Family and Medical Leave Act 330 Makowski v. SmithAmundsen LLC 333 D. Sexual Orientation A Protected Category? 336 E. The Bona Fide Occupational Qualification Exception 339 Dothard v. Rawlinson 340 International Union, United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. 347

Contents xv F. Grooming and Appearance Standards 356 Jespersen v. Harrah s Operating Co. 357 G. The Equal Pay Act and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act 363 Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. 365 King v. Acosta Sales & Marketing, Inc. 375 H. Chapter-in-Review 381 Chapter 8: National Origin Discrimination 383 A. Introduction 384 B. The Meaning of National Origin 385 Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co. 386 C. English-Only Rules 392 Garcia v. Spun Steak Co. 394 Maldonado v. City of Altus 405 D. Accent Discrimination 415 Fragante v. City & County of Honolulu 416 E. Undocumented Worker Status 422 Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. N.L.R.B. 423 F. Chapter-in-Review 430 Chapter 9: Religious Discrimination 431 A. Introduction 432 B. What Is Religion? 433 EEOC v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 434 C. Disparate Treatment Cases 439 EEOC v. Preferred Management Corp. 439 Moranski v. General Motors Corp. 447 D. Failure to Accommodate Cases 451 Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison 452 Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook 462 EEOC v. Unión Independiente de la Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados de Puerto Rico 468 E. Exceptions to Religious Discrimination Claims 472 1. The Educational Exception 476

xvi Contents 2. The Religious Employer Exception 477 3. The BFOQ 478 4. The Ministerial Exception 479 Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC 480 F. Chapter-in-Review 490 Chapter 10: Disability Discrimination 493 A. Introduction 494 1. Elements of the Cause of Action 495 2. Disability and Qualified Defined 496 B. Actual, Perceived, and Record of a Disability 497 Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. 497 EEOC v. Heartway Corp. 507 Graham v. St. John s United Methodist Church 513 C. History of a Disability 517 Shaver v. Independent Stave Co. 517 D. Accommodation Requirement and the Interactive Process 520 U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett 521 Rauen v. U.S. Tobacco Manufacturing Ltd. Partnership 530 E. Direct Threat Defense and Qualification Standards 536 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal 537 F. Disparate Impact Claims 541 G. Unlawful Medical Inquiries and Examinations 542 H. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 544 I. Chapter-in-Review 545 Chapter 11: Age Discrimination 547 A. Introduction 548 B. Disparate Treatment Claims 550 Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 550 Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co. 555 Dediol v. Best Chevrolet, Inc. 561 C. The Meaning of Age 567 General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline 567 Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. 576

Contents xvii D. RFOA Defense and a Note About the BFOQ 579 E. Disparate Impact Claims 580 F. Exceptions for Police and Firefighters 582 G. Damages 583 H. Chapter-in-Review 585 PART FOUR REMEDIES Chapter 12: Relief in Discrimination Cases 589 A. Introduction 590 B. Reinstatement 590 C. Front Pay 592 D. Backpay 594 EEOC v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. 594 E. Compensatory Damages 600 Whitten v. Cross Garage Corp. 601 F. Punitive Damages 606 Kolstad v. American Dental Association 607 Philip Morris USA v. Williams 615 G. Other Damages 619 H. Liquidated Damages and the ADEA 620 I. Attorneys Fees 621 J. Chapter-in-Review 622 PART FIVE BEST PRACTICES Chapter 13: Handling Employment Discrimination Claims: Best Practices 625 A. Introduction 626 B. The Employee 627 1. When to Complain of Discrimination 627 Jordan v. Alternative Resources Corp. 628 2. How and Where to Complain of Discrimination 637

xviii Contents 3. Drafting the Complaint 639 Mangum v. Town of Holly Springs 639 E.E.O.C. v. Concentra Health Services, Inc. 645 4. Protecting Against Retaliation 652 C. The Employer 653 1. Effective Employer Policies 654 a. Dating Policies 654 Sarsha v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 656 b. Computer/Electronic Device Policies 659 Cargo v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 661 c. Antidiscrimination Policies 664 d. Anti-Bullying Policies 666 e. Responding to Reference Requests 667 Matthews v. Wisconsin Energy Corp. Inc. 669 f. Caregiving Responsibilities 674 Johnson v. University of Iowa 675 2. Training Employees on Discrimination 678 3. Documentation, Discipline, and Investigations 680 Toliver v. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights 683 4. Insulation from Liability 687 Staub v. Proctor Hospital 687 D. Chapter-in-Review 692 Index 00