Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Similar documents
Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISON COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:07-cv GEL Document 1 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 1:12-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

cij;'l~jl NO~ AC..

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. 1. This is an action for direct patent infringement of United States Letters Patent Nos.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-789 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 03/06/13 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) IQ BIOMETRIX S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. Jonathan E. Singer (pro hac vice to be filed) 60 South 6 th Street, Suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 35 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:130

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 21. Case No.

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 1 Filed 12/08/08 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SYNERGETICS, INC., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PEREGRINE SURGICAL, LTD., and INNOVATECH SURGICAL, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Synergetics, Inc. ( Synergetics, for its Complaint for Patent Infringement against Peregrine Surgical, Ltd. ( Peregrine and Innovatech Surgical, Inc. ( Innovatech (hereinafter, collectively Defendants, asserts as follows: BACKGROUND 1. Synergetics is a corporation with its primary place of business at 3845 Corporate Centre Drive, St. Charles, Missouri. 2. On information and belief, Peregrine is a company that has its principal place of business located in this jurisdiction, at 51 Britain Drive, Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901. On information and belief, Peregrine does business throughout the United States and does business within this judicial district. 3. On information and belief, Innovatech is a company that has its principal place of business at 1000 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 514 Camden, NJ 01804. On

Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 2 of 5 information and belief, Innovatech does business throughout the United States and does business within this judicial district. 4. Synergetics is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in U.S. Patent No. 6,984,230 ( the 230 patent, entitled Directional Laser Probe, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The 230 patent was duly and legally issued on January 10, 2006, and is currently valid and enforceable. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States (Title 35 of the United States Code. 1338(a. 6. Jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 7. Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district. 8. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 230 PATENT AGAINST PEREGRINE 9. Synergetics incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 8 as though fully set forth herein. 10. On information and belief, Peregrine is infringing, inducing others to infringe, and/or contributorily infringing, in the United States and in this District, at least one claim of Synergetics 230 patent. Such infringing activities by Peregrine include making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering to sell products, including the Adjustable Intuitive Probe. These acts are without right, license, or permission from 2

Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 3 of 5 11. Peregrine s actions as described herein constitute infringement of at least one claim of Synergetics 230 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, 281-285. 12. On information and belief, Peregrine s actions as described herein are willful, wanton, and deliberate and are causing substantial and irreparable damage to 13. On information and belief, Peregrine s infringement, if not enjoined by this Court, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable damage to COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF THE 230 PATENT AGAINST INNOVATECH 14. Synergetics incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 13 as though fully set forth herein. 15. On information and belief, Innovatech is infringing, inducing others to infringe, and/or contributorily infringing, in the United States and in this District, at least one claim of Synergetics 230 patent. Such infringing activities by Innovatech include making, using, importing, selling, and/or offering to sell products, including the Adjustable Intuitive Probe. These acts are without right, license, or permission from 16. Innovatech s actions as described herein constitute infringement of at least one claim of Synergetics 230 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, 281-285. 17. On information and belief, Innovatech s actions as described herein are willful, wanton, and deliberate and are causing substantial and irreparable damage to 18. On information and belief, Innovatech s infringement, if not enjoined by this Court, will continue to cause substantial and irreparable damage to 3

Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 4 of 5 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Synergetics respectfully requests this Court to enter a judgment: A. Declaring that Peregrine and Innovatech have willfully infringed and continue to willfully infringe one or more claims of the 230 patent; B. Preliminarily and permanently enjoining Peregrine and Innovatech, including any subsidiaries, agents, officers, employees, directors, licensees, servants, successors, assigns, and all others acting in privity or in concert with them, from making, using, importing, selling, or offering to sell products that fall within the scope of the 230 patent; from actively inducing infringement of the 230 patent; from contributing to infringement of the 230 patent; or from engaging in any other acts of infringement of any of the claims of the 230 patent; C. Awarding Synergetics damages adequate to compensate Synergetics for Defendants infringement of the 230 patent, together with interest; D. Awarding Synergetics treble damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, and other applicable law, by reason of the willful, wanton, and deliberate nature of Defendants infringement; E. Awarding Synergetics attorneys fees and costs of suit, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285, and other applicable law; F. Awarding Synergetics any other relief that this Court deems just and proper. 4

Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 5 of 5 FREY, PETRAKIS, DEEB, BLUM & BRIGGS, P.C. By: Adam S. Barrist #88645 Joseph H. Blum #36874 1601 Market Street, 26 th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215 563-0500 FAX: (215 563-5532 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Synergetics, Inc. 5