UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Similar documents
Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case: 1: 1 0-cv Document #: 77 Filed: 03/22/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:569

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

I ELECTRONICALLY FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:06-cv WMN Document 270 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:15-cv JFK Document 114 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:15-cv JFK Document Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 13

Case 1:12-cv RM-KMT Document 239 Filed 03/06/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ Document 95 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 1:12-cv GBD Document 47 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 13

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FINALLY CERTIFYING A CLASS

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 6:05-cv ACC-DAB Document 56 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:14-cv MCE-KJN Document 87 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 14

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

1:1_ (I f 0 HiIiB} ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Case 1:10-cv ER-SRF Document 825 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv WHP Document 571 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, AT INDEPENDENCE

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 30 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

2:14-cv CAS-JEM Document 38 Filed 04/27/15 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:07-cv H-CAB Document 213 Filed 08/04/2009 Page 1 of 41

Case 8:04-cv SCB-EAJ Document 166 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 31

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JMA-SIL Document 5 Filed 12/27/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 63 Filed 11/12/14 Page 1 of 13

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 58 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 EXHIBIT 2

Case 0:11-cv CMA Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/18/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 214 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiff, j Judge: Hon. Joan M. Lewis ) ) )

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:09-cv GAG-BJM Document Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Robbins Geller Rudman&Dowd UP

#0 I. ! l>a TE FILE ~ V 1 Q r USDC ~DNY, DOCU'.\'IENT I FLF.CTRO:\ICALLY FILED I I DOC#:

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 576 Filed: 07/06/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:22601

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 77 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:08-cv SHM-dkv Document 327 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 8969

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

X

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:16-CV MHC

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 169 Filed: 12/01/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:2786

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:09-cv JPG-PMF Document 47 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #466

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 866 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:15-cv NRB Document 243 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 14. Case 1:15-cv NRB Document Filed 09/19/17 Page 1of14

Case 1:15-cv MAK Document 191 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 36 PageID #: 7331

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv LGS Document 536 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : :

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:14-cv SMG Document 68 Filed 09/19/17 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1270

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE AND SCHEDULING A FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. TJ H Case No. 5:15-cv ~jc~-gjs

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 266 Filed: 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:5588

Case 1:15-cv ELR Document 60 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 21

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Case 1:11-cv LAK-JCF Document 285 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 7:16-cv KMK Document 75 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case: 4:16-cv JAR Doc. #: 97 Filed: 12/13/18 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 2279

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Transcription:

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSVLVAJ'ELA ------------------ ------- - ------x CHAJTANYA 1(AtflYALA and KELLY SI-IARKEY, on behalf of themselves Individually and all others similarly situated, Case No. 11-cv-7103(JLS Plaintiffs, OLYMPUS CORPORATION. TSUYOSHI KIKUKAWA. and SHTJICHI TAKAYAMA, Defendants. - -------- - ---- x ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE WHEREAS, a class action i5 pending before the Court entitled Kadiyala, et al. v. Olympus Corporation, et al., Case no. 11 -cv-7 103 (JLS(E.D. Pa.(the "Litigation"; WHEREAS the Settling Parties having made application, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e, for an order preliminarily approving the settlement of the Litigation, in accordance with a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of December 23, 2013 (the "Stipulation", which, together with the Exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for a proposed settlement of the Litigation and for dismissal of the Litigation with prejudice upon the terms and conditions set forth therein (the "Settlement"; and the Court having read and considered the Stipulation and the Exhibits annexed thereto; and LEGAL US E749S65 I S677.00OO2-1 -

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 2 of 7 WHEREAS, all defined terms contained herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the Settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing described below. 2. A hearing (the'settlement Hearing" shall be held before this Court on A1A 74 / 2, 2014, at 2-..''l?m., at the courtroom of Honorable Jeffrey L. Schmehl, United States District Judge, Madison Building, 400 Washington Street, Room 401, Reading. Pennsylvania, to determine: (I whether the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and should be approved by the Court, (2 whether a Class should be certified under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 for the purpose of effectuating the Settlement, (3 whether the proposed Plan of Allocation should be approved, (4 whether a Judgment in the form of Exhibit B to the Stipulation should be entered herein, (5 the amount of attorneys' fees that should be awarded to Lead Plaintiff's Counsel, and (6 whether and in what amount to reimburse Lead Plaintiff's Counsel and Plaintiffs for their expenses in connection with the Litigation. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to Members of the Class. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court certifies, for purposes of effectuating the Settlement only, a class consisting of any person or entity, including their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, who purchased or otherwise acquired Olympus ADRs between May 8, 2007 and November 7, 2011, inclusive, and were allegedly damaged thereby. Excluded from the Class are Olympus, current or former officers and directors of Olympus, any entity in which Olympus has or had a majority interest, and the legal representatives, successors, affiliates and assigns of Olympus. Also excluded are all LEGAL-US-E # 74S9S6 15.1 38677.0000-2 -

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 3 of 7 persons who, although otherwise entitled to be in the Class, timely and validly request exclusion from the Class pursuant to the procedures for exclusion described herein. 4. The Court approves, as to form and content, the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action (the "Notice", Summary Notice, and the Proof of Claim and Release form (the "Proof of Claim" annexed as Exhibits A I. A-2 and A-3 to the Stipulation, and finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and publishing of the Summary Notice substantially in the manner and form set forth in J 5-6 of this Order meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and due process, and is the best notice practicable under the circumstances and shall constitute due and sufficient notice to all Persons entitled thereto. 5. Lead Plaintiff's Counsel are hereby authorized to retain the firm of Gilardi & Co. LLC ("Claims Administrator" to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as process the claims submitted as more fully set forth below: (a Within 20 days of the date of this Order (the "Notice Date", Lead Plaintiff's Counsel shall cause a copy of the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed as Exhibits A-i and A-3 hereto, to be mailed by first class mail to all Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort; (b Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Lead Plaintiffs Counsel shall cause the Summary Notice to be published once in Investor's Business Daily; and (c At least seven calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing, Lead Plaintiffs Counsel shall serve on Olympus' counsel and file with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing and publishing. 6. Nominees who held Olympus ADRs, purchased or otherwise acquired during the period between May 8, 2007 and November 7, 2011, inclusive, shall send the Notice and the LEGA1_1JSE74898615-1 38677.00002-3 -

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 4 of 7 Proof of Claim to the beneficial owners of such Olympus ADRs within ten days after receipt thereof, or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator within ten days of receipt thereof in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice and Proof of Claim to such beneficial owners. 7. All Members of the Class shall be bound by all determinations and judgments in the Class Action concerning the Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Class. 8. Any potential Member of the Class may request to be excluded from the Class. Any such Person must submit to the Claims Administrator and to counsel for Olympus a request for exclusion ("Request for Exclusion" postmarked no later than twenty-one (21 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing date, that must comply with the requirements set forth in the Notice and must state: (a the name, address, and telephone number of the Person requesting exclusion; (b each of the Person's purchases or acquisitions and/or sales of Olympus ADRs made between May 8, 2007 and November 7, 2011, inclusive, including the dates of purchase or acquisition and/or sale, the number of securities purchased, acquired and/or sold, and the number of Olympus ADRs currently held; (c that the Person wishes to be excluded from the Class. All Persons who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall have no rights under the Stipulation, shall not share in the distribution of the Settlement Fund, and shall not be hound by the Stipulation or the Judgment entered in the Litigation. 9. Class Members who wish to participate in the Settlement shall complete and submit hoof of Claim forms in accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Proof of Claim forms must be submitted no later than one hundred (100 calendar days from the Notice Date. Any Class Member who does not timely submit a LEGAL US E # 74986L5.138677.00002-4 -

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 5 of 7 Proof of Claim within the time provided for shall be barred from sharing in the distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but the claims of such Class Member shall nonetheless be barred by entry of the Judgment. 10. Any Member of the Class may enter an appearance in the Litigation, individually or through counsel of their own choice, at their own expense. Any Class Member wishing to enter an individual appearance, or to address the Court at the Settlement Hearing, must file with the Court, and deliver a copy to all counsel, no later than fourteen (14 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing a "Notice of Appearance and of Intention to Appear at Settlement Hearing.' This Notice must state the Class Member's name, address and telephone number, and must establish that the tiler is a Member of the Class. Any Class Member who does not file a Notice of Appearance will be represented by Lead Plaintiffs Counsel. 11. Pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be approved, the Lead Plaintiff shall not, either directly, representatively, or in any other capacity, commence or prosecute against any of the Released Parties, any action or proceeding in any court or tribunal asserting any of the Released Claims. 12. Any Member of the Class may show cause, if he, she or it has any, why the proposed Settlement of the Litigation should or should not be approved as fair, reasonable and adequate, or why a judgment should or should not be entered thereon, why the Plan of Allocation should or should not be approved, or why attorneys' fees and expenses should or should not be awarded to counsel for Plaintiffs; provided, however, that no Class Member or any other Person shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the proposed Settlement, or, if approved, the Judgment to be entered thereon approving the same, or the order approving the Plan of Allocation, or the attorneys' fees and expenses to be awarded to Plaintiffs' LEGALUS_E 4 74898615 3567700002-5 -

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 6 of 7 counsel, unless that Person has filed a written objection with the Court, with a copy served on all counsel, no later than fourteen (14 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing Date. Objections must contain (I the objector's name, address, and telephone number, (2 a statement establishing that the objector is member of the Class. (3 a statement of all grounds upon which the Class Member objects to the Settlement, or any aspect of it. (4 copies of any papers and briefs upon which the objector intends to rely, and (5 the name of each witness, if any, whom the objector intends to rely upon or call to testify at the Settlement Hearing. Any Class Member who intends to appear at the Settlement Hearing and address the Court in connection with an objection must file a "Notice of Appearance and of Intention to Appear at Settlement Hearing" as described in 10, along with his or her objection. Any Member of the Class or other person who does not make his, her or its objection in the manlier provided herein and in the Notice shall be deemed to have waived such objection and shall forever be foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness or adequacy of the proposed Settlement as incorporated in the Stipulation, to the Plan of Allocation, and to the award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses to counsel for the Plaintiffs, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 13. All funds held by or on behalf of the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed pursuant to the Stipulation and/or further order(s of the Court. 14. In the event that the Stipulation is not approved by the Court or the settlement set forth in the Stipulation is terminated or fails to became effective in accordance with its terms, the Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation as of September 24, 2013. LEGAL US E# 7489615.1 38677.00002-6-

Case 5:11-cv-07103-JLS Document 97 Filed 01/28/14 Page 7 of 7 15. All papers in support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, any application by counsel for the Plaintiffs for attorneys' fees or reimbursement of expenses shall be filed and served seven (7 calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing. 16. All reasonable expenses incurred in identifying and notifying Class Members, as well as administering the Settlement Fund, shall be paid from the Settlement Fund, as set forth in the Stipulation. In the event the Settlement is not approved by the Court, or otherwise fails to become effective, neither the Plaintiffs nor any of their counsel shall have any obligation to repay to the Settlement Fund any amounts due and owing from the Settlement Fund in connection with administration of the fund. 17. As provided for in paragraph 8.1 of the Stipulation, neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an admission or concession by Olympus of the truth of any of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind. 18, The Court retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or connected with the proposed settlement. The Court may approve the Settlement, with such modifications as may be agreed to by the Settling Parties, if appropriate, without further notice to the Class. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:.>7 I- tkl Y L. S(.MMLtjL S DISTRICT JUDGE LEOAL_US_E74986I 387700002-7-