Case 3:06-cr LAB Document 378 Filed 09/01/07 Page 1 of 3

Similar documents
Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER]

Case4:11-cv PJH Document65 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 8

Case 3:10-cr JAH Document 19 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (Hon. Sherry Stephens)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 613 Filed 05/07/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petition, there is. staff for this form. the other party s

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IN RE TELES AG,

EX PARTE MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON CHARLES H. MOORE S JOINDER TO MOTION OF THE CREDITORS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 3:05-cv Document 22 Filed 06/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Washington Western District Court Case No. 3:14-cr BHS USA v. Wright et al. Document 173. View Document.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR CALVERT COUNTY, MARYLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

Plaintiffs' Response to Individual Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:13-cv KJM-DAD Document 80 Filed 07/07/15 Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Honorable James J. Wechler v. San Juan River Adjudication. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Claims of Navajo Nation CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv RAJ Document 8 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Case 3:07-cr JM Document 25 Filed 05/27/2008 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAMILY COURT Domestic Relations Branch

LOCAL OPERATING PROCEDURES IMMIGRATION COURT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Case 9:16-cr RLR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 3:15-cv HEH Document 64 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 445

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:18-cv EMC Document 156 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 8

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Court Chatter. (Hon.

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 3:11-cv County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al.

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Case 4:18-cv JSW Document 18 Filed 12/10/18 Page 1 of 10

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FAMILY COURT Domestic Relations Branch RELATED CASES: OPPOSITION TO MOTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv L-AGS Document 45 Filed 02/23/17 PageID.923 Page 1 of 7

1900 M Street, NW, Ste. 250, Washington, D.C


Case: 4:07-cr RGK-RGK Document #: 176 Date Filed: 08/21/09 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cr SRB Document 250 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 8

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Court Chatter. (Hon.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS IN RE SMALL CLAIMS FORMS SUPREME COURT NO.

Case: Document: 6 Filed: 11/03/2016 Pages: 6 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Transcription:

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 Larry A. Hammond Arizona State Bar No. 000 Diane M. Meyers Arizona State Bar No. 0 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0- Telephone: (0 0-000 Facsimile: (0 0-0 Email: lhammond@omlaw.com; dmeyers@omlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF Certified Specialist, Criminal Law California State Bar No. 0 West Broadway, Suite 0 San Diego, California 0-0 Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -0 Email: db@barticklaw.com LAW OFFICES OF California State Bar No. th Avenue, Suite San Diego, California 0 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Email: markadamsesq@yahoo.com Francisco Javier Arellano-Felix UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Honorable Larry A. Burns, Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal Case No. 0CR-0-LAB Plaintiff, Date: September, 00 Time: :00 p.m. v. DEFENDANT FRANCISCO JAVIER FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX (0, ARELLANO-FELIX S MOTION TO BE et. al., HEARD ON SHORT NOTICE AND DECLARATION OF ATTORNEY LARRY A. HAMMOND Defendants. [Prohibiting Filing of Replies] COMES NOW, defendant FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX by and through his 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of attorneys and respectfully requests to be heard on short notice, on the above date and time, and in the above court, so as to move for the reconsideration of the Court s Order prohibiting the filing of replies. This Motion is based on the attached Declaration of Larry A. Hammond, and the papers and pleadings on file in this matter. 0 0 Dated: September, 00 Respectfully submitted, LARRY A. HAMMOND DIANE M. MEYERS FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX By: /s/ David H. Bartick 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 DECLARATION OF LARRY A. HAMMOND I, Larry A. Hammond, hereby declare as follows:. I am an attorney licensed to practice before this Court. I have been appointed by this Court to represent Francisco Javier Arellano Felix, who is facing a potential death sentence. I am learned counsel in the matter.. The Motion for Reconsideration of the Court s Order Prohibiting the Filing of Written Replies is being made on short notice because the Court has calendared a hearing on September, 00. Counsel for Mr. Arellano are mindful of the January, 00 trial date and, in an effort to prepare for that trial date, wish to take advantage of the recently-scheduled September hearing date. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United State that the foregoing is true and st correct. Executed this day of September, 00, in Phoenix, Arizona. /s/ Larry A. Hammond Larry A. Hammond 0 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document - Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 Larry A. Hammond Arizona State Bar No. 000 Diane M. Meyers Arizona State Bar No. 0 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0- Telephone: (0 0-000 Facsimile: (0 0-0 Email: lhammond@omlaw.com; dmeyers@omlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF Certified Specialist, Criminal Law California State Bar No. 0 West Broadway, Suite 0 San Diego, California 0-0 Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -0 Email: db@barticklaw.com LAW OFFICES OF California State Bar No. th Avenue, Suite San Diego, California 0 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( - Email: markadamsesq@yahoo.com Francisco Javier Arellano-Felix UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Honorable Larry A. Burns, Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal Case No. 0CR-0-LAB Plaintiff, Date: September, 00 Time: :00 p.m. v. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX (0, TO RECONSIDER AUGUST, 00 et. al., ORDER PROHIBITING THE FILING OF WRITTEN REPLIES Defendants. TO: KAREN P. HEWITT, United States Attorney and to LAURA E. DUFFY, PETER G. KO, and STEPHEN M. TOKARZ Assistant United States Attorneys. 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document - Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September, 00, at the hour of :00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, defendant FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX by and through his attorneys will respectfully move this Court to reconsider its previous order prohibiting the filing of written replies in the briefing of issues to be addressed in future motion hearings. During the August, 00 hearing, the Court stated that it would no longer permit parties to file reply briefs without first seeking and receiving leave from the Court to do so. In light of the significance and complexity of this case and the issues involved, Defendant Javier Arellano requests that the Court reconsider its order and permit the filing of replies. The Local Rules for the Southern District of California do not expressly prohibit the filing of replies. In fact, though the rules do not set forth the time for filing replies, the rules do prohibit replies in excess of ten pages without leave of court, implicitly acknowledging that there may be occasions on which a reply is necessary. See Crim. LR.(e. The filing of replies in this case is critically important to the preservation of Mr. Arellano s rights. Under the unique circumstances of this uniquely complex death penalty case, we respectfully submit that limiting the opportunity to reply to the Government s responses on motions, whether they be related to discovery or to substantive issues such as the Constitutionality of the death penalty charges in this case, deprives Mr. Arellano of his right to counsel and his right to due process of law. The factual nuances are substantial and the need to clarify matters prior to oral argument is generally greater in this case than in the more typical federal criminal cases. Mr. Arellano does not want, however, to delay the scheduling of hearings, and therefore proposes that should a reply be necessary, it should be filed not less than four calendar days before any hearing, as is the practice in the Northern District of California. See N.D. Cal. Crim. R. -(d. 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document - Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 Dated: September, 00 Respectfully submitted, LARRY A. HAMMOND DIANE M. MEYERS FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX By: /s/ David H. Bartick 0CR-0-LAB

Case :0-cr-0-LAB Document - Filed 0/0/0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal Case No. 0CR-0-LAB Plaintiff, v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FRANCISCO JAVIER ARELLANO-FELIX, et. al., Defendants. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT: I,, am a citizen of the United States and am at least eighteen years of age. My business address is 0 West Broadway, Suite 0, San Diego, California 0-0. I am not a party to the above-entitled action. I have caused service of Notice of Motion and Motion to Reconsider August, 00 Order Prohibiting the Filing of Written Replies previously filed on behalf of codefendant Manuel Villarreal-Heredia on the following parties by electronically filing the foregoing with the Clerk of the District Court using the ECF System, which electronically notifies the following individuals: Laura E. Duffy, Attorney for the Government, Laura.Duffy@usdoj.gov Peter G. Ko, Attorney for the Government, Peter.Ko@usdoj.gov Stephen M. Tokarz, Attorney for the Government, Stephen.Tokarz@usdoj.gov John R. Grele, Attorney for Manuel Villarreal-Heredia, jgrele@earthlink.net Paul W. Blake, Attorney for Manuel Villarreal-Heredia, paulwblake@cox.net Lee Plummer, Attorney for Manuel Villarreal-Heredia, irafam@aol.com I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September, 00. /s/ David H. Bartick 0CR-0-LAB