Defendant Chad Gurney moves to suppress all evidence obtained as a. result of two search warrants issued on May 29, 2009, and June 9,2009. Mr.

Similar documents
FINDINGS. 1. On August 15, 2011 Karyn Kundishora was the occupant of an apartment located

v C;t),!<elJ I/U/:1 01 0

0 s gw.der ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS ) ) )

{/f\1- KL~J--()r//I)D!J

EN I E R E D DEC

) ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO. The indictment. Defendant James Sparks-Henderson is charged with the November 21, 2014, aggravated

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

r<t:n-jvlr1 V{~ Vo -fl1-/lt-

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. The State of New Hampshire. Thomas Auger Docket No. 01-S-388, 389 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

1-"" c..:n ''T.J 3.:!-"' ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BACKGROUND. The defendant, Catrina Lynn Seymore (Seymore), is charged with one count ofengaging

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

DECISION POCKET NO.: CR STATE OF MAINE RUSSELL BISHOP

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Bowie City Police Department - General Orders

Augusta for purposes of taking a polygraph examination. The Oakland police officer

VIDEO RECORDING OF POLICE ACTIVITY. Date Published. By Order of the Police Commissioner

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

S09A0155. TIMMRECK v. THE STATE. A jury found Christopher Franklin Timmreck guilty of the malice murder

Follow the instructions in each section carefully. Please ensure that your responses are legible.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Laurel Police Department - General Order Chapter 4, Section 100, Order 115 Video Recording of Police Activity August 12, 2012

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HENRY LUTHER BROWN, III NO. COA (Filed 18 August 2009)

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Page 1 of 9 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME SCENE PROCESSING GENERAL ORDER JUL 2012 ANNUAL

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Search Warrant M. 2. The same warrant was reviewed, signed, and issued by Augusta

COURT USE ONLY. DATE FILED: August 15, 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

DISTRICT COURT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: State of Minnesota,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

People v Bodie 2012 NY Slip Op 33851(U) May 23, 2012 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G. Zambelli Cases posted

Hearing on the Defendant's motion to suppress was held on May 1, The Defendant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO.: PROSECUTOR FILE NO.: State of Minnesota,

OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT. vs. ** CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO Appellee. **

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE JONATHAN BALL. Argued: June 13, 2012 Opinion Issued: September 28, 2012

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Number August 31, 2017 IMMEDIATE POLICY CHANGE GJ-14, VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS DO-1, INTAKE PROCESS

Defendant in the above case has moved to dismiss, arguing that he cannot be

Criminal Justice Process

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No MDA 2013

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

I. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL M. ROMAN, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

CHECKLIST FOR PROCESSING JNA. Checklist #1. Citation or complaint filed with court. (Arts , , and , C.C.P.)

STATE OF MAINE KENNEBEC, SS. UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET AUGUSTA DOCKET NO. CR STATE OF MAINE ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS MATTHEW J.

COURT RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Said acts constituting the offense of Murder in the Second Degree in violation of MN Statute: (1) Maximum Sentence: 40 years.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS * CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHTO. The indictment

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cr HES All Defendants

PUBLIC INFORMATION FUNCTION

COUNTY ATTORNEY HOMICIDE CHARGES IN DEATH OF OWNER OF MAHTOMEDI BAR

State of Minnesota, MN PLAINTIFF, VS. NAME: first, middle, last DYMOND RENE HAYDEN

PORT ORCHARD MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL COURT RULES

This Article may be cited as the DNA Database and Databank Act of 1993.

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

MEMORANDUM (via ) Changes to DWI Seizure and Felony Speeding Elude Seizure Laws

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY

Court of Appeals of Ohio

ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS

[ ] WARRANT [X] ORDER OF DETENTION v. [ ] AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Complainant, being duly sworn, makes complaint to the above-named Court and COUNT I

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SEAN ELLIS NOLLE PROSEQUI

LOCAL COURT RULES. 39th Judicial Circuit

_v i-i /vl. 1<'!::-,v if.j/:)o! 0

Presentation to The Bail System Task Force on Laws as to Judicial Branch Procedures. December 17, Elizabeth Buckler Veronis Task Force Staff

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ELLIOT ROJAS. DUI Traffic Stop -Suppression Reasonable Suspicion

United States Court of Appeals

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Court of Common Pleas

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

FINAL REPORT 1 PROCEDURES WHEN DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: June 06, NO. 33,666 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Follow this and additional works at:

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULES 3:26 BAIL

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

TEXAS MISDEMEANOR CASE PROCEDURE GENERAL OUTLINE

IC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

Transcription:

STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss.. - - '-' I \ l..'.~. i - i UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET DOCKET NO: CR-2009-4017 I './. ' STATE OF MAINE v. ORDER CHAD GURNEY Defendant Chad Gurney moves to suppress all evidence obtained as a result of two search warrants issued on May 29, 2009, and June 9,2009. Mr. Gurney argues that the affidavits supporting the warrants were insufficient to establish probable cause and the searches thus violated his Fourth Amendment right. BACKGROUND Mr. Gurney stands accused of arson and the murder of Zoe Sarnacki. On May 29, 2009, Detective Eli Chase of the Portland Police Department filed an affidavit and warrant to search certain portable electronic devices Mr. Gurney had voluntarily surrendered on arrest. These items consisted of an Apple brand laptop computer, Apple brand ipod portable music player, a Blackberry brand cellular telephone/pda device, and electronic storage media and data contained within each of the three devices. Detective Chase specializes in computer crimes and has substantial experience with and training in electronics, computers, software, and forensic data recovery. In his affidavit, Detective Chase reported learning that the Portland Fire Department had responded to reports of smoke coming from the third floor of 1

463 Cumberland Avenue on May 25, 2009 at approximately 6:35 in the everling. The Department found a working fire coming from apartment #8 and forced its way inside. As they worked to extinguish the fire, members of the Fire Department found a charred female body lying on a bed in the apartment. The body was later identified as Ms. Sarnacki. The scene was secured, and the Portland Police Detectives arrived to begin their investigation. Apartment #8 had been rented to Mr. Gurney and his was the sole name on the lease. Inside the apartment, detectives found that Ms. Sarnacki's head had been severed and that various items including a crucifix had been placed on or around her body prior to burning. The detectives also learned that Mr. Gurney's best friend was Corey Bryant. Detectives Scott Dunham and Lisa Sweatt located Mr. Bryant and spoke with him at his residence on May 26, 2009, at approximately 1:00 am. Mr. Bryant told the detectives that Mr. Gurney had been planning a trip to Thailand, and that Mr. Bryant had called him on May 25, 2009, but that his calls had not been returned. In the past, Mr. Gurney had told Mr. Bryant that he believed himself to be a prophet. One hour later, at approximately 2:08 am on May 26, 2009, Portland Police Department Officer Jason King was on routine patrol when he stopped a vehicle for failing to stop at a red light. Mr. Bryant was driving the vehicle, and he was actively talking to Mr. Gurney on a cellular telephone. Mr. Bryant informed Officer King that Mr. Gurney was on the phone, and then handed the phone over. Officer King was then able to speak with Mr. Gurney and learned that Mr. Gurney was staying in Room #107 at the Crest Motel in Old Orchard Beach. Mr. Gurney indicated that he wished to turn himself in. The Old Orchard Police 2

Department and Detectives Rybeck and Vogel from the Portland Police were notified. At approximately 4:00 am on May 26, 2009, Ivlr. Gurney left his hotel room and was taken into custody. He was transported to the Portland Police Department Headquarters and interviewed by Detective Dunham. After receiving and waiving his Miranda warnings, Mr. Gurney told Detective Dunham that he had been in a struggle with Ms. Sarnacki, his girlfriend, during which he strangled her until he knew she was dead. He then decapitated her with a knife and walked to a nearby gas station to purchase gasoline. He returned to his apartment, poured the gasoline on Ms. Sarnacki's body, and ignited it. Mr. Gurney then collected a bag he had packed for his trip to Thailand, his laptop, and a shotgun and drove to the Motel in Old Orchard Beach. He claimed to have no particular reason for severing Ms. Sarnacki's head or placing the crucifix and other objects on and around her body. Detective Chase arrived at the Portland Police Department's property and evidence section at approximately 11:30 am on May 26,2009. There he examined the electronic items that had been retrieved from Mr. Gurney's hotel room after he was taken into custody. The Apple brand laptop's LED light was on and pulsing, indicating that the computer was in "sleep mode." Detective Chase did not open the computer's lid or remove its battery because he understood that doing so would risk losing a decryption key for data stored on the computer's hard drive. On May 29, 2009, Detective Chase requested and received a warrant to search the named electronic devices for "[c]omputer records or data, whether in printed or electronic form, that are evidence of indifference to the value of 3

Facebook account. During the conversation Mr. Bryant indicated that he had deleted Mr. Gurney as a friend. Later interviews with Mr. Gurney's friends and former girlfriends led Detective Murphy to believe that relevant information might be contained in Mr. Gurney's Facebook account. DISCUSSION The Fourth Amendment requires a showing of probable cause prior to the issuance of a search warrant. "When determining whether probable cause exists, the judicial officer must rely on 'factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent [persons], not legal technicians, act.'" Stnte v. Snmsoll, 2007 ME 33, 9f 1t 916 A.2d 977, 980 (quoting Illinois v. Gntes, 462 U.s. 213, 231 (1983)) (alteration in original). "Probable cause exists when, based on the totality of the circumstances, 'there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.'" Id. 9f 12, 916 A.2d at 981 (quoting Stntc v. Wrigltt, 2006 ME 13, <JI 8, 890 A.2d 703, 7(5). \Vhen asked to review the issuance of a warrant, the court's role is to ensure that the judicial officer who issued the warrant "had a 'substantial basis for... [concluding]' that probable cause existed." Gntes, 462 U.S. at 238-39 (quoting [olles v. United Stntes, 362 U.s. 257, 271 (1960), overrllled all otlter grounds hy Uuited Stntes v. Snlvllcci, 448 U.s. 83 (1980)) (alterations in original). The revievving court directly reads "the affidavit in support of the warrant in a positive light and consider[s] all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from information in the affidavit." Snmsoll, 2007 ME 33, <JI 11, 916 A.2d at 980-81. Mr. Gurney objects to both warrants on the ground that their supporting affidavits fail to establish any evidentiary nexus between the items to be searched and the alleged criminal activity. He also objects that Detective Murphy's 5

affidavit supporting the June 9, 2009 warrant does not establish that the Facebook account of "Chad Thomas" in fact belonged to Chad Thomas Gurney. Detective Chase's affidavit provides a substantial basis for the issuing justice to find a fair probability that evidence relating to Mr. Gurney's alleged criminal activity would be found on his laptop computer, Blackberry cellular telephone/pda device, and their attendant electronic storage devices. Mr. Gurney confessed to killing Ms. Sarnacki. Credible evidence indicated that he communicated through his Facebook account shortly before the killing, and used a cellular phone to call his friend Mr. Bryant shortly after. The Blackberry telephone and Apple computer were with Mr. Gurney when he was apprehended on the same evening. The computer was turned on when it was seized, but in sleep mode. The justice could reasonably infer that Mr. Gurney had used his computer to communicate via his Facebook account or in other ways, that he had been using the computer shortly before being apprehended, and that he had used his Blackberry phone to call Mr. Bryant. It was likewise reasonable to believe that there was at least a fair probability that evidence relating to Mr. Gurney's activities, whereabouts, communications, motives, plans, and state of nlind could be stored within those devices. The motion to suppress evidence obtained from the Apple computer, Blackberry cellular telephone, and their attendant storage devices is denied. Unlike the computer and cellular telephone, Detective Chase's affidavit does not make any mention of the Apple ipod portable music player apart from its presence with the other devices. There is no reason to believe that evidence 6

relating to the alleged criminal activity might be found on the ipod, and the motion to suppress evidence from that device is granted. While Detective Murphy's affidavit supplies less support for searching Mr. Gurney's Facebook account than Detective Chase's does for the devices, it does provide a substantial basis for the issuing judge's decision. The affidavit indicates that Chad Thomas Gurney admitted to killing Ms. Sarnacki shortly after surrendering himself to police custody. After the killing but before Mr. Gurney's apprehension, Detectives Dunham and Sweatt interviewed Mr. Bryant at his home. During the interview Mr. Bryant logged into his own Facebook account and was able to tell the detectives that Mr. Gurney had recently communicated through the Facebook network. When Mr. Gurney was found, he had a laptop computer and a Blackberry PDA in his possession. Detective Murphy later spoke with Mr. Bryant about Mr. Gurney's facebook account. From this, the judge could reasonably infer that the detectives learned Mr. Gurney's Facebook identity through Mr. Bryant, and that there was a strong chance Mr. Gurney had used his computer or rda to update his Facebook,account around the time of the killing. The judge could also cond ude that there was a strong probability the Facebook records would hold evidence of Mr. Gurney's contucts, locations, uctivities, motives, plans, and state of mind shortly before und after he killed Ms. Sarnacki. The motion to suppress evidence obtained from Facebook, [nc., is denied. The entry is: The \varrants and supporting affidavits contained sufficiently credible and detailed facts to provide the issuing judicial officers with a substantial basis to conclude that the detectives had probable cause to search the Apple brand laptop 7

conlputer and associated storage media, Blackberry brand cellular telephone/pda device and associated storage media, and Facebook, Inc. The motions to suppress evidence obtained from these items are denied. The affidavits did not demonstrate probable cause to search the Apple brand ipod, and the motion to suppress evidence from that anted. Di\TE: 8

STATE OF MAINE vs CHAD GURNEY Docket No CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 463 CUMBERLAND AVE APT 8 PORTLAND ME 04103 DOCKET RECORD DOB: 08/19/1981 LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT C LEBRASSEUR PC 415 CONGRESS STREET SUITE 202 PORTLAND ME 04101 RETAINED 06/09/2009 State's Attorney: LISA MARCHESE Filing Document: CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Filing Date: OS/27/2009 Major Case Type: HOMICIDE Charge(s) 1 MURDER OS/25/2009 PORTLAND Seq 621 17-A 201 (1) (A) Class M RYBECK / POR 2 ARSON OS/25/2009 PORTLAND Seq 776 17-A 802 (1) (A) Class A RYBECK / POR Docket Events: OS/27/2009 FILING DOCUMENT - CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED ON OS/27/2009 OS/27/2009 MOTION - MOTION TO IMPOUND FILED BY STATE ON OS/27/2009 OS/27/2009 MOTION - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF CNSL FILED BY DEFENDANT ON OS/27/2009 OS/27/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT ON OS/27/2009 MOTION TO PRESERVE OS/27/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT ON OS/27/2009 TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE OS/27/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON OS/27/2009 TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE OS/27/2009 MOTION - MOTION FOR MENTAL EXAMINATION FILED BY STATE ON OS/27/2009 OS/27/2009 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON OS/27/2009 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OS/28/2009 ORDER - COURT ORDER ENTERED ON OS/28/2009 ORDER TO IMPOUND AFFIDAVIT AND REQUEST FOR SEARCH WARRANT, SEARCH WARRANT, INVENTORY AS WELL AS ANY ATTACHMENTS IMPOUNDED AND MADE A PART OF CUMCD-CR-2009-4017 OS/28/2009 CASE STATUS - CASE FILE LOCATION ON OS/28/2009 Page 1 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010

CHAD GURNEY CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 DOCKET RECORD CASE ON PENNY'S DESK WAITING TO GET IN TOUCH WITH DET VAUGHN TO GET THE INVENTORY COVER SHEET SO THAT THE INVENTORY IS SWORN TO. OS/29/2009 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON OS/28/2009 SEARCH WARRANT ALONG WITH AFFIDAVIT AND INVENTORY FILED OS/29/2009 MOTION - MOTION FOR MENTAL EXAMINATION GRANTED ON OS/27/2009 COpy SENT TO STATE FORENSIC SERVICE OS/29/2009 PSYCHIATRIC EXAM - STAGE ONE EXAM ORDERED ON OS/27/2009 OS/29/2009 PSYCHIATRIC EXAM - STAGE TWO EXAM ORDERED ON OS/27/2009 OS/29/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON OS/27/2009 MOTION TO PRESERVE OS/29/2009 Charge(s): 1,2 HEARING - INITIAL APPEARANCE HELD ON OS/27/2009 DA: LISA MARCHESE Defendant Present in Court STAGE I & II ORDERED TAPE 3285 AFF IN SUPPORT OF PROBABLE CAUSE SIGNED IN OPEN COURT, STATE REQUEST A HARNISH HEARING. DEFENDANT WAIVES RIGHT FOR HARNISH HEARING UNTIL AFTER DISCOVERY IS PROVIDED. R LEBRASSEUR STANDING IN. DEFENDANT DOWS NOT QUALIFY FOR COURT APPOINTMENT. MTN TO PRESERVE GRANTED. MTN TO IMPOUND GRANTED. STAGE I & II ORDERED. JUSTICE COLE TO REVIEW RECORDS. COPY NOT TO BE GIVEN TO AG & ATTY UNTIL FURTHER ORDER. NO PLEA ENTERED. 06/01/2009 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON 06/01/2009 ADDENDUM TO REQUEST FOR SEARCH WARRANT 06/05/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY PETITIONER ON 06/05/2009 Attorney: PAUL DRISCOLL EAST END CORPS MOTION FOR ORDER AMENDING ORDER DATED MAY 27, 2009 ENTERED @ 1:30 PM 06/08/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON 06/05/2009 EAST END CORPS MOTION FOR ORDER AMENDING ORDER DATED MAY MOTION GRANTED AS REQUESTED. 06/08/2009 OTHER FILING - OTHER DOCUMENT FILED ON 06/08/2009 27, 2009 ENTERED @ 1:30 PM. AFFIDAVIT AND REQUEST FOR SEARCH WARRANT RETURNED & FILED PER J COLE 6/8/09, NO REQUEST FOR IMPOUNDMENT. 06/08/2009 LETTER - FROM NON-PARTY FILED ON 06/05/2009 LETTER FROM STATE FORENSIC INFORMING COURT THAT THE STAGE I 06/09/2009 Charge(s): 1,2 SUPPLEMENTAL FILING - INDICTMENT FILED ON 06/04/2009 IS SET FOR 6/8/09 @ 8:30 A.M. 06/10/2009 Party (s) : CHAD GURNEY ATTORNEY - RETAINED ENTERED ON 06/09/2009 Attorney: ROBERT LEBRASSEUR Page 2 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010

06/10/2009 MOTION - MOTION EXPERT WITNESS REPORT FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 06/09/2009 CHAD GURNEY CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 DOCKET RECORD 06/19/2009 HEARING - CONFERENCE HELD ON 06/19/2009 DA: LISA MARCHESE CHAMBERS CONFERENCE HELD. 06/19/2009 Charge (s): 1,2 ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR JULY 16, 2009 AT 8:30 AM. HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 07/16/2009 @ 8:30 in Room No. 11 06/19/2009 Charge(s) : 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT NOTICE SENT ON 06/19/2009 07/16/2009 Charge (s) : 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT NOT HELD ON 07/16/2009 08/03/2009 PSYCHIATRIC EXAM - STAGE TWO REPORT FILED ON 08/03/2009 08/17/2009 PSYCHIATRIC EXAM - STAGE TWO REPORT FILED ON 08/17/2009 08/26/2009 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT SCHEDULED FOR 09/03/2009 @ 1:00 in Room No. 8 08/26/2009 Charge (s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT NOTICE SENT ON 08/26/2009 09/01/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 09/01/2009 MOTION TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE. 09/02/2009 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON 09/02/2009 ROBERT E CROWLEY, JUSTICE MOTION TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE. 09/03/2009 PSYCHIATRIC EXAM - STAGE THREE EXAM ORDERED ON 09/03/2009 09/03/2009 Charge(s): 1,2 HEARING - ARRAIGNMENT HELD ON 09/03/2009 DA: LISA MARCHESE DEFENDANT INFORMED OF CHARGES. 21 DAYS TO FILE MOTIONS COURT ORDER STAGE III COPIES TO BE GIVE TO ATTY WHEN FILED. 60 DAYS FROM FILING STAGE III ER TAPE 3419 INDEX 10 09/03/2009 Charge (s): 1,2 PLEA - NOT CRIMINALLY RESPONSIBLE ENTERED BY DEFENDANT ON 09/03/2009 09/03/2009 BAIL BOND - NO BAIL ALLOWED SET BY COURT ON 09/03/2009 09/03/2009 BAIL BOND - NO BAIL ALLOWED COND RELEASE ISSUED ON 09/03/2009 09/03/2009 ORDER - COURT ORDER FILED ON 08/27/2009 AFTER CONFERRING WITH DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY, HE CONSENTS TO RELEASING BOTH STAGE II EXAMINATION REPORTS TO HIM AND HIS ATTY FOR THE STATE Page 3 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010

10/26/2009 LETTER - FROM NON-PARTY FILED ON 10/22/2009 CHAD GURNEY CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 DOCKET RECORD LETTER FROM STATE FORENSIC INFORMING COURT THAT THE STAGE III EVALUATION IS SET FOR 11-3 09 @ 9:00 A.M. 10/26/2009 LETTER - FROM NON-PARTY FILED ON 10/22/2009 LETTER FROM STATE FORENSIC TO RIVERVIEW RE: ADMISSION ON 10/15/09 @ 11:00 A.M. 11/18/2009 LETTER - FROM NON-PARTY FILED ON 11/09/2009 LETTER FROM STATE FORENSIC INFORMING PARTIES THAT THE DEFENDANT IS DISCHARGED FROM RIVERVIEW FOR PURPOSES OF STAGE III ORDER. 11/20/2009 CASE STATUS - CASE FILE LOCATION ON 11/20/2009 MARIAH'S SHELF 12/18/2009 OTHER FILING - FORENSIC REPORT FILED ON 12/18/2009 COPIES TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 04/16/2010 MOTION - MOTION FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY STATE ON 04/15/2010 04/29/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/11/2010 @ 1:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 05/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 05/10/2010 05/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 05/10/2010 RESULT OF THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR "FACEBOOK INC" 05/10/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 05/10/2010 OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF THE SEARCH WARRANT FOR APPLE BRAND, MODEL MACBOOK PRO LAPTOP COMPUTER, ANY ELECTRONIC STORAGE MEDIA AND DATA CONTAINED WITHIN SAID MACBOOK PRO LAPTOP, AN APPLE BRAND IPOD CLASSIC, AND A BLACKBERRY BRAND CELLULAR TELEPHONE /PDA DEVICE 05/12/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE HELD ON 05/11/2010 DA: LISA MARCHESE Defendant Not Present in Court STATUS CONFERENCE HELD IN CHAMBERS, NO RECORDING. JURY SELECTION SET FOR JAN 7, 2011 AT 8:30 AM. ALL PENDING MOTIONS TO BE HEARD ON 7-7-2010 AT 8:30AM, 05/12/2010 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 01/07/2011 @ 8:30 in Room No. 11 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 05/12/2010 TRIAL - JURY TRIAL NOTICE SENT ON 05/12/2010 06/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE SCHEDULED FOR 07/07/2010 @ 8:30 in Room No. 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 06/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE NOTICE SENT ON 06/07/2010 06/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT SCHEDULED FOR 07/07/2010 @ 8:30 in Room No. 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL Page 4 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010

06/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT NOTICE SENT ON 06/07/2010 CHAD GURNEY CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 DOCKET RECORD 06/18/2010 MOTION - OTHER MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT ON 06/11/2010 MOTION TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE FOR HEARING 7-7-10. 06/22/2010 MOTION - OTHER MOTION GRANTED ON 06/22/2010 MOTION TO WEAR PROPER COURT ATTIRE FOR HEARING 7-7-10. 07/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT NOT HELD ON 07/07/2010 COY TO CCJ. WITHDRAWN 07/07/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT WITHDRAWN ON 07/07/2010 07/07/2010 HEARING - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE HELD ON 07/07/2010 DA: LISA MARCHESE Reporter: TIMOTHY THOMPSON AS TO SEARCH WARRANT AS TO FACEBOOK/BLACKBERRY. AFTER HEARING COURT TAKES MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT. 07/07/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE HELD ON 07/07/2010 DA: LISA MARCHESE DEADLINES GIVEN. DEF. TO ADVISE THE COURT BY 11-1-10 IF THEY AE GOING TO PROCEED WITH JURY TRIAL OR WAIVE JURY. DEF. EXPERT REPORTS TO BE DUE BY 11-1-10. ALL OTHER PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS BY 12-3-10 ALONG WITH PROPOSED JURY QUESTIONNAIRE, STATUS CONF. TO BE SET FOR JAN. 4, 2011. 07/07/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/04/2011 @ 9:00 NOTICE TO PARTIES/COUNSEL 07/07/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE NOTICE SENT ON 07/07/2010 07/13/2010 HEARING - CONFERENCE RET UNDELIVERABLE ON 07/13/2010 07/13/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DENIED ON 07/12/2010 THE WARRANTS AND SUPPORTING AFFIDAVITS CONTAINED SUFFICIENTLY CREDIBLE AND DETAILED FACTS TO PROVIDE THE ISSUING JUDICIAL OFFICERS WITH A SUBSTANTIAL BASIS TO CONCLUDE THAT THE DETECTIVES HAD PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH THE APLE BRAND LAPTOP OMPUTER AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE MEDIA, BLACKBERRY BRAND CELLULAR TELEPHONE/PDA DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE MEDIA AND FACEBOOK, INC. THEMOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THESE ITEMS ARE DENIED. COPIES MAILED TO PARTIES 7/13/10. 07/13/2010 MOTION - MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE GRANTED ON 07/12/2010 THE AFFIDAVITS DID NOT DEMOSTRATE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH THE APPLE BRAND IPOD, AND MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM THAT DEVICE IS GRANTED. COPIES MAILED TO PARTIES ON 7 13-10. 07/13/2010 ORDER - COURT ORDER FILED ON 07/12/2010 MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DENIED AS TO APPLE BRAND LAPTOP COMPUTER AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE MEDIA, BLACKBERRY BRAND CELLULAR TELEPHONE/PDA DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED STORAGE MEDIA AND FACEBOOK, INC. - MOTION TO SUPPRESS AS TO THE APPLE BRAND IPOD IS GRANTED. THE Page 5 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010

CHAD GURNEY CUMCD-CR-2009-04017 DOCKET RECORD A TRUE COPY ATTEST: Clerk Page 6 of 6 Printed on: 07/30/2010