A IRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. ".!,... q I"!

Similar documents
AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. '1 r.-... nr'z~ RESOLUTION NO. l \,) U '' ' ~

AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESOLUTION NO

AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RESOLUTION NO

AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 1'..RANCISCO RESOLUTION NO. 1_0_-_0_3_07

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Twenty-First Supplemental Resolution

AIRPORT COMMISSION CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRA:-,'CISCO RESOLUTION NO.

1 [Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds Mission Street - Not to Exceed $60,488,962]

WHEREAS, the Community Facilities District has determined that it would be advantageous to refund the outstanding Prior Bonds;

1 [Multifamily Housing Revenue Note- Market Heights Apartments Putnam Street and 1000 Tompkins Avenue- Not to Exceed $18,000,000] 2

AN ORDINANCE INTRODUCED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER DOUG

THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION 9201

Resolution: 1) authorizing the issuance and delivery of a multifamily housing revenue

Transmittal 1 NP Draft 8/11/16

BOROUGH OF ELMER, COUNTY OF SALEM, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, the City and the Authority desire to provide for the negotiated sale of the Bonds; and

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4919

ITEM R1104. STATE OF MONTANA ) : ss COUNTY OF LEWIS AND CLARK )

CHERRY CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO. 15/16-37


BOROUGH OF WOODBINE COUNTY OF CAPE MAY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

BOND RESOLUTION (SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM) (sewage treatment plant improvements)

ITEM R0903 Attachment 6 Page 1

1 [Issuance of General Obligation Bonds - Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response Bonds, Not to Exceed $400,000,000] 2

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4010

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3414

Cortlund Ashton. Necia Christensen. Charles Henderson Dannie McConkie

CITY OF WOODBURY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3402

AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NIAGARA TOBACCO ASSET SECURITIZATION CORPORATION

ORDINANCE NO

March 18, 2015 MEMORANDUM. UHEAA Authorizing Resolution: Student Loan Backed Notes. Issue

ATTACHMENT A HCIDLA Request for Issuance of Bonds for T. Bailey Manor. Resolution for T. Bailey Manor on next page.

THE CITY OF MARGATE CITY IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO OF THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF EPHRATA LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

AMENDED IN BOARD 10/16/2018 RESOLUTION NO

The following members of the Board were absent: Also present:

EXTRACT OF MINUTES. Meeting of the Town Board of the. Town of Woodbury, in the. County of Orange, New York. June 16, 2016 * * *

ITEM STATE OF MONTANA ) : SS COUNTY OF GALLATIN )

ORDINANCE Ordinance Page 1 of 10 Prepared by Bond Attorney; Edited by City Clerk

TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, The Authority operates a Transportation System, as defined in. the Act; and

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Sponsor: Janet Venecz Councilwoman at Large ORDINANCE NO. 9332

RESOLUTION NO /

PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. XXXXX THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT. Relating to:

Egg Harbor Township. Ordinance No

BOND ORDINANCE 2071 BOND ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN AND BY THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD, IN THE COUNTY OF

RESOLUTION NO

FOURTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

AN ACT. (H. B. 2964) (Conference) (No ) (Approved July 4, 2016)

ORDINANCE NO. 12 of 2014

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT October 23, 2018

BOND PURCHASE CONTRACT

$ CITY OF ALBANY (Alameda County, California) 2016 General Obligation Refunding Bonds BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE BE IT ORDAINED by the Borough Council of the Borough of Beachwood,

THE CITY OF MARGATE CITY IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO

NOTICE OF BOND ELECTION TO THE RESIDENT, QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SCHULENBURG INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT:

RIDGEFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 122 CLARK COUNTY, WASHINGTON GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS RESOLUTION NO

BOROUGH OF BARRINGTON, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE

City ofpickens } Ordinance , Issuance of General Obligation Bond State of South Carolina } Ordinance Number CountyofPickens }

TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO. O-13-12

II. D. 2 12/3/2018 (F&A)

(No ) (Approved March 13, 2015) AN ACT

WHEREAS, the Atlanta Gulch Project was contemplated by and is consistent with the Westside Redevelopment Plan adopted by the City; and

WHEREAS, the Sublease Agreement requires the City to pay rent to the Corporation;

1 [Proposing Adoption of Infrastructure Financing Plan - Infrastructure and Revitalization Financing District No. 2 (Hoedown Yard, Pier 70)] 2

AH AT TURNPIKE SOUTH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY 9, 2017

MINUTES OF THE FIRST MEETING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CCCCCC, INCORPORATED A California Corporation

(Published in The Miami County Republic, May 17, 2017) ORDINANCE NO. 3114

BNY TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA in its capacity as trustee of SUMMIT TRUST. - and - COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA

Statutory Installment Bond Resolution

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

TOWN OF NIAGARA TOWN BOARD MEETING Tuesday, October 23, :30 PM Town of Niagara Town Hall 7105 Lockport Rd. Niagara Falls, NY WORK SESSIONS

$13,583, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, 2012 Series A

ORDINANCE NO OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF BLOOMINGDALE

RESOLUTION NO BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 415, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, as follows:

AGENDA May 6, April 28, Industrial Development Authority of Alameda County Administration Building Oakland, CA 94612

ORDINANCE NO authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $37,000,000 principal amount of Subordinate

ORDINANCE NO. 2 SEWER DISPOSAL

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. LAMBERTVILLE, IN THE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON, NEW JERSEY (not less than

M E M O R A N D U M. The Promontory project debt service will be funded with special assessment paid by the Promontory developer.

BOND RESOLUTION (SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM) County, New York, held at the Village Hall, in Larchmont, New York, in said Village, on the

ORDINANCE undertaken by the Borough of Beachwood, in the County of Ocean and State of New Jersey. For said

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

RECITALS. 1. The State Service Contract Legislation, comprised of. Section 16 of Chapter 314 of the Laws of 1981,

RESOLUTION NO. TS2:dsc /22/2016 1

ORDINANCE NO. 965 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF OCEANPORT, IN THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY (NOT LESS THAN

WALNUT VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE TOWNSHIP COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS WAS HELD THIS EVENING IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING. Monday, April 3, 2017

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE CONCESSION AND LEASE AGREEMENT (this Amendment) is dated as of August 12, 2010 and made:

NOTICE OF ELECTION TO ALL THE DULY QUALIFIED, RESIDENT ELECTORS OF AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT:

FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBORDINATE TRUST INDENTURE. by and between HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. and

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING AGENDA

Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): March 14, WELLS FARGO & COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

ORDINANCE NO. 9, 2019

Transcription:

A IRPORT COMMISSION ".!,..... q I"! RES 0 LUTI 0 N N 0 -~1.,t,, =-----"- 1 p~(,,.,_;_.( --=.'.i AMENDMENT OF PRIOR RESOLUTIONS TO AUTHORIZE AN ADDITIONAL $2, 775,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SECOND SERIES REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE CAPITAL PROJECTS IN THE AIRPORT'S APPROVED CAPITAL PLAN, AND RELATED ACTIONS. the Airp01t Commission of the City and County of San Francisco (the "Commission"), on December 3, 1991, duly adopted its Resolution No. 91-0210, providing for the issuance of San Francisco International Airp01t Second Series Revenue Bonds, which Resolution, as previously supplemented and amended, including as amended and supplemented by Resolution No. 08-0035, duly adopted on February 19, 2008 (the "Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution"), Resolution No. 12-0050, duly adopted on March 20, 2012 (the "Sixteenth Supplemental Resolution"), Resolution No. 14-0024, duly adopted on February 18, 2014 (the "Seventeenth Supplemental Resolution"), and Resolution No. 15-0182, duly adopted on September 22, 2015 (the "Eighteenth Supplemental Resolution"), is herein called the "1991 Resolution"; and the 1991 Resolution provides for the issuance by the Commission from time to time of San Francisco International Airport Second Series Revenue Bonds (the "1991 Resolution Bonds"); and the Commission, pursuant to the 1991 Resolution, has previously authorized the issuance of up to $5,016,725,000 aggregate principal amount of 1991 Resolution Bonds (the "Capital Plan Bonds") for the purpose of financing and refinancing the development, acquisition, construction, and equipping of capital projects approved by the Commission and costs related thereto, of which an aggregate principal amount of $2,727,605,000 remains unissued; and the Commission has determined that it is necessary and desirable to authorize the issuance of up to an additional $2,775,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Capital Plan Bonds; and the Board of Supervisors ofthe City and County of San Francisco (the "Board") by its Resolutions Nos. 229-08, 349-12, 125-14 and 433-15 approved the issuance of a total '.lggregate principal amount ofnot to exceed $3,433,030,773 of Capital Plan Bonds, of which $1,143,910,773 remains unissued, and the Commission desires now to authorize the Airp01t Director to request the Board to approve an additional $4,358,694,227 aggregate principal amount of Capital Plan Bonds and request a supplemental appropriation in the amount necessary for the Airp01t to spend the proceeds of authorized Capital Plan Bonds; and the Commission has previously approved, among other things, the form of documents for the 1991 Resolution Bonds, including the Capital Plan Bonds, in Resolution No. 10-0307, adopted by the Commission on October 5, 2010 (as supplemented and amended, the "Omnibus Approving Resolution"), and the Commission desires now to ratify and confirm such approvals; and Page 1of5

A IRPORT COMM ISS ION the approvals in this Resolution are intended to establish a financing mechanism for capital projects approved by the Commission from time to time and do not constitute approval of any particular project, each of which is subject to approval by separate action of the Commission and/or Board; and pursuant to Section 9.0l(f) ofthe 1991 Resolution;the Commission, by Supplemental Resolution, may make any change or addition to the 1991 Resolution to provide for the issuance of, and to set the terms and conditions of, additional Series ofbonds under the 1991 Resolution; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that this Commission authorizes the following: Section 1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Nineteenth Supplemental Resolution shall have the meanings set fo1th in the 1991 Resolution. Section 2. Increased Authorization. In accordance with Section 9.0l(f) of the 1991 Resolution, in order to authorize the issuance of an additional aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $2, 775,000,000 of Capital Plan Bonds, the 1991 Resolution is hereby further amended and supplemented as follows: (a) Each of the references in the 1991 Resolution, including the caption and whereas clauses and in Sections 34-82.01 and 34-83.0l(a) thereof, to "Five Billion Sixteen Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars" and "$5,016, 725,000" of Capital Plan Bonds is hereby amended to read "Seven Billion Seven Hundred Ninety-One Million Seven Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars" and "$7,791,725,000" respectively. (b) The Capital Plan Bonds shall be sold prior to June 30, 2023. Section 3. Separate Commission Approval. The issuance of each individual Series of Capital Plan Bonds shall be approved by a separate resolution or resolutions of the Commission; provided, that the Commission shall not approve the sale of Capital Plan Bonds for construction costs of any project unless and until the required environmental review, if any, for such project has been completed and the Commission has determined to proceed with such project and California Environmental Quality Act findings have been adopted as required by law. Capital Plan Bonds may also be used to fund planning and development costs necessary to prepare other projects for environmental review and the necessary approvals. Page 2of5

AI RPO RT COMM ISSIO N O Lu-1 N '1... ri in 1 r.a RES I 0 N 0 --.:g;-iv. ~t...,.,:-t(,;c;-t-t~~~ C"T~= Section 4. Certain Limitations on Capital Plan Bonds. No Capital Plan Bonds shall mature later than forty ( 40) years from the date of issuance thereof. The maximum number of separate series of Capital Plan Bonds (with each series consisting of all ofthe Capital Plan Bonds sold on a given date) shall be equal to the aggregate authorized principal amount thereof divided by $25,000,000. The sale date for each series of Capital Plan Bonds shall be as determined by the Airport Director in his or her discretion. Section 5. _ Use ofproceeds of Capital Plan Bonds. Capital Plan Bond proceeds may be used for the purposes of financing and refinancing the acquisition, development, construction and equipping of capital projects that are approved by the Commission from time to time (subject to the limitations in Section 3 above), making one or more deposits to the Contingency Account, making required deposits to debt service reserve funds, financing capitalized interest costs, paying costs of issuance in connection therewith, and for other lawful purposes related thereto. Section 6. Delegation by Airport Director. The Airport Director is authorized to delegate the authority granted to him pursuant to this Resolution in writing to a member of Airport management upon consultation with the Office of the City Attorney. Section 7. Request for Board Approval. The Commission hereby authorizes and. directs the Airport Director to request that the Board of Supervisors (the "Board"): (a) approve this Nineteenth Supplemental Resolution, including the is suance by the Commission of up to an additional $2, 775,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Capital Plan Bonds; (b) approve the issuance by the Commission of up to an additional $1,583,694,227 aggregate principal amount of Capital Plan Bonds previously authorized by the Commission pursuant to the Seventeenth Supplemental Resolution but not yet approved by the Board; and (c) request a supplemental appropriation in the amount necessary for the Airport to spend the proceeds of all such additional Capital Plan Bonds. Section 8. Ratification of Prior Acts. The actions of the officers, agents and employees of the Commission to carry out the Commission's intents and.purposes taken prior to the adoption of this Resol~tion are ratified, approved and confmned: Section 9. General Authorization.-. The Airport Director and the other officers, agents and employees of the Commission are autho~'ized and directed to execute and deliver such documents, agreements and certificates and to take such other actions, upon consultation with the Office of the City Attorney, as may be necessary or desirable and in the best interests of the Airport to carry out the purposes and intents ofthis Resolution and the transactions contemplated hereby. Page 3of5

AIRPORT COM MISSION Section 10. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall become effective on and as of the date of adoption hereof. Section 11. Ratification of the Prior Resolutions. The 1991 Resolution and the Omnibus Approving Resolution are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms and provisions thereof, as amended and supplemented, including as amended and supplemented by this Resolution. Section 12. Severability. Should the application of any provision of this Resolution to any particular facts or circumstances be found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, then (a) the validity of other provisions ofthis Resolution shall not be affected or impaired thereby, and (b) such provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent possible so as to effect the purposes and intents of this Resolutio1:1. Page4of5

AIRPORT COMMISSION ADOPTED by the Airport Commission ofthe City and County of San Francisco this 1st day of November, 2016 by the following vote: Ayes: s Noes: 0 Absent: () [SEAL] Approved as to Form: DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco By Brooke D. Abola \ Deputy City Attorney Page 5of5 I hereby certifj that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Airport Comniission at its meeting if_