Docket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Similar documents
Docket Number: 2044 A.R. POPPLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Geff Blake, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: CITY OF DAVID CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST and REV. DAVID DRUMMOND. Dennis M. Abrams, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1441 M & K ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. Keith A. Bassi, Esquire CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Docket Number: FC JEAN ZEPPI. Pasco L. Schiavo, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE

Docket Number: 1150 GREEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. Paul A. Logan, Esquire (co-counsel) CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1300 Consolidated with Docket Nos. 1150, 1167, 1371 GREEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. C. Grainger Bowman, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 1371 Consolidated with Docket Nos. 1150, 1167, GREEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, to the use of CHAPIN & CHAPIN

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 4010 PENN STATE CONSTRUCTION, J&D, LLC. John G. Milakovic, Esquire Charles O. Beckley, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: * (Consolidated with Docket Nos. 3520, 3628 & 3629) * A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Docket Number: 1468 WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. Thomas J. Stallings, Esquire Jack M. Stover, Esquire Charles I. Artz, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1076 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 2847 DELAWARE VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. Stephen C. Baker, Esquire Stephen R. Harris, Esquire Nancy L. Margolis, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1624 DARIEN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.

Docket Number: 1722 LEHIGH VALLEY BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. Emil W. Kantra, III, Esquire Erich J. Schock, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 3450 KEVIN H. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES. Kevin H. Wright, Esquire Mark R. Zolfaghari, Esquire NOTE CHANGE OF ADDRESS VS.

Docket Number: 3573 PRO-SPEC PAINTING, INC. Robert D. Ardizzi, Esquire Brian C. Kuhn, Esquire David S. Makara, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 1317 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 2818 MARK KUTNYAK. Mark Kutnyak, Pro Se GQ5407 VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Docket Number: 1606 KIEWIT EASTERN CO. AND PERINI CORPORATION, A JOINT VENTURE. Paul A. Logan, Esquire. C. Grainger Bowman, Esquire CLOSED

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3464) Docket Number: 3643 PRO-SPEC PAINTING, INC. Robert D. Ardizzi, Esquire David S. Makara, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 4132 MORRIS & MCDANIEL, INC. Elliot A. Strokoff, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE

Docket Number: 3654 ANGELO IAFRATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Michael D. Reed, Esquire Kenneth L. Sable, Esquire John W. Dornberger, Esquire

Docket Number: 1244 DAUPHIN COUNTY PROBATION OFFICE. Charles B. Zwally, Dauphin County Solicitor Guy P. Beneventano, Assistant Solicitor CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1074 DICK CORPORATION, AND DICK ENTERPRISES, INC., A JOINT VENTURE, TO THE USE OF BEAVER VALLEY BUILDER S SUPPLY, INC.

Docket Number: 3900 THOMAS DIDIANO, THOMAS DIDIANO, JR. AND THOMAS DIDIANO & SON, INC. Carlyle J. Engel, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 3757 WASHINGTON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO. Mark F. Nowak, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Docket Number: 1600 W.S. CUMBY AND SON, INC. Roy S. Cohen, Esquire CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES

Docket Number: 1866 CLOSED. Jennifer A. Stiller, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

Docket Number: 3916 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIION, SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY

Docket Number: Philadelphia Suburban Water Company. Keith E. Gabage CLOSED VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Department of Transportation

Docket Number: CASEY COMPANY on its own behalf and to the use of T.D. Patrinos Painting and Contracting Company

Docket Number:2849 MOORE FLESHER TRUCKING CO., INC. Dwight L. Koerber Jr., Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 3674 CONSOLIDATED WITH 3670, 3552, 3683, 3669, 3676, 3617, 3675 KIRBY ELECTRIC, INC.

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO 3951)* Docket Number: TO1 CONTACT CENTERS, INC. Jeffrey J. Reich, Esquire James W Kutz, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: BARR STREET CORPORATION, d/b/a HORIZON SENIOR CARE. Katherine Stine, Esquire Daniel K. Natirboff, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: Daniel K. Natirboff, Esquire Samuel B. Fineman, Esquire CLOSED

PETER D. HUNT, E. MICHAEL DUGAN, NANCY R. JOHNSON, MARILYN J. LABOSKY, MICHELLE M.LOGAN, CONNIE R. RUSIN AND RHONDA J. SEAMON

Docket Number: 1879 ROBERT A. BOSAK & ASSOCIATES. Mark F. Brancato, Esquire Kevin B. Watson, Esquire CLOSED VS.

Docket Number: 1075 J. E. BRENNEMAN COMPANY. Victor P. Stabile, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES

Docket Number: 2441 LABOR & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, INC.

Docket Number: 2657 VS.

Docket Number: 3938 SPENCER MECHANICAL, INC. J. Michael Wiley, Esquire VS. ROBERT FEASTER CORPORATION, aka, The Robert Feaster Corporation

Docket Number: 2643 PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER OF WASHINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA, INC.

Docket Number: 4176 THE HARTFORD SURETY AND FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY. Timothy J. Woolford, Esquire Joseph M. Kanfer, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 3795 PATRICIA ALINCIC. Jon M. Lewis, Esquire VS. MORGAN CORPORATION. Regis J. Moeller, Esquire VS.

ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS

Docket Number: Robert J. Ray, Esquire John P. Sieminski, Esquire Benjamin Sorisio, Esquire Ira L. Podheiser, Esquire VS.

Docket Number: 4074 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of

Docket Number: 2212-P

Docket Number: FRANKLIN COVEY CLIENT SALES, INC., a Utah Corporation

Docket Number: 4079 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION/ BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY

RULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY ORPHANS COURT DIVISION CHAPTER 1. LOCAL RULES OF ORPHANS COURT DIVISION

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

Docket Number: 3829 LUKE B. MIHALY AND MATTHEW G. MIHALY. Jeffrey S. Treat, Esquire VS.

Ch. 197 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 37. Subpart L. STATE HEALTH FACILITY HEARING BOARD 197. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Authority

PART VI. BOARD OF CLAIMS

Docket Number: 3984 DEREK DELACH. Joseph D. Talarico, Esquire VS.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION

Ch. 491 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 67 ARTICLE V. GENERAL PROCEDURES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

PART III LOCAL ORPHANS COURT RULES (cited as L.O.C. Rule )

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Title 255 LOCAL COURT RULES

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Title 201 RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Docket Number: 4129 CZOP/SPECTER, INC. Christopher Wilson, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE

(c) Real Estate Tax Assessment Appeals Petition shall be formatted and contain the following :

Docket Number: 1382 Consolidated with 1390, 1433 and 1515

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

ORDER. AND NOW, May 5, 2005, it is hereby ordered and decreed that all Perry County

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:4. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL

CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL ORIGINAL MATTERS Applications for Leave to File Original Process. KING S BENCH MATTERS

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE FIFTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (Composed of Elk and Cameron Counties)

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE

LOCAL RULES. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Rules of Civil Procedure. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

THE COURTS. Title 252 ALLEGHENY COUNTY RULES. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

PART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

TITLE VII ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

BLAIR COUNTY LOCAL RULES CIVIL (Revised May 21, 2015)

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

WESTMORELAND COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TABLE OF RULES

PA Huntingdon Cty. Civ. LR 205 This document is current with amendments received through June 1, 2016

THE COURTS Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

LOCAL RULES. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Rules of Civil Procedure. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS DRIVER S LICENSE OR REGISTRATION SUSPENSION APPEAL

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee

Transcription:

Docket Number: 1120 SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD Gary F. DiVito, Chief Counsel Kenneth B. Skelly, Chief Counsel Francis X. O Brien, Chief Counsel Eileen Maunus, Deputy Chief Counsel

June 8, 1987 Claim and filing fee filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Amount of Claim: $7,881,775.40+. June 16, 1987 Copy of Claim forwarded to attorney for Defendant and Chief Deputy Attorney General. June 23, 1987 Acceptance of Service of Claim received from Office of Attorney General. Receipt of same acknowledged by Office of Attorney General June 18, 1987. June 24, 1987 Acceptance of Service of Claim received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant June 18, 1987. July 6, 1987 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Determination of the Same Issue by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. July 16, 1987 Answer Responding to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board s Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. August 21, 1987 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 1987 the Motion to Stay Proceedings in the above captioned matter is hereby GRANTED. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. August 26, 1987 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated August 21, 1987 by attorney for Defendant August 25, 1987. August 31, 1987 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated August 21, 1987 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged 2

by attorney for Plaintiff August 26, 1987. March 21, 1988 Motion to Vacate Stay Order filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. March 30, 1988 Reply to Motion to Vacate Stay Order and New Matter filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. April 8, 1988 Reply to New Matter filed by attorney for Plaintiff. to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. June 10, 1988 Copy forwarded The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 1988, upon due consideration of the Motion filed by the Plaintiff to Vacate the Stay Order and the Order of the Board, wherein the Board stated that it would vacate the Stay upon the Motion of any party, the Board does GRANT the Motion of the Plaintiff and the Stay Order is vacated. The Defendant is DIRECTED to file responsive pleadings within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. It is further suggested by the Board, due to the delay in the Stay, that both Plaintiff and Defendant expedite their discovery proceedings and bring this litigation to issue wherein a hearing may be scheduled, evidence presented, Briefs filed and an Opinion rendered. June 13, 1988 Copies of Opinion and Order dated June 10, 1988 forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. June 16, 1988 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated June 13, 1988 by attorney for Defendant June 15, 1988. June 20, 1988 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated June 13, 1988 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff June 16, 1988. 3

July 29, 1988 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Determination of Appeal in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. August 3, 1988 Reply in Opposition to Motion to Stay Proceedings and New Matter filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. October 11, 1988 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 1988, the proceedings as they are filed before the Board of Claims will be considered STAYED until the matter pending before the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is ruled upon. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. October 19, 1988 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated October 11, 1988 by attorney for Defendant October 14, 1988. October 20, 1988 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated October 11, 1988 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff October 14, 1988. January 16, 1990 Motion to Vacate Stay of Proceedings, Proposed Order and copy of Opinion of Supreme Court filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. April 6, 1990 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 1990, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the Stay Order of October 11, 1988, be and is hereby VACATED. It is further Ordered and Decreed that the parties shall proceed with and complete all discovery within One Hundred Twenty (120) days of this Order. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. 4

April 16, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 6, 1990 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff April 9, 1990. April 20, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 6, 1990 by attorney for Defendant April 17, 1990. June 25, 1990 Motion for Leave to file Amended Claim and Proposed Order filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. July 25, 1990 Notice of Depositions of Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. August 24, 1990 Claimant s Brief in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amended Claim filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. September 20, 1990 Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. September 25, 1990 Response of Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board in Opposition to Claimant s Motion for Leave to file Amended Claim filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. October 19, 1990 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 1990, the request of the Plaintiff in the nature of a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is DENIED. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. 5

October 19, 1990 Answers to Interrogatories filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. October 24, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated October 19, 1990 by attorney for Defendant October 22, 1990. October 30, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated October 19, 1990 received from attorney for Plaintiff. by attorney for Plaintiff October 23, 1990. November 5, 1990 Receipt of same acknowledged The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 1990, the Defendant is given thirty (30) days from the Order dated October 19, 1990 to file an appropriate pleading. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. November 8, 1990 Motion for Certification of Board s Order of October 19, 1990 and Proposed Order filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. November 13, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Order dated November 5, 1990 received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant November 7, 1990. November 14, 1990 The Board made the following Order: AND NOW, to wit, this 14th day of November, 1990, upon consideration of the foregoing Motion for Certification, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that this Board s Order of October 19, 1990 involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and this Board certifies that an appeal to the Commonwealth Court would materially advance the ultimate determination of the litigation. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. November 16, 1990 6

Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated November 5, 1990 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff November 7, 1990. November 19, 1990 Copy of Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. 702(b) as filed in Commonwealth Court filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. November 26, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Order dated November 14, 1990 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff November 20, 1990. November 26, 1990 Acceptance of Service of Order dated November 14, 1990 received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff November 19, 1990. January 2, 1991 Copy of Order received from Commonwealth Court; Order as follows: NOW, December 27, 1990, upon consideration of petitioner s petition for permission to appeal, said petition is granted and said appeal is allowed from the order entered by the Board of Claims on October 19, 1990 at. The Chief Clerk is directed to list oral argument on the merits of this matter on the April 1991 Argument List at Harrisburg. The Executive Secretary of the Board of Claims shall certify the record in this matter to this Court on or before January 21, 1991. Petitioner shall file and serve its brief and reproduced record (15 copies) on or before February 18, 1991. Respondents shall file and serve their briefs (15 copies) on or before March 18, 1991. All proceedings in this matter in the Board of Claims are stayed pending resolution of the instant appeal. In addition to mailing copies of this Order to counsel of record, the Chief Clerk is directed to mail a copy of same to the Executive Secretary of the Board of Claims. January 17, 1991 7

The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 1991, it is ORDERED and DIRECTED by the Board of Claims that the Answer to the Claimant s Original Complaint in the above-entitled matter is STAYED until the matter is determined by the Commonwealth Court. In the event the amendment is permitted, then the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board will be required to respond to the said Amended Complaint. In the event it is not permitted, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is directed to file, within thirty (30) days from the date of said Opinion, its Answer or Response to Claimant s original Complaint. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. January 17, 1991 File transmitted to Commonwealth Court. January 28, 1991 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated January 17, 1991 by attorney for Defendant January 22, 1991. February 4, 1991 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated January 17, 1991 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff January 21, 1991. March 26, 1991 Courtesy copy of Brief of Appellee, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, as filed in Commonwealth Court, received from attorney for Defendant. April 22, 1991 Courtesy copy of Brief o Appellant in Support of Appeal from Order of Pennsylvania Board of Claims at Denying Motion for Leave to file Amended Claim, as filed in Commonwealth Court, received from attorney for Plaintiff. August 22, 1991 8

Copy of Opinion and Order received from Commonwealth Court. Order as follows: "NOW, August, 1991, the order of the Board of Claims in the above-captioned matter is hereby vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Jurisdiction relinquished." October 31, 1991 File returned from Commonwealth Court. November 25, 1991 Motion for Order Consistent With Opinion of the Commonwealth Court filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. December 19, 1991 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: "AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 1991, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the Plaintiff, Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc., be and is hereby permitted to amend its Claim in accordance with the ruling of the Commonwealth Court. It is further ORDERED and DECREED that the Plaintiff is directed to file its Amended Claim within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Additionally, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the Motion for Order Consistent With Opinion of the Commonwealth Court, as filed by Plaintiff, is DISMISSED as being MOOT." Copies forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. January 6, 1992 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated December 19, 1991 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff December 24, 1991. January 6, 1992 First Amended Claim filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Amount of Claim: $300,000.00+. January 9, 1992 Copies of First Amended Claim forwarded to attorney for Defendant and Chief Deputy Attorney General. January 14, 1992 9

Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated December 19, 199 by attorney for Defendant January 10, 1992. January 16, 1992 Acceptance of Service of First Amended Claim filed by Chief Deputy Attorney General. Receipt of same acknowledged by Chief Deputy Attorney General January 13, 1992. February 7, 1992 Responsive Pleading to First Amended Claim and New Matter filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. February 28, 1992 Reply to New Matter filed by attorney for Plaintiff. to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. June 3, 1992 Copy forwarded Respondent s Request for Production of Documents as well as Respondent s Interrogatories to Claimant filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. July 30, 1992 Claimant s Request for Admissions, Interrogatory and Document Request Directed to Respondent filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. August 3, 1992 Claimant s Second Request for Production of Documents filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. August 3, 1992 Claimant s Responses and Answers to Respondent s Interrogatories filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. April 1, 1993 10

Claimant s Supplemental Responses to Interrogatories 8, 9, 12 and 17, filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. September 9, 1993 Hearing scheduled for December 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1993 as well as December 14, 15, 16 and 17, 1993, if necessary, in Board s Courtroom No. 1, Room 707 Transportation & Safety Building, Harrisburg, PA commencing at 11:15 on December 7, 1993, and commencing at 10:00 a.m. each day thereafter. September 9, 1993 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 1993, for the reasons set forth in the foregoing Opinion, it is ORDERED and DIRECTED that all issues relating to the validity of the alleged contract between Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board shall be determined in a separate trial, which shall take place prior to the trial on the merits of the breach of contract and damages in the assumpsit action, in accordance with the hearing schedule of the Board of Claims. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. September 21, 1993 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated September 9, 1993 by attorney for Defendant September 14, 1993. September 24, 1993 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated September 9, 1993 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff September 20, 1993. December 7, 1993 Bifurcated hearing on the issue as to whether or not a contract exists held this date commencing at 9:30 a.m. December 8, 1993 Bifurcated hearing on the issue as to whether or not a contract exists held this date commencing at 9:30 a.m. Contract issue completed. (undated) Claimant s Memorandum of Law Regarding Failure to Answer Request 11

for Admissions filed by attorney for Plaintiff. December 8, 1993 Answer to Claimant s Request for Admission Interrogatory, and Document Request Directed to Respondent filed by Defendant at time of hearing. Copy given to all counsel of record at time of hearing. January 6, 1994 Testimony for hearing held December 7 and 8, 1993 filed. January 14, 1994 Copy of testimony for hearing held December 7 and 8, 1993 forwarded to attorney for Defendant. January 26, 1994 Acceptance of Service of testimony for hearing held December 7 and 8, 1993 received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant January 25, 1994. January 27, 1994 Claimant s Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Brief filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. February 28, 1994 Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Brief filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. March 9, 1994 Claimant s Answer in Opposition to the Application for Permission to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant and attorney for Office of General Counsel by attorney for Plaintiff. March 14, 1994 Reply of Applicants to Claimant s Answer in Opposition to the Application to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by attorney for Office 12

of General Counsel. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant by attorney for Office of Attorney General Counsel. April 11, 1994 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 1994, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the Plaintiff, Shovel Transfer Storage, Inc., be and is hereby permitted to amend its Claim in accordance with the ruling of the Commonwealth Court. It is further ORDERED and DECREED that the Plaintiff is directed to file its Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. Additionally, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the Motion for Order Consistent with Opinion of the Commonwealth Court, as filed by Plaintiff, is DISMISSED as being MOOT. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. April 19, 1994 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 11, 1994 received from attorney for Plaintiff. by attorney for Plaintiff April 13, 1994. April 25, 1994 Receipt of same acknowledged The Board rendered an Amended Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 1994, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the Order of April 11, 1994, is MOOT as being superfluous. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. April 27, 1994 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 11, 1994 by attorney for Defendant April 28, 1994. April 28, 1994 Acceptance of Service of Amended Opinion and Order dated April 25, 1994 received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant April 26, 1994. May 11, 1994 Acceptance of Service of Amended Opinion and Order dated April 25, 1994 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff May 5, 1994. 13

November 4, 1994 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 1994, as a valid contract did not exist between Plaintiff, Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. and the Defendant, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, the Claim of Shovel Transfer Storage, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff, attorney for Defendant and Chief Deputy Attorney General. November 14, 1994 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated November 4, 1994 received from attorney for Plaintiff. by attorney for Plaintiff November 8, 1994. November 22, 1994 Receipt of same acknowledged Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated November 4, 1994 by attorney for Defendant November 7, 1994. November 28, 1994 Notice of Appeal filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. January 12, 1995 Petition for Review field by attorney for Plaintiff. to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. 1994) February 2, 1995 Copy forwarded (No. 3151 C.D. File transmitted to Commonwealth Court. October 24, 1995 Copy of Opinion and Order received from Commonwealth Court. Order as follows: NOW, this 19th day of October, 1995, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board s motion to quash appeal is granted and the appeal of Shovel Transfer and Storage, Inc. is dismissed. April 24, 1998 Copy of Opinion and Order received from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District. Order as follows: PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 1998, the petition for allowance 14

of appeal is granted. October 29, 1999 [699 A.2d 1324 (Pa. Commw. 1997)] Opinion rendered in Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Western District as follows: Accordingly, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court and hold that a valid contract existed between the parties. We remand this matter to the Board of Claims for a determination of the damages due to Shovel Transfer for the PLCB s breach of this contract. December 21, 1999 File returned from Commonwealth Court. January 18, 2000 Letter filed by attorney for Plaintiff requesting a hearing be set. January 26, 2000 The Board rendered the following Order: "AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2000, it is ORDERED and DECREED that this matter is set for a hearing before the Board beginning on May 8, 2000 through May 12, 2000, if necessary. Said hearing shall be held in Courtroom No. 1, 6th Floor, Fulton Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, commencing at 9:30 a.m. It is further ORDERED and DECREED that all discovery herein shall be completed no later than forty-five (45) days prior to May 8, 2000." and attorney for Defendant. February 3, 2000 Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff Acceptance of Service of Order dated January 26, 2000 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff January 28, 2000. April 7, 2000 Plaintiff s Pre-Trial Statement filed. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. April 7, 2000 Defendant s Pre-Trial Statement filed. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. April 19, 2000 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2000, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the trial scheduled to begin on May 8, 2000 shall now begin on May 15

11, 2000, at 9:30 a.m. and shall continue through May 12, 2000. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. April 25, 2000 Respondent Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board's Motion in Limine and Brief in Support filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. Response due from Plaintiff May 2, 2000. May 1, 2000 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 19, 2000 received from attorney for Plaintiff. by attorney for Plaintiff 4/24/00. May 2, 2000 Receipt of same acknowledged Claimant's Answer in Opposition to Respondent's Motion in Limine as well as Brief in Support filed by attorney for Plaintiff. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. May 2, 2000 The Board rendered the following Order: "AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2000, after consideration of Respondent's Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Motion in Limine and Claimant's, Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc., Response thereto it is ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion is DENIED. After the extensive litigation in this matter, the principle of judicial economy is outweighed by the necessity to conduct a thorough and complete hearing. A ruling on the issues of damages will be made after testimony has concluded and the parties have had an opportunity to fully argue and brief the issue." Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff and attorney for Defendant. May 5, 2000 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated April 19, 2000 received from attorneyh for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant April 20, 2000. May 5, 2000 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated May 2, 2000 received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant May 3, 2000. May 10, 2000 16

Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated May 2, 2000 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by Plaintiff 5/5/00. May 11, 2000 Hearing held in Board's Courtroom No. 1, 200 North Third Street, Suite 700, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, commencing at 9:30 a.m. Case Completed. June 7, 2000 Testimony for hearing held May 11, 2000 filed. June 9, 2000 Copy of testimony for hearing held May 11, 2000 forwarded to attorney for Defendant. Defendant's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law due July 10, 2000. Plaintiff's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law due August 10, 2000. June 16, 2000 Acceptance of Service of Testimony received from attorney for Defendant. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Defendant June 14, 2000. July 7, 2000 Plaintiff's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Brief filed. Copy forwarded to attorney for Defendant by attorney for Plaintiff. August 10, 2000 Defendant's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Brief filed by attorney for Defendant. Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff by attorney for Defendant. February 14, 2001 The Board rendered an Opinion and made the following Order: "AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2001, it is hereby ORDERED that an award be entered in favor of the Claimant, Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc., in the amount of One Million Eight Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars and Thirteen 17

Cents ($1,834,556.13), plus interest at the legal rate of six percent (6%) from the date of December 7, 1987, the date the Claim accrued as per the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision dated October 27, 1999. Upon receipt of payment of said award, Plaintiff shall forthwith file with the Board a Praecipe that the case be marked settled and ended with prejudice." Copy forwarded to attorney for Plaintiff, attorney for Defendant and Chief Deputy Attorney General. February 21, 2001 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated February 21, 2001 by attorney for Defendant February 15, 2001. February 21, 2001 Acceptance of Service of Opinion and Order dated February 21, 2001 received from attorney for Plaintiff. Receipt of same acknowledged by attorney for Plaintiff February 15, 2001. March 19, 2001 Petition for Review received from Commonwealth Court. Record to be transmitted on/or before May 3, 2001. [Docket No. 623 C.D. 2001] March 28, 2001 Defendant's Docketing Statement as filed in Commonwealth Court. April 16, 2001 File transferred to Commonwealth Court. April 27, 2001 Praecipe to Discontinue as filed in Commonwealth Court filed by attorney for Defendant. April 27, 2001 Notice that the case is discontinued in Commonwealth Court filed. Filed returned from Commonwealth Court. 18

19