IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Similar documents
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH COUNSEL

Case 3:16-cv JO Document 9 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 1

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-5 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 8

10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES

Petition, there is. staff for this form. the other party s

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 31 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 43 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 122 Filed 10/30/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 625 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 5

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/18/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/18/2017

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION

STIPULATION FOR JOINT APPENDIX. KAMALA D. HARRIs Attorney General of California. DOUGLAS J. WOODS Senior Assistant Attorney General

Case 3:17-cv PK Document 9 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP


Case 4:03-cv GTE Document 16 Filed 09/22/03 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

Case3:06-md VRW Document738-3 Filed07/07/10 Page1 of 14

Case 0:16-cv WJZ Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/18/2016 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543

Case 3:14-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 1

Investigations and Enforcement

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

6. In the body of the motion:

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

FORM 146. STIPULATION FOR APPOINTMENT

Case Doc 11 Filed 10/18/17 Entered 10/18/17 20:19:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 17

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

Court Rules of The Honorable Martin D. Auffredou, J.S.C. ~ 2017 ~

LAKE FOREST PARK MUNICIPAL COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 16 EXHIBIT 25

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CINDY LEE GARCIA, an individual, Case No. CV MWF (VBKx) Plaintiff,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 9893

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1274-LCB-JLW

8/31/2018 2:12 PM 18CV38516 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:18-cv Document 9 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU -PART 47

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER LIMITED CIVIL APPEAL. Self Help Center Loca ons:

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:11-cv AWI-JLT Document 3 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON DR 10, UE 88, UM 989

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 3:06-cv JSW Document 136 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 8

Case 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

U.S. District Court United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:04-cv JCH

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON CA A

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

Case 6:13-cv AA Document 20 Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 132

Case3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BONNER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CV-BLOOM/VALLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH UTCR CONFERRAL STATEMENT

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:07-CV-231

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF KURT CASADINE IN SUPPORT 17. Defendants.

Case 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17

NORTH CAROLINA APPELLATE PRO BONO PROGRAM

Case 1:08-cv RDB Document 83 Filed 10/20/2009 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

NOS , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNDER SEAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Alec T. Sabina and Emma L. Sabina v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. No. BCD-CV Business and Consumer Court for Cumberland County, Maine If you

~IE EIVIEIQ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S INJUNCTION AND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 186 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x

Professionalism/Ethics Series: Ethical Issues Arising While Conducting Discovery in 42 U.S.C Cases

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Jami L. Pannell, OSB #06429 Animal Law Clinic Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Boulevard Portland, OR 97219-7799 Telephone: 503.768.6848 Facsimile: 503.768.6917 Email: anmlclin@lclark.edu Attorney for Defendant Kevin Mieras IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GREGG SCHUMACHER and LINDA SCHUMACHER, individually and as husband and wife, and GREGG SCHUMACHER FURS LLC dba SCHUMACHER FURS & OUTERWEAR, CV-07-00601-MO Plaintiffs, v. DECLARATION OF JAMI PANNELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation; IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS, a foreign nonprofit corporation; ANIMAL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT LIBERATION FRONT, an unincorporated KEVIN MIERAS association; PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., a foreign nonprofit corporation; MATT ROSSELL; KEVIN MIERAS aka Bluejay ; CONNIE DURKEE; ALEX LILLI; JOHN DOES 1-10; and JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants. I, Jami Pannell, declare and testify as follows: 1. I make the following statements based on my personal knowledge. PAGE 1 DECLARATION OF JAMI PANNELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

2. I am a staff attorney for the Animal Law Clinic at Lewis and Clark Law School, and I am one of two attorneys who represented defendant Kevin Mieras throughout the majority of this case, and I remain his sole attorney today. I make this declaration in support of Mr. Mieras motion for attorney fees. 3. The number of hours and services rendered by the Animal Law Clinic in this matter are as follows: Name Position Hourly Rate Number of Hours Total Fees Jami Pannell Attorney $125 (out of court $200 (court time 79.6 4 $9,950 $800 4. As an attorney for a 501(c(3 non-profit organization, I often take cases on a pro bono basis, but stipulate with clients that I will seek attorney fees from opposing parties as allowed by law. The above hourly rate is based upon our retainer agreement with Mr. Mieras, which provides that if he is awarded attorney fees, my rate is $125 per hour for all services except court time, which is $200 per hour. These are the standard rates I charge clients when I do not charge them separately for staff time, law clerk time, shipping and postage, office supplies, mileage, and photocopying. 5. As a matter of judgment, I am electing to forego requesting reimbursement for the numerous telephone and email communications between my client and myself, which total over 10 hours. 6. Attached as Exhibit A to this declaration is a detailed listing of my time entries and description of services rendered by myself in this matter through October 4, 2007. The entries account for each tenth of an hour spent defending Mr. Mieras in this matter. PAGE 2 DECLARATION OF JAMI PANNELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

7. The attorney fees charged in this matter are appropriate and reasonable considering the issues involved, the briefing required, the experience of the attorneys involved and the amount in controversy. 8. The hourly rate is appropriate under recent surveys of rates and fees charged by Portland attorneys of similar experience in civil litigation matters. According to the 2002 Oregon State Bar Economic Survey, the average hourly rate for attorneys admitted to practice 0-3 years was $144 per hour. 9. Adjusting the 2002 Oregon State Bar Economic Survey rates for inflation at 3% through 2007 produces an average rate of $167 per hour, which is well above the fees sought here, which average out to approximately $129 per hour. 10. My responsibilities at the Animal Law Clinic include selecting cases and clients, and assuming primary responsibility and often sole representation of those clients. In addition, I am a clinical professor of law, which entails supervising and educating up to eight law students each semester. 11. Based on the above, Mr. Mieras is entitled to a reasonable and appropriate award of attorney fees in the amount of $10, 750 for the services rendered by the Animal Law Clinic. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 4th day of October, 2007, at Portland, Oregon. Jami Pannell PAGE 3 DECLARATION OF JAMI PANNELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

LISTING OF TIME ENTRIES AND SERVICES Jami Pannell Schumacher v. City of Portland, Case No. CV 07-601- MO Client: Kevin Mieras Date Duration Description 5/3/2007 2.1 Initial meeting with client, discussion with co-counsel. 5/4/2007 3.3 File/document review (complaint, motion for PI, documents provided by client. 5/5/2007 3.9 Anti-SLAPP research; reviewed FRCP & local rules. 5/7/2007 1 Telephone conference with IDA counsel and co-counsel. 5/7/2007.4 Fax to plaintiffs counsel; entry of appearance. 5/8/2007.3 Reviewed fax from plaintiffs counsel & responded. 5/8/2007.5 Conferred with co-counsel; reviewed memo from co-counsel re: pendent party jurisdiction. 5/8/2007 1.3 Researched media coverage re: case; reviewed client s materials; conferred with client. 5/9/2007 1.6 Meeting with defense counsel at offices of Kafoury & McDougal; travel to/from meeting. 5/9/2007 3.1 Researched law of preliminary injunctions and hearsay in affidavits; wrote memo for co-counsel and IDA counsel. 5/10/2007 2.3 Prepared answer (not filed; prepared client declaration. 5/11/2007 4.8 Finalized joint filings with IDA counsel; travel to/from IDA counsel s office; met with client re: declaration. 5/16/2007 1.8 Prepared for oral argument re: preliminary injunction hearing. 5/17/2007 2 Court appearance re: motion for preliminary injunction. 5/17/2007.9 Travel to/from courthouse; post-hearing conference with client and co-counsel. 5/17/2007 2.2 Researched motion for reconsideration; conferred with IDA counsel. 5/18/2007 2 Researched John Doe issue; drafted memo. 5/19/2007 2.5 Legal research re: preliminary injunctions. 5/20/2007 8.2 Researched & wrote first draft of Mieras motion for reconsideration. 5/21/2007.3 Reviewed research provided by N. McDougal re: motion for reconsideration. 5/21/2007 6 Further research re: motion for reconsideration; edits to draft. 5/22/2007 4.5 Further research re: motion for reconsideration; edits; conferred with co-counsel; prepared affidavit. 5/23/2007 3.8 Prepared exhibits re: motion for reconsideration; further edits to motion. 5/25/2007 2.2 Finalized motion; conferred with plaintiffs counsel; filed motion. 5/31/2007 1.9 Wrote Mieras 2 nd Suppl. Declaration; conferred with client; filed. 6/5/2007.5 Reviewed and edited reply to City's opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 6/9/2007 2 Reviewed plaintiffs opposition & supporting documents re: motion for reconsideration. Exhibit A to Pannell Declaration

6/12/2007 1.2 Conferred with co-counsel re: reply to opposition; edited draft. 6/14/2007 1 Reviewed letter from plaintiffs counsel; researched & responded; conferred with M. McDougal. 6/16/2007 3 Reviewed documents and performed research to prepare for hearing. 6/18/2007 2.0 Oral argument on special motion to strike, motion for reconsideration. 6/19/2007 2 Research re: supplemental brief requested by the Court on Mieras special motion to strike (whether existence of website might constitute either of the two remaining COA. 6/25/2007 1 Conferred with co-counsel re: supplemental brief. 6/28/2007 1.2 Made final edits to supplemental brief and filed. 8/25/2007 1 Reviewed Plaintiffs response to IDA & PETA s motions for attorney fees. 8/30/2007.8 Reviewed IDA & PETA s response to Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. 9/20/2007.8 Reviewed order for judgment of dismissal and opinion re: Mieras. 10/3/2007 4.2 Prepared motion for attorney fees, supporting memorandum, declaration and exhibit. Total In- 4.0 Court Hours Total Outof-Court 79.6 Hours TOTAL 83.6 HOURS Exhibit A to Pannell Declaration