Force majeure patent relief in New Zealand

Similar documents
BELIZE TRADE MARKS ACT CHAPTER 257 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

People's Republic of Bangladesh THE PATENTS AND DESIGNS ACT ACT NO. II OF 1911 as amended by Act No. XV of 2003 Entry into force: May 13, 2003

APPLICABILITY TO SOUTH WEST AFRICA:

NEW ZEALAND Patent Regulations SR 1954/211 as at 3 September 2007 as amended by Supreme Court Act (2003 No. 53) ENTRY INTO FORCE: January 1, 2004

AUSTRALIA Patents Act 1990 Compilation date: 24 February 2017 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, 2016 Registered: 27 February 2017

Compilation date: 24 February Includes amendments up to: Act No. 61, Registered: 27 February 2017

The Patents Act 1977 (as amended)

PATENTS ACT NO. 57 OF 1978 [ASSENTED TO 26 APRIL, 1978] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JANUARY, 1979]

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

Exclusions from patentability 15 Inventions contrary to public order or morality not patentable

LAWS OF MALAWI PATENTS CHAPTER 49:02 CURRENT PAGES

HONG KONG Patents (General) Rules as amended by L.N. 40 of 2004 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 7, 2004 Chapter: 514C

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

CHAPTER 337 THE SOCIETIES ACT An Act to provide for the registration of societies and for other related matters. [1st June, 1954]

CHAPTER 324. INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RULES (SECTION 58) [Commencement 8th June, 1967]

IRELAND Trade Marks Rules as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

IRELAND Trade Marks Act as amended up to and including the February 2, 2016

The Patents (Amendment) Act,

This document has been provided by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL).

AFRICAN REGIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (ARIPO)

TRADE MARKS ACT 1996 (as amended)

ST CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS CHAPTER PROTECTION OF LAYOUT-DESIGNS (TOPOGRAPHIES) OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS ACT

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF NEW ZEALAND (IPONZ)

BELIZE PATENTS ACT CHAPTER 253 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003

Trade Marks Ordinance (New Version),

U E R N T BERMUDA 1930 : 33 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - PRELIMINARY

TITLE 26 TITLE 26 26:07 PREVIOUS CHAPTER INTEGRATED CIRCUIT LAYOUT-DESIGNS ACT

Trade Marks Act* (Act No. 11 of 1955, as last amended by Act No. 31 of 1997) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

TRADE MARKS ACT (CHAPTER 332)

Singapore Trade Marks (International Registration) Rules as amended by S 740 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 13, 2014

S.I. No. 199/1996: TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES. Preliminary

PUBLIC LAW OCT. 30, 1998 TRADEMARK LAW TREATY IMPLEMENTATION

Failure to adhere to the above can result to the irrevocable lapsing of a patent application.

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1996 (as amended)

Number 31 of 2001 STANDARDS IN PUBLIC OFFICE ACT 2001 REVISED. Updated to 13 April 2017

Chapter 419. Vacant. Chapter 420. Financial Institutions (Validation of Acts) Act. Chapter 422. Vacant. National Savings and Credit Act

LAWS OF PITCAIRN, HENDERSON, DUCIE AND OENO ISLANDS. Revised Edition 2014 CHAPTER XVI REGISTRATION OF BUSINESS NAMES ORDINANCE

DRAFT PATENT LAW TREATY AND DRAFT REGULATIONS *

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 20 th April, versus. Advocates who appeared in this case:

NIGERIA Patent Rules under section 30, L.N. 96 of 1971 Commencement: 1st December, 1971

BRUNEI Patent Order 2011

M/S. Iritech Inc vs The Controller Of Patents on 20 April, % Judgment pronounced on: 20th April, 2017

TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993 BR 31/1993 TRADE MARKS ACT 1974 TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993

CHAPTER 318 THE TRUSTEES' INCORPORATION ACT An Act to provide for the incorporation of certain Trustees. [25th May, 1956]

Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits Protection Act

REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE GOVERNMENT GAZETTE ACTS SUPPLEMENT. Published by Authority NO. 28] FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21 [2012 REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE

Registration of UK Trade Marks Ordinance

Bangladesh Trade Marks Rules Amended on September 10, 1963

NEW ZEALAND Trade Marks Regulations SR 2003/187 as at 10 December 2012, as amended by Trade Marks Amendment Regulations (SR 2012/336)

Integrated Circuit Topography Act*

Pensions (Amendment) Act, No. 18/1996: PENSIONS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1996 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Trade Marks Act 1994

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA Trade Marks Regulation amended on 2002

Standing Committee on Patents. Questionnaire on the Publication of Patent Applications India Section

COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009

NIGERIA Patents and Designs Act Chapter 344, December 1, 1971 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990

Charitable Trusts Act 1957

CHAPTER II (1) PATENTS AND DESIGNS RULES, (As amended up to the 15 th June 1946.) CHAPTER I

BERMUDA 2010 : 8 PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS AND SECURITY GUARDS AMENDMENT ACT 2010

The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999

SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS No. 16 of 2010

TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999

CONSOLIDATED VERSION. Registered Designs Act 1949 (c.88) An Act to consolidate certain enactments relating to registered designs

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2013 No., 2013

BUSINESS NAMES ACT. Act No. 11,1962.

THE PATENTS ACT 1970

Registered Designs Ordinance, 2000.

BELIZE BORDER MANAGEMENT AGENCY ACT CHAPTER 144 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

THE NATIONAL PAYMENT SYSTEM ACT, 2011 NO. 39 OF 2011 LAWS OF KENYA

Cap. 249 Ed Registration of Business Names 3 CHAPTER 249 REGISTRATION OF BUSINESS NAMES

Broadcasting and Publications Authority

The Somaliland Protectorate Application of the 1913 Indian Companies Act

, No. 26.] Patents, Designs, and Trade-marks Amendment TRADE-MARKS.

Exchange Control Act 1953

The Companies Acts 1985 and A public company limited by shares. Articles of Association. Cadogan Petroleum plc Registered No.

Trade Marks Regulations

CHAPTER 26 THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

COMPANIES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMISSION (CIPC) (SOUTH AFRICA)

Chapter 16 of the above-mentioned Agreement establishes provisions relating to the need to respect and safeguard intellectual property rights;

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

UNITED KINGDOM Trade Marks Act Last updated on 27 April 2017.

CHAPTER 7 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS

LAND USE PLANNING AND APPROVALS AMENDMENT BILL 2013

PART 2 MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS

Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2015

CHAPTER 1.06 INTERPRETATION ACT

SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS ACT

The Sale of Training Courses Act

REPUBLIC OF VANUATU BILL FOR THE PATENTS ACT NO. OF 1999

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT (RAISING THE BAR ACT) 2012

HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013

International Trusts Act 1984

Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000

EXCHANGE CONTROL ACT 1953

CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Administration and Probate (Amendment) Act 1994

Notification PART I CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY

OBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I. Preliminary PART II. Licensing Requirements for International Service Providers

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ACT 1993

TRADE MARKS TRADE MARKS

Transcription:

Force majeure patent relief in New Zealand With reference to force majeure patent relief in New Zealand, the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) has the following comments. 1. On filing an application in New Zealand Paris Convention applications: Extension of the one year period may be had under Section 93A of the New Zealand Patents Act 1953, if the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances warrant the extension. It is considered that this section would be construed to apply to circumstances such as those of 11 September 2000. The full text of Section 93A follows at the end of this document. PCT applications: Relief for late entry into national phase (beyond the 21 and 31 months from priority date for chapter I and chapter II respectively of the PCT) may be had under Article 48(2)(b) of the Treaty and in accordance with IPONZ practice as established by Patent Office Practice Note No. 1997/2 in Journal 1413. This practice requires that the failure to enter the national phase in time must have been unintentional, and the application for late national phase application must be made without undue delay. 2. During prosecution of patent application in New Zealand (before acceptance ) Section 93(2) of the Patents Act permits the Commissioner to extend the time allowed for placing an application in order for acceptance if such an extension is warranted by the circumstances (such as force majeure circumstances). The text of Section 93 follows at the end of this document. If an applicant is unable to place an application in order for acceptance at the examination stage, and the application is marked off as void, the applicant may seek restoration of the application under Section 37. The application for restoration will most likely be granted if the failure to pay the renewal fee was unintentional and there was no undue delay in making the application for restoration. The full text of Section 37 follows at the end of this document. 3. After acceptance of the application and during the term of the patent Following advertisement of acceptance of an application, sealing of the patent must be applied for. Present IPONZ practice is for this to occur automatically, so the applicant need not make an application for sealing. However, if for any reason the sealing fee is not paid, the application will lapse. Section 36 of the Patents Act allows for restoration of the application if the failure to pay the sealing fee was unintentional and no delay in applying for the application for restoration has occurred. If a renewal fee is not paid (due 4, 7, 10 and 13 years from the application date, with a six month extension of time available), and the patent is still within the 20-year term, the patentee may request restoration of the patent under Section 35. The application for restoration will most likely be granted if the failure to pay the renewal fee was unintentional and there was no undue delay in making the application for restoration. The full text of Section 35 follows at the end of this document. General Notes Time limits specifically set under the provisions of the Patents Act are not extendible except where another provision of the Act specifically provides for an extension. Some time limits are set under the Patent Regulations and the Commissioner has the discretion to vary these limits under Regulation 168.

The Commissioner also has the power, under Regulation 169, to waive various regulatory requirements, such as, in the force majeure circumstances, the form and type of documents to be lodged with IPONZ in support of a patent application or by way of evidence. Any request for the exercise of the Commissioner s discretion, and requests for extensions of time under the Patents Act and restoration of applications and patents, will be required to fulfil various conditions, will be subject to various actions and restrictions by IPONZ, and will be open to opposition by those others who may be affected by the granting of the request. In most circumstances a refusal by the Commissioner (IPONZ) to grant the request may be appealed to the court. Moreover, the grant of such extensions and restorations may later be grounds for another to oppose the sealing of a patent under Section 21(1) (h), (i), (j), or (k), or to seek to have the patent revoked by the Commissioner under Section 42(1), but not, apparently, by the Court under Section 41. Such conditions and actions for extensions/restorations may include: A. A formal request; B. Payment of a fee; C. Supporting evidence by way of affidavits or statutory declarations or oral evidence; D. Compliance with time limits; E. Evidence that the lapse was unintentional on the part of the applicant or agent; F. Evidence that no undue delay occurred before the request was made; G. Evidence that due diligence and prudence was exercised on the part of the applicant or agent; H. Advertisement of the request and provision of a period for others to oppose the granting of the request; I. An IPONZ decision to grant or refuse the request (possibly after an inter parte hearing); J. Advertisement of grant of the request; K. Rulings by the Commissioner to protect innocent infringers; L. Appeal of the Commissioner s decision to the court. Table 1 sets out the appropriate conditions and actions for the relief specified above. Table 1 A B C D E F G H I J K L Late filing convention application Late entry PCT national phase Grant of time under Section 93(2) Request for time under Section 93(2) Restoration of Application, Section 37 Restoration of Patent, Section 35 Restoration of Application, Section 36 Patents Act Sections 35 Restoration of lapsed patents (1) Where a patent has ceased to have effect by reason of a failure to pay any renewal fee within the prescribed period or within that period as extended under section 30 of this Act, and the Commissioner is satisfied upon application that the failure was unintentional and that no undue delay has occurred in the making or prosecution of the application, he shall by order restore the patent and any patent of addition specified in the application which has ceased to have effect on the cesser of that patent. (2) An application under this section may be made by the person who was the patentee or by his personal representative; and where the patent was held by 2 or more persons

jointly, the application may, with the leave of the Commissioner, be made by one or more of them without joining the others. (3) An application under this section shall contain a statement (to be verified in such manner as may be prescribed) fully setting out the circumstances which led to the failure to pay the renewal fee; and the Commissioner may require from the applicant such further evidence as he may think necessary. (4) If after hearing the applicant (if the applicant so requires or the Commissioner thinks fit) the Commissioner is satisfied that a prima facie case has been made out for an order under this section, he shall advertise the application in the Journal; and within the prescribed period any person may give notice to the Commissioner of opposition thereto on either or both of the following grounds, that is to say, (a) That the failure to pay the renewal fee was not unintentional; or (b) That there has been undue delay in the making of the application. (5) If notice of opposition is given within the period aforesaid, the Commissioner shall notify the applicant, and shall give to him and to the opponent an opportunity to be heard before he decides the case. (6) If no notice of opposition is given within the period aforesaid or if, in the case of opposition, the decision of the Commissioner is in favour of the applicant, the Commissioner shall, upon payment of any unpaid renewal fee and such additional fee as may be prescribed, make the order in accordance with the application. (7) An order under this section for the restoration of a patent (a) May be made subject to such conditions as the Commissioner thinks fit, including in particular a condition requiring the registration in the register of patents of any matter in respect of which the provisions of this Act as to entries in that register have not been complied with; and (b) Shall contain or be subject to such provision as may be prescribed for the protection of persons who may have begun to avail themselves of the patented invention between the date when the patent ceased to have effect and the date of the application under this section, and if any condition of an order under this section is not complied with by the patentee, the Commissioner may, after giving to the patentee an opportunity to be heard, revoke the order and give such directions consequential on the revocation as he thinks fit. (8) An appeal to the Court shall lie from any decision of the Commissioner under this section. 37 Restoration of application where complete specification not accepted (1) Where an applicant has not complied with all the requirements imposed on him by or under this Act within the period prescribed by section 19 of this Act, or within any extension of the period granted by the Commissioner under that section or under section 93 of this Act, and the application has accordingly become void, the applicant may apply to the Commissioner in the prescribed manner for an order restoring the application and extending the period for complying with the requirements imposed on the applicant by or under this Act to such date as may be specified in that behalf in the order. (2) Every such application shall contain a statement of the circumstances which led to the failure of the applicant to comply with the requirements imposed on him by or under this Act. (3) If it appears from that statement that any omission on the part of the applicant was unintentional and that no undue delay has occurred in the making of the application, the Commissioner shall advertise the application and within such period as may be prescribed any person may give notice of opposition at the Patent Office. (4) Where any such notice is given the Commissioner shall notify the applicant thereof. (5) After the expiration of the prescribed period the Commissioner shall hear the case, and issue an order which shall either (a) Restore the application and extend the period for complying with the requirements imposed on the applicant by or under this Act to a period to be specified in that behalf in the order; or (b) Dismiss the application.

(6) An order under this section shall contain or be subject to such provisions as may be prescribed for the protection of persons who may have availed themselves of the invention the subject of the application for a patent between the date when the period prescribed by section 19 of this Act, and every extension of that period granted under that section or under section 93 of this Act, for complying with all the requirements imposed on the applicant by or under this Act expired and the date of the application under this section. (7) An appeal to the Court shall lie from the decision of the Commissioner under this section. 93 Commissioner may grant extension of time (1) Where by this Act anything is required to be done within a prescribed time, and by reason of delay in the Patent Office the thing is not so done, the Commissioner may extend the time for the doing of the thing. (2) Where, having regard to the procedure specified and the information required under sections 12 to 16 of this Act or any regulations under those sections, the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances warrant an extension or extensions of the period specified in subsection (1) of section 19 of this Act, the Commissioner may extend the period prescribed therein for complying with any requirement imposed on the applicant by or under this Act; and the said subsection shall then be read as if the period so extended had been substituted for the period of 15 months therein mentioned. (3) Where an extension of period has been allowed under subsection (2) of this section, the period so allowed shall be extended by the Commissioner to such further period not exceeding 3 months, as may be specified in a notice given by the applicant to the Commissioner, if the notice is given and the prescribed fee is paid before the expiration of the further period so specified. (4) No fees shall be payable in respect of any extension of time granted under subsection (1) or subsection (2) of this section. (5) The powers conferred on the Commissioner by this section may be exercised notwithstanding that in any case the time limited may have expired. [93A Additional provisions for extending time limits (1) The Commissioner may extend (a) The time prescribed in subsection (2) of section 7 of this Act for the filing of a convention application; or (b) The time prescribed in subsection (2) of section 9 of this Act for the filing of a complete specification on such terms (if any) as he thinks fit where he is satisfied that the circumstances warrant the extension. (2) Where by this Act any thing is required to be done within a prescribed time, and by reason of failure of or delay in the delivery of mail by any postal official or postal carrier that thing is not done within such time, the Commissioner may extend the time for the doing of the thing on such terms (if any) as he thinks fit. (3) Notwithstanding subsection (1) or subsection (2) of this section, the Commissioner shall refuse to grant an extension of time under that subsection if in his opinion (a) The applicant or his agent has not allowed a reasonable margin of time for the delivery to the Patent Office, by post or otherwise, of any documents relating to the matter in respect of which the application for the extension of time is made; or (b) The applicant or his agent has in any other way failed to act with due diligence and prudence in respect of such manner; or (c) There has been undue delay in bringing the application for the extension of time or in prosecuting the application. (4) Every extension of time granted under this section shall be advertised in the Journal in the prescribed manner. (5) Where an application is made for an extension of time under this section by an agent on behalf of any applicant, the Commissioner may require as a condition of granting the application that written confirmation that the application is authorised shall be

signed or executed by the applicant and lodged with the Commissioner within such time as the Commissioner specifies. (6) Any extension of time under this section, and any requirement given or other action taken by the Commissioner under this section, may be granted, given, or taken so as to have effect in respect of things done or omitted to be done before the commencement of this section, as long as the application for the extension of time has been made before acceptance of the complete specification of the application for a patent in respect of which the application under this section has been made. (7) The Governor-General may from time to time, by Order in Council, make regulations for all or any of the following purposes: (a) For the protection of persons who at any time in good faith have begun to avail themselves of any invention that is the subject-matter of a matter in respect of which any application under this section is made: (b) Prescribing the evidence that the Commissioner may accept in support of applications under this section: (c) Prescribing the manner of advertising in the Journal extensions of time granted under this section: (d) Prescribing the grounds of opposition to applications under this section: (e) Regulating the procedure to be followed in relation to applications under this section and opposition to such applications: (f) Prescribing the fees to be paid in respect of applications under this section.]