UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an

Similar documents
TH 0NST1TUTES f'- T~CE OF ENTRY AS RR EQUiI;LC BY FRS n, RULE 77(d).

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

5:01-cv JF Document 364 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 5:01-cv JF Document 361 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 3:06-cv WHA Document 21-1 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 8

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

5:01-cv JF Document 363 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 10

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

Case 8:15-cv DOC-KES Document 184 Filed 04/03/19 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:4371

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07-cv JSW. Parties and Attorneys

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

B CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

August 3, Re: Request for Publication of Jacobs v. Coldwell Banker B (July 25, 2017)

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv VC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case5:11-cv RMW Document72 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:16-cv WHP

Case3:13-cv MMC Document95 Filed09/17/14 Page1 of 7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES CASE NO: 2: RGK-E

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISIO N. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:99-cv MMC

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

I will continue to provide updates to creditors as relevant matters arise.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 8:11-cv FMO-AN Document 193 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:4291

Case 2:07-cv JBF-TEM Document 45 Filed 02/11/2008 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

x : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Jose) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:14-cv EJD

U.S. District Court Southern District of California (San Diego) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 03-CV-2260

Case 2:15-cv MMD-GWF Document 50 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 4

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

PARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.

United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver (Chicago) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:18-cv-04473

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:98-cv JSM

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND

Case 1:08-mdl CCC Document 24 Filed 04/22/08 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Case gwz Doc 226 Entered 01/03/11 17:27:13 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:16-cv MLW Document 91 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

Case 2:17-ap BB Doc 50 Filed 05/04/17 Entered 05/04/17 14:14:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

EV22fl $ JEFFREY R. KRINSK, State Bar No FINKELSTEIN & KRINS K UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

U.S. District Court CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv R-CW

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) Defendants. )

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 374 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5

Transcription:

0 0 Brian Barry (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: (0) -0 Facsimile: (0) -0 bribarry@yahoo.com [Additional Plaintiff s Counsel Identified on Signature Page] Attorneys for Plaintiff and all others similarly situated In re: TEXTAINER PARTNERSHIP SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: C 0-0-MMC(Labow) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO Master File No. C 0-00 MMC [proposed] ORDER REMANDING LABOW ACTION TO STATE COURT The Motion of Plaintiff Leonard Labow in the above-entitled action, for an Order pursuant to U.S.C. (c) remanding the Labow action, C 0-0- MMC, to the Superior Court of California from which it was removed, came on for hearing before me on, 00. Upon reading and considering the supporting papers filed in connection with plaintiffs motion to remand, and defendants opposition to the motion in the above-styled action and the evidence presented in support and in opposition thereto, and it satisfactorily appearing to the Court that good cause has been shown; the Court makes the following findings of fact:. Each of nominal defendants TCC Equipment Income Fund, a California Limited Partnership, Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, L.P., Textainer

0 0 Equipment Income Fund III, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund V, L.P., and Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI, L.P. (the Textainer Partnerships ) are limited partnerships organized under State law.. The cause of action alleged in plaintiff Labow s first amended complaint is a claim that relates to the internal affairs or governance of the six Textainer Partnerships and arises under or by virtue of the laws of the State under which each Textainer Partnership is organized.. The cause of action alleged in plaintiff s first amended complaint is a claim that relates to the rights, duties (specifically the fiduciary duties), and obligations relating to and created by and pursuant to a security (as defined under section (a)() of the Securities Act of.. The Class Action Fairness Act, U.S.C. (d)()-(), specifically excludes the fiduciary duty cause of action alleged in plaintiff s first amended complaint from its application.. This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty under State law alleged in plaintiff s first amended complaint. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT. Plaintiff s motion for remand is GRANTED; and. The case, C 0-0-MMC, is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. BY THE COURT: DATED: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge [proposed] Order Remanding Labow Action to State Court

0 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC POSTING PURSUANT TO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL RULES AND ECF GENERAL ORDER NO. AND BY MAIL ON ALL KNOWN NON-REGISTERED PARTIES I, the undersigned, say: I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court. I am over the age of and not a party to the within action. My business address is 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite, Los Angeles, California 00. On June, 00, I served the following by posting such documents electronically to the ECF website of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: [proposed] ORDER REMANDING LABOW ACTION TO STATE COURT on all ECF-registered parties in the action and, upon all others not so-registered but instead listed below, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California. They are: SEE SERVICE LIST Executed on June, 00, at Los Angeles, California. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. /S/John Boutsikakis 0 [proposed] Order Remanding Labow Action to State Court

0 0 For Plaintiffs Kenneth J. Catanzarite Jim T. Tice Catanzarite Law Corporation W. Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 0 Telephone: () 0- Facsimile: () 0-00 Laurence Rosen Laurence Rosen Law Offices Madison Avenue, Suite 0 New York, NY 00 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - SERVICE LIST IN RE TEXTAINER LITIGATION Nicholas E. Chimicles James R. Malone, Jr. Chimicles & Tikellis LLP One Haverford Centre West Lancaster Ave Haverford, PA 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) - Lawrence A. Sucharow Beth Hoffman Goodkind, Labaton, Rudoff & Sucharow, LLP 00 Park Avenue New York, New York 00 Telephone: () 0-000 Facsimile: () -0 Lawrence P. Kolker Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz 0 Madison Avenue New York, New York 00 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Francis M. Gregorek Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz, LLP Symphony Towers, 0 B Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - Lionel Z. Glancy Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP 0 Avenue of the Stars, Suite Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile: (0) 0-0 Susan G. Kupfer Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP Market Street, Suite 0 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -0, ext: Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff Alan P. Gordon Solomon B. Cera Gwendolyn R. Giblin Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP Market Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - Jeffrey S. Abraham Abraham Fruchter & Twersky, LLP One Penn Plaza, Suite 0 New York, New York 0-0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiffs Robert Lewis and City Partnerships Co. IN RE TEXTAINER LITIGATION - SERVICE LIST

0 0 For Defendants Heather L. Weaver Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP 0 California Street, nd Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00 Counsel for Defendant RHF, Ltd. Terry M. Gordon tgordon@clausenlawgroup.com Janet Morgan Clausen Law Group 0 Brickyard Cove Rd., Suite 0 Pt. Richmond, CA 0 0-- 0-- (fax) Attorney for Defendants TCC Equipment Income Fund, Textainer Capital Corporation, Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, Textainer Equipment Income Fund III, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund V, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI, L.P., Textainer Equipment Management Limited, Textainer Financial Services Corporation, Textainer Group Holdings Limited, Textainer Limited, John A. Maccarone John G. Jacobs jgjacobs@thejacobslawfirm.com Bryan G. Kolton bgkolton@thejacobslawfirm.com The Jacobs Law Firm, Chtd. South Michigan Avenue, Suite 0 Chicago, IL 00 () -000 () -0 (fax) Attorney for Defendants TCC Equipment Income Fund, Textainer Capital Corporation, Textainer Equipment Income Fund II, Textainer Equipment Income Fund III, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund IV, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund V, L.P., Textainer Equipment Income Fund VI, L.P., Textainer Equipment Management Limited, Textainer Financial Services Corporation, Textainer Group Holdings Limited, Textainer Limited, John A. Maccarone IN RE TEXTAINER LITIGATION - SERVICE LIST