IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAKIMA. On December 29, 1995, the Referee, Douglas Clausing, filed with

Similar documents
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 52

CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CENTRAL ARIZONA GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box PHOENIX, ARIZONA

The Irrigation Regulations

LINKAGE TO STRATEGIC PLAN, POLICY, STATUTE OR GUIDING PRINCIPLE:

CAPE COD COMMISSION MAIN STREET P.O. BOX226 BARNSTABLE, MA (508) FAX (508)

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER RIGHTS ADJUDICATION. SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OF REFEREE Re: SUBBASIN NO. 7 (REECER CREEK)

COURT USE ONLY. Decree: Order. DATE FILED: September 13, :12 PM CASE NUMBER: 2012CW191

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Supreme Court of the United States

WYOMING S COMPACTS, TREATIES AND COURT DECREES

1. "Bear River" means the Bear River and its tributaries from its source in the Uinta Mountains to its mouth in Great Salt Lake;

COURT USE ONLY Case No. 2015CW3018. Div.: 1

UTILITIES COMMITTEE MONDAY, APRIL 9, :00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS

NON-ATTORNEY S GUIDE TO COLORADO WATER COURTS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAKIMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ATLANTA REGIONAL COMMISSION METROPOLITAN RIVER PROTECTION ACT RULES AND REGULATIONS

Arkansas River Compact Kansas-Colorado 1949 ARKANSAS RIVER COMPACT

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact:

In The Supreme Court of the United States

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. THE STATE ENGINEER, AB-07-1 Claims of Navajo Nation

DOCKET NO. D CP-3 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION. Drainage Area to Special Protection Waters

TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND GREAT BRITAIN RELATING TO BOUNDARY WATERS, AND QUESTIONS ARISING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA

or so much of such amount as constitutes three-fourths of

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

CASE NO. 01CW1 TOM SMITH, P. O.

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF [ ], TEXAS AND [WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OR MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT]

SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN IN NEW MEXICO NAVAJO NATION WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal

Variance 2018 Bargersville Board of Zoning Appeals Application Kit

Engineer, State. General Agency, Board or Commission Rules. Chapter 1: Fees. Wyoming Administrative Rules. Effective Date: 07/13/2017.

ZONING CHANGES PROCEDURE/PROCESS FOR ZONE CHANGES APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGES

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 2, COLORADO

CHANGE OF ZONING (REZONING) APPLICATION CHECKLIST

SOUTHWEST KINGS GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY District Office: 286 W. Cromwell Ave., Fresno, CA Phone: Fax:

In The Supreme Court of the United States

Vague and Ambiguous. The terms market and marketing are not defined.as such, the

s 2 Notice of Adoption THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION PERORS , OAR CHAPTER DIVISION 18

CHAPTER 4 APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS SECTION 4.1 FILING AND COMPLETENESS REVIEW; INFORMAL REVIEWS

In the Supreme Court of the United States

IRRIGATION DISTRICTS ACT

ZONING CHANGES PROCEDURE/PROCESS FOR ZONE CHANGES APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGES

CHAPTER 7 ANNEXATION Chapter Outline

AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF WATER FROM THE NORTH SAN JOAQUIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BY THE CITY OF LODI

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF ARIZONA

Idaho Water Law: Water Rights Primer & Definitions. A. What is a Water Right?

Court of Appeals of Ohio

WSBA JUDICIAL RECOMMENDATION COMMITTEE SUPPLEMENT TO UNIFORM JUDICIAL EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Key Issues: Climate Zone: As: Tropical humid. Subjects: - Restoration of livelihood and Rebuilding of Resettled Communities

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION III. Appellant, THIRD JOINT STATUS REPORT

PETITION FOR VARIANCE

DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Tuesday, March 22, 2011

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIV. 6, COLORADO TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS IN WATER DIV. 6

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Civil Action No. SU- - CV- Garnishment Court Information: Clerk of Superior Court

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Effective September 1, 2018 TABLE OF RULES II. TRANSFER TO ARBITRATION AND ASSIGNMENT OF ARBITRATOR

Tax Identification Parcel Number

BEFORE THE DOUGLAS COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER I. FINDINGS OF FACT

6 THE CONTROL AND JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY

AUSLEY MCMULLEN ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 123 SOUTH CALHOUN STREET P.O. BOX 391 ( ZIP 32302) TALLAHASSEE, FLOR I DA 32301

RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AS ADOPTED

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF ARIZONA

BY-LAWS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD. Table of Contents

(2) MAP. The term Map means the map entitled Proposed Pine Forest Wilderness Area and dated October 28, 2013.

Enclosed you will find four (4) copies of Ordinance of the Town of Callahan annexing into the town 1.68 acres.

"SOIL REMOVAL AND DEPOSITING REGULATION BYLAW 1976 NO. 1747"

(c) "The Commission" means the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, as described in Article 2 of this Treaty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

ARTICLE 4. LEGISLATIVE/QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEDURES

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CITY PLACE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

DELIVERY AND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT BETWEEN METROPOLITAN AND COACHELLA FOR 35,000 ACRE-FEET RECITALS

CITY OF ROCKWALL ORDINANCE NO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NO. S -138 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLANNING APPLICATION PROPERTY ADDRESS: TAX KEY NUMBER(S):

UTE INDIAN WATER COMPACT. Purpose of Compact. Legal Basis for Compact. Water

THE COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF RECORD IN COLORADO CHAPTER 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. TITLE: Review City of Olympia Request for Consider Adoption of Ken Lake Interim Regulations at the Request of the City of Olympia

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

This ordinance shall be known as the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance of Pulaski County, Virginia.

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS ALTERNATIVE ENERGY DIVISION LP-Gas Operations

A Practitioner s Guide to Instream Flow Transactions in California

778 November 15, 2017 No. 556 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv CAS-JC

Appeal from the Judgment Entered October 19, 2007, Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County, Civil Division, at No CD 2005.

DOCKET NO. D DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

PROTEST to the California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights regarding

Douglas County Hearing Examiner

1-ofJCt 2Qt}'8, by and between pia, herein referred to as

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PO Box 1911 AFIN Deer Park, TX CONSENT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018

25 8/15/05 2 7/ /17/06 3 4/ /24/06 4 4/ /21/06 5 8/ /1/07 6 1/22/ /21/08 7 1/22/ /18/09 8 1/26/98

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc., et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al. Supreme Court of California.

Kansas Department of Agriculture Division of Water Resources

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CONTACT: Marie Pearthree Dennis Rule (623) (623)

RESOLUTION NO

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding the information that was redacted, if any, please contact:

Transcription:

\./ l! I IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAKIMA IN THE MATTER OF THE DETERMINATION OF THE RIGHTS TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE WATERS OF THE YAKIMA RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF C~~PTER 0.0, REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF'ECOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. JAMES J. ACQUAVELLA. et al., Defendants --------------- No. --0- CONDITIONAL FINAL ORDER SUBBASIN NO. (ROZA CREEK On December,, the Referee, Douglas Clausing, filed with the court a "Report of Referee Re: Subbasin No. (Roza Creek. Thereafter, this court set April,, for a hearing on exceptions to this report. Pursuant to the direction of the court, the Referee then served a notice (together with a copy of the report upon all parties, setting a time period for filing any exceptions to the report and for the aforementioned hearing on exceptions. Written exceptions were received from the Terrace Heights Irrigation District. Claim No. 0, (A00 and (A0, and from the Department of Ecology related to the claims of the Terrace Heights Irrigation District. At the hearing. on exceptions a stipulation was I presented by the T~rrace Heights Irrigation District and the Department of Ecology resolving the two exceptions. That stipulation is attached and is hereby incorporated by reference. I Conditional Final Order Subbasin No. (Roza Creek,

,, \ The court, having reviewed the filings,' testimony and Report of Referee, orders as follows:. The "Report of Referee Re: Subbasin No. (Roza Creek" as filed with the court, and as amended by the attached stipulation is entered as a Conditional Final Order confirming claimed rights recommended for confirmation in said report as existing rights.. All claims to water rights before the Referee pertaining to Subbasin No. not so confirmed, are denied.. This Conditional Final Order" relating to the confirmation 0 of rights and denial of claims of water rights, constitutes a final order for purposes of appeal (see RAP.(d», except for purposes of final integration of all confirmed rights 'as provided in Section XII of Pretrial Order No. (Procedures of Claims Evaluation, dated March, of this court. DATED this, /!* JUDGAit!!lAa~day of ----=F+--. --,''----,. Conditional Final Order Subbasin No. (Roza Creek

0 ~ IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNTY OF YAKIMA IN THE MATTER OF THE DETERMINATION OF THE RIGHTS TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE WATERS OF THE YAKIMA RIVER DRAINAGE BASIN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 0.0, REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. JAMES J. ACQUAVELLA, et al., Defendants. --------------- The. Referee, in his Report of the Referee, Volume, recommended to the Court confirmation of a NO. --0- ORDER RE: CORRECTION TO THE PRIORITY DATE IN THE STIPULATION BETWEEN ECOLOGY AND THE TERRACE HEIGHTS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, COURT CLAIM NO., SUBBASIN NO. ROZA CREEK COURT DOCUMENT, right to Terrace Heights with a priority date of November,. aoth the Department of Ecology (Ecology and the Terrace Heights Irrigation District filed exceptions to the Referee's recommendation, but did not file an exception to the priority date. Ecology and the District entered a stipulation on April,.. The stipulation.contained a typ.ographical error in the priority date. November~,, not November,. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the priority date for Terrace Heights Irrigation District be corrected to November, l~. The priority date should be DATED this 0/ sr day of OCo-Dl"-.,. ORDER RE: CORRECTION OF THE PRIORITY DATE FOR THE TERRACE HEIGHTS IRRIGATION DISTRICT. l~a"iftl~., WALTER A. ST;F!; R;JiiDGE

.,. ~. 0 rn: r. r-i \Ir. n." '.. ~@ f nly~@a~~ I ~.~I~ ' PopR [V O~'~" ':.Mi L,,' j ",. - '\..,ICIOCLEe!!r,~. -, SUPc-:/fi:"l CO' :~.\-vr r-,'" f P...lIl' '.;,;.\,,. """".,0\ 'U;',I :...,,~...=:;ll :. "'''' u _..., Cf;;\!~~;\ l.~. ("!!!~_~"""I\I Yakima Referee " "'. '';"oi'\;: >' vs. FOR THE COUNTY OF YAKIMA r B &ll APR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON plaintiff, state of Washington, KM.M EATON., YA/(IMA cout..,m CLcR,~ IN.THE MATTER OF THE DETERMINATION No. --0- OF THE RIGHTS TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE WATERS OF THE YAKIMA RIVER STIPULATION RE: DRAINAGE BASIN, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 0.0, TERRACE HEIGHTS REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON, IRRIGATION DISTRICT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, CLAIM NO. BB DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, Department of Ecology ("Ecology"., appearing by and through its attorney, Mary McCrea, Assistant Attorney General, and defendant, Terrace Heights Irrigation District ("District" appearing by and through its attorney, James E. Davis, agree to the following stipulation concerning the water rights of Terrace Heights Irrigation District. Claim No. plaintiff, JAMES J. ACQUAVELLA., et al., Defendant -------------- This stipulation is based upon the District, s Court, the Sworn statement of Richard V. Haapal'a and attached exhibits, Court Document filed by Terrace Heights Irrigation District with the District's Motion to supplement the STIPULATION RE: TERRACE HEIGHTS IRRIGATION DISTRICT, CLAIM NO. ~ -- ATIORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Ecology DiviJion PO Box 0 Olympia, WA 0-0 FAX (0

Record, Court Document, on February,, and the Report of. Referee for SUbbasin No. (Roza Creek. The Sworn Statement of Richard V. Haapala, P.E., Claim #, Court. Document includes the following exhibits: Exhibit "A" Land Use Data Tab~~; Exhibit "B" - Diversion Calculations; and Exhibit "c" - Map of Terrace Heights Irrigation District. Ecology and.terrace Heights Irrigation District enter into 0 this stipulation based on the current law of the case as established by the Court's previous decision regarding Warren Act Contracts. Nothing in this stipulation will prejudice Terrace Heights Irrigation District's, Ecology's, or any other parties' right to appea l this decision of the court, or any part of this decision. The parties stipulate as follows:. Place of Use: Terrace Heights Irrigation District delivers water to.0 acres within its district boundaries as illustrated on. Exhibit "c" of the Sworn Statement of Richard V. Haapala, P.E., court Document. The District Boundary as depicted on Exhibit "c" includes the NE~NW~ of section, T. N., R. E.W.M., which is not part of the lands described in the description of the boundaries of ~he Terrace. Heights Irrigation District, Attachment "A" to Terrace.Heihts Irrigation District's Claim No.. Terrace STIPULATION RE: TERRACE HEIGHTS,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,>. njl:t~lrt rl.alm NO. -- ATIORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Ecology Division PO Box0l Olympia. WAS0-<ll FAX (0.

...,.. i. :,' 0.. Heights Irrigation District is in the process of changing the District Boundary and has filed a Notice of Intention with the Boundary Review Board. Upon approval by the Boundary Review Board and issuance of an Order by Terrace Heights Irr~gation District to include thene!tnw% of section, T. N., R. E.W.M. in the District Boundary, Terrace Heights Irrigation District wi~l provide the court and Ecology with a copy of the legal description of the new District Boundary.. Should the Boundary Review Board not approve Terrace Heights Irrigation District's Notice of Intention, the Terrace Heights Irrigation District Boundary shall be as described in Attachment "A" of court Claim No.. Annual Quantity: a.,0. acre-feet per calendar year at the Terrace Heights Irrigation District's turn-outs from the Roza Canal (based on a water duty of. acre-feet per year and.0 irrigated acres. b.,. acre-feet at the Roza Diversion Dam based upon a ten (0 percent transportation loss from the dam to the Terrace Heights Irrigation District turn-outs. STIPULATION RE: TERRACE HEIGHTS.----.... _.,..-..lrvto"", ""\,,"'\ (V -- ATIORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Ecology DiviJiOll '0 Box 0 Olympia, WA0-0 FAJ'(0

J...! '. Natural Flow Right: 0.. a. Priority Date: November,. b. Source: Yakima River. c. Point of Diversion: Roza Diversion Dam. d. Season of Use: April th~ough October. e. Instantaneous Quantity: cubic feet per second April through August;. cubic feet per second in September;..cubic feet per second in October. f. Annual Quantity:, acre-feet per calendar year. Warren Act Contract Rights: a. Priority Date: May 0, 0. b. Source: Yakima River. c. Point of Diversion: Roza Diversion Dam. d. Season of Use: April through September 0. e. Instantaneous Quantity:. April. cubic feet per second May. c.~:j.bic feet per second June. cubic feet per second July..cubic feet per second August. cubic feet per second September. cubic feet per second f. Annual Quantity:,. acre-feet per calendar year.. Supplemental Water Right: Terrace Heights Irrigation District may divert up to. acre-feet per calendar year under its contract Right when there is STIPULATION RE: TERRACE HEIGHTS' IRRlGATION DISTRICT, CLAIM NO. ~ -- ATIORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Ecology DivWOC\ POBox 0 Olympia, WA0~ FAJ'(0

-.....,..f. '.,.. ( \,',, ' C(: insufficient natural flow to allow Terrace Heights. Irrigation District,to divert its,~nnual quantity. Terrace Heights Irrigation District's diversions at the Roza Diversion Dam may not exceed,., acrefeet per calendar year from the~r natural flow right and contract right Qombined. 0 CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE Attorney General,, DATE i TERRACE HEIGHTS IRRIGATION DISTRICT J"l...w Attorney for Defendant Terrace Heights Irrigation District Dm STIPULATION R : TERRACE HEIGHTS -- AtTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINOTON Ecology Diviaioa PO Boll 0 Olympia, WA (.0 FAX (0