Enlighten Latest developments in EU competition law and fundamental rights: an ongoing tale

Similar documents
Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Antitrust: Commission introduces settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/1056)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 January 2016 (OR. en)

General Overview of the EU Cartel Settlement Procedure. Jean-François Bellis (Partner, Van Bael & Bellis, Brussels)

Due process: build confidence in your investigation process

Due process: build confidence in your investigation process. Agenda. Agenda. Compliance & Ethics Institute, October 2017

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 September 2014 (OR. en)

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES

Comments on DG Competition s Guidance on procedures of the Hearing Officers in proceedings relating to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU *

ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

BULGARIA: PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTED

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION DATA PROTECTION (PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA IN THE POLICE SECTOR) REGULATIONS

Wouter P.J. Wils* Paper presented at the 2 nd Annual International Concurrences Conference 'New Frontiers of Antitrust' (Paris, 11 February 2011)

ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques

THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND SPAIN S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT: A FRUITFUL RELATIONSHIP

Private Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project

Roundtable on Safe Harbours and Legal Presumptions in Competition Law - Note by the European Union

ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO IMPOSE STRUCTURAL REMEDIES

Avoiding a Full Criminal Trial: Fair Trial Rights, Diversions and Shortcuts in Dutch and International Criminal Proceedings K.C.J.

Strategic choices in antitrust investigations: litigation versus commitments & settlements. Pranvera Këllezi Attorney at Law, Geneva

The presumption of innocence and procedural safeguards for children

Administrative Sanctions in European law Ljubljana, March Answers to questionnaire: Germany

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )

Why is the Commission proposing to introduce a settlement procedure? Does the settlement procedure imply negotiations?

Oral Hearings Neither a Trial Nor a State of Play Meeting

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

OJ Ann. I(I) L. 156(I) 2004 No 3851,

CLASS ACTION DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE (April 2015) Stefaan Voet. Recommendation on Common Principles for Collective Redress Mechanisms

Competition: revised Leniency Notice frequently asked questions (see also IP/06/1705)

Official Gazette No. 55 issued on 8 May Data Protection Act. of 14 March 2002

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

5418/16 AV/NT/vm DGD 2

DIRECTIVE 95/46/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 24 October 1995

GDPR: Belgium sets up new Data Protection Authority

Very rough machine translation by La o Hamutuk

Cybercrime investigation and the protection of personal data and privacy

Period of limitations in follow-on competition cases: when does a decision become final?

ACTION FOR DAMAGES AND IMPOSITION OF FINES

Official Journal of the European Union

Damages Directive 2014/104/EU:

Influence of EU Law on National Procedural Rules

The UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive

COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 11 December /12 Interinstitutional File: 2012/0036 (COD) DROIPE 185 COPE 272 CODEC 2918

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Actions for damages under national law: Achieving compensation through an appropriately balanced system

The Interface between Human Rights and Competition Law

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Privacy International's comments on the Brazil draft law on processing of personal data to protect the personality and dignity of natural persons

Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules

DIRECTIVE 2014/57/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 April 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive)

Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994

Personal Data Protection Act

GDPR. EU General Data Protection Regulation. ebook Version 1.2

International Antitrust Litigation

A Legal Overview of the Data Protection Act By: Mrs D. Madhub Data Protection Commissioner

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 February 2015 (OR. en)

ECB-PUBLIC. Recommendation for a

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Ninth Chamber) 26 September 2013 (*)

EU Damages Directive Implementation

MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2084(INL) Draft report Emil Radev (PE593.

Cross-Border Internal Investigations: Data Protection and Employee Issues. June 11, 2014

PROVISIONAL AGREEMENT RESULTING FROM INTERINSTITUTIONAL NEGOTIATIONS

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Act No. 502 of 23 May 2018

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. On the global approach to transfers of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data to third countries

Legal remedies and penalties in discrimination cases (Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC) Academy of European Law, Trier, 29 September 2014

1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

Table of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1

UNIT 1: GUILT AND LIABILITY

Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings

Case Note: Sison v. Council 1 Human Rights or the Fight Against Terrorism Do We Really Have to Choose?!

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

Equality of arms procedural safeguards for defendants: the way through and forward on the EU map

Law Reform Commission Issues Paper on Regulatory Enforcement and Corporate Offences

Information Notice. Information Notice. Reference: ComReg 17/49

STATUTORY INSTRUMENT 2002 NO THE ELECTRONIC COMMERCE (EC DIRECTIVE) REGULATIONS Statutory Instruments No. 2013

TRADE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

ANNEX 4 TO THE ORGANIZATION, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL MODEL PURSUANT TO LEGISLATIVE DECREE NO. 231/2001 OPENJOBMETIS S.P.A. - EMPLOYMENT AGENCY -

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 4 April 2014 (OR. en) 2011/0297 (COD) PE-CONS 8/14 DROIPEN 1 EF 6 ECOFIN 21 CODEC 47

closer look at Rights & remedies

Index. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7

Official Journal of the European Union L 94/375

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

Antitrust: policy paper on compensating consumer and business victims of competition breaches frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/515)

Answers to the Questionnaire on behalf of the High Court of Cassation and Justice of Romania

STANDARD OF PROOF IN CARTEL CASES

8118/16 SH/NC/ra DGD 2

TECHNOLOGY AND DATA PRIVACY. Investigative Powers of the Data Protection Commissioner. by Peter Bolger, Jeanne Kelly

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 27 November 2001 *

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Official Journal of the European Union

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 3 February 2006 (OR. en) 2005/0182 (COD) PE-CONS 3677/05 COPEN 200 TELECOM 151 CODEC 1206 OC 981

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (First Chamber, Extended Composition) 20 February 2001 *

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Transcription:

Enlighten Latest developments in EU competition law and fundamental rights: an ongoing tale Dr Arianna Andreangeli 24 June 2017 CCLP Conference, Pembroke College, Oxford www.law.ed.ac.uk

A gift that keeps on giving? Most recent EU Court of Justice case law Some recurring themes A decision within a reasonable time The presumption of innocence in, inter alia, parent/subsidiary liability cases Equality of the arms, exchange of information and use of documents in evidence Secrecy of leniency documents and implications for the right against self-incrimination Settlements, finality and legal certainty of proceedings and some emerging trends? Looking for greater predictability in the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and of general principles Aiming to strike the right balance between the effective enforcement of competition law and sound standards of due process

The right to a decision within a reasonable time in composite proceedings Administrative vs judicial stage of EU competition proceedings Before the EU Commission: no binding deadlines what is a reasonable time? - Depends on the circumstances, the behaviour of the parties and of the EU Commission - When is the right infringed? Assessing the impact of a delay on the exercise of the rights of defence the idea of significant difficulties and taking into account the parties duty of diligence! - Remedy? Before the EU Courts: need to consider the complexity, nature of the case and conduct of the parties also was the General Court inactive at any stage? - Remedy? Right to seek damages on the assumption that an unreasonable delay sufficiently serious breach! The position of the European Court of Human Rights sufficient convergence?

Settlement proceedings as the EU competition plea bargaining and the fairness test Settlement proceedings take care of perhaps less serious cases? An efficiency shortcut. Do they comply with due process principles? The case of infringement decisions adopted after negotiations were interrupted the Timab appeal: - Key factor/benchmark: whether the undertaking(s) engaged in discussions voluntarily - and whether they were afforded full hearing rights in the normal proceedings; - Note: interruption of negotiations any offer as to the sanctions falls the Commission comes back to enjoying full discretion. And the human rights test: Scoppola, Natvlishvilii and the trade off between waiving rights and gaining procedural and sanction related advantages - but with limits: appropriate safeguards must assist the procedure; no arbitrariness on the part of the authorities should occur outcome or conduct thereof.

Evidence, cooperation and the right against self-incrimination squaring the circle? Leniency documents in the context of EU competition proceedings secret but not in all cases? Evonik Degussa: drawing a distinction between factual information and information leading to the identification of the whistle-blower and laying down boundaries as to the scope of the right to privacy and to the integrity of one s reputation. The EU Courts approach to the ECHR test: - Is the offence the likely consequence of the person s behaviour? - Time matters - and so do the circumstances: of public officials and former KGB officers the Gillberg and Sidabras cases.

Evidence, cooperation and the right against self-incrimination squaring the circle? Article 12 of Council Regulation No 1/2003 and its limits! Between the demands of effective enforcement, the impact of the principle of national autonomy and the need to protect the rights of defence of the parties FSL and documents by the EU Commission from domestic tax authorities can they be lawfully used as evidence? Article 12 as a tool to regulate the flow of information within the ECN minimum requirement: so long as it is legal under national law but is this solution desirable from a legal certainty standpoint? FSL to the ECHR test the Mihaile judgment and the importance of the strength of the procedural safeguards accompanying the transmission and use of exchanged evidence: Nature of the proceedings whether adversarial or not; Could the individual challenge the use of/inferences drawn from the evidence? Rights of appeal?

Parent/subsidiary links, presumption of innocence and liability for sanctions who pays? A long-standing principle the impact of the single economic entity concept on the issue of liability for EU antitrust fines A derivative type of liability in principle the parent company can benefit from any extenuating factor affecting the subsidiary s conduct unless the parent had autonomous involvement in the infringement with some safeguards: entitlement to be informed of the subject matter of proceedings, to be heard and to launch an appeal against the Commission s decision (AKZO Nobel); Can be rebutted! Toshiba account must be taken of all circumstances/features of links between the companies concerned/ existence of evidence of public distancing to what extent has decisive influence been actually exercised? Greater clarity/predictability? Toshiba and AKZO to the ECHR test the Radio France case: issues of presumption of liability and due process In principle allowed but without making the right to a fair hearing nugatory but use must be assisted to procedural safeguards, e.g. right to challenge the inferences drawn

EU Competition enforcement and human rights? Are we there yet? Getting close An ongoing tale in the EU Courts practice Emerging trends toward crystallising a number of safeguards into the fundamental rights entitlements contained in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: - The example of the right to a decision within a reasonable time - and efforts toward defining more clearly the presumption of innocence! Still, open questions remain Exchange of information in the absence of common evidentiary rules Ensuring effective due process entitlements in parent/subsidiary liability cases the limits of this responsibility as derivative Settlements drawing a distinction between voluntary negotiations and ordinary proceedings, especially if discussions break down

Questions, comments? Thank you! a.andreangeli@ed.ac.uk