IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Similar documents
Case 4:11-cv TCK-TLW Document 191 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/22/13 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:11-cv TCK-TLW Document 195 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 05/06/13 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:11-cv TCK-TLW Document 203 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 06/14/13 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Defendants / Cross-Claimants/ Counter- Claimants

Case 4:11-cv TCK-TLW Document Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/01/13 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CHEROKEE NATION PETITION CHALLENGING ELECTION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:13-cv TFH Document 244 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:15-cv JED-FHM Document 2 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/17/15 Page 1 of 11

Case 4:17-cv TCK-FHM Document 107 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/16/17 Page 1 of 14

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLW Document 96 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/15/13 Page 1 of 40

Case 5:07-cv C Document 27 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Cherokee Nation Shadow Report to Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Submitted by Principal Chief Chadwick Smith, February 5, 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:15-cv L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DEPARTMENTAL REGULATION

Case 1:03-cv HHK Document 149 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Section 1: Recitals. Section 2: Purpose and Scope.

Case 2:13-cv DB Document 2 Filed 12/03/13 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:16-cv DB Document 13 Filed 10/06/16 Page 1 of 8

) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:12-cv- ) ) ) COME NOW Plaintiff the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes ("Tribes") by and

NATURE OF THE ACTION. enforcement of the Arbitration Award entered November 24, 2015 styled In the

U.S. District Court U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:10-cv TCK -PJC

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLW Document 148 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLVV Document 23 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 12/21/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

TITLE 25--INDIANS CHAPTER 14--MISCELLANEOUS SUBCHAPTER LXXIII-A--TEXAS BAND OF KICKAPOO INDIANS

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLW Document 135 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 01/03/14 Page 1 of 52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:13-cv TFH Document 239 Filed 02/28/14 Page 1 of 33 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

CONSTITUTION OF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLW Document 149 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 69 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:11-cv BJR Document 72 Filed 07/05/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:14-cv DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv CW Document 85 Filed 02/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 4:17-cv TCK-FHM Document 2 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 06/08/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 3:12-cv SRB Document 8 Filed 06/06/12 Page 1 of 5

CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS of the SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE of the SQUAXIN ISLAND INDIAN RESERVATION, WASHINGTON PREAMBLE ARTICLE I --TERRITORY

Case 4:12-cv JED-PJC Document 74 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 08/12/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Introduction. 1. In an effort to give native Americans greater control over their own affairs,

Case 5:12-cv C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 4:15-cv JED-FHM Document 36 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 12/07/15 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CONSTITUTION OF THE OTTAWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA PREAMBLE

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

CONSTITUTION OF THE OTTAWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA PREAMBLE

USDC IN/ND case 4:18-cv JVB-JEM document 1 filed 11/01/18 page 1 of 7

No IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. FOURTEEN YEARS, BIRTH FATHER, AND THE CHEROKEE NATION, Respondents.

Case 3:05-cv JZ Document 12-1 Filed 09/22/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No

Case 2:13-cv KJM-KJN Document 30 Filed 05/09/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

Case 5:14-cv HE Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:08-cv RLY-TAB Document 19 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) )

Case 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 154 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION C.A. NO. 1:16-CV TCB

Defendants Final Motion for Enlargement of Time. The Marion County Election Board and Marion County Voter Registration Board

Case 1:17-cv LJO-EPG Document 1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Indian Reorganization Era The Indian New Deal

Case 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:02-cv JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

TIGER V. WESTERN INV. CO. 221 U.S. 286 (1911)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Sec. 4 A New Era of Trust.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 1:13-cv WJM-BNB Document 178 Filed 11/07/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION MOTION TO REMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-CV-876 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

CONSTITUTION OF THE SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE PREAMBLE

TRIBAL COURT OF THE PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, et al.

Case 1:05-cv TLL-CEB Document 133 Filed 11/03/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Presented by Marsha Harlan, Esq, Kara Whitworth, Director of Cherokee Nation Child Support Services TRIBAL IV-D 101- FOR STATES

Case3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8

1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Plaintiff,

PUBLISH TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Case 4:12-cv GKF-TLW Document 150 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Transcription:

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA THE CHEROKEE NATION, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 11-CV-648 TCK TLW v. ) ) RAYMOND NASH, LARRY WASSON, ROBERT ) ALLEN, KATHY WASHINGTON, LISA DUKE, KEN ) SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND THE ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. ) Defendants. ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF Comes now the Plaintiff, the Cherokee Nation, and alleges and states: 1. The Cherokee Nation has not previously sought amendment of its Complaint, which was filed on Feb. 3, 2009. This case was transferred back from the District of Columbia on September 30, 2011. On February 27, 2012, this Honorable Court entered an Order setting deadlines, including a deadline for amended pleadings, or motions for leave to file amended pleadings, by April 23, 2012. 2. The proposed Amended Complaint by the Cherokee Nation does not change the original parties, nor add causes of action. It changes the cause of action from a focus upon federal abrogation of the Treaty, to a focus on interpretation of the Treaty language as it was meant by the parties at the time, and as later interpreted by federal statute and cases. 3. Under FRCP 15(a)(2), the Nation must have written consent of the parties or leave of this Court to Amend. While the parties (the Freedmen Defendants and the United

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 2 of 8 States of America) have been consulted about an Amended Complaint, they have not had sufficient time to review it in order to give written consent, or objection. Therefore, leave of this Honorable Court is sought. 4. The proposed Amended Complaint is attached hereto. Respectfully submitted: s/ A. Diane Hammons A. Diane Hammons Campbell & Tiger, PLLC 2021 S. Lewis, Ste. 630 Tulsa, OK 74104 dhammons@campbelltiger.com (918)30101172 and s/ Todd Hembree Todd Hembree, Attorney General Cherokee Nation P. O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465 todd-hembree@cherokee.org (918) 453-5652 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 23, 2012, I electronically transmitted the Amended Complaint to the Court via ECF for filing and also electronically transmitted a copy of the same via email to the following: Amber Blaha Jonathan T. Velie Alvin Dunn Cynthia Robertson Respectfully submitted, s/ A. Diane Hammons A. Diane Hammons Campbell & Tiger, PLLC 2021 S. Lewis, Ste. 630 Tulsa, OK 74104

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 3 of 8 dhammons@campbelltiger.com (918)30101172 and s/ Todd Hembree Todd Hembree, Attorney General Cherokee Nation P. O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465 todd-hembree@cherokee.org (918) 453-5652

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 4 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA THE CHEROKEE NATION, ) Plaintiff, ) ) 11 CV-0648 TCK TLW v. ) ) RAYMOND NASH, LARRY WASSON, ROBERT ) ALLEN, KATHY WASHINGTON, LISA DUKE, KEN ) SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AND THE ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. ) Defendants. ) AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF Comes now the Plaintiff, the Cherokee Nation, and alleges and states: 1. The Cherokee Nation is a sovereign Indian nation recognized by the United States of America. 2. The Defendants are the Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America (the Secretary), and the United States Department of the Interior, who are responsible for the administration of the Treaty between the United States and the Cherokee Nation, July 19, 1866, 14 Stat. 799 ( 1866 Treaty ), subsequent acts of Congress applicable to the 1866 Treaty and benefits to citizens of the Cherokee Nation based on their stats as citizens of the Nation, and Raymond Nash, Larry Wasson, Robert Allen, Kathy Washington, and Lisa Duke (the individual defendants ), who as non-indian Freedmen descendants resident in this federal judicial district publicly claim right as alleged citizens of the Cherokee Nation under the Treaty of 1866, and benefits based on their alleged status as citizens of the Cherokee Nation. 3. This action is brought pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201 to resolve an actual case and controversy between the Cherokee Nation and the individual defendants

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 5 of 8 and the United States arising from the 1866 Treaty and a federal statute as to whether non- Indian Freedmen descendants have a right to citizenship in the Cherokee Nation and benefits administered by the Secretary attendant to that legal status. 4. Subject matter jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 28 U.S.C. 1362. 5. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b). 6. Prior to European contact, ties of kinship were the overwhelming connection among Cherokees of different communities and all claims to citizenship rested on blood or marriage. As European colonists began settling in North America, the Cherokee Nation struggled to maintain the identity and territory. 7. European colonists introduced chattel slavery to the Cherokee Nation, believing that slave ownership would civilize the Cherokee Nation. The Cherokee Nation voluntarily abolished slavery in 1863, almost two years before the end of the Civil War. The former slaves became known as the Freedmen. 8. In 1866, the Cherokee Nation signed the 1866 Treaty with the U.S. Government. Article IX of the 1866 Treaty provided that the Freedmen and their descendants were to have all the rights of native Cherokees. Although the 1866 Treaty did not require that the Freedmen be given citizenship in the Cherokee Nation, the Cherokee Nation, as an act of sovereignty, voluntarily amended the Cherokee Nation Constitution in 1866 to grant citizenship to the Freedmen, Intermarried Whites and members of certain foreign tribes residing in the Nation. 9. On March 3, 1871, the U.S. Government ceased its policy of entering into treaties with the Cherokee Nation. 10. As part of its public policy aimed at destroying Indian government and promoting assimilation through an allotment of commonly held tribal land to individual tribal members, between 1898 and 1907 the U.S. Government created four rolls: Cherokee by Blood, Delaware, Intermarried Whites and Freedmen. Collectively, these separate rolls became

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 6 of 8 known as the Dawes Rolls, so named for the chairman of the federal commission delegated to perform the census. 11. In 1906, pursuant to its then policy of dealing with Indian tribes by unilateral statute rather than through the bilateral treaty making process, Congress passed several acts including the Five Tribes Act, ch. 1876, 3, 34 Stat. 137 (1906) ( Five Tribes Act ) modifying and/or construing the 1866 Treaty. 12. As a result of the U.S. Government s action in modifying the Treaty of 1866 by the Five Tribes Act, Freedmen not living in the Cherokee Nation at that time did not possess any rights of native Cherokees conferred by the 1866 Treaty. 13. The Secretary is responsible for administering programs providing benefits to citizens of the Cherokee Nation. COUNT I CLAIM FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT THE NON-INDIAN FREEDMEN DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE RIGHTS TO CITIZENSHIP WITHIN THE CHEROKEE NATION BASED ON THE TREATY OF 1866 14. A case and controversy exists between the Cherokee Nation and the non-indian Freedmen descendant individual defendants as to whether the Treaty of 1866 currently mandates that non-indian Freedmen descendants, including the individual defendants, enjoy the rights of citizens of the Cherokee Nation. 15. The non-indian Freedmen descendant individual defendants contend that the Treaty of 1866 guarantees to them the current right of citizenship within the Cherokee Nation and to all the benefits of such status, including the benefits administered by the Secretary. 16. The Cherokee Nation contends that the Treaty of 1866 did not guarantee to Freedmen and their descendants eternal unimpeachable rights to citizenship within the Cherokee Nation.

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 7 of 8 The Five Tribes Act and other federal statutes modified the specific provisions of the Treaty and also acknowledged that it was the Cherokee Constitution that granted citizenship to the Freedmen. 17. If the Cherokee Constitution was the organic document that granted citizenship to Freedmen, then a valid amendment to the Cherokee Constitution may remove that citizenship. 18. The Cherokee Nation is entitled to a resolution of this case and controversy in its favor through a judgment of this Court declaring that the Treaty of 1866, including subsequent federal statutes and case law, does not bestow upon current descendants of Freedmen a right to citizenship within the Cherokee Nation that cannot be altered by the Cherokee Constitution. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff the Cherokee Nation requests the Court to enter its declaratory judgment granting the relief prescribed in Paragraph 18 above, along with all other relief to which it is entitled, including but not limited to its costs. Respectfully submitted: s/ A. Diane Hammons A. Diane Hammons Campbell & Tiger, PLLC 2021 S. Lewis, Ste. 630 Tulsa, OK 74104 dhammons@campbelltiger.com (918)30101172 and s/ Todd Hembree Todd Hembree, Attorney General Cherokee Nation P. O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465 todd-hembree@cherokee.org (918) 453-5652

Case 4:11-cv-00648-TCK -TLW Document 109 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 04/23/12 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 23, 2012, I electronically transmitted the Amended Complaint to the Court via ECF for filing and also electronically transmitted a copy of the same via email to the following: Amber Blaha Jonathan T. Velie Alvin Dunn Respectfully submitted, s/ A. Diane Hammons A. Diane Hammons Campbell & Tiger, PLLC 2021 S. Lewis, Ste. 630 Tulsa, OK 74104 dhammons@campbelltiger.com (918)30101172 and s/ Todd Hembree Todd Hembree, Attorney General Cherokee Nation P. O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74465 todd-hembree@cherokee.org (918) 453-5652