IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF RYAN MCCALL, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY

Similar documents
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

REPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE

REPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF R.

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF ANAND SARA, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF KEITH SHUSTOV,

REPORT OF THE HEARING COMMITTEE

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA. IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, RSA 2000, c L-8, - and -

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT; AND

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. MURRAY THOMAS TRUNKS October 28, 2013 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Trunks, 2013 SKLSS 11

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF MARK PAIDRA, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA

IN THE MATTER OF PART 3 OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, RSA 2000, c. L-8 AND

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF MARK FEEHAN, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA

The Law Society of Saskatchewan

The Law Society of Saskatchewan

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA RESIGNATION COMMITTEE REPORT

3. IT IS ALLEGED that you engaged in conduct that brings discredit to the profession, and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction.

The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Clayton Bruce Williams

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA

The Law Society of Saskatchewan Discipline Decision regarding Drew Ronald Filyk of Regina, Saskatchewan

REASONS FOR DECISION. 3. The notice to solicitor referenced two citations, namely that:

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. STEVEN J. WILSON November 23, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Wilson, 2011 SKLSS 8

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. BRADLEY DAVID TILLING November 29, 2013 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Tilling, 2013 SKLSS 12

About Us. Strategic Goals We will realize our vision and mission by achieving the following strategic goals:

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, 1990 AND IN THE MATTER OF William Zion Brown, of La Ronge, Saskatchewan, A LAWYER

1. Miss Musaji had not responded at all to the Notice of Hearing. The Panel therefore proceeded on the basis that the above charge was not admitted.

1. Admission to the Bar. A lawyer is qualified for admission to the bar of the district if the lawyer meets the following requirements:

JUDGMENT ON AN AGREED OUTCOME

THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ALBERTA. AB, for executive director of the Real Estate Council of Alberta Michael Eurchuk, in person

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. WILLIAM T. JOHNSTON November 22, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Johnston, 2011 SKLSS 7

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL REGARDING RICHARD MIRASTY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

CITATION: Legal Services Commissioner v Wilson [2013] QCAT 307. Occupational regulation matters

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c.6, Sched. B;

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning MICHAEL SAUL MENKES

People v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014.

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, Statutes of Ontario 2010, C.6, Schedule B;

IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO BY-LAW 20 OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA. Re: MICHAEL ROBERT DE LONG

THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: LOUIS JEROME STANLEY NUMBER: 14-DB-042 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD INTRODUCTION

Alberta Human Rights Commission. Bylaws. Pursuant to section 17(1) of the. Alberta Human Rights Act

The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules

Mental Health Litigation Division Civil Commitment Certification Training. Nov. 2, 3 and 17, 2017

Alan J. Stern, Q.C., for the Nova Scotia Barristers Society

The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Robert John Douglas McRoberts

The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning AARON MURRAY LESSING.

Law Society of Alberta Trust Safety Approvals Guideline

FINDINGS of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Constituted under the Solicitors Act 1974

Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JOSE W. VEGA RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)

LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA HEARING COMMITTEE REPORT. IN THE MATTER OF the Legal Profession Act (the LPA ); and

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. DWAYNE JAMES STONECHILD September 30, 2013 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Stonechild, 2013 SKLSS 8

STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD. Decision No. 194

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN RICHARD NUTT, solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974

The Law Society of Saskatchewan

SAMUEL H. MCCULLOUGH MAY 18, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Samuel H. McCullough, 2011 LSS 1

Allen Berenbaum: Summary, as Published in CheckMark

NO. 01-B-1642 IN RE: CHARLES R. ROWE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

The Law Society of Saskatchewan. ALBERT JOSEPH ANGUS August 31, 2010 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Angus, 2010 LSS 6

Nursing and Midwifery Council:

A guide to GMC investigations and fitness to practise proceedings

DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF REGISTERED PSYCHOTHERAPISTS AND REGISTERED MENTAL HEALTH THERAPISTS OF ONTARIO

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning GLENFORD EMERSON GREENE

2007 No LEGAL PROFESSION, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2007

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated July 29, 2011, it is hereby

ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: ROY JOSEPH RICHARD, JR. NUMBER: 14-DB-051 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c.6, Sched. B;

In-House Counsel Masterclass

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning PIR INDAR PAUL SINGH SAHOTA

IN THE MATTER of the Certified Management Accountants Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c.6, Sched. B;

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:

SECURITY SERVICES AND INVESTIGATORS ACT

Krishan Kumar. The Law Society of Saskatchewan

The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. James Douglas Hall.

In accordance with Rule 41 of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 the hearing was held in public.

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: MICHAEL A. BETTS NUMBER: 15-DB-054 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD INTRODUCTION

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD OPINION AND ORDER

*Secretary s Note: The arrival and/or departure of participants, staff, and guests during the meeting are recorded in the body of these minutes.

ANNE ELIZABETH HARDY NOVEMBER 1, 2011 Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Anne Elizabeth Hardy, 2011 LSS 6

Alberta Electric System Operator

LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: KEVIN MICHAEL STEEL NUMBER: 17-DB-018 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION

The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Gerardus Martin Maria Laarakker

Transcription:

IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF RYAN MCCALL, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY Chair: Member: Member: Walter J. Pavlic, Q.C. Anthony Young, Q.C. Robert Dunster APPEARANCES: L. MACLEAN - LAW SOCIETY R. MCCALL - MEMBER HEARING REPORT: 1. This matter proceeded to hearing on September 5, 2014 before a consisting of W.J. Pavlic, Q.C. Chair, Anthony Young, Q.C., and Robert Dunster. The Law Society was represented by Lois MacLean and the member represented himself. Jurisdiction 2. The Law Society established jurisdiction in this matter through the entry of the following exhibits: Exhibit J-1 being the Notice of Appointment of a, Exhibit J- 2 Notice to the Solicitor, Exhibit J-3 Notice to Attend, Exhibit J-4 Certificate of Status and Exhibit J-5 Certificate of Exercise of Discretion re Private Hearing Application Notices. Citations: 3. On the 24 th of June 2014, the conduct committee panel directed the following citations: 1. It is alleged that you failed to serve your client A.B. and that your conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. 2. It is alleged that you misled or attempted to mislead your client A.B. and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. 4. At the hearing, the parties jointly agreed that citation (2) should be amended as follows 2. It is alleged that you failed to provide accurate and/or complete information to your client A.B. concerning the status of a filing of a Statement of Claim on behalf of your client A.B. and such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. Ryan McCall Report April 7, 2015 Prepared for Public Distribution July 21, 2015 Page 1 of 5

5. The was presented with an Admitted Statement of Facts and Admission of Conduct Deserving of Sanction which is attached as Appendix "A" to this document. Factual Background 6. In March of 2009, Mr. McCall met with Mr. B. At that time they discussed commencing an action against another lawyer who had missed a limitation date. Following that meeting, Mr. McCall did not take any steps to pursue Mr. B.'s claim. Mr. McCall admits that it was his intention to file a Statement of Claim however due to his heavy workload, he failed to do so. Mr. McCall subsequently contacted Mr. B. and advised Mr. McCall that a Statement of Claim had been prepared and was going to be served. This was untrue as at no time had a Statement of Claim been prepared by Mr. McCall. 7. It was submitted that an appropriate sanction in this case would be a reprimand and payment of the costs of the hearing. The accepted that submission and the Chair then issued a reprimand. The Chair identified that Mr. McCall's misconduct negatively impacted not only his personal reputation but also the reputation of the legal profession. The Chair identified that it was no excuse that Mr. McCall had a heavy workload and identified that Mr. McCall's obligations extended beyond that workload and beyond any personal inconvenience. The Chair also noted that the Practice Review Committee had identified that Mr. McCall had taken steps to improve his practice. The Chair concluded by stating that such a reprimand is a public expression of the profession's denunciation of Mr. McCall's conduct and is a very serious matter as the reprimand will stay on Mr. McCall's file for the remainder of his career. 8. Mr. McCall was then ordered to pay costs of $4,432.03. These costs are to be paid on or before March 5, 2015 failing which Mr. McCall is immediately suspended and stands suspended until payment is made. Dated this 07 th day of April, 2015. Walter J. Pavlic, Q.C. Bencher and Member Anthony Young, Q.C. Bencher and Member Robert Dunster Lay Bencher and Member Ryan McCall Report April 7, 2015 Prepared for Public Distribution July 21, 2015 Page 2 of 5

Appendix A In the Matter of the Legal Profession Act And In the Matter of A Hearing Regarding The Conduct of Ryan McCall A Member of the Law Society of Alberta Law Society Hearing file: #HE20120036 ADMITTED STATEMENT OF FACTS And ADMISSION OF CONDUCT DESERVING OF SANCTION 1. Ryan McCall is, and was at all times relevant to this proceeding, a member of the Law Society of Alberta, having been admitted in 2005. 2. Mr. McCall was an associate at Litwiniuk & Company in Calgary, Alberta from September 2005 until September 2009. He is currently working as a sole practitioner. 3. Ryan McCall faces two citations, as follows: 1. It is alleged that you failed to serve your client A.B. and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. 2. It is alleged that you misled or attempted to mislead your client A.B., and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. 4. The complainant, Mr. A.B., was a client of Litwiniuk & Company. 5. Mr. B. met with Ryan McCall in March of 2009, at which time they discussed a potential action against another lawyer, Mark Freeman, who had allegedly missed a limitation date. 6. Mr. McCall did not take any steps to pursue Mr. B. s claim against Mr. Freeman. 7. In November of 2009, Mr. B. was advised by a member of Litwiniuk & Company that Mr. McCall was no longer with the firm. 8. Mr. B. asked Litwiniuk & Company to continue with the litigation against Mr. Freeman. 9. On November 19, 2009, Mr. B. filed a complaint with the Law Society of Alberta (Exhibit 6) asserting that Mr. McCall agreed to sue Mr. Freeman on Mr. B. s behalf and to prepare and file a Statement of Claim for that purpose. Ryan McCall Report April 7, 2015 Prepared for Public Distribution July 21, 2015 Page 3 of 5

10. On January 27, 2010, a Complaint Resolution Officer with the Law Society of Alberta contacted Mr. McCall and requested a written response to the complaint. 11. On February 22, 2010, Mr. McCall wrote to the Complaint Resolution Officer providing his written response (Exhibit 7). 12. In that response, Mr. McCall acknowledges that he met with Mr. B. He indicates that he discussed possible contingency rates for pursuing the claim against Mark Freeman. His letter includes the following statement: I did mention the possibility of opening a file to Todd Litwiniuk once in passing, however I was never able to speak to Larry Litwiniuk personally about Mr. B. s matter and as such a contingency fee agreement was never signed with Mr. B. and a file was never opened. I do remember speaking to Mr. B. via telephone, in approximately June 2009 and informing him I had spoke (sic) with Todd Litwiniuk briefly and it was my intention to file a Statement of Claim and serve it on his previous lawyer, however due to heavy workload, I was never able to get around to opening Mr. B. s file and filing his claim. 13. On March 25 th, 2010, Mr. McCall confirmed the contents of his previous response. 14. Mr. McCall s response was provided to Mr. B. who provided a letter to the Law Society on April 16, 2010 (Exhibit 9), which states in part: In our telephone conversation in June of 2009 he did not tell me that he had spoken to Todd Litwiniuk but rather that everything was fine and he was going to serve Mark Freeman with a statement of claim, which he had made already. 15. Mr. McCall admits all of the facts set out in paragraphs 1 through 14 above. 16. Mr. McCall disputes the allegation in Citation #2 that he misled or attempted to mislead his client with respect to this matter, but he acknowledges that he failed to provide accurate and/or complete information to Mr. B. concerning the status of the filing of the Statement of Claim. 17. The parties jointly agree and respectfully submit that Citation #2 should be amended as follows: 2. It is alleged that you failed to provide accurate and/or complete information to your client A.B. concerning the status of filing a Statement of Claim on behalf of your client A.B. and that such conduct is conduct deserving of sanction. I acknowledge that the facts as set out above constitute conduct deserving of sanction within the meaning of the Legal Profession Act of Alberta, with respect to Citation #1 and Citation #2 subject to the proposed amendment to Citation #2. Ryan McCall Report April 7, 2015 Prepared for Public Distribution July 21, 2015 Page 4 of 5

This Agreement is dated the 25 th day of June, 2014. Witness Signature Witness Ryan McCall Ryan McCall Ryan McCall Report April 7, 2015 Prepared for Public Distribution July 21, 2015 Page 5 of 5