EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. 21 Plaintiffs Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and Olivia Tamayo ("Ms.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

EEOC v. Zale Corporation

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

) Case 3:05-cv MEJ Document 21-2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 6

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

Case 2:03-cv WBS-KJM Document 10 Filed 05/18/2004 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Foodscience Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

Anita Robinson, et al., v. Boeing Company, d/b/a Boeing Defense & Space Group

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

If a response is filed, a hearing will be scheduled. Notification of the hearing date will be mailed to both parties.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR (Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 2716 et seq.) (REVISED 2/3/2015)

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:03-cv PJH

EEOC v. Ruby Tuesday, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 11-1-000 EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant Judge David F. Levi Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny's Restaurant Keywords EEOC, Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, Denny's Restaurant, S-99-190-DFL/PAN, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, Sexual Harassment, Retaliation, Constructive Discharge, Sex, Female, Service, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/09

1 8 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO - #089 (CA) JONATHAN T. PECK - #10 (VA) EALY BENNETT - #01000 (TX) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 901 Market Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 910 Telephone No. (1) -0 SANYA P. HILL - #189 (WA) San Jose Local Office 9 N. Third Street, Suite 00 San Jose, CA 911 Telephone No. (08) 91-9 FILED NOV 0 000 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN A BY DEPUTY CLERK 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 ROBERT D. KILGORE - #110100 (TX) DANIEL R. STERN- #1910 (TX) LAUREN R. WOOD-#00899 (TX) COX & SMITH, INC. 11 East Pecan Street, Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 80-11 Telephone No. (10) -00 ALAN R. BERKO WITZ-# 011 (CA) JOHN D. ADKISSON-#l 19 (CA) SUE ANN VAN DERMYDEN-#118 (CA) SCHÄCHTER, KRISTOFF, ORENSTEIN & BERKOWITZ 980 Ninth Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 981 Telephone No. (91) - Defendant 0, 1 QM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 OYMENT OPPORTUNITY) COMMISSION, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DEN-CAL NORTH, DEN-TEX WEST, ) d/b/a DENNY S RESTAURANT, ) ) Defendant ) J I CIVIL ACTION NO. S-99-190-DFL/PAN S-99-19-DFL/RVN 1

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 1 SECTION I. INTRODUCTION AND REPRISALS 8 9 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 19 0 1 8 1. On or about September 0, 1999, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, filed its complaint against Den-Cal North, Den-Tex West, d/b/a Denny s Restaurant ( Denny s ) in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No, S-99-19-DFL/PAN. The complaint alleged that the company had violated Title VII by subjecting Patricia Corey, Judith Ries and Kimberly Sanchez to sexual harassment and a sexually hostile work environment. The complaint also alleged that Denny s subjected Patricia Corey and Judith Ries to retaliation. The complaint further alleged that Denny s constructively discharged Patricia Corey.. Denny s filed its answer to the complaint in which it denied the material allegations of the complaint.. The parties, desiring that this action be settled by Consent Decree and without the burden of protracted litigation, agree to the jurisdiction of this Court over the parties and the subject matter of this action, and hereby waive, for the purposes of this Consent Decree only, hearings and findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues, and further agree to the entry of this Consent Decree as final and binding among themselves as to the issues raised in the Complaint filed in this case. SECTION II. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and over the parties hereto.. The parties agree that this Consent Decree settles, compromises and resolves all claims arising out of the EEOC s Charge Nos. 0-9-08; 09-080 and 0-9-00 and the complaint against Denny s in Civil Action No. S-99-19-DFL/PAN, and constitutes a full resolution of all claims that were made by the Commission in this action.. This Consent Decree does not constitute an acknowledgment or admission by Denny s that it has violated Title VII or any other federal or state law or regulation.. This Consent Decree shall become effective upon its entry by the Court. S-99-19-DFL/PAN

P Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 1. Each party shall bear its own costs and attomeys s fees. SECTION III. MONETARY RELIEF 1. In Settlement of the EEOC s claims under Title VII, Denny s agrees to pay the sum total of $10,000.00 to Patricia Corey, Kimberly Sanchez and Judith Ries, as follows: (a) Kimberly Sanchez Within 10 days after the effective date of this Consent Decree, Denny s will pay to Kimberly Sanchez the sum of $ 10,000.00. Payment will be made by check payable to Ms. Sanchez, and mailed directly to her by certified mail to: with photocopy mailed to the EEOC, 9 North Third 9 Street, Suite 00, San Jose, California 911, attention Sanya P. Hill, EEOC-S JLO, Legal Unit. 10 (b ) Patricia Corev 11 (i) For the 1-month period following the effective date of this Consent 1 Decree, Denny s will pay to Patricia Corey the sum total of $0,000.00. Within 10 days after the 1 effective date of this Consent Decree, Denny s will pay to Patricia Corey the sum of $,000.00. 1 Payment will be made by check payable to Ms.Corey, and mailed directly to her by certified mail 1 to: with photocopy mailed to 1 the EEOC, 9 North Third Street, Suite 00, San Jose, California 911, attention Sanya P. Hill, 1 EEOC-S JLO, Legal Unit. 18 (ii) In addition to the payment identified in paragraph 1 (b)(i), above, 19 for the 11 -month period following payment identified in paragraph 1 (b)(i) above, Defendant shall 0 pay to Ms. Corey on the first of each month the sum of $,000. Payment shall follow the 1 procedures set forth in paragraph l(b)(i) above. No interest shall be charged or accrue on unpaid portions of this judgment, unless defendant defaults in the making of payments. (c) Judith Ries (i) For the 1-month period following the effective date of this Consent Decree, Denny s will pay to Judith Ries the sum total of $0,000.00. Within 10 days after the effective date of this Consent Decree, Denny s will pay to Judith Ries the sum of $,000.00. Payment will be made by check payable to Ms. Ries, and mailed directly to her by certified mail 8 to: with photocopy mailed to the S-99-19-DFL/PAN

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 1 EEOC, 9 North Third Street, Suite 00, San Jose, California 911, attention Sanya P. Hill, EEOC-SJLO, Legal Unit. (ii) In addition to the payment identified in paragraph 1 (c)(i), above, 8 9 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 19 0 1 for the 11-month period following the payment identified in paragraph 1 (c)(i) above, Defendant shall pay to Ms. Ries on the first of each month the sum of $,000. Payment shall follow the procedures set forth in paragraph 1 (c)(i) above. No interest shall be charged or accrue on unpaid portions of this judgment, unless defendant defaults in the making of payments.. Denny s monthly payments shall be due on the first day of each month during the payment term. Payments shall be considered timely if they are postmarked within three days after the due date. Failure to make any monthly payment to Ms. Corey and/or Ms. Ries under the terms of this Consent Decree will result in an enforcement action by the EEOC to collect the amount of $0,000.00 owed to each Ms. Corey and Ms. Ries, less credit of payments made pursuant to paragraphs 1 and above. In the event Ms. Corey and/or Ms. Ries do not receive a monthly payment within five days after the due date, Ms. Corey, Ms. Ries or the EEOC shall give Denny s written notice of the alleged default by certified mail, and thereafter Denny s shall have ten days within which to cure the alleged default. In the event Denny s then makes payment of the amount in default within the aforementioned ten days after it receives notice of the default by certified mail, the payment schedule shall remain in effect. In the event, however, Denny s fails to make any payment within the aforementioned ten days, EEOC may initiate court enforcement proceedings to collect the remaining amount of the unpaid balance of the $0,000.00 settlement amount owed to each Ms. Corey and Ms.Ries, plus interest on such unpaid balance at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of the default only, less all amounts previously paid by Denny s. The EEOC shall give notice of any such court enforcement proceedings to Denny s and its attorneys.. Denny s agrees that it will provide notice of the terms of this Consent Decree to any successors or assigns. The EEOC and Denny s agree that the monetary obligation set forth in this Consent Decree shall, for all purposes, remain binding on Denny s successors and assigns. 8 CONSENT DECKER S-99-19-DFI/PAN

«Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Docum ent 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 * * *1 1. Denny s may elect to pay the remaining balance of its monetary obligation owed to Patricia Corey and Judith Ries under this Consent Decree at any time and without penalty. SECTION IV. AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF 1. Within six () months of the effective date of this agreement, Denny s will complete the following steps with regard to its training policies, programs and procedures: Denny s shall submit to the Commission its training policies, programs and procedures pertaining to sexual harassment and retaliation. The Commission will then make 8 recommendations, if any are necessary, to include or change. With the advice and approval of 9 counsel of the Commission, Denny s will then adapt, revise, modify and otherwise adapt its 10 training policies, programs and procedures in sexual harassment and retaliation for all of its 11 employees, supervisors/and managers. After the recommendations have been received Denny s 1 shall make a reasonable and good-faith effort to train all of its employees regarding sexual 1 harassment and retaliation. Within twenty (0) days after the training session, Denny s will 1 confirm with the Commission that the training was conducted. 1. Within six () months of the effective date of this agreement, with the advice and 1 approval of counsel for the Commission, Denny s shall adopt, revise, modify and otherwise adapt 1 its existing sex harassment and retaliation policies, procedures and associated notices and forms 18 to more effectively carry out Denny s anti-discrimination policies. 19. Denny s shall not engage in reprisal or retaliation of any kind against Patricia 0 Corey, Judith Ries or Kimberly Sanchez because of the filing of his charge, giving testimony or 1 participation in any manner in this investigation and proceeding under Title VH. SECTION V. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION AND EXPIRATION OF 8 1. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purposes of enforcing the provisions of this Consent Decree. //// ////. S-99-19-D FL /PA N

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 1 8. The terms of this Consent Decree shall expire three () years after the effective date of this Consent Decree. Respectfully Submitted, C. GREGORY STEWART ftpiipful P m in c p l EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 00 9 10 11 1 1 DATED: DATED: i l C? jx^/oo 1 1 DATED: jw S 1 1 18 19 0 1 8 DATED: A X f döö / / / / //// UII m i n n n n nn SANYA K HILL Counsel for the Plaintiff EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Jose Local Office 9 N. Third Street, Suite 00 San Jose, CA 911 Telephone Number (08) 91-9 S-99-19-DFL/PAN

Kt _ * > J ' ' Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page of 10 1 DATED: O C i. ^^IQÖO 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 19 0 1 8 DATED: /? Mis*m(%tt, ^. k u t I "** / United States District Judge S-99-19-DFL/PAN

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page 8 of 10 1 C E R T I F I C A T E O F S E R V I C E I am a citizen of the United States, employed in the County of Santa Clara, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to this action. My business address is the office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, San Jose Local Office, 9 North Third Street, Suite 00, San Jose, CA 911. On the date below, a true and correct copy of 8 9 10 11 1 1 1 mailed by the United States mail to: Daniel R. Stern, Esq. COX & SMITH, INC. 11 East Pecan Street, Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 80-11 1 1 1 18 I certify under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. 19 0 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 8

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page 9 of 10 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California November 0, 000 ljr * * CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE * * : 99-CV-019 EEOC V -. Den-Cal North I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California. That on November 0, 000, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office, or, pursuant to prior authorization by counsel, via facsimile. William Robert Tamayo HV/DFL U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commisssion 901 Market Street TM/PAN Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 910 Jennifer Page Brown Shaw Schächter Kristoff Orenstein and Berkowitz US Bank Plaza 980 Ninth Street Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 981 Robert D Kilgore PRO HAC VICE Cox and Smith 11 East Pecan Street Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 80-11 Daniel R Stern PRO HAC VICE Cox and Smith 11 East Pecan Street Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 80-11

Case :99-cv-019-DFL-PAN Document 1 Filed 11/0/000 Page 10 of 10 Lauren R Wood PRO HAC VICE Cox and Smith 11 East Pecan Street Suite 1800 San Antonio, TX 80-11