Despite such clear legal provisions, both Congress and BJP blatantly sought and accepted donations from foreign sources year after year.

Similar documents
SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No... Of 2013

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

Bar & Bench (

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

FORUM FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY

Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on: % Date of Decision: WP(C) No.7084 of 2010

In re: Violation of model code of conduct by Shri Salman Khurshid, Union Minister for Law and Justice and Minorities Affairs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

The 2019 General Election in Odisha: BJD vs. BJP?

Be Happy, Share & Help Each Other!!! Study-IQ education

+ W.P.(C) 7127/2015, CM APPL. No /2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, Reserved on: January 27, Pronounced on: February 22, 2012

Bharatiya Janata Party

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VERSUS

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013

Shri Rajeev Khosla, President, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Shri Jatan Singh, Vice-President, Delhi High Court Bar Association,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

Chattisgarh High Court Chattisgarh High Court Konda Ram Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh &Amp;... on 16 July, 2010 WRIT PETITION C No 7123 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PERMANENT REGISTRATION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 8745/2011 & C.M. Nos.

Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates for R-1 and 2

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4761/2016 & CM Appls /2016. versus. Through: None

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DECIDED ON: W.P. (C) 8494/2014

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 5537/2018 & CM Nos /2018 & 33487/2018. versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

APPENDIX-FORM. (See Rule 3) (Appeal for Information under Right to Information Act 2005)

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF Association for Democratic Reforms Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. 1. Writ Petition (Civil) No of Judgment reserved on: August 30, 2007

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT W.P.(C) No.1098 of 2012 Reserved on: February 24, Pronounced on: April 20, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT W.P.(C) 7933/2010. Date of Decision : 16th February, 2012.

[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT )] Case Name: TRYTON MEDICAL INC. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER :

Getting ties with UAE on track

The Applicability Of Amendments To Pending Arbitration Proceedings:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LICENCE FOR OPERATING KIOSK Date of decision : February 8, 2007 W.P.(C) 480/2007

II PUC POLICAL SCIENCE Chapter 4 ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN INDIA

STRATEGIC PLAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. WP(C) No.3114/2007. Reserved on : November 19, Date of decision : December 03, 2007.

RESPONDENT: D.S. Mathur, Secretary,Department of Telecommunications

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH (DELHI)

Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

Mr. Mark Ramkerrysingh. Chairman of the Elections and Boundaries Commission. Address at Trinidad and Tobago Transparency Institute

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

Bombay High Court Bombay High Court The President/Secretary vs Shri Pradipkumar S/O... on 21 February, 2012 Bench: Ravi K.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 536 OF 2018

$~26, 27 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 3539/2016. versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Offences and Penalties and Compounding of certain offences

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus

THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS),

THE PREVENTION OF BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OFFICIALS OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS BILL, 2011

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO OF 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2015) VERSUS JUDGMENT

Through : Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Ms.Promila K.Dhar Advocates. Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) No.

Joliet Junior College District 525 Board of Trustees Consolidated Election April 2, 2019

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

The Road Ahead for Aam Aadmi Party. Ronojoy Sen 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. I.A. Nos of 2005 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 202 OF 1995 VERSUS

CANDIDATE PACKET. For candidates seeking nomination for Library Trustee. You may not start circulating petitions until September 18 th, 2018.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(S) No of Bindeshwari Das Petitioner -V e r s u s- B.C.C.L. & Others Respondents

Prashant Mavani, is an expert in current affairs analysis and holds a MSc in Management from University of Surrey (U.K.).

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARMED FORCE TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007 W.P.(C) 3755/2013 DATE OF DECISION :

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015 VERSUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS

Bar & Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. WP (C) No.4604/1996. Reserved on: Date of decision:

An Interlocutory Application has been filed by the. writ petitioners for early disposal of this writ petition, which has been. admitted.

Commission on Parliamentary Reform

IN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2467/2015

Bar and Bench (

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4619/2003. versus

The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2. February 9, 2018

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay)

Transcription:

2 of 5 2018-02-16, 14:04 condone the illegalities committed by Congress, BJP and a few other political parties by unethically accepting political donations from foreign sources, though prohibited under that Act. This, in my view, is not only illegal but it runs counter to the national interest, making a mockery of your so-called campaign of bringing in electoral reforms and enhancing honesty in the electoral system. To amend an existing law retrospectively to permit the political parties to accept donations from foreign companies raises serious concerns about the government's intentions vis-a-vis the likely influence of foreign agencies over the electoral process in India and its likely adverse implications for the national interest. Both FCRA of 1976 and FCRA of 2010 rightly prohibited political parties and their members from accepting donations from foreign sources. The Representation of the People Act echoed these prohibitive provisions. It goes to the credit of the Parliamentarians at that time to have thought about the deleterious implications that foreign donations could have on the political parties and their implications for the national interest. Despite such clear legal provisions, both Congress and BJP blatantly sought and accepted donations from foreign sources year after year. I, along with Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), filed a Writ Petition [W.P.(C) 131/2013] before Hon'ble Delhi High Court contesting the same. The latter pronounced their judgement on 28-3-2014 (copy enclosed) upholding the contention in our WP and directing the Union Govt to act against the political parties within six months. Instead of complying with that judgement in an earnest and forthright manner, the two political parties, perhaps with the tacit consent of your government, chose to file appeals (SLP 18190/2014 & 32626/2014) before Hon'ble Supreme Court. The appeals of Congress and BJP were dismissed by the apex court on 29-11-2016. Though there was no interim order of the apex court against the High Court direction, the Union Home Ministry, for reasons best known to it, refrained from complying with the judgement dated 28-3-2014 of Hon'ble Delhi High Court. A contempt petition filed by us against the government is presently pending before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. Meanwhile, apparently with a view to "regularise" the illegalities committed by Congress and BJP, your government adopted the backdoor approach of introducing a retrospective amendment to FCRA of 2010 through the unusual and inappropriate instrument of the Finance Act of 2016. Not satisfied with it and apparently eager to open the floodgates to foreign company donations, your government went one step farther next year, once again through the backdoor of Finance Act of 2017 and introduced amendments to Companies Act to lift the cap on political donations even by foreign companies and

3 of 5 2018-02-16, 14:04 introducing an element of anonymity in the donations to introduce opaqueness in company donations in favour of the political parties. BJP has since been a significant beneficiary of these amendments, clearly demonstrating how there was an inherent conflict of inherent it NDA's decision making process. Meanwhile, I have pointed out to your government (Ministries of Finance and Mines) the possibility of several companies, especially mining companies, over-invoicing their exports, laundering the differential amounts to undisclosed foreign accounts (Panama & Paradise papers corroborate this) and re-routing the illicitly deposited amounts to India, partly by way of political donations. I have enclosed copies of the correspondence for your reference. Is it not ironic that the foreign black money that your government is ostensibly trying to get back for the country should indirectly fund electioneering by Congress, BJP and others? I thought that, in view Shri Narendra Modi's repeated pronouncements to campaign against corruption, against black money and against malfeasance in electoral processes, the government would take my letters with the seriousness they deserve and ask the central investigating agencies such as CBI, ED and DRI (to whom I had marked copies of my correspondence) to institute independent investigations. I thought that your government would plug the inflow of foreign money into electioneering. I find that your government has not only ignored my concerns but also is, more than ever, determined to "legalise" the illegalities even under FCRA of 1976 by using the Finance Bill for the current year so as to avoid the much needed detailed discussion on this in the Parliament. Since both BJP and Congress are co-partners in violating FCRA of 1976 as well as FCRA of 2010, perhaps, you will make sure that the amendments go through without providing an opportunity to the Parliament and the people of this country to discuss and debate! Mr Modi, I feel highly disappointed and distressed! I feel deeply concerned that your government, contrary to what you have pronounced in your speeches time and again, should adopt the highly retrograde measure of retrospectively amending and neutralising the law made by the Parliament during the seventies with the sacred intent of preventing foreign companies and agencies from funding India's political parties and preventing them from influencing policies that affect the people of this country. Anyone with the national interest at heart would hesitate even to think of tinkering with the salutary provisions of FCRA of 1976 and FCRA of 2010, as well as the corresponding provisions of the Representation of the People Act. I write this letter with a feeling of extreme anguish and distress, as all my previous letters on the subject have failed to deter you from causing such an irreparable and long-term damage to the firewalls built by the members of the Parliament in 1976 against foreign influences on the integrity of the domestic electoral system. Looking at the track record of your

4 of 5 2018-02-16, 14:04 government so far, I would not be surprised if this letter too becomes a cry in the wilderness. Maybe some of us will then be constrained to seek judicial intervention to save the electoral process and the nation from the likely harm that such amendments would inflict. I am circulating this letter widely to all political parties, the media and the public at large hoping that it will trigger a wider debate and discussion. I realise that only such a discussion can ultimately save the nation and its electoral system from marauding political parties. You should realise that the people of India are far too nationalistic to ignore the machinations of the political parties. Whoever thinks otherwise will only be deluding himself or herself. I still hope and pray that good sense will prevail on the government to desist from going ahead with the proposed statutory amendments. If the NDA government genuinely believes in what it has been professing, it should revoke all retrospective amendments made so far to FCRA 2010, revoke the amendments to the Companies Act cited above, drop the regressive idea of opaque electoral bonds and introduce stringent penalties to be imposed on all such political parties that violate the law. Regards, Yours sincerely, E A S Sarma Former Secretary to Govt of India Visakhapatnam 3-2-2018 E.A.S.Sarma 14-40-4/1 Gokhale Road Maharanipeta Visakhapatnam 530002 Mobile: 91-9866021646 Email: eassarma@gmail.com Website: http://eassarma.in -- E.A.S.Sarma 14-40-4/1 Gokhale Road

5 of 5 2018-02-16, 14:04 Maharanipeta Visakhapatnam 530002 Mobile: 91-9866021646 Email: eassarma@gmail.com Website: http://eassarma.in 3 attachments FCRA amendment in finance Bill to help BJP, Congress escape scrutiny The Indian Express.pdf 1218K Gmail - money laundering in illegal mining of iron ore & manganese ore- Justice M B Shah Committee report- Implications of retrospective amendment to Foreign Contribution Regulation Act, 2010 and political donations.pdf 215K Delhi HC FCRA Order.pdf 412K