Case3:08-cv MHP Document63 Filed12/15/10 Page1 of 5

Similar documents
Case 1:09-cv JLK Document 80-1 Filed 02/15/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 3:15-cv MMC Document 32 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:16-cv EGS Document 21 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:04-cv RWR Document 27-2 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 1:12-cv JDB Document 25-2 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 05-CV-274-HA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:10-cv JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement ) is entered into among

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. 1. This Settlement Agreement is entered into this 23d day. of December, 1998 (hereinafter the Effective Date ) among

DISTRICT OF HAW AI'I. ) Civil No SOM-KJM ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:12-cv PJH Document82-1 Filed02/20/14 Page1 of 11

Case 2:10-cv TSZ Document 174 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 14 THE HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY

Case 2:10-cv JCZ-JCW Document 87 Filed 02/01/12 Page 1 of 3

. ~ ;.,~ ENVIROTIM]ENTAL DEFENSE CENTER, Plaintiff, No. 2:14-cv PSG-FFMx. BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONIN~NTAL ENFORCEMENT, et al.

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 47-1 Filed 08/31/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WHEREAS, Portland General Electric Company ( PGE ) is an Oregon corporation;

Case 1:12-cv RLW Document 48 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 6:15-cv JR Document 72 Filed 10/28/16 Page 1 of 16

Attorneys for Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PRESCOTT DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv TSC Document 9 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv EJL Document 39 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 4 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv MCE-DAD Document 11 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:09-cv JW Document77-1 Filed07/03/12 Page1 of 20 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case GMB Doc 207 Filed 12/21/13 Entered 12/21/13 14:45:36 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION. Case 2:15-cv MCE-DB Document 46 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Prescott Division

) Case 3:05-cv MEJ Document 21-2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case3:12-cv WHA Document59 Filed05/31/13 Page1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. ) MASTER FILE: No. C-OO-4S99-TEH ) Plaintiffs, ) AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF ) UNDERSTANDING vs.

stipulated that each of the above parties shall bear its own costs and fees.

Case 1:12-cv RBW Document 44-1 Filed 01/29/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:02-cv JR Document 78 Filed 01/29/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward Peruta, et al,, Case No

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:17-cv SU Document 52 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. CV DWM

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 8 Filed 07/11/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:12-cv CKK Document 12 Filed 06/21/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UN-ll~U STATES DISTRICf COURT FOR me DISTRICf OF WYOMING ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between: 1) Sierra Club; and 2)

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians filed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the Zoning map.

Case 3:17-cv WHO Document 51 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:13-cv JFW-VBK Document 57 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1030 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:13-cv JCJ Document 23-1 Filed 05/06/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. CASE NO. 4:08-cv RH-WCS

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AN AUTHORITIES

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:03-cv WBS-KJM Document 10 Filed 05/18/2004 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 16 Filed 09/28/16 Page 1 of 2

Case 4:17-cv HSG Document 180 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 3

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW

Case 3:07-cv SI Document 25 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 116 Filed 08/07/17 Page 1 of 24

Case 1:16-cv WHP Document 4-1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 10 NO. 1:16-CV-6544

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv RH-WCS Document 90 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

March 13, 2017 ORDER. Background

CUSHMAN PROJECT FERC Project No Settlement Agreement for the Cushman Project

Case 1:11-cv BJR Document 72 Filed 07/05/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 3:14-cv JAM Document 80-2 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:12-cv WWE Document 44 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Case3:14-cv RS Document66 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv Document 59-1 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 819

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petition for Review

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv RHS-WDS Document 5 Filed 11/10/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

Supreme Court of the United States

Case 1:13-cv MMS Document 393 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JOINT MOTION TO ADOPT QUICK PEEK ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ----oo0oo----

Transcription:

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed//0 Page of 0 0 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General ALISON D. GARNER (DC Bar No. KATHRYN M. LIBERATORE (NY Bar No. 0 Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section 0 D Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 000 Telephone: (0 - Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 0-00 alison.garner@usdoj.gov kathryn.liberatore@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER The Parties to these actions, Plaintiffs, California Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the People of the State of California, ex rel. California STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed//0 Page of 0 0 Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. (collectively, the State Plaintiffs, the Center for Biological Diversity, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, California Wilderness Coalition, The Wilderness Society, and Sierra Club (collectively, the Environmental Plaintiffs ; Defendants, the United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, acting in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, the United States Forest Service, Tom Tidwell, acting in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and Randy Moore, acting in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Pacific Southwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service (collectively, the Forest Service ; and Intervenor- Defendants, the Blue Ribbon Coalition, California Association of -Wheel Drive Clubs, California Enduro Riders Association, and American Motorcyclist Association D, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby aver as follows: WHEREAS, On February, 00, the State Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, pursuant to the National Forest Management Act ( NFMA, U.S.C. 0, the National Environmental Policy Act ( NEPA, U.S.C., et seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act ( APA, U.S.C. et seq., challenging the Forest Service s decision to adopt revised forest plans for the San Bernardino, Los Padres, Cleveland, and Angeles National Forests ( four forests. WHEREAS, On August, 00, the Environmental Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, pursuant to the NFMA, NEPA, and the APA, challenging the same decision by the Forest Service to adopt revised forest plans for the four forests challenged by the State Plaintiffs, and also alleging a claim for attorneys fees and costs. WHEREAS, On September, 00, the Court entered judgment, granting in part and denying in part the parties motions for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 0. The Court held that the Forest Service s final Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS for the revised forest plans violated NEPA and the NFMA. The Court ordered the parties to submit, by November, 00, simultaneous briefs proposing the appropriate forms of relief to remedy the violations of law found by the Court. The parties subsequently entered into settlement discussions to resolve remedy. The parties requested, and the Court granted, eight stipulated requests to stay the schedule for briefing of the STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed//0 Page of relief issue. On December, 00, the parties finalized a settlement agreement ( Agreement determining the forms of relief and providing for payment of Environmental Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs. The Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 0 Accordingly, the parties do hereby stipulate as follows:. The Agreement resolves all the State and Environmental Plaintiffs claims against the Forest Service in these cases. The Agreement becomes effective upon an order of this Court dismissing the State and Environmental Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to oversee compliance with the Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., U.S. (. 0 Dated: December, 00 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General s/alison D. Garner ALISON D. GARNER KATHRYN M. LIBERATORE Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 00-0 Telephone: (0 - Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 0-00 alison.garner@usdoj.gov kathryn.liberatore@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Thomas J. Vilsack, acting in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, Tom Tidwell, acting in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and Randy Moore, acting in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Pacific Southwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service s/erin M. Tobin (authorized Erin M. Tobin Trent W. Orr Earthjustice th Street, th Floor STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed//0 Page of 0 0 Oakland, CA Tel.: (0 0- Fax: (0 0- etobin@earthjustice.org torr@earthjustice.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, California Wilderness Coalition, The Wilderness Society, and Sierra Club s/brian Hembacher (authorized Brian Hembacher Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General s Office 00 South Spring Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel.: -- Fax: --0 Brian.Hembacher@doj.ca.gov Attorney for People of the State of California, ex rel. California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. s/peter Southworth (authorized Peter Southworth Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General s Office Land Law Section 00 I Street, th Floor Sacramento, CA Tel.: ( Fax: ( Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov Attorney for California Natural Resources Agency and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection s/paul A. Turcke (authorized Paul A. Turcke Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke, Chartered 0 West Bannock, Suite 0 Boise, Idaho 0 Tel.: 0--0 Fax: 0--0 pat@msbtlaw.com Attorney for Intervenors Blue Ribbon Coalition, California Association of -Wheel Drive Clubs, California Enduro Riders Association and American Motorcyclist Association D STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed//0 Page of [PROPOSED] ORDER The above-captioned cases are dismissed with prejudice, except that the Court retains jurisdiction over these matters to oversee compliance with the Agreement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., U.S. (. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: 0 MARILYN HALL PATEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 0 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case Nos. 0-0-MHP & 0-0-MHP

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of EXHIBIT A

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY, et al., v. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., v. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. Case Nos. 0-0-MHP and 0-0-MHP SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Judge Marilyn H. Patel The Parties to these actions, Plaintiffs, the People of the State of California, ex rel. California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr., California Natural Resources Agency, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, (collectively, the State Plaintiffs, the Center for Biological Diversity, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, California Wilderness Coalition, The Wilderness Society, and Sierra Club (collectively, the Environmental Plaintiffs ; Defendants, the United States Department of Agriculture, Thomas J. Vilsack, acting in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, the United States Forest Service, Tom Tidwell, acting in his official capacity as

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and Randy Moore, acting in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Pacific Southwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service (collectively the Forest Service ; and Intervenor-Defendants, the Blue Ribbon Coalition, California Association of - Wheel Drive Clubs, California Enduro Riders Association, and American Motorcyclist Association D, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree to the following Settlement Agreement in order to resolve these actions informally, solely as a compromise, and to avoid the need for further litigation before the Court:. The Forest Service will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ( SEIS that re-examines forest plan management direction with regard to Inventoried Roadless Areas ( IRAs within the Angeles, Cleveland, Los Padres and San Bernardino National Forests (collectively, four forests and analyzes alternative monitoring protocols. The SEIS will include a description of the Forest Service s efforts to coordinate with the State Plaintiffs regarding the State s policies for management of roadless areas. At the request of the Environmental Plaintiffs and the People of the State of California, the Forest Service will consider, at a minimum, the areas listed in Attachment A, or portions thereof, for potential re-zoning to the Recommended Wilderness ( RW or Back Country Non-Motorized ( BCNM land use zones and the SEIS will include as a component of the proposed action, a proposal to rezone these areas, or portions thereof, to the RW or BCNM land use zones. Additional alternatives will also be considered as part of the NEPA process. The Forest Service will use best For purposes of this Agreement, the term inventoried roadless areas means those areas identified in the set of inventoried roadless area maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area, Conservation, Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume Two, dated November 000.

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 efforts to complete the SEIS and issue a Record of Decision within twenty-four months of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement.. The Forest Service will provide Plaintiffs with a current inventory of National Forest System roads and trails and unauthorized routes within IRAs on the four forests within two weeks of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement.. The Parties will engage in a collaborative process, to meet and exchange information, as follows: a. The Parties will use best efforts to review information regarding the road and trail inventory provided pursuant to Paragraph above, as well as decommissioning and restoration efforts in IRAs that have taken place on the four forests since issuance of the revised forest plans, within two months of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement; b. The Parties will use best efforts to develop criteria for prioritizing road and trail decommissioning and/or restoration projects in IRAs within five months of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement; c. The Parties will use best efforts to identify a list of priority roads and trails for decommissioning and/or restoration projects in IRAs within seven months of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement.. The Forest Service will use best efforts to identify and apply for existing sources of funding, including but not limited to Legacy Roads and Trails funds, for priority decommissioning and restoration projects in the four forests, assuming these funds continue to be available. If funding is secured, the Forest Service will use best efforts to make reasonable progress toward implementing the restoration and/or decommissioning

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 projects identified pursuant to Paragraph c above, after complying with NEPA procedures, as applicable. The Parties agree that the Forest Service is not required to seek appropriations for the projects identified in Paragraph.. Between the date of this Settlement Agreement and the issuance of an SEIS and Record of Decision, the Forest Service will: a. Complete annual monitoring and evaluation reports as required by Part of Appendix C of the revised forest plans, and make such reports available to the public by October of the following year, except that the 00 report will be made available within two months of the effective date of the Settlement Agreement; b. Modify Schedules of Proposed Action (SOPAs for the four forests to indicate whether projects are proposed within IRAs and provide the names of the affected IRA(s in the SOPAs; c. Not approve activities in IRAs in the four forests that impair the wilderness values of those areas and limit the Forest Service s ability to recommend those areas for wilderness designation, except for: ( activities needed to protect public health, safety, and property in cases of imminent threat; ( activities required by law to be approved; ( activities needed to manage or realign existing National Forest System roads; or ( fuels reduction activities when necessary to reduce the risk of uncharacteristic fires and protect communities as long as the project does not involve road construction or reconstruction. Any roads constructed pursuant to one of the above exceptions shall be decommissioned as quickly as feasible when no longer needed. All activities within IRAs in the four forests must proceed in

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 compliance with all laws, regulations, and any other applicable legal requirements.. The Forest Service will pay the Environmental Plaintiffs $0,000 in full and complete satisfaction of any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ( EAJA, U.S.C. (d, and/or any other statute and/or common law theory, for all attorneys fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff, individually and/or severally, in this litigation. As used in Paragraphs -, Environmental Plaintiffs is defined to include: Center for Biological Diversity, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, California Wilderness Coalition, and The Wilderness Society. The Parties agree that Sierra Club, the People of the State of California, the California Natural Resources Agency, and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection are not requesting attorney s fees or costs.. The Forest Service s payment, as identified in Paragraph above, shall be accomplished by electronic funds transfer to Earthjustice. Environmental Plaintiffs attorneys shall provide the appropriate account number and other information needed to facilitate payment to the undersigned counsel. Defendants shall submit the paperwork for the payment within twenty (0 business days after the stipulation of dismissal is entered by the Court or Environmental Plaintiffs provide the necessary information as required to facilitate the payment, whichever is later. Environmental Plaintiffs attorneys shall notify the Defendants attorneys when payment is received.. The Environmental Plaintiffs agree that receipt of the full amount specified in Paragraph, above, from the Forest Service to Environmental Plaintiffs attorneys shall operate as a

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 release of any and all claims for attorneys fees and costs that Environmental Plaintiffs may seek to pursue in this litigation.. The Environmental Plaintiffs attorneys are receiving funds in trust for Environmental Plaintiffs, and Environmental Plaintiffs and their attorneys agree to hold harmless Defendant in any litigation, further suit, or claim arising from the deposit of the agreedupon $0,000 settlement amount into the Client Trust Account identified in Paragraph. 0. The Parties agree that they will submit the accompanying stipulation of dismissal and proposed order dismissing these cases with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., provided that the Court shall retain jurisdiction as specified in Paragraph. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., U.S. (. If the Court does not enter the Settlement Agreement, it is voidable by any party.. The Parties agree that the Court should retain jurisdiction over these matters solely to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement. In the event of a disagreement between the parties concerning any aspect of this Settlement Agreement, the dissatisfied Party shall provide the other Party with written notice of the dispute and a request for negotiations. The Parties shall meet and confer in order to attempt to resolve the dispute within 0 days of the written notice, or such time thereafter as is mutually agreed. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute within 0 days of such meeting, then either Party may file a motion to enforce the terms of the Agreement. Any challenge by Plaintiffs to the validity or sufficiency of the SEIS completed pursuant to Paragraph above, including any challenge to the Forest Service s compliance with the provisions of Paragraph concerning matters to be addressed in the SEIS, shall be made only upon completion of the SEIS and Plaintiffs exhaustion of any and all available administrative

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 appeal opportunities. For cases brought pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, U.S.C. 0-0, the Court s review will be conducted only to the extent allowed by, and pursuant to, the judicial review provisions of the APA. The Parties agree that contempt of court is not an available remedy for any violation of this Agreement, and the Parties therefore knowingly waive any right that they might have to seek an order of contempt for any such violation.. This Agreement is the result of compromise and settlement and does not represent an admission by any Party to any fact, claim, or defense in any issue in this lawsuit. This Agreement has no precedential value and shall not be cited in any other litigation except as necessary to enforce the terms of the Agreement.. No provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted as or constitute a commitment or requirement that Defendants obligate or pay funds in violation of the Anti-Deficiency Act, U.S.C., or any other applicable appropriations law.. Nothing in the terms of this Agreement shall be construed to limit or deny the power of a federal official to promulgate or amend regulations.. The undersigned representatives of the Parties certify that they are fully authorized by the respective Parties whom they represent to enter into the terms and conditions of this and to legally bind such Parties to it.. This Agreement represents the entirety of the Parties commitments with regard to settlement. The terms of this Agreement shall become effective upon entry by the Court of the accompanying order of dismissal.

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 Attachment A Antimony Barker Valley Black Mountain Cactus Springs B Caliente Cedar Creek Coldwater Cucamonga B Cucamonga C Cuyama Diablo Dry Lakes Eagle Peak Fish Canyon Fox Mountain Garcia Mountain Juncal Ladd Machesna Mountain Malduce Buckhorn No Name Pyramid Peak A Quatal Raywood Flat B Red Mountain Salt Creek Sawmill Badlands Sespe Frazier Sill Hill Spoor Canyon Tequepis Trabuco Tule Upper San Diego River Gorge White Ledge West Fork Westfork Cedar Creek and Upper San Diego River Gorge are areas the public has proposed for wilderness designation recommendation and were analyzed for potential wilderness designation recommendations in the Final EIS supporting the revised forest plans. All other areas listed in Attachment A are IRAs.

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page0 of 0 0 Dated: December, 00 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General /s/alison D. Garner ALISON D. GARNER KATHRYN M. LIBERATORE Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 00-0 Telephone: (0 - Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 0-00 alison.garner@usdoj.gov kathryn.liberatore@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Thomas J. Vilsack, acting in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Agriculture, Tom Tidwell, acting in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and Randy Moore, acting in his official capacity as Regional Forester for the Pacific Southwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service /s/erin M. Tobin Erin M. Tobin Trent W. Orr Earthjustice th Street, th Floor Oakland, CA Tel.: (0 0- Fax: (0 0- etobin@earthjustice.org torr@earthjustice.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Los Padres ForestWatch, California Native Plant Society, Defenders of Wildlife, California Wilderness Coalition, The Wilderness Society, and Sierra Club /s/brian Hembacher Brian Hembacher Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General s Office 00 South Spring Street, Suite 0

Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document- Filed//0 Page of 0 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel.: -- Fax: --0 Brian.Hembacher@doj.ca.gov Attorney for People of the State of California, ex rel. California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. /s/peter Southworth Peter Southworth Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General s Office Land Law Section 00 I Street, th Floor Sacramento, CA Tel.: ( Fax: ( Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov Attorney for California Natural Resources Agency and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection /s/paul A. Turcke Paul A. Turcke Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke, Chartered 0 West Bannock, Suite 0 Boise, Idaho 0 Tel.: 0--0 Fax: 0--0 pat@msbtlaw.com Attorney for Intervenors Blue Ribbon Coalition, California Association of -Wheel Drive Clubs, California Enduro Riders Association and American Motorcyclist Association D 0