Case 4:11-cv SBA Document 93 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 5

Similar documents
Case3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:09-cv CW Document 579 Filed 06/01/16 Page 1 of 5

Case 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:13-cv WHO Document 90 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 5

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1210 Filed06/20/12 Page1 of 6

Case3:12-cv VC Document77 Filed06/25/15 Page1 of 5

Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case3:12-cv VC Document46 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case4:11-cv PJH Document65 Filed08/31/12 Page1 of 8

CASE NO. 16-CV RS

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

Case 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5

Attorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 90 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 10

Case4:13-cv JSW Document122 Filed10/31/14 Page1 of 4

Case5:08-cv PSG Document519 Filed08/22/13 Page1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv SBA Document 180 Filed 03/03/2009 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No TODD S. GLASSEY AND MICHAEL E. MCNEIL,

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv SV Document13 FUec101/22/14 Pagel of 7

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case3:08-cv VRW Document33 Filed07/13/09 Page1 of 5

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT AIR FRANCE-KLM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 4141(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Case 3:16-cv JD Document Filed 05/22/18 Page 2 of 19

Case3:10-cv WHA Document1105 Filed05/08/12 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 276 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case4:07-cv PJH Document728-1 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 5

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15-cv JD

Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 160 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case4:07-cv PJH Document1062 Filed04/20/11 Page1 of 5

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 798 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 7

Case4:11-cv YGR Document22 Filed02/16/12 Page1 of 5

Post-Grant Proceedings in the USPTO

Case4:09-cv CW Document42 FUedi 0/07/09 Pagel of 9

-,ase 486-CW Document 1681 Filed 10/21/2007 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ORACLE USA, INC., et al.,

Case 4:02-cv Document 661 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 6

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cv-05017

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case 1:17-cv GBD Document 60 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 4 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Case 3:18-cv RS Document 30 Filed 06/18/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 3:06-cv VRW Document 16 Filed 03/31/2006 Page 1 of 6

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Courthouse News Service

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DOTCONNECTAFRICA TRUST,

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:14-cv L-NLS Document 60 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3

Case4:10-cv CW Document205 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 6

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case5:11-cv LHK Document Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:18-cv CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 170 Filed 03/22/13 Page 1 of 8

Case 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

Case3:12-cv VC Document88 Filed06/09/15 Page1 of 2

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs,

Attorneys for Plaintiff Regina Bozic, the Proposed Classes, and the Appeals Class (See FRAP 3(c)(3))

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Case 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6

Case4:08-cv JSW Document280 Filed09/18/14 Page1 of 12

Case 1:06-cv CKK Document 31 Filed 05/18/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

U.S. District Court California Northern District (Oakland) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 4:12-cv SBA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 795 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:13-md YGR Document Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 28 EXHIBIT 9

Case3:15-cv VC Document25 Filed06/19/15 Page1 of 8

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv BLF Document 163 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION

Case3:13-cv CRB Document25 Filed08/15/13 Page1 of 5

Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against

Case 3:16-md VC Document 419 Filed 08/03/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Paper No. Filed December 1, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

Case 3:12-cv VC Document 119 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 13 (Counsel listed on signature page)

Case 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

Case :-cv-0-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN ) BWilson@mofo.com DIEK VAN NORT (CA SBN ) DVanNort@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 0-0 Telephone: 0..00 Facsimile: 0..0 SONICS, INC. ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS LISTED ON NEXT PAGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SONICS, INC., Case No. :-CV-0-SBA Plaintiff, v. ARTERIS, INC., et al. Ctrm: Judge:, th Floor Saundra Brown Armstrong Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 0 CASE NO. :-CV-0-SBA pa-

Case :-cv-0-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 MARK D. FOWLER (Bar No. ) mark.fowler@dlapiper.com CHRISTINE K. CORBETT (Bar. No. 0) christine.corbett@dlapiper.com 000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 0- Tel: (0) -000 Fax: (0) -00 GERALD T. SEKIMURA (Bar No. ) gerald.sekimura@dlapiper.com Mission Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Tel: () -00 Fax: () -0 KEVIN C. HAMILTON kevin.hamilton@dlapiper.com 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel: () -00 Fax: () -0 Defendants ARTERIS, INC., ARTERIS S.A.S., and ARTERIS HOLDINGS, INC. 0 CASE NO. :-CV-0-SBA pa-

Case :-cv-0-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Pursuant to the terms of the Order Granting Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination (Dkt. No. ), Plaintiff Sonics, Inc. ( Sonics ) and Defendants, Arteris, Inc., Arteris S.A.S., and Arteris Holdings, Inc. (collectively, Arteris ) hereby provide the Court with the following joint status update. I. STATUS OF THE LITIGATION Pursuant to the Court s Order dated February, 0 (Dkt. No. ), this case has been stayed pending reexamination of the patents at issue. II. STATUS OF THE REEXAMINATION PROCEEDINGS Sonics has asserted seven patents-in-suit related to network-on-chip technology against Arteris. Defendant Arteris, Inc. filed requests for reexamination of each of the Sonics patents-insuit. The status of the reexamination proceedings is summarized in the following table. 0 Patent No. (Reexam. No.),, (0/00,),, (/000,),, (/000,),, (/000,) Claim Status - - Confirmed: -, -0, - Reexam. Status Request for ex parte reexamination of claims - was denied May, 0. The PTAB has confirmed the rejection of claims -0 and -. A reexamination certificate canceling claims -0 and - has been issued. -0 The PTAB has confirmed the rejection of claims 0- and,, and - and 0- added a new ground of rejection for amended claims - and -0. Sonics amended claims - and -0. Sonics and Arteris have fully briefed the PTAB about the issues and are awaiting a decision from the PTAB. A reexamination certificate canceling claims - and 0- has been issued. CASE NO. :-CV-0-SBA pa-

Case :-cv-0-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Patent No. (Reexam. No.),, (/000,),, (/000,),, (/000,0) Claim Status -, -, -, -,, -, and,,,, 0,,,, 0,,, -, and,,,, and Confirmed:, -0,,, and (as issued);, 0-, and (new or as amended) 0-,,,, and - -,,, and Reexam. Status The PTAB has confirmed the rejections of claims,,,, 0,,,, and 0. The PTAB also added a new ground of rejection for claim. Sonics amended claim. Sonics and Arteris have fully briefed the PTAB about the issues and are awaiting a decision from the PTAB. The PTAB affirmed the Examiner s claim rejections and confirmations. The PTAB denied Arteris request for rehearing. Neither party appealed to the Federal Circuit. The PTAB rejected claims -,,, and based on new grounds. Sonics amended claims -,,, and. Sonics and Arteris have fully briefed the PTAB about the issues and are awaiting a decision from the PTAB. 0 CASE NO. :-CV-0-SBA pa-

Case :-cv-0-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Dated: August, 0 Dated: August, 0 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Bryan Wilson BRYAN WILSON SONICS, INC. By: /s/ Christine Corbett CHRISTINE CORBETT ARTERIS, INC., ARTERIS S.A.S., AND ARTERIS HOLDINGS, INC. I, Bryan Wilson, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this. In compliance with Civil L.R. -(i)(), I hereby attest that Christine Corbett has concurred in this filing. Dated: August, 0 By: /s/ Bryan Wilson BRYAN WILSON 0 CASE NO. :-CV-0-SBA pa-