SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2016 MINUTES 15:15 16:45 LOCAL IN-PERSON MEETING. MEETING IPC Public Meeting, Part 1 CHAIR FOR MEETING MINUTES TAKEN BY

Similar documents
The Governmental Advisory Committee

Agenda. New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Avri Doria and Jeff Neuman. Introduction and Timeline Eleeza Agopian

11:00 Los Angeles; 14:00 Washington; 19:00 London; 23:00 Islamabad; (Thursday 28 June) 03:00 Tokyo; 04:00 Hobart

Submission of Adopted GNSO Council Review of the Johannesburg GAC Communiqué

Insert title here (75 characters maximum) PRE-ICANN60 POLICY OPEN HOUSE

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

DRAFT WORKING GROUP CHARTER

Welcome to Pre-ICANN62 Policy Webinar PRE-ICANN63 POLICY OPEN HOUSE 11 OCTOBER 2018

21 December GNSO Council Review of the Hyderabad GAC Communiqué. From: James Bladel, GNSO Chair To: Steve Crocker, ICANN Board

New gtld Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Face-to- Face Session (Work Track 5) ICANN60 1 November 2017

Final Issue Report on IGO-INGO Access to the UDRP & URS Date: 25 May 2014

The ICANN GNSO Business Constituency

The ICANN GNSO Business Constituency

Transcription ICANN Dublin Wednesday 21 October 2015 GNSO Public Council Meeting Part 2

Working Group Charter

Role of Governments in Internet Governance. MEAC-SIG Cairo 2018

Attendance list is available at:

ICANN Policy Update - Dakar

Joint SO/AC Working Group (WG) Charter

GAC Communiqué Buenos Aires, Argentina

ccnso Council Telephone Conference 11 December 2014

Issues Report IDN ccpdp 02 April Bart Boswinkel Issue Manager

26 th Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference

Background to and Status of Work on Protections for Names and Acronyms of the Red Cross movement and International Governmental Organizations (IGOs)

GNSO Report. Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council ICANN Board Public Forum Marrakech, June 28, 2006

Agenda and resolutions ccnso Council Meeting 18 January 2018

GNSO Working Session on the CWG Rec6 Report. Margie Milam 4 December 2010

GNSO Council Open Mee0ng 7 December 2010

For GNSO Consideration: Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) October 2009

The new gtlds - rights protection mechanisms

Standing Selection Mailing list archives: Committee Mailing List:

IGO/INGO Identifiers Protection Policy Implementation. Meeting with the IRT ICANN October 2015

Amended Charter of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) Date of Adoption from ccnso and GNSO Councils: 27 June 2018 version 2

Exploring the Public Interest within ICANN s Remit. High Interest Session ICANN55 7 March 2016

ccnso Council Meeting Los Angeles 15 October 2014

Council Telephone Conference 11 th December 2008

.HEALTH STARTUP PLAN Version 1.0

Proposed Next Steps Readiness for post-transition Bylaws 15 May 2018

Background on ICANN s Role Concerning the UDRP & Courts. Tim Cole Chief Registrar Liaison ICANN

Final GNSO Issue Report on the Protection of International Organization Names in New gtlds

ccnso Council Telephone Conference 12 June 2012

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy VERSION 1.0

Dominion Registries - Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Annex to NGPC Resolution NG01. NGPC Scorecard of 1As Regarding Non- Safeguard Advice in the GAC Beijing Communiqué

The Who, What, Why, How and When of the Rejection Action Process

ccnso Council Call 16 th September 2008

FRL Registry BV. Terms & Conditions for the registration and usage of.frl domain names

[.onl] Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

.FARMERS DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

GNSO WHOIS Survey Drafting Team (WSDT) Charter

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

Revised ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law

the domain name is not identical to the mark on which the registrant based its Sunrise registration; (2)

NCUC Africa Regional Webinar:

.VIG DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

.NIKE DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

FISH, VIA . ft. com. May 11, John O. Jeffrey General Counsel & Secretary ICANN Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094

.XN--MGBCA7DZDO SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

ccnso Council Meeting Marrakech 9 March 2016

Top Level Design LLC January 22, 2015

TRADEMARK CLEARINGHOUSE

Preliminary GNSO Issue Report on The Current State of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy

.BOOKING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

.BOSTIK DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION POLICIES

Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy

(a) A number of Constituencies, where applicable, organized within the Stakeholder Groups as described in Section 11.5;

Summary of Changes to New gtld Registry Agreement. (Proposed Draft 5 February 2013)

Introducing ICANN s Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)


ccnso Council Meeting Beijing 10 April 2013

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

ccnso Council Meeting Costa Rica 14 March 2012

.CREDITUNION SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

Summary of Changes to Base Agreement for New gtlds Draft for Discussion

TRADEMARK POST-DELEGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (TRADEMARK PDDRP) 4 JUNE 2012

From: Rafik Dammak Date: Friday, October 19, 2018 To: Cherine Chalaby Subject: NCSG Comment on UAM

At-Large Advisory Committee Statement.

The Future of Internet Governance: Should the United States Relinquish Its Authority Over ICANN?

SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY

The Future of Internet Governance: Should the U.S. Relinquish Its Authority Over ICANN?

.Brand TLD Designation Application

August The Board looks forward to the community discussion of this report.

ANNEX 1: Registry Reserved Names. Capitalized terms have the meaning as specified in Article 1 of the.vistaprint Domain Name Registration Policies.

The Future of Internet Governance: Should the United States Relinquish Its Authority over ICANN?

Sunrise and DPML Dispute Resolution Policy

ICANN Transcript GNSO Standing Committee for Improvements Implementation (SCI) Saturday, 05 March 2016

The Future of Internet Governance: Should the U.S. Relinquish Its Authority Over ICANN?

APPROVED 08/17/2017 Georgia Connections Academy (GACA) MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNUAL MEETING Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.

The Future of Internet Governance: Should the United States Relinquish Its Authority over ICANN?

Summary of Changes to Registry Agreement for New gtlds. (Proposed Final version against v.4)

Workshop on the Current State of the UDRP

INDEPENDENT REVIEW PROCESS INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PARALEGAL EDUCATION

MEMORANDUM. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Thomas Nygren and Pontus Stenbeck, Hamilton Advokatbyrå

. 淡马锡 REGISTRATION POLICIES

Attachment 3..Brand TLD Designation Application

ccnso Council Meeting San Francisco 16 March 2011

NGPC Agenda 28 September 2013

ccnso Council Meeting Dublin 21 October 2015

REGISTRY RESTRICTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE (RRDRP) 1 19 SEPTEMBER 2011

Transcription:

CHAIR FOR MEETING TAKEN BY Greg Shatan, IPC President Chantelle Doerksen, IPC Secretariat / Approved by Kiran Malancharuvil, IPC Secretary Agenda Items 1. Welcome and Roll Call 2. Introductions; Announcement of New Officers 3. Report from Council/Review of Motions 4. Reports from the Working Groups and Review Teams Review of All RPMS in All gtlds WG Next Gen RDS WG New gtld Subsequent Procedures WG CCT Review CWG on Country/Territory Names as TLDs IGO-INGO Access to Curative RPMs WG Accountability WS2 Subgroups 5. Discussion of IPC Policy Positions and Public Comments 6. TMCH Independent Review 7. All Other Business 8. Adjourn

1. Welcome & Roll Call Greg Shatan Greg opened the meeting by welcoming IPC members and Guests. Everyone was requested to state their name before the opening of the meeting. 2. Introductions; Announcement of New Officers Greg announced the new list of IPC Officers for 2017: IPC President Greg Shatan Vice President Vicky Sheckler Treasurer Lori Schulman Secretary Kiran Malancharuvil Greg acknowledged Steve s Metalitz years of service to the IPC, and thanked him for his dedication and hard work. Greg also thanked Fabricio Vayra for his work a Secretary during the year. Greg also announced that the IPC bylaws review will commence following the IPC meeting. Greg also acknowledged the ongoing efforts of the fellowship alumni, Dusan Popovic and Charné LeRoux, to increase the engagement of the IPC within the ICANN Fellowship Program. It is important for the IPC to continue expanding its regional and gender diversity. 3. Report from Council/Review of Motions - Heather Forrest & Paul McGrady Heather Forrest and Paul McGrady reviewed the upcoming GNSO Council agenda and highlighted the following items: Consent agenda: 3.1 & 3.2 GAC GNSO Consultation Group on the GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Processes and the final status report and recommendations. Heather noted that these were discussed in detail during the GNSO GAC meeting that took place on Saturday, 6 November. Motions: GNSO Liaison to the GAC Carlos Raul Gutierrez will replace Mason Cole in the role. GNSO Bylaws Drafting Team this is the adoption of the consensus recommendations, and the most contentious of all the items put forth for tomorrow s agenda. The source of contention is the Drafting Team s report and the subsequent minority report. GNSO and the Chartering Organization for the CCWG on Internet Governance The ccnso is reluctant from removing itself as a chartering organization, and the discussion is focused on redrafting this motion. It will be discussed more during the informal Council session later today. Greg noted that there was most likely a realization that while the CCG IG is productive, not many people know about it, and therefore, there needs to be more emphasis on output and deliverables. Heather noted that the case for the motion may have been achieved, as it set out to do what was intended prior to the vote. 2

CCWG on New gtld Auction Proceeds Heather noted that the GNSO is one of the last SOACs to vote on this motion because of the meetings schedule. All other groups have supported it. No concerns for this have been expressed by the IPC. Heather ended the discussion regarding the council update. Steve Metalitz, IPC Vice President, reminded all to explain the acronyms as there are many newcomers in this meeting and it would make the discussion easier to follow. 9. Reports from the Working Groups and Review Teams Greg opened the discussion on Working Groups and Review Teams, encouraging IPC members to consider joining and that it is never too late to participate. Review of All RPMS in All gtlds WG Greg Shatan presented on the WG as one of the members. Currently, the group is working through -- in two phases Phase 2 being the UDRP, which is domain arbitration system, and the PDDRP which is that postdelegation dispute resolution procedure for dealing with complaints about registries that may be essentially operating infringement machines. Next Gen RDS WG Steve Metalitz, IPC Vice President, provided an update. He reminded the group that this group refers to what comes after Whois and has been active over the past six to eight months. This group is focused on a very complex task because it builds on several prior reports, notably a very detailed report from an expert working group on Whois. Further, it is looking at a wide range of issues about how the existing system ought to be either reformed or perhaps jettisoned in favor of a new system. A methodology has been developed for starting to debate or discuss the possible requirements and for deciding which ones should be requirements and which ones should be tossed aside or modified. Deliberations began for the first time on the actual possible requirements when the group met in Hyderabad on Thursday, 3 November. They covered two of them out of the 600 or 700 in the first tranche, and are working on Number 3. New gtld Subsequent Procedures WG Jeff Neuman, IPC member, is one of the co-chairs of this Working Group (WG). This WG is charged with reviewing the 2012 round for introducing new gtlds and then proposing any revisions to policy and implementation for subsequent application windows. Jeff noted that they should not be called rounds since that is one of the issues being discussed. They completed their first consultation, being the community consultation questionnaire. Jeff noted the IPC s response to the questionnaire and thanked the group. Going forward, the group is looking at overall process, applicant support. whether they should accredit or preapproved registry service providers or the backend service providers. CCT Review Greg Shatan encouraged IPC members to discuss this with Jonathan Zuck and David Taylor, who are actively involved with the CCT Review, including the internal IPC group. Steve Metalitz noted for new members and guests that the CTT is a review on the Competition and Consumer Choice and Trust, which is a review of the launch of the new gtlds over the past five years. 3

CWG on Country/Territory Names as TLDs Heather Forrest presented on the WG, as she is one of the co-chairs, and provided the following link to the group: https://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccwg-unct.htm. There is concern of multiple overlapping activities in this area, and stated that the purpose of this group was to establish whether or not it was possible to develop a uniform framework on the use of country and territory names as TLDs. IGO-INGO Access to Curative RPMs WG IPC Member Petter Rindforth is one of the co-chairs. Greg Shatan noted that this group highlighted the differences within groups at ICANN and this item should be revisited in the future. Accountability WS2 Subgroups Leon Sanchez, IPC Members, noted that most heated discussions are taking place in the jurisdiction working group and in the human rights working group. The aim for Work Stream 2 is to come to an end at the middle of the next year around June 2017. Paul McGrady provided an update on issues and concerns in jurisdiction and the human rights sub groups, noting that there were issues regarding ICANN s obligations to human rights under California law. 10. Discussion of IPC Policy Positions and Public Comments Kiran Malancharuvil Kiran Malancharuvil, Participation Coordinator, provided an update on the IPC s work on the following comments:.xxx Registry Agreement, and the Phase 2 Assessment of the Competitive Effects associated with the new gtld program, are two public comments being drafted by Brian Scarpelli and Claudio DiGangi. Kiran thanked both for their hard work and deepening their knowledge of ICANN policy. Draft PTI FY18 Operating Plan and Budget is being drafted by Lori Schulman, IPC Treasurer. ACTION: Two comments need volunteers: 1. GNSO Thick Whois, One Consensus Policy Requiring the Consistent Labeling and Display RDDS Output for all gtlds. 2. Proposed Implementation of GNSO Thick RDDS Whois Transition Policy for Com, Net and Jobs. Latin America and Caribbean DNS marketplace study Kiran thanked Brian Scarpelli and Hector Manoff for their comments. 11. AOB Document Pilot Production Program - Kiran Malancharuvil welcomed Angie Graves and Dan O Neill to the IPC meeting. Like the role of the Secretariat, Angie is participating in a pilot program sponsored by ICANN, and will be providing research support to assist in with policy coordination. 4

12. List of Participants Attendance: Aleksandar Icokaev, Alex Deacon, Angie Graves, Avekur Du, Brian Scarpelli, Chuck Gomer, Colin O'Brien, Damon Ashcraft, Dan O'Neill, Dana Northcott, Dipak Pamar, Greg Shatan, Griffin Barnett, Hector Manoff, June Okol, Keith Drazek, Linda Muller, Lori Schulman, Marie Milam, Mariya Malysheva, Martin Kuechenthal, Owen Smigelski, Patrick Charnley, Philippe Collin, Sara Bockey, Vicky Sheckler Adjourn Greg Shatan adjourned the meeting at 16:45 Local time. 5