CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM, AMRAVATI ZONE, AKOLA.

Similar documents
CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAl FORUM,

M/s. Heer Enterprises - Applicant

B - On behalf of Applicant 1) Shri.Pavati Rajkumar Nisad - Consumer Representative

CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM; NAGPUR (RURAL) COMPLAINT NO. 352/2011

CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM; NAGPUR (RURAL) COMPLAINT NO. 365/2012

ORDER (passed on 02/07/2015)

CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM; MSEDCL NAGPUR (RURAL) ZONE NAGPUR COMPLAINT NO.7 /2015

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Zone, Nagpur Case No.

Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Kalyan Zone Behind Tejashree", Jahangir Meherwanji Road, Kalyan (West) Ph: & Ext: - 122

Case No. CGRF(NZ)/91/2018

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/040/2009

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No.

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

The complaint dated regarding to give AG connection in dark zone scheme.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur Case No.

CASE No. 156 of In the matter of

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No.

Date of Admission : Date of Decision :

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM O R D E R

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: RSA No.55/2009 & CM No.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. s Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Nagpur Urban Zone, Nagpur. Case No.

Case No. CGRF(NUZ)/0122/2006. : Shri Vijaykumar Yashwantrao Falke, Plot No. 47, Verma Layout, Ambazari, Nagpur.

Case No. 2 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva

No:- CGRF/AZ/AUR/U/ 446 / 2013 /30 Date :-

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM M.S.E.D.C.L., PUNE ZONE, PUNE. Case No.07/2016 Date of Grievance : Date of Order :

MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Case No.06/2016 Date of Grievance : Date of Order :

MAHARASTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO. LtD. KONKAN ZONE RATNAGIRI CONSUMER GREVANCE REDRASSAL FORUM Consumer case No. 37/2009 Date: 08/04/2009

REGISTERED CONSUMERS GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM AT KASUMPTI SHIMLA-9 No. CGRF/Comp. No. 1453/1/17/005

Case No. 16 of 2007 Date: 19/12/2007. In the matter of Shri Sachin P. Sakpal V/S

The Gujarat Government Gazette

TRANSFER OF TELEPHONE CONNECTION TO THE LEGAL HEIRS AFTER THE DEATH OF THE ORIGINAL HIRER OF TELEPHONES

Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (Of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai)

Before The J&K State Electricity Regulatory Commission Jammu

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

CONSUMER GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL FORUM; MSEDCL NAGPUR (RURAL) ZONE NAGPUR COMPLAINT NO. 19/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI. Complaint No.CC/13/172

Shri P J Patel, Gandhinagar Independent Member Harsha S Chauhan, Vadodara Technical Member Smt M M Marathe, MGVCL

Case No. 111 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.

Case No.25/2016 Date of Grievance : Date of Order :

THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN SCHEME 2006 (including May 24, 2007 Amendments) NOTIFICATION. Ref.RPCD.BOS.No. 441 / / December 26, 2005

Government of West Bengal Backward Classes Welfare Department Writers Buildings, Kolkata Website:

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

No.MePDCL/D(D)/T-383(B)/ /6 Dated 6 th December 2016 OFFICE ORDER

IN THE MATTER OF GRIEVANCE NO. K/DOS/001/482 OF OF MRS.

Grievances No.K/DOS/015/874 of and No. K/DOS/016/875 of

V/s. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Through it s Nodal Officer/Addl.EE... (Hereinafter referred as Licensee)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION. W.P.(C) 1972/2011 and CMs 4189/2011, 4729/2011, 12216/2011

M/s. Neelsidhi Developers - Complainant The Emerald, 2 nd floor, Plot No. 195 B, Besides, Neelsidhi Towers, Sector -12, Vashi, Navi Mumbai

Case No. 99 of Smt. Chandra Iyengar, Chairperson Shri Vijay. L. Sonavane, Member Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member

No. 07/GEN/DOP Dated:

Rules made by the High Court under Article 227 of the. Constitution of India Relating to Appeals under Section

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

II (2013) CPJ 10A (NC) (CN) NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI Hon ble Mr. Justice V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member PARMOD KUMAR

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016

BOM/BSD 31/ August 2013 BANK OF MAURITIUS. Guidelines on Complaints Handling Procedures

Following documents are required to be submitted in the case original registrant died and claim to be transfer in the name of legal heir.

Appointment of Internal Ombudsman (IO) For Redressal of Customer Grievance

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION. Date of Judgment : R.S.A.No. 459/2006 & CM No /2006 (for stay)

The Gujarat Government Gazette

VENDOR AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT OF VENDOR is made at Chandigarh on this day of, 20 between:

BEFORE THE COMPLAINANT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. Representation No. N-G(S) dtd. 25/06/2012 V/S

CASE No. 44 of In the matter of

CONTENTS. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Preamble

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FEROZEPUR. C.C. No. 137 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE

Advocate Mahesh Adagale for the Opponents * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **

ORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH ORDER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2004

Shri P J Patel, Gandhinagar Independent Member Harsha S Chauhan, Vadodara Technical Member Medha M Marathe, MGVCL

IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION UNDER THE BYELAWS, RULES & REGULATIONS OF NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED (NSEIL)

Suo-Motu Petition No. 2/2018

FORM J. REQUEST LETTER FOR ISSUANCE OF DUPLICATE SHARE CERTIFICATE (Transmission of shares) From: (Name, Address & ID of Legal heir)

RESOLUTION OF THE MARYS LAKE LODGE COMBINED CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSN., INC. REGARDING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR COVENANT AND RULE ENFORCEMENT

Checklist for Incorporation of Company

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY MATTER. Date of Decision : January 16, 2007 W.P.(C) 344/2007

15/27, National Chambers, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad Tel.No ,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. AA No.396/2007. Date of decision: December 3, Vs.

BEFORE THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION. PETITION No. CP 02/17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTRACT ACT. Judgment reserved on : October 15, Judgment delivered on : November 04, 2008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2013 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007

BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)

W.P. (C) No of 2005

FROM: THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS. Sub: - Opposition No. AMD to application No in class 30

MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012)

Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Procedure for filing appeal before the Appellate Authority) Regulations, 2004

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005

Sri. Alex Soharab. V.F, M/s. Southern Engineering Corporation, V/830-A, Development Area, Edayar, Muppathadom , Aluva.

Guidelines for New Employees for submitting various documents (For CLERKs)

Transcription:

CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM, AMRAVATI ZONE, AKOLA. Vidyut Bhavan, Ratanlal Plots, Akola: 444 001 Tel.No.2434476 February 11, 2014. Complaint No.107/2013 In the matter of grievance in respect of not providing elec.connection Quorum : Shri T.M.Mantri, Chairman Shri A.S.Gade, Member Shri P.B.Pawar, Secretary Shrimati Lakhpatibai Nathulal Gupta,Yavatmal vs The Executive Engineer,MSEDCL, Yavatmal... Complainant Respondent Appearances: Complainant Representative: Shri D.M.Deshpande,Akola Respondent Representative: Shri S.J.Khangar,A.E. MSEDCL,Yavatmal.. 1. The complainants case in brief is that about 4 Hectres Ag. Field of the complainant has been acquired for Bembla Project and thereby complainant is project affected, hence entitled for benefits. Accordingly for availing irrigation facilities to field Survey No.43, the requested No objection Certificate of Bembla Project was submitted along-with all other necessary documents for electricity connection. In the application for connection it was specifically mentioned that the place from where the electric supply is to be made. The said application was granted by the N.A. and as per demand Rs.7650/- was deposited on 17/7/12 along-with test report. 1

2. It is alleged that inspite submitting application on 10/10/12 no supply has been provided and the complainant approached to IGRC wherein order has been passed for providing electric supply after making joint inspection as early as possible of 4/1/2013. Accordingly on 15/1/13 measurement was taken wherein the place of lifting irrigation is found to be at 96 feet. Inspite of all these, connection has not been provided inspite making all compliances and making of payment as per demand note, the connection is not provided, compelling the complainant to approach the Forum seeking reliefs provided for. Along-with complaint copies of documents annexed herewith. 3. As per regulations notice was given to N.A. for submitting reply to the complaint inspite availing the time the reply has not been filed and subsequently and belatedly the said reply has been filed, wherein the facts have not been disputed including making of payment of Rs.7650/- on 17/7/12. According to the N.A. the complainant has submitted no objection certificate of E.E. Bembla Project for S.No.43 whereas in fact the complainant wants electric connection from S.No.50 which is owned by E.E.Bembla Project. 4. It is further stated that as per spot inspection report the referred place is of S.No.50 whereas it is at about 800 feet from plot No.43. Further it is stated that the concerned transformer is meant for the Bembla Project and no LT line is pssing there from for providing electric connection. It is stated that the No Objection of concerned E.E.Bembla Project isrequired as the said transformer is istalled for the said project.the complainant is trying to misguide the Forum, the complainant is not entitled for relief and only to harass the N.A., the complaint has been filed, which needs to be rejected. 2

5 The matter was then posted for arguments. Heard complainants representative Lakhanlal Nathulal Gupta, the complainants son with Mr. D.M.Deshpande, the representative whose authority filed on record and Shri S.J.Khangar, A.E. the learned representative of the N.A. It is pertinent to note that on behalf of the complainant further submissions in writing came to be filed with copies of documents and the same have been furnished to the learned representative of the N.A. It is pertinent to note that complainant Smt. Lakhapatibai N.Gupta has expired during the pendency of the proceeding i.e. on 4.1.14 and the affidavit along-with relevant documents including heir- ship certificate came to be filed on record. It is pertinent to note that the application for electric connection (A-1 form) field S.No.43 is shown so also on Page No.2 in front of name of owner of the premises where supply is to be made is shown as E.E.Bembla Project, Maharashtra State Govt. is mentioned. All other relevant documents including that of certificate of Talathi is also filed on record showing that the transformer is at 96 feet away. Needless to mention here that the matte was taken under Right to Information Act and ultimately Commissioner RTI Amravati has given certain instructions, the complainant has filed on record, copy of letter dt. 19 th Dec.2011 of E.E. Yavatmal addressed to Commissioner RTI Amravati by forwarding copies thereof to the Information Officer and Appellate Authority specifically mentioned thereunder that both these authorities have been warned not to repeat such things in future. 6 The record clearly shows that the complainant has submitted certificate dt. 6/2/12 of the E.E. Bembla Project permitting the complainant for availing water for irrigation from the canal, copy of which was submitted to N.,A. and also annexed with the complaint. The record clearly shows that after 3

submission of application for connection sanctioned thereof the complainant has deposited Rs.7650/- as per demand note of N.A. of 17/7/12. The complainant has been asked to bring No Objection from E.E. Bembla Project. Accordingly complainant has submitted the letter dt. 8/10/12 to the E.E. Bembla Project Yavatmal narrating the facts alongwith relevant documents copy of which was given to the N.A. It is clear from record that after receipt of such letter from the complainant, the said authority, the E.E.Bembla Project Yavatmal has issued certificate dt. 15/7/13 in respect of its no objection for providing necessary electric connection to the complainant for irrigation in field S.No.43. The said No Objection certificate was also submitted with the N.A. and is also filed on record with complaint copy of which admittedly received by the N.A. In view of such facts and documentary material on record it is clear that the complainant has complied with the requirements. 7 According to the N.A. the complainant wants to have irrigation in field S.No.43 and the transformer is in Field No.50, the learned representative of the N.A. has submitted that the non-applicant is ready to provide electric connection to the complainant in S.No.43, suffice to say that such submissions is un-sound a already observed above in the application of the complainant for electric connection itself. It has been specifically mentioned by referring to the site of Bembla Project so also by letter dt. 8/10/12 as demanded by the N.A. the complainant has obtained No Objection Certificate from E.E. Bembla Project so in fact everything was complied with. At the most one year about 15/7/13 nothing prevented for the N.A. to provide connection, it has been wemently submitted on behalf of the the complainant Mr.Deshpande, the learned representative that in all such cases the N.A. has never raised no objection as tried to be raised in the present complaint and further submitted 4

that it does not required or mandatory that the place and electric supply to be provided must be owned by the applicant consumer concerned seeking connection at the most No Objection of the concerned owner is needed and that has been complied with, he has even cited number of examples including that of Corporation which is supplying drinking water to the city from Mahan Dam by availing electric connection at that place and water is being supplied to Akola city and other places. The submissions made on behalf of complainant in that regard has not been disputed from the side of the N.A. so apparently it is clear that the submissions made on behalf of the N.A. does not appear to be sound. Here it is further to be noted that even IGRC has passed order for providing electric connection at the earliest vide Order dated 4/1/13 as already observed above, the concerned No Objection Certificate of E.E.Bembla Project has been placed on record, consequently there has been compliances on the part of the complainant even as per the policy of the State Govt. priority is required to be given to irrigation and the N.A. is government undertaking, it has to co-operate and implement the schemes and also all the State Govt. have all these reasons. The complainant has made out the case and entitled for appropriate relief hence this forum proceeds to pass following unanimous order. ORDER 1 The complaint 107/13 is hereby allowed. The N.A. is directed to provide electric connection to the complainant for irrigation of his field S.No.43 as per application, more particularly in view of No Objection Certificate 5

dt. 15/7/13 of E.E.Bembla Project Yavatmal as early as possible preferably within a period of one month. 2 In the circumstances parties to bear their respective costs. 3 That the compliance report to be submitted within one month from this order. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (A.S.Gade) (P.B.Pawar) (T.M.Mantri) Member Secretary Chairman 6