EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

Similar documents
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIll~ STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CONSENT DECREE. Tbe Litigation

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. Altec Industries

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

IN TIlE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR TIlE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Judge Gettleman CONSENT DECREE THE LITIGATION

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Gehl Corporation d/b/a The Gehl Group

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE LmGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. CONSENT DECREE INTRODUCTION

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

EEOC v. Eastern Engineered Wood Products, Inc.

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Case 2:03-cv BBD-sta Document 14 Filed 08/05/2004 Page 1 of 7

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

EEOC v. Scrub Inc. Cornell University ILR School. Judge Susan Cox

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Griffin & EEOC v. Formosa Plastics

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., and CBOCS West, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

Case 5:07-cv VAP-JCR Document 11 Filed 06/14/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSENT DECREE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. United Airlines, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, and The Heil Company, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

EEOC v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.; William Bandy, et al. v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 4-18-2006 EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al. Judge Blanche Manning Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al. Keywords EEOC, Bice of Chicago, Inc., 04 C 2708, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, Sexual Harassment, National Origin, Sex, Male, Retail, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/42

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Case No. 04 C 2708 BICE OF CHICAGO, INC., BICE ) RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, DA ECIB ) USA, INC., D/B/A THE BICE GROUP, ) Judge Manning ITALIAN, RG, INC. ) Defendants. ) ) CONSENT DECREE The Litigation Magistrate Judge Mason Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereafter the "EEOC"), filed this action on April 20,2004, alleging that Defendants Bice of Chicago, Inc., Bice Restaurant Group, LLC, Da Ecib USA, Inc., d/b/a The Bice Group, and Italian, RG Inc. (collectively "Defendants") discriminated against fourteen (14) Charging Parties and a class of employees, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"), and 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981A, by subjecting them to harassment and a hostile work environment because of their sex (male) and national origin (non-italian). As a result of the parties having engaged in settlement discussions, the parties have agreed that this action should be finally resolved by entry of this Consent Decree. Unless otherwise noted in this Consent Decree, "Bice" and "Defendant" shall refer only to Bice of Chicago, Inc, not the other named defendants. This Consent Decree is intended to and does fully and finally resolve any and all claims arising out of the Complaint.

Findings Having examined the terms and provisions of this Consent Decree and based on the pleadings, records, and stipulations of the parties, this Court finds the following: A. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the parties. B. The terms and provisions of this Consent Decree are fair, adequate, reasonable, equitable and just. The rights of the parties are adequately protected by this Consent Decree. C. This Consent Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title VII. The entry of this Consent Decree will further the objectives of Title VII and will be in the best interest of the parties and the public. D. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: Non-Discrimination 1. In all matters arising from or relating to employment, Bice shall comply with Title VII and will not discriminate on the basis of sex or national origin. Non-Retaliation 2. Bice, its officers, agents, employees, successors, and assigns shall not retaliate against, penalize or otherwise prejudice any employee, former employee or applicant for employment because such person has opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII; filed a Complaint or Charge of Discrimination; testified, assisted, or otherwise participated in any manner in any investigation, proceeding, hearing or litigation under Title VII; asserted any right under this Consent Decree; or otherwise exercised his or her rights under Title VII. 2-

Monetary Relief 3. Bice shall pay monetary damages in the sum of $210,000.00 to Hugo Gonzalez, Victor Gonzalez, Heladio Gonzalez, Jesus Gonzalez, Javier Padilla, Jose Labra, Luis Arcos, Carlos Hernandez, Deidre Fennessy, Alejandro Padilla, and Felix Marquez (referred to collectively as "Class Members"). Within thirty (30) calendar days of the execution of the Consent Decree, or after EEOC has provided Bice a Release Agreement (attached as Exhibit A to this Consent Decree) executed by the Class Members, whichever is later for each individual Class Member, Bice shall pay the Class Members a total amount of $50,000 in the manner listed below. Within seven (7) months of the execution of the Consent Decree, Bice shall pay the Class Members an additional total amount of $80,000 in the manner listed below. Within fourteen (14) months of the execution of the Consent Decree, Bice shall pay the Class Members an additional total amount of $80,000 in the manner listed below. Name First Payment Second Payment Third Payment Hugo Gonzalez Victor Gonzalez Heladio Gonzalez Jesus Gonzalez Uvaldo Padilla (a.k.a. Javier Padilla) Jose Labra Luis Arcos Carlos Hernandez Deidre Fennessy $2,380.96 $3,809.52 $3,809.52 Alejandro Padilla $2,380.96 $3,809.52 $3,809.52 Felix Marquez $2,380.96 $3,809.52 $3,809.52 Total $50,000 $80,000 $80,000 3-

Bice shall issue, by certified mail, checks payable to the claimants at the addresses for each Class Member provided to Bice by EEOC. Defendants shall send a copy of the checks to EEOC. These amounts represent compensatory damages, from which no federal tax withholdings will be made and for which Bice shall issue IRS Forms 1099. If any of the Class Members, for whatever reason, are unable to claim the entire monetary payment listed above, the portion of their monetary settlement that they did not receive shall be dispersed by Bice among the other Class Members as EEOC deems appropriate and as EEOC directs Bice to do. Bice Restaurant Group, LLC, Da Ecib USA, Inc., d/b/a The Bice Group, and Italian, RG Inc. shall be guarantors for the payments described in this paragraph. Should, for any reason, Bice not be able to make the payment described in this paragraph, Bice Restaurant Group, LLC, Da Ecib USA, Inc., d/b/a The Bice Group, and Italian, RG Inc. shall be jointly and severally responsible for paying the Class Members the remaining balance of the monetary relief. Notice Posting 4. Within ten (10) days after the Court's entry of this Consent Decree and for the duration of this Decree, Bice shall continuously post the notice annexed hereto as Exhibit B in locations prominently visible to Bice employees. Within ten (10) days after the Consent Decree is entered Bice shall certify in writing to the Chicago District Office of the EEOC that the Notice has been posted, and shall inform the EEOC of the locations where it has been posted. Bice shall permit a representative of EEOC to enter Bice's premises for purposes of verifying compliance with this Paragraph at any time during normal business hours without prior notice. Record Keeping and Reporting 5. Bice shall maintain records of any complaints, formal or informal, oral or in -4-

writing, it receives relating to harassment based on sex and national origin, including the name, address, telephone number and social security number of the complainant and what was alleged, its investigation and any action taken by Bice in response to such complaints relating to its Chicago, Illinois restaurant, for the duration of the Consent Decree. 6. Beginning six (6) months after entry of this Consent Decree and every six (6) months thereafter for the duration of the Consent Decree, Bice shall furnish EEOC with reports reflecting the information detailed in the records described in Paragraph 5 of this Consent Decree. Bice's last report will be submitted to EEOC two (2) weeks prior to the date on which the Decree is to expire. 7. For the term of the Consent Decree and upon five (5) business days' notice to Bice, the EEOC, when it has reasonable cause to believe Bice is not in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree, shall have reasonable access to Bice's facility during normal business hours to review and copy any documents related to determining compliance at its facility and to interview any personnel employed by Bice for the purpose of determining Bice's compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Adoption of Non-Harassment/Discrimination Policy 8. Within twenty-eight (28) calendar days of the date of the entry of this Consent Decree, Bice shall submit to EEOC a policy against harassment and discrimination based on sex and national origin which complies with Title VII and which provides for a complaint process and mechanism for responding to such complaints. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of the Commission's receipt of the policy, and after any good faith comments EEOC makes to Bice regarding its policy are taken into consideration, Bice will distribute a copy of the policy to each employee. At the same time, it will post a copy of the policy at Bice. The inclusion of this -5-

paragraph in the Decree does not represent the Court's or EEOC's approval of Bice's policy. Training 9. During each of the two (2) years covered by this Decree, Bice shall arrange for annual training of all employees, including supervisors and managers, regarding the requirements of Title VII and Bice's policies prohibiting discrimination under Title VII. Bice shall submit to EEOC for approval, materials regarding the training sessions, including the credentials of the trainer and proposed training program, prior to such training. Within five (5) days after the completion of the training described above, Bice will certify to EEOC that the training has been completed, the name(s) of the person(s) conducting the training, the time(s), duration and date(s) the training were held and a list identifying by name and position all individuals who received the training. The first training shall take place within forty-five (45) days after entry of this Consent Decree. Duration of Decree/Retention of Jurisdiction 10. The terms of this Consent Decree shall be in effect (and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Decree) for a period of two (2) years from the date on which this Consent Decree is entered, provided, however, that if, at the end of the two (2) year period, there are disputes that remain unresolved, and written notice is given by the party claiming that such dispute(s) remain unresolved, the term of the Decree shall be automatically extended until such time as all such disputes have been resolved. Costs and Attorneys' Fees 11. Each party to this action shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. Dispute Resolution 12. If EEOC has reasonable cause to believe that Defendants have violated any of the -6-

terms of this Consent Decree, EEOC shall notify Defendants in writing and Defendants will then have ten (10) business days in which to satisfy EEOC that there has not been a violation or that the violation has been corrected. If, at the expiration of such time period, EEOC has not been so satisfied, then EEOC may immediately apply to the Court for appropriate relief. 13. When this Consent Decree requires the submission by Defendants of reports, notices, or other materials to the Commission, such materials shall be mailed to: Bice Settlement, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Chicago District Office, Legal Division, 500 West Madison, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60661. -7-

ENTERED AND APPROVED FOR: For the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507 For Defendants: Bice of Chicago, Inc., Bice Restaurant Group, LLC, Da Ecib USA, Inc., d/b/a The Bice Group, Italian RG Inc. les V. JHOonan Joonan fe'lieberman, Ltd. 105 West Adams Street Suite 3000 Chicago, Illinois 6( (312)431-1455, d. UfAAjJtrtKswi/jtoi >HN C. HENDRICKSON Regional Attorney Brown rown, LLC West Adams Street Suite 3000 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312)789-9700 Diane I. Smason Supervisory Trial Attorney -> /& Pamela S. Moore/Gibbs Trial Attorney Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Chicago District Office 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312)886-9120 Date: ENTER: Honorable Blanche Manning United States District Judge 8-

EXHIBIT A RELEASE AGREEMENT In consideration for paid to me by Defendants, in connection with the resolution of EEOC v. Bice of Chicago. Inc.. and Bice Restaurant Group. LLC. Da Ecib USA, Inc., d/b/a The Bice Group. Italian RG Inc.. Case No. 04 C 2708 (N.D.I11.), I waive my right to recover for any claims of sexual harassment and/or national origin discrimination and/or constructive discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et sea. ("Title VII"), and 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. 1981A, that I had against Defendants prior to the date of this release and that were or could have been included in the claims alleged in EEOC's complaint in EEOC v. Bice of Chicago. Inc.. and Bice Restaurant Group. LLC. Da Ecib USA. Inc.. d/b/a The Bice Group. Italian RG Inc.. Case No. 04 C 2708. I understand that it shall be my sole responsibility to provide current contact information to EEOC in order to facilitate the receipt of all monies. My failure to provide current contact information, which may result in non-receipt of monies, will not render this Release void. Date Signature

EXHIBIT B NOTICE TO ALL BICE EMPLOYEES This Notice is posted pursuant to the Consent Decree entered by the U.S. District Court resolving the lawsuit entitled EEOC v. Bice of Chicago. Inc., and Bice Restaurant Group. LLC. Da Ecib USA. Inc.. d/b/a The Bice Group. Italian RG Inc.. Case No. 04 C 2708, filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") against Bice. In its complaint, EEOC alleged that Bice discriminated against employees by subjecting them to a hostile work environment based on sex and national origin and retaliated against them. Bice filed an answer denying these allegations. To resolve the case, Bice and EEOC have entered into a Consent Decree which provides, among other things, that: 1) Bice will pay monetary relief totaling $210,000 to the alleged victims of harassment; 2) Bice is enjoined from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex and national origin or subjecting them to harassment based on sex and national origin; 3) Bice is enjoined from retaliating against any person because (s)he opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII, filed a Title VII charge of discrimination, participated in any Title VII proceeding or asserted any rights under the Consent Decree; 4) Bice will implement a policy against discrimination and harassment based on sex and national origin. Bice will also implement a complaint policy and a mechanism for responding to complaints; 5) Bice will provide mandatory training to employees regarding sexual and national origin harassment, retaliation, and Bice's policies regarding such discrimination. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of sex, race, color, religion or national origin. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency responsible for enforcing Title VII. THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE AND MUST NOT BE DEFACED OR REMOVED This Notice must remain posted for two (2) years from the date shown below and must not be altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Any complaints of discrimination or questions concerning this Notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60661,(312)353-2713. Dated: / Judge Blanche Manning United States District Court